This isn't an intellectual thread. HTHI like to complain about "the rich" writing our tax laws as I ask for them to write some more. You like to claim you voted for Reagan so maybe revisit starving the beast and get back to us6 trillion dollar budget by Joe. Not enough taxes to come close to covering that nutGood luck the rest of the way I simply proposed a change to the tax laws. You and Houston keep complaining that only the rich are allowed to write tax laws. Under the previous administration, perhaps. But it's not a Constitutional requirement. Only thing I poasted was 3 of the most obvious facts of the leak that you blatantly ignored because they go against your political leanings. Guess you are a mind-reader?And you are correct...this is a distinguished board...for your interpretation of the information on any other board I would have called you a fucking moron.HTH... I read your "There's nothing we can do" flavored poast.It wasn't your best work . . . one hopes.
This isn't an intellectual thread. HTHI like to complain about "the rich" writing our tax laws as I ask for them to write some more. You like to claim you voted for Reagan so maybe revisit starving the beast and get back to us6 trillion dollar budget by Joe. Not enough taxes to come close to covering that nutGood luck the rest of the way I simply proposed a change to the tax laws. You and Houston keep complaining that only the rich are allowed to write tax laws. Under the previous administration, perhaps. But it's not a Constitutional requirement. Only thing I poasted was 3 of the most obvious facts of the leak that you blatantly ignored because they go against your political leanings. Guess you are a mind-reader?And you are correct...this is a distinguished board...for your interpretation of the information on any other board I would have called you a fucking moron.HTH...
This isn't an intellectual thread. HTHI like to complain about "the rich" writing our tax laws as I ask for them to write some more. You like to claim you voted for Reagan so maybe revisit starving the beast and get back to us6 trillion dollar budget by Joe. Not enough taxes to come close to covering that nutGood luck the rest of the way I simply proposed a change to the tax laws. You and Houston keep complaining that only the rich are allowed to write tax laws. Under the previous administration, perhaps. But it's not a Constitutional requirement.
This isn't an intellectual thread. HTHI like to complain about "the rich" writing our tax laws as I ask for them to write some more. You like to claim you voted for Reagan so maybe revisit starving the beast and get back to us6 trillion dollar budget by Joe. Not enough taxes to come close to covering that nutGood luck the rest of the way
Consumption/VAT tax far better than a wealth tax. Why? Ask @GrandpaSankey to read for you and explain 'liquidity'. "Consumption/VAT tax far better than a wealth tax" 'cuz liquidity?C'mon. You need to put the work in. I already work in finance. I don't need to do any work in that field. You do the work.Because it is @creepycoug's gentlemen's board, I won't call you a fucking idiot for taking grannies cash when she doesn't have any to take. So she's supposed to condo out her home to pay her wealth tax? Fuck off with that bullshit. She has NO liquidity, no cash, no dinero to pay tax on a perceived unrealized gain/appreciation. Instead granny buys a new luxury little rascal scooter with her saved up social security checks, she pays more in VAT than your fat obese slob riding a shopping cart model. Capiche? Prolly not. You've identified one issue with a wealth tax that would need to be dealt with and explained the alleged vast superiority of a consumption tax not at all.Cuz finance. Make it on anything requiring a liquidity event. Why should someone be forced to liquidate their holdings before a realized gain to pay tax on something that hasn't transpired yet? Do they get a refund when their wealth goes down on taxes they previously paid?Because smarter than you.
Consumption/VAT tax far better than a wealth tax. Why? Ask @GrandpaSankey to read for you and explain 'liquidity'. "Consumption/VAT tax far better than a wealth tax" 'cuz liquidity?C'mon. You need to put the work in. I already work in finance. I don't need to do any work in that field. You do the work.Because it is @creepycoug's gentlemen's board, I won't call you a fucking idiot for taking grannies cash when she doesn't have any to take. So she's supposed to condo out her home to pay her wealth tax? Fuck off with that bullshit. She has NO liquidity, no cash, no dinero to pay tax on a perceived unrealized gain/appreciation. Instead granny buys a new luxury little rascal scooter with her saved up social security checks, she pays more in VAT than your fat obese slob riding a shopping cart model. Capiche? Prolly not. You've identified one issue with a wealth tax that would need to be dealt with and explained the alleged vast superiority of a consumption tax not at all.Cuz finance.
Consumption/VAT tax far better than a wealth tax. Why? Ask @GrandpaSankey to read for you and explain 'liquidity'. "Consumption/VAT tax far better than a wealth tax" 'cuz liquidity?C'mon. You need to put the work in. I already work in finance. I don't need to do any work in that field. You do the work.Because it is @creepycoug's gentlemen's board, I won't call you a fucking idiot for taking grannies cash when she doesn't have any to take. So she's supposed to condo out her home to pay her wealth tax? Fuck off with that bullshit. She has NO liquidity, no cash, no dinero to pay tax on a perceived unrealized gain/appreciation. Instead granny buys a new luxury little rascal scooter with her saved up social security checks, she pays more in VAT than your fat obese slob riding a shopping cart model. Capiche? Prolly not.
Consumption/VAT tax far better than a wealth tax. Why? Ask @GrandpaSankey to read for you and explain 'liquidity'. "Consumption/VAT tax far better than a wealth tax" 'cuz liquidity?C'mon. You need to put the work in.
Consumption/VAT tax far better than a wealth tax. Why? Ask @GrandpaSankey to read for you and explain 'liquidity'.
Consumption/VAT tax far better than a wealth tax. Why?
Consumption/VAT tax far better than a wealth tax.
This isn't an intellectual thread. HTHI like to complain about "the rich" writing our tax laws as I ask for them to write some more. You like to claim you voted for Reagan so maybe revisit starving the beast and get back to us6 trillion dollar budget by Joe. Not enough taxes to come close to covering that nutGood luck the rest of the way I simply proposed a change to the tax laws. You and Houston keep complaining that only the rich are allowed to write tax laws. Under the previous administration, perhaps. But it's not a Constitutional requirement. Only thing I poasted was 3 of the most obvious facts of the leak that you blatantly ignored because they go against your political leanings. Guess you are a mind-reader?And you are correct...this is a distinguished board...for your interpretation of the information on any other board I would have called you a fucking moron.HTH... I read your "There's nothing we can do" flavored poast.It wasn't your best work . . . one hopes. Huh? Side job as a palm reader now? There is a shit ton that can be done to improve the situation...the fact from the leak you can’t even recognize a few of them leads to my comment of you not being a bright one.
This isn't an intellectual thread. HTHI like to complain about "the rich" writing our tax laws as I ask for them to write some more. You like to claim you voted for Reagan so maybe revisit starving the beast and get back to us6 trillion dollar budget by Joe. Not enough taxes to come close to covering that nutGood luck the rest of the way I simply proposed a change to the tax laws. You and Houston keep complaining that only the rich are allowed to write tax laws. Under the previous administration, perhaps. But it's not a Constitutional requirement. Only thing I poasted was 3 of the most obvious facts of the leak that you blatantly ignored because they go against your political leanings. Guess you are a mind-reader?And you are correct...this is a distinguished board...for your interpretation of the information on any other board I would have called you a fucking moron.HTH... I read your "There's nothing we can do" flavored poast.It wasn't your best work . . . one hopes. Huh? Side job as a palm reader now? There is a shit ton that can be done to improve the situation...the fact from the leak you can’t even recognize a few of them leads to my comment of you not being a bright one. I'd have to be a palm reader to get anything from your contributions thus far.
You don't think the rich already have a plan in place? Either most of their property becomes foreign property, or it's transferred into other entities. As long as rich people are the ones modifying the tax code, rich people will continue to benefit from the tax code. Principle has nothing to do with it. It has to do with execution, and there will never be an efficient way of executing it. The people that get screwed by these code revisions are people who are fairly wealthy but not quite wealthy enough.
You don't think the rich already have a plan in place? Either most of their property becomes foreign property, or it's transferred into other entities. As long as rich people are the ones modifying the tax code, rich people will continue to benefit from the tax code. Principle has nothing to do with it. It has to do with execution, and there will never be an efficient way of executing it. The people that get screwed by these code revisions are people who are fairly wealthy but not quite wealthy enough. Exactly this.
You don't think the rich already have a plan in place? Either most of their property becomes foreign property, or it's transferred into other entities. As long as rich people are the ones modifying the tax code, rich people will continue to benefit from the tax code. Principle has nothing to do with it. It has to do with execution, and there will never be an efficient way of executing it. The people that get screwed by these code revisions are people who are fairly wealthy but not quite wealthy enough. All taxes can be evaded, whether successfully or not. The fact the super rich have oversize influence is just one of the many good reasons for enacting a wealth tax. And perhaps campaign finance reform as well.
You don't think the rich already have a plan in place? Either most of their property becomes foreign property, or it's transferred into other entities. As long as rich people are the ones modifying the tax code, rich people will continue to benefit from the tax code. Principle has nothing to do with it. It has to do with execution, and there will never be an efficient way of executing it. The people that get screwed by these code revisions are people who are fairly wealthy but not quite wealthy enough. All taxes can be evaded, whether successfully or not. The fact the super rich have oversize influence is just one of the many good reasons for enacting a wealth tax. And perhaps campaign finance reform as well. Ask me how I know you were never a GOP voter like you claim?
You don't think the rich already have a plan in place? Either most of their property becomes foreign property, or it's transferred into other entities. As long as rich people are the ones modifying the tax code, rich people will continue to benefit from the tax code. Principle has nothing to do with it. It has to do with execution, and there will never be an efficient way of executing it. The people that get screwed by these code revisions are people who are fairly wealthy but not quite wealthy enough. All taxes can be evaded, whether successfully or not. The fact the super rich have oversize influence is just one of the many good reasons for enacting a wealth tax. And perhaps campaign finance reform as well. Ask me how I know you were never a GOP voter like you claim? Oh look! Another dumbshit populist thinks the Republican Party hasn't changed over the past 45 years.
You don't think the rich already have a plan in place? Either most of their property becomes foreign property, or it's transferred into other entities. As long as rich people are the ones modifying the tax code, rich people will continue to benefit from the tax code. Principle has nothing to do with it. It has to do with execution, and there will never be an efficient way of executing it. The people that get screwed by these code revisions are people who are fairly wealthy but not quite wealthy enough. All taxes can be evaded, whether successfully or not. The fact the super rich have oversize influence is just one of the many good reasons for enacting a wealth tax. And perhaps campaign finance reform as well. Ask me how I know you were never a GOP voter like you claim? Oh look! Another dumbshit populist thinks the Republican Party hasn't changed over the past 45 years. Lmao.Muh party switch! The dems who were pro slavery and segregation were actually....Republicans!!!!!!
The only way to go after real wealth is to either tax net worth (good luck with that) or estates. Otherwise you're just beating up lower end millionaires and creating a larger wealth gap. This arbitrary 400k income level that Biden is targeting is FS Indeed, the estate tax is a wealth tax and Biden is merely talking about income taxes, which can have minimal impact on people who don't need to receive income regularly and who have the ability to time their receipt of income.In my opinion we need to have an estate tax, at least. But a net worth tax would be better in my opinion, if you had to choose between the two--which we don't have to do actually.
The only way to go after real wealth is to either tax net worth (good luck with that) or estates. Otherwise you're just beating up lower end millionaires and creating a larger wealth gap. This arbitrary 400k income level that Biden is targeting is FS
The only way to go after real wealth is to either tax net worth (good luck with that) or estates. Otherwise you're just beating up lower end millionaires and creating a larger wealth gap. This arbitrary 400k income level that Biden is targeting is FS Indeed, the estate tax is a wealth tax and Biden is merely talking about income taxes, which can have minimal impact on people who don't need to receive income regularly and who have the ability to time their receipt of income.In my opinion we need to have an estate tax, at least. But a net worth tax would be better in my opinion, if you had to choose between the two--which we don't have to do actually. Trust and Estate Lawyer stumps for Estate taxes. Pictures at 11. Or. Are you really a Union lawyer despite saying you weren’t?
The only way to go after real wealth is to either tax net worth (good luck with that) or estates. Otherwise you're just beating up lower end millionaires and creating a larger wealth gap. This arbitrary 400k income level that Biden is targeting is FS Indeed, the estate tax is a wealth tax and Biden is merely talking about income taxes, which can have minimal impact on people who don't need to receive income regularly and who have the ability to time their receipt of income.In my opinion we need to have an estate tax, at least. But a net worth tax would be better in my opinion, if you had to choose between the two--which we don't have to do actually. Trust and Estate Lawyer stumps for Estate taxes. Pictures at 11. Or. Are you really a Union lawyer despite saying you weren’t? Tequila thinks you should stop believing your own bullshit.