Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Mark Nabou, 2022 3* OL, Seattle (O'Dea), WA (mutually parted ways)

12467…19

Comments

  • bluechipuwrecruits
    bluechipuwrecruits Member Posts: 394
    Roof compared him to Jackson Kirkland saying that 3 stars do not matter. Per usual.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Edwin_Bambino
    Edwin_Bambino Member Posts: 2,944
    UDubHusky23 said:

    Neighbor2972 said:

    NICE! We still going to have room for the rest? Connerly, Agbo, Ioane and Iuli if they wanna come?
    I have no idea if this kid is good or not but from my 10,000 feet view with no actually recruit video review or insider sources - this plus the Arizona OL commitment tells me they don’t think they are getting more than 1 or 2 of the above guys that you mentioned. Based on looking at the offer lists of all of the kids seems like Huff might not be having his best year.

    Offer lists aren’t the end all be all, and if Connerly and Agbo are the two who commit I won’t be complaining. Also happy to have someone who spends time watching OL Hudl’s tell me I’m wrong and tell me why this kid or the AZ kid are better than some of the aforementioned players but that’s kind of where I’m at.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,834 Swaye's Wigwam
    bluechipuwrecruits said:

    Roof compared him to Jackson Kirkland saying that 3 stars do not matter. Per usual.

    UW 3* equal most others's 5*. It's well established. Remember the Will Disslys's and Stan Emptermans's? Proof is proof.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • louism2wash
    louism2wash Member Posts: 368
    If he's actually 6-4 and 300+ then he moves really well for his size. Shows good bend and power.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    So here’s the question: Would you take six OL in the ‘22 class?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,968 Founders Club
    TTJ said:

    So here’s the question: Would you take six OL in the ‘22 class?

    Bumper crop?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,834 Swaye's Wigwam
    TTJ said:

    So here’s the question: Would you take six OL in the ‘22 class?

    I suppose a few will portal, so,....maybe? I wouldn't like it normally. Mass defections can happen now, but even so isn't the portal the way to address that rather than repeatedly overstocking with underclassmen OL who are worthless for 2-3 years?

    To me it seems like the OL is one group where you really want to find a balance between classes and keep as much continuity as you can. Feeding and training those big fuckers for two years then gifting that investment to some other team would bug me.

    There are still aspects to player management with the portal that I'm not sure about.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,675 Founders Club
    chuck said:

    TTJ said:

    So here’s the question: Would you take six OL in the ‘22 class?

    I suppose a few will portal, so,....maybe? I wouldn't like it normally. Mass defections can happen now, but even so isn't the portal the way to address that rather than repeatedly overstocking with underclassmen OL who are worthless for 2-3 years?

    To me it seems like the OL is one group where you really want to find a balance between classes and keep as much continuity as you can. Feeding and training those big fuckers for two years then gifting that investment to some other team would bug me.

    There are still aspects to player management with the portal that I'm not sure about.
    We want to be motherfucking Wisconsin so it doesn't surprise me at all that we're loading up on OL, hemorrhaging skill players every year, and have a "stable" of like 9 rb's looking for that miracle workhorse.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    chuck said:

    TTJ said:

    So here’s the question: Would you take six OL in the ‘22 class?

    I suppose a few will portal, so,....maybe? I wouldn't like it normally. Mass defections can happen now, but even so isn't the portal the way to address that rather than repeatedly overstocking with underclassmen OL who are worthless for 2-3 years?

    To me it seems like the OL is one group where you really want to find a balance between classes and keep as much continuity as you can. Feeding and training those big fuckers for two years then gifting that investment to some other team would bug me.

    There are still aspects to player management with the portal that I'm not sure about.
    This is the right answer. I think.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,257
    Edwin_Bambino said:

    UDubHusky23 said:

    Neighbor2972 said:

    NICE! We still going to have room for the rest? Connerly, Agbo, Ioane and Iuli if they wanna come?
    I have no idea if this kid is good or not but from my 10,000 feet view with no actually recruit video review or insider sources - this plus the Arizona OL commitment tells me they don’t think they are getting more than 1 or 2 of the above guys that you mentioned. Based on looking at the offer lists of all of the kids seems like Huff might not be having his best year.

    Offer lists aren’t the end all be all, and if Connerly and Agbo are the two who commit I won’t be complaining. Also happy to have someone who spends time watching OL Hudl’s tell me I’m wrong and tell me why this kid or the AZ kid are better than some of the aforementioned players but that’s kind of where I’m at.
    His film is like watching The Blind Side movie ... he’s just scratching the surface of his abilities

    Between Socha’s rhino cum and Huff’s teaching ... he should be good
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter