“white teachers are guilty of spirit murdering black children”
https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/critical-race-theory-fight/
What does critical race theory look like in practice? Last year, I authored a series of reports focused on critical race theory in the federal government. The FBI was holding workshops on intersectionality theory. The Department of Homeland Security was telling white employees they were committing “microinequities” and had been “socialized into oppressor roles.” The Treasury Department held a training session telling staff members that “virtually all white people contribute to racism” and that they must convert “everyone in the federal government” to the ideology of “antiracism.” And the Sandia National Laboratories, which designs America’s nuclear arsenal, sent white male executives to a three-day reeducation camp, where they were told that “white male culture” was analogous to the “KKK,” “white supremacists,” and “mass killings.” The executives were then forced to renounce their “white male privilege” and write letters of apology to fictitious women and people of color.
Comments
-
@GDS supports this commie garbage
-
Come on!!! Why do you oppose racial sensitivity training?jecornel said:Outstanding read about fighting CRT.
https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/critical-race-theory-fight/
What does critical race theory look like in practice? Last year, I authored a series of reports focused on critical race theory in the federal government. The FBI was holding workshops on intersectionality theory. The Department of Homeland Security was telling white employees they were committing “microinequities” and had been “socialized into oppressor roles.” The Treasury Department held a training session telling staff members that “virtually all white people contribute to racism” and that they must convert “everyone in the federal government” to the ideology of “antiracism.” And the Sandia National Laboratories, which designs America’s nuclear arsenal, sent white male executives to a three-day reeducation camp, where they were told that “white male culture” was analogous to the “KKK,” “white supremacists,” and “mass killings.” The executives were then forced to renounce their “white male privilege” and write letters of apology to fictitious women and people of color. -
This is nuts
-
In terms of principles, we need to employ our own moral language rather than allow ourselves to be confined by the categories of critical race theory. For example, we often find ourselves debating “diversity.” Diversity as most of us understand it is generally good, all things being equal, but it is of secondary value. We should be talking about and aiming at excellence, a common standard that challenges people of all backgrounds to achieve their potential. On the scale of desirable ends, excellence beats diversity every time.
-
That's one of the reasons the left is going after merit. They aren't interested excellence, it's about equity and equity is defined as the same out come for everyone no matter their talent, effort or intelligence. Skin color is what matters, not excellence.jecornel said:In terms of principles, we need to employ our own moral language rather than allow ourselves to be confined by the categories of critical race theory. For example, we often find ourselves debating “diversity.” Diversity as most of us understand it is generally good, all things being equal, but it is of secondary value. We should be talking about and aiming at excellence, a common standard that challenges people of all backgrounds to achieve their potential. On the scale of desirable ends, excellence beats diversity every time.
-
The left believes all cultures are equal, only some have spicier food. This is of course nonsense. Western civilization as defined by life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness and the legal protection of private property rights is superior to Muslim sharia law or communism. Skin color is irrelevant. Take South Korea and North Korea as the shining example. Hong Kong versus mainland China.jecornel said:In terms of principles, we need to employ our own moral language rather than allow ourselves to be confined by the categories of critical race theory. For example, we often find ourselves debating “diversity.” Diversity as most of us understand it is generally good, all things being equal, but it is of secondary value. We should be talking about and aiming at excellence, a common standard that challenges people of all backgrounds to achieve their potential. On the scale of desirable ends, excellence beats diversity every time.
-
Diversity is a scam. I fail to see any benefit in it.
-
@HHusky loves it, because it's all about using non-white people as props versus individuals. And since props are all black and brown people with their own opinions are good for, in @HHusky's eyes, he and his bougie, superficial ilk will keep preaching and supporting it all day long.Pitchfork51 said:Diversity is a scam. I fail to see any benefit in it.
-
I blame standardized tests
