Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Australia Sky News: Biden tells reporters he's 'not supposed to be answering all these questions’
Comments
-
It’s a no. End of discussion. Either you would or wouldn’t. Right now, you wouldn’t.MelloDawg said:
I don’t see a point where I said I would not. If it’s 50/50, the distance between “unsure” and saying yes is the same distance between “unsure” and saying no.MikeDamone said:
It’s a no. You said you wouldn’t. Based on what you know. Thanks for the clarification.MelloDawg said:
It’s really not a no or a yes.MikeDamone said:
So the answer is no.MelloDawg said:
I would probably want to vet him a little more before making a determination, you know, like any parent would. It’s tough to say without in-person evidence. Can’t rule it out, can’t say I’d consent to it.MikeDamone said:
No. You know what he meant. Would you have someone who has shown the cognitive function of Biden babysit your infant. Yes or no.MelloDawg said:
Was it that? Or was it also about an alleged predilection of Biden to be mildly inappropriate around women? Abundance?MikeDamone said:
He wasn’t asking about a president. He was asking about the mental capability of a human. Answer the question.MelloDawg said:
That’s a unique litmus test to evaluate a president. I do think having POTUS as babysitter would be a good story.DerekJohnson said:
If you had an infant daughter, would you trust Biden to babysit her?MelloDawg said:
It was more a questioning of his absolute statement of “utterly incapable.”DerekJohnson said:
@MelloDawg you downvoted his post. Are you suggesting that there is nothing mentally wrong with Biden?EsophagealFeces said:Never in my life could I imagine the United States having a president so utterly and completely incapable of doing the job, physically or mentally. It’s an absolute fucking embarrassment.
-
Your inference was not my implication. The willingness of a parent to have the current POTUS babysit their infant can’t be known without more information. That’s ok to say.MikeDamone said:
It’s a no. End of discussion. Either you would or wouldn’t. Right now, you wouldn’t.MelloDawg said:
I don’t see a point where I said I would not. If it’s 50/50, the distance between “unsure” and saying yes is the same distance between “unsure” and saying no.MikeDamone said:
It’s a no. You said you wouldn’t. Based on what you know. Thanks for the clarification.MelloDawg said:
It’s really not a no or a yes.MikeDamone said:
So the answer is no.MelloDawg said:
I would probably want to vet him a little more before making a determination, you know, like any parent would. It’s tough to say without in-person evidence. Can’t rule it out, can’t say I’d consent to it.MikeDamone said:
No. You know what he meant. Would you have someone who has shown the cognitive function of Biden babysit your infant. Yes or no.MelloDawg said:
Was it that? Or was it also about an alleged predilection of Biden to be mildly inappropriate around women? Abundance?MikeDamone said:
He wasn’t asking about a president. He was asking about the mental capability of a human. Answer the question.MelloDawg said:
That’s a unique litmus test to evaluate a president. I do think having POTUS as babysitter would be a good story.DerekJohnson said:
If you had an infant daughter, would you trust Biden to babysit her?MelloDawg said:
It was more a questioning of his absolute statement of “utterly incapable.”DerekJohnson said:
@MelloDawg you downvoted his post. Are you suggesting that there is nothing mentally wrong with Biden?EsophagealFeces said:Never in my life could I imagine the United States having a president so utterly and completely incapable of doing the job, physically or mentally. It’s an absolute fucking embarrassment.
-
There's an implication.MelloDawg said:
Your inference was not my implication. The willingness of a parent to have the current POTUS babysit their infant can’t be known without more information. That’s ok to say.MikeDamone said:
It’s a no. End of discussion. Either you would or wouldn’t. Right now, you wouldn’t.MelloDawg said:
I don’t see a point where I said I would not. If it’s 50/50, the distance between “unsure” and saying yes is the same distance between “unsure” and saying no.MikeDamone said:
It’s a no. You said you wouldn’t. Based on what you know. Thanks for the clarification.MelloDawg said:
It’s really not a no or a yes.MikeDamone said:
So the answer is no.MelloDawg said:
I would probably want to vet him a little more before making a determination, you know, like any parent would. It’s tough to say without in-person evidence. Can’t rule it out, can’t say I’d consent to it.MikeDamone said:
No. You know what he meant. Would you have someone who has shown the cognitive function of Biden babysit your infant. Yes or no.MelloDawg said:
Was it that? Or was it also about an alleged predilection of Biden to be mildly inappropriate around women? Abundance?MikeDamone said:
He wasn’t asking about a president. He was asking about the mental capability of a human. Answer the question.MelloDawg said:
That’s a unique litmus test to evaluate a president. I do think having POTUS as babysitter would be a good story.DerekJohnson said:
If you had an infant daughter, would you trust Biden to babysit her?MelloDawg said:
It was more a questioning of his absolute statement of “utterly incapable.”DerekJohnson said:
@MelloDawg you downvoted his post. Are you suggesting that there is nothing mentally wrong with Biden?EsophagealFeces said:Never in my life could I imagine the United States having a president so utterly and completely incapable of doing the job, physically or mentally. It’s an absolute fucking embarrassment.
-
Fuck offMelloDawg said:
I would probably want to vet him a little more before making a determination, you know, like any parent would. It’s tough to say without in-person evidence. Can’t rule it out, can’t say I’d consent to it.MikeDamone said:
No. You know what he meant. Would you have someone who has shown the cognitive function of Biden babysit your infant. Yes or no.MelloDawg said:
Was it that? Or was it also about an alleged predilection of Biden to be mildly inappropriate around women? Abundance?MikeDamone said:
He wasn’t asking about a president. He was asking about the mental capability of a human. Answer the question.MelloDawg said:
That’s a unique litmus test to evaluate a president. I do think having POTUS as babysitter would be a good story.DerekJohnson said:
If you had an infant daughter, would you trust Biden to babysit her?MelloDawg said:
It was more a questioning of his absolute statement of “utterly incapable.”DerekJohnson said:
@MelloDawg you downvoted his post. Are you suggesting that there is nothing mentally wrong with Biden?EsophagealFeces said:Never in my life could I imagine the United States having a president so utterly and completely incapable of doing the job, physically or mentally. It’s an absolute fucking embarrassment.
-
Dipshits don't like being told they're wrong...10 times a day.Pitchfork51 said:
Easily the worst thing about trump is that he made people so irrationally angry that they don't give a fuck if his opponents are legitimately retardedEsophagealFeces said:
iT’s A StUTtER!!!!!!1!!!!DerekJohnson said:
@MelloDawg you downvoted his post. Are you suggesting that there is nothing mentally wrong with Biden?EsophagealFeces said:Never in my life could I imagine the United States having a president so utterly and completely incapable of doing the job, physically or mentally. It’s an absolute fucking embarrassment.
-
You really need to level up.MelloDawg said:
Your inference was not my implication. The willingness of a parent to have the current POTUS babysit their infant can’t be known without more information. That’s ok to say.MikeDamone said:
It’s a no. End of discussion. Either you would or wouldn’t. Right now, you wouldn’t.MelloDawg said:
I don’t see a point where I said I would not. If it’s 50/50, the distance between “unsure” and saying yes is the same distance between “unsure” and saying no.MikeDamone said:
It’s a no. You said you wouldn’t. Based on what you know. Thanks for the clarification.MelloDawg said:
It’s really not a no or a yes.MikeDamone said:
So the answer is no.MelloDawg said:
I would probably want to vet him a little more before making a determination, you know, like any parent would. It’s tough to say without in-person evidence. Can’t rule it out, can’t say I’d consent to it.MikeDamone said:
No. You know what he meant. Would you have someone who has shown the cognitive function of Biden babysit your infant. Yes or no.MelloDawg said:
Was it that? Or was it also about an alleged predilection of Biden to be mildly inappropriate around women? Abundance?MikeDamone said:
He wasn’t asking about a president. He was asking about the mental capability of a human. Answer the question.MelloDawg said:
That’s a unique litmus test to evaluate a president. I do think having POTUS as babysitter would be a good story.DerekJohnson said:
If you had an infant daughter, would you trust Biden to babysit her?MelloDawg said:
It was more a questioning of his absolute statement of “utterly incapable.”DerekJohnson said:
@MelloDawg you downvoted his post. Are you suggesting that there is nothing mentally wrong with Biden?EsophagealFeces said:Never in my life could I imagine the United States having a president so utterly and completely incapable of doing the job, physically or mentally. It’s an absolute fucking embarrassment.
-
The fact that you can’t readily say YES is telling ... it’s the entire point of the original questionMelloDawg said:
Your inference was not my implication. The willingness of a parent to have the current POTUS babysit their infant can’t be known without more information. That’s ok to say.MikeDamone said:
It’s a no. End of discussion. Either you would or wouldn’t. Right now, you wouldn’t.MelloDawg said:
I don’t see a point where I said I would not. If it’s 50/50, the distance between “unsure” and saying yes is the same distance between “unsure” and saying no.MikeDamone said:
It’s a no. You said you wouldn’t. Based on what you know. Thanks for the clarification.MelloDawg said:
It’s really not a no or a yes.MikeDamone said:
So the answer is no.MelloDawg said:
I would probably want to vet him a little more before making a determination, you know, like any parent would. It’s tough to say without in-person evidence. Can’t rule it out, can’t say I’d consent to it.MikeDamone said:
No. You know what he meant. Would you have someone who has shown the cognitive function of Biden babysit your infant. Yes or no.MelloDawg said:
Was it that? Or was it also about an alleged predilection of Biden to be mildly inappropriate around women? Abundance?MikeDamone said:
He wasn’t asking about a president. He was asking about the mental capability of a human. Answer the question.MelloDawg said:
That’s a unique litmus test to evaluate a president. I do think having POTUS as babysitter would be a good story.DerekJohnson said:
If you had an infant daughter, would you trust Biden to babysit her?MelloDawg said:
It was more a questioning of his absolute statement of “utterly incapable.”DerekJohnson said:
@MelloDawg you downvoted his post. Are you suggesting that there is nothing mentally wrong with Biden?EsophagealFeces said:Never in my life could I imagine the United States having a president so utterly and completely incapable of doing the job, physically or mentally. It’s an absolute fucking embarrassment.
-
Someone needs to do better at counting the steps that Biden doesn’t miss on the jetway.MikeDamone said:
Lol. Christ.MelloDawg said:
It was more a questioning of his absolute statement of “utterly incapable.”DerekJohnson said:
@MelloDawg you downvoted his post. Are you suggesting that there is nothing mentally wrong with Biden?EsophagealFeces said:Never in my life could I imagine the United States having a president so utterly and completely incapable of doing the job, physically or mentally. It’s an absolute fucking embarrassment.
Be positive. -
Right, but I don’t know enough about him personally to make a determination either way as to how he’d be watching an infant, I feel as though it’s a pretty reasonable stance.Tequilla said:
The fact that you can’t readily say YES is telling ... it’s the entire point of the original questionMelloDawg said:
Your inference was not my implication. The willingness of a parent to have the current POTUS babysit their infant can’t be known without more information. That’s ok to say.MikeDamone said:
It’s a no. End of discussion. Either you would or wouldn’t. Right now, you wouldn’t.MelloDawg said:
I don’t see a point where I said I would not. If it’s 50/50, the distance between “unsure” and saying yes is the same distance between “unsure” and saying no.MikeDamone said:
It’s a no. You said you wouldn’t. Based on what you know. Thanks for the clarification.MelloDawg said:
It’s really not a no or a yes.MikeDamone said:
So the answer is no.MelloDawg said:
I would probably want to vet him a little more before making a determination, you know, like any parent would. It’s tough to say without in-person evidence. Can’t rule it out, can’t say I’d consent to it.MikeDamone said:
No. You know what he meant. Would you have someone who has shown the cognitive function of Biden babysit your infant. Yes or no.MelloDawg said:
Was it that? Or was it also about an alleged predilection of Biden to be mildly inappropriate around women? Abundance?MikeDamone said:
He wasn’t asking about a president. He was asking about the mental capability of a human. Answer the question.MelloDawg said:
That’s a unique litmus test to evaluate a president. I do think having POTUS as babysitter would be a good story.DerekJohnson said:
If you had an infant daughter, would you trust Biden to babysit her?MelloDawg said:
It was more a questioning of his absolute statement of “utterly incapable.”DerekJohnson said:
@MelloDawg you downvoted his post. Are you suggesting that there is nothing mentally wrong with Biden?EsophagealFeces said:Never in my life could I imagine the United States having a president so utterly and completely incapable of doing the job, physically or mentally. It’s an absolute fucking embarrassment.
-
<MelloDawg said:
Right, but I don’t know enough about him personally to make a determination either way as to how he’d be watching an infant, I feel as though it’s a pretty reasonable stance.Tequilla said:
The fact that you can’t readily say YES is telling ... it’s the entire point of the original questionMelloDawg said:
Your inference was not my implication. The willingness of a parent to have the current POTUS babysit their infant can’t be known without more information. That’s ok to say.MikeDamone said:
It’s a no. End of discussion. Either you would or wouldn’t. Right now, you wouldn’t.MelloDawg said:
I don’t see a point where I said I would not. If it’s 50/50, the distance between “unsure” and saying yes is the same distance between “unsure” and saying no.MikeDamone said:
It’s a no. You said you wouldn’t. Based on what you know. Thanks for the clarification.MelloDawg said:
It’s really not a no or a yes.MikeDamone said:
So the answer is no.MelloDawg said:
I would probably want to vet him a little more before making a determination, you know, like any parent would. It’s tough to say without in-person evidence. Can’t rule it out, can’t say I’d consent to it.MikeDamone said:
No. You know what he meant. Would you have someone who has shown the cognitive function of Biden babysit your infant. Yes or no.MelloDawg said:
Was it that? Or was it also about an alleged predilection of Biden to be mildly inappropriate around women? Abundance?MikeDamone said:
He wasn’t asking about a president. He was asking about the mental capability of a human. Answer the question.MelloDawg said:
That’s a unique litmus test to evaluate a president. I do think having POTUS as babysitter would be a good story.DerekJohnson said:
If you had an infant daughter, would you trust Biden to babysit her?MelloDawg said:
It was more a questioning of his absolute statement of “utterly incapable.”DerekJohnson said:
@MelloDawg you downvoted his post. Are you suggesting that there is nothing mentally wrong with Biden?EsophagealFeces said:Never in my life could I imagine the United States having a president so utterly and completely incapable of doing the job, physically or mentally. It’s an absolute fucking embarrassment.
The correct answer is you're a fag ostrich boy shill.
Still.
