Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Childish Men MAY Be The Reason Women Aren't Having Children, The US Faces A STEEP Birthrate Decline
DerekJohnson
Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,304 
in Tug Tavern
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytsWMM5kSLcComments
-
Bull fucking shit.
It's because chicks are fat and you are pretty much guaranteed for financial ruin by getting married. -
I will go with a combination of both.Pitchfork51 said:Bull fucking shit.
It's because chicks are fat and you are pretty much guaranteed for financial ruin by getting married. -
Death of a nation when we have zero willing fathers. You'll survive. Now get to work!
-
The chicks are fat and so are the dudes. Who knew that sitting on your ass for hours on end smoking dope, playing video games and eating pizza could make you fat.Pitchfork51 said:Bull fucking shit.
It's because chicks are fat and you are pretty much guaranteed for financial ruin by getting married. -
OK Boomers
Thank goodness there's someone/something to blame!
-
Trust us dazzler. We blame you. If only you had the courage of your convictions and had paid your fair share of taxes. But, you will only do so at the threat of a government gun.HHusky said:OK Boomers
Thank goodness there's someone/something to blame! -
Kind of flattering, really.WestlinnDuck said:
Trust us dazzler. We blame you. If only you had the courage of your convictions and had paid your fair share of taxes. But, you will only do so at the threat of a government gun.HHusky said:OK Boomers
Thank goodness there's someone/something to blame!
And the rent's unbeatable. -
I did my part.
-
Yeah it could be that. Or it could be the last 40 years of massively ballooning costs of having children (chiefly childcare) that are driving this change.
-
Child care costs have massively ballooned? Really? They've gotten more expense like everything else but I wouldn't say they've massively ballooned.GreenRiverGatorz said:Yeah it could be that. Or it could be the last 40 years of massively ballooning costs of having children (chiefly childcare) that are driving this change.
-
In the United States, per-child spending doubled from the 1970s to the 2000s, according to a 2013 paper by Sabino Kornich of the University of Sydney and Frank Furstenberg of the University of Pennsylvania. Parents spent more on education, toys, and games. But nothing grew faster than per-child spending on child care, which increased by a factor of 21—or approximately 2,000 percent—in those 40 years.SFGbob said:
Child care costs have massively ballooned? Really? They've gotten more expense like everything else but I wouldn't say they've massively ballooned.GreenRiverGatorz said:Yeah it could be that. Or it could be the last 40 years of massively ballooning costs of having children (chiefly childcare) that are driving this change.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/11/why-child-care-so-expensive/602599/ -
The clear solution is to ban women with kids from the workplace. Agreed.GreenRiverGatorz said:
In the United States, per-child spending doubled from the 1970s to the 2000s, according to a 2013 paper by Sabino Kornich of the University of Sydney and Frank Furstenberg of the University of Pennsylvania. Parents spent more on education, toys, and games. But nothing grew faster than per-child spending on child care, which increased by a factor of 21—or approximately 2,000 percent—in those 40 years.SFGbob said:
Child care costs have massively ballooned? Really? They've gotten more expense like everything else but I wouldn't say they've massively ballooned.GreenRiverGatorz said:Yeah it could be that. Or it could be the last 40 years of massively ballooning costs of having children (chiefly childcare) that are driving this change.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/11/why-child-care-so-expensive/602599/ -
That should play well with the focus groupsWestlinnDuck said:
The clear solution is to ban women with kids from the workplace. Agreed.GreenRiverGatorz said:
In the United States, per-child spending doubled from the 1970s to the 2000s, according to a 2013 paper by Sabino Kornich of the University of Sydney and Frank Furstenberg of the University of Pennsylvania. Parents spent more on education, toys, and games. But nothing grew faster than per-child spending on child care, which increased by a factor of 21—or approximately 2,000 percent—in those 40 years.SFGbob said:
Child care costs have massively ballooned? Really? They've gotten more expense like everything else but I wouldn't say they've massively ballooned.GreenRiverGatorz said:Yeah it could be that. Or it could be the last 40 years of massively ballooning costs of having children (chiefly childcare) that are driving this change.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/11/why-child-care-so-expensive/602599/ -
Pitchfork51 said:
Bull fucking shit.
It's because chicks are fat and you are pretty much guaranteed for financial ruin by getting married.
-
Toss in don't have kids you can't afford would be also be nice. Leftards love biased focus groups. Hey, all those in favor of free sh*t, raise your hands.GreenRiverGatorz said:
That should play well with the focus groupsWestlinnDuck said:
The clear solution is to ban women with kids from the workplace. Agreed.GreenRiverGatorz said:
In the United States, per-child spending doubled from the 1970s to the 2000s, according to a 2013 paper by Sabino Kornich of the University of Sydney and Frank Furstenberg of the University of Pennsylvania. Parents spent more on education, toys, and games. But nothing grew faster than per-child spending on child care, which increased by a factor of 21—or approximately 2,000 percent—in those 40 years.SFGbob said:
Child care costs have massively ballooned? Really? They've gotten more expense like everything else but I wouldn't say they've massively ballooned.GreenRiverGatorz said:Yeah it could be that. Or it could be the last 40 years of massively ballooning costs of having children (chiefly childcare) that are driving this change.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/11/why-child-care-so-expensive/602599/ -
-
It's because of divorce rates and women in the workforce. No shit costs go up when there isn't a parent at home to watch the kids.GreenRiverGatorz said:
In the United States, per-child spending doubled from the 1970s to the 2000s, according to a 2013 paper by Sabino Kornich of the University of Sydney and Frank Furstenberg of the University of Pennsylvania. Parents spent more on education, toys, and games. But nothing grew faster than per-child spending on child care, which increased by a factor of 21—or approximately 2,000 percent—in those 40 years.SFGbob said:
Child care costs have massively ballooned? Really? They've gotten more expense like everything else but I wouldn't say they've massively ballooned.GreenRiverGatorz said:Yeah it could be that. Or it could be the last 40 years of massively ballooning costs of having children (chiefly childcare) that are driving this change.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/11/why-child-care-so-expensive/602599/ -
Lets see, for most years the "cost" of child care was zero because mom or maybe grandma and mom took care of the kids. Now people pay for childcare because mom has to work. Has the cost of child care massively ballooned or are people now paying for something that few paid for in years prior?GreenRiverGatorz said:
In the United States, per-child spending doubled from the 1970s to the 2000s, according to a 2013 paper by Sabino Kornich of the University of Sydney and Frank Furstenberg of the University of Pennsylvania. Parents spent more on education, toys, and games. But nothing grew faster than per-child spending on child care, which increased by a factor of 21—or approximately 2,000 percent—in those 40 years.SFGbob said:
Child care costs have massively ballooned? Really? They've gotten more expense like everything else but I wouldn't say they've massively ballooned.GreenRiverGatorz said:Yeah it could be that. Or it could be the last 40 years of massively ballooning costs of having children (chiefly childcare) that are driving this change.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/11/why-child-care-so-expensive/602599/
It's like saying the cost of internet access has massively ballooned since the 1970s.
-
-
I’m good with less kids because we’re getting dumb as fuck.
-
Agreed. But the effect that everyone is further disincentivized to have children still remains.BleachedAnusDawg said:
It's because of divorce rates and women in the workforce. No shit costs go up when there isn't a parent at home to watch the kids.GreenRiverGatorz said:
In the United States, per-child spending doubled from the 1970s to the 2000s, according to a 2013 paper by Sabino Kornich of the University of Sydney and Frank Furstenberg of the University of Pennsylvania. Parents spent more on education, toys, and games. But nothing grew faster than per-child spending on child care, which increased by a factor of 21—or approximately 2,000 percent—in those 40 years.SFGbob said:
Child care costs have massively ballooned? Really? They've gotten more expense like everything else but I wouldn't say they've massively ballooned.GreenRiverGatorz said:Yeah it could be that. Or it could be the last 40 years of massively ballooning costs of having children (chiefly childcare) that are driving this change.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/11/why-child-care-so-expensive/602599/ -
What's a greater disincentive? Not getting married or the cost? And why do poor folks continue to have so many kids if the cost of kids is a disincentive?GreenRiverGatorz said:
Agreed. But the effect that everyone is further disincentivized to have children still remains.BleachedAnusDawg said:
It's because of divorce rates and women in the workforce. No shit costs go up when there isn't a parent at home to watch the kids.GreenRiverGatorz said:
In the United States, per-child spending doubled from the 1970s to the 2000s, according to a 2013 paper by Sabino Kornich of the University of Sydney and Frank Furstenberg of the University of Pennsylvania. Parents spent more on education, toys, and games. But nothing grew faster than per-child spending on child care, which increased by a factor of 21—or approximately 2,000 percent—in those 40 years.SFGbob said:
Child care costs have massively ballooned? Really? They've gotten more expense like everything else but I wouldn't say they've massively ballooned.GreenRiverGatorz said:Yeah it could be that. Or it could be the last 40 years of massively ballooning costs of having children (chiefly childcare) that are driving this change.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/11/why-child-care-so-expensive/602599/ -
Because they're irresponsibleSFGbob said:
What's a greater disincentive? Not getting married or the cost? And why do poor folks continue to have so many kids if the cost of kids is a disincentive?GreenRiverGatorz said:
Agreed. But the effect that everyone is further disincentivized to have children still remains.BleachedAnusDawg said:
It's because of divorce rates and women in the workforce. No shit costs go up when there isn't a parent at home to watch the kids.GreenRiverGatorz said:
In the United States, per-child spending doubled from the 1970s to the 2000s, according to a 2013 paper by Sabino Kornich of the University of Sydney and Frank Furstenberg of the University of Pennsylvania. Parents spent more on education, toys, and games. But nothing grew faster than per-child spending on child care, which increased by a factor of 21—or approximately 2,000 percent—in those 40 years.SFGbob said:
Child care costs have massively ballooned? Really? They've gotten more expense like everything else but I wouldn't say they've massively ballooned.GreenRiverGatorz said:Yeah it could be that. Or it could be the last 40 years of massively ballooning costs of having children (chiefly childcare) that are driving this change.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/11/why-child-care-so-expensive/602599/ -
And then we subsidize the "irresponsible" and then for some strange reason we get a lot more "irresponsible". NaGreenRiverGatorz said:
Because they're irresponsibleSFGbob said:
What's a greater disincentive? Not getting married or the cost? And why do poor folks continue to have so many kids if the cost of kids is a disincentive?GreenRiverGatorz said:
Agreed. But the effect that everyone is further disincentivized to have children still remains.BleachedAnusDawg said:
It's because of divorce rates and women in the workforce. No shit costs go up when there isn't a parent at home to watch the kids.GreenRiverGatorz said:
In the United States, per-child spending doubled from the 1970s to the 2000s, according to a 2013 paper by Sabino Kornich of the University of Sydney and Frank Furstenberg of the University of Pennsylvania. Parents spent more on education, toys, and games. But nothing grew faster than per-child spending on child care, which increased by a factor of 21—or approximately 2,000 percent—in those 40 years.SFGbob said:
Child care costs have massively ballooned? Really? They've gotten more expense like everything else but I wouldn't say they've massively ballooned.GreenRiverGatorz said:Yeah it could be that. Or it could be the last 40 years of massively ballooning costs of having children (chiefly childcare) that are driving this change.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/11/why-child-care-so-expensive/602599/ -
So then being poor in this country may have more to do with personal responsibility than does skin color? Or are you like Kobe and believe that Systemic white racism makes POC irresponsible?GreenRiverGatorz said:
Because they're irresponsibleSFGbob said:
What's a greater disincentive? Not getting married or the cost? And why do poor folks continue to have so many kids if the cost of kids is a disincentive?GreenRiverGatorz said:
Agreed. But the effect that everyone is further disincentivized to have children still remains.BleachedAnusDawg said:
It's because of divorce rates and women in the workforce. No shit costs go up when there isn't a parent at home to watch the kids.GreenRiverGatorz said:
In the United States, per-child spending doubled from the 1970s to the 2000s, according to a 2013 paper by Sabino Kornich of the University of Sydney and Frank Furstenberg of the University of Pennsylvania. Parents spent more on education, toys, and games. But nothing grew faster than per-child spending on child care, which increased by a factor of 21—or approximately 2,000 percent—in those 40 years.SFGbob said:
Child care costs have massively ballooned? Really? They've gotten more expense like everything else but I wouldn't say they've massively ballooned.GreenRiverGatorz said:Yeah it could be that. Or it could be the last 40 years of massively ballooning costs of having children (chiefly childcare) that are driving this change.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/11/why-child-care-so-expensive/602599/ -
I thought it was law now that you had to be gay?
-
On you it's a good look. Maybe mince a little less, then you could be Rock Hudson and not Liberace.HuskyJW said:I thought it was law now that you had to be gay?
-
We need males that are actually men. Men are in short supply these days. A bunch of beta cuck near queers running around.
