Cannabis City!
Comments
-
Truth.MikeDamone said:
The real answer to all of this is people just want to use it without getting in trouble. Every other reason is bullshit.
The question is, do we need a better fucking reason than that? -
I'm interested in the external costs of smoking and drinking. Can you provide some details?AZDuck said:Demand curves for drugs aren't super elastic. People who want drugs will get drugs and pay premium prices for them if they have to and will pay bargain prices if they can. I know that the external costs of smoking have been researched and litigated ad nauseum and those costs are quite high. Likewise, alcohol is either the cause of or a contributor to thousands of deaths and injuries each year, to say nothing of alcohol-related injuries.
Of all consumer drugs, pot probably has the lowest amount of negative externalities, but prices have been artificially high for about a hundred years. Only WA's fucking stupid implementation of legalization could have fucked that up, and apparently has.
As an outsider looking in, I think it is hilarious that WA looked at its liquor-control scheme and thought that it works great and should be replicated for pot.
http://lcb.wa.gov/publications/Marijuana/I-502/I-502_Draft_Rule_Summary_IIIX_02-27-14.pdf
LOL -
Once everyone sees that recreational pot use wont cause Armageddon, we can shit can the fucked up system.AZDuck said:Demand curves for drugs aren't super elastic. People who want drugs will get drugs and pay premium prices for them if they have to and will pay bargain prices if they can. I know that the external costs of smoking have been researched and litigated ad nauseum and those costs are quite high. Likewise, alcohol is either the cause of or a contributor to thousands of deaths and injuries each year, to say nothing of alcohol-related injuries.
Of all consumer drugs, pot probably has the lowest amount of negative externalities, but prices have been artificially high for about a hundred years. Only WA's fucking stupid implementation of legalization could have fucked that up, and apparently has.
As an outsider looking in, I think it is hilarious that WA looked at its liquor-control scheme and thought that it works great and should be replicated for pot.
http://lcb.wa.gov/publications/Marijuana/I-502/I-502_Draft_Rule_Summary_IIIX_02-27-14.pdf
LOL -
It will be easier to take the bong from the stoners than to take the tax revenue from WA DOR.TheGlove said:
Once everyone sees that recreational pot use wont cause Armageddon, we can shit can the fucked up system.AZDuck said:Demand curves for drugs aren't super elastic. People who want drugs will get drugs and pay premium prices for them if they have to and will pay bargain prices if they can. I know that the external costs of smoking have been researched and litigated ad nauseum and those costs are quite high. Likewise, alcohol is either the cause of or a contributor to thousands of deaths and injuries each year, to say nothing of alcohol-related injuries.
Of all consumer drugs, pot probably has the lowest amount of negative externalities, but prices have been artificially high for about a hundred years. Only WA's fucking stupid implementation of legalization could have fucked that up, and apparently has.
As an outsider looking in, I think it is hilarious that WA looked at its liquor-control scheme and thought that it works great and should be replicated for pot.
http://lcb.wa.gov/publications/Marijuana/I-502/I-502_Draft_Rule_Summary_IIIX_02-27-14.pdf
LOL -
I wasnt talking about the taxes, I was talking about the stores. But whatevs. It's legal here, its cheap. I'm happy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It will be easier to take the bong from the stoners than to take the tax revenue from WA DOR.TheGlove said:
Once everyone sees that recreational pot use wont cause Armageddon, we can shit can the fucked up system.AZDuck said:Demand curves for drugs aren't super elastic. People who want drugs will get drugs and pay premium prices for them if they have to and will pay bargain prices if they can. I know that the external costs of smoking have been researched and litigated ad nauseum and those costs are quite high. Likewise, alcohol is either the cause of or a contributor to thousands of deaths and injuries each year, to say nothing of alcohol-related injuries.
Of all consumer drugs, pot probably has the lowest amount of negative externalities, but prices have been artificially high for about a hundred years. Only WA's fucking stupid implementation of legalization could have fucked that up, and apparently has.
As an outsider looking in, I think it is hilarious that WA looked at its liquor-control scheme and thought that it works great and should be replicated for pot.
http://lcb.wa.gov/publications/Marijuana/I-502/I-502_Draft_Rule_Summary_IIIX_02-27-14.pdf
LOL -
No.MikeDamone said:
I'm interested in the external costs of smoking and drinking. Can you provide some details?AZDuck said:Demand curves for drugs aren't super elastic. People who want drugs will get drugs and pay premium prices for them if they have to and will pay bargain prices if they can. I know that the external costs of smoking have been researched and litigated ad nauseum and those costs are quite high. Likewise, alcohol is either the cause of or a contributor to thousands of deaths and injuries each year, to say nothing of alcohol-related injuries.
Of all consumer drugs, pot probably has the lowest amount of negative externalities, but prices have been artificially high for about a hundred years. Only WA's fucking stupid implementation of legalization could have fucked that up, and apparently has.
As an outsider looking in, I think it is hilarious that WA looked at its liquor-control scheme and thought that it works great and should be replicated for pot.
http://lcb.wa.gov/publications/Marijuana/I-502/I-502_Draft_Rule_Summary_IIIX_02-27-14.pdf
LOL
-
Cannabis City is closed - on siesta for 10-15 days. Ran out of product
http://blogs.seattletimes.com/pot/2014/07/11/wheres-the-weed-the-morning-report-for-july-11/
-
Sounds like a budding problem. Could be a chronic issue.unfrozencaveman said:Cannabis City is closed - on siesta for 10-15 days. Ran out of product
http://blogs.seattletimes.com/pot/2014/07/11/wheres-the-weed-the-morning-report-for-july-11/
-
You reap what you sow!dnc said:
Sounds like a budding problem. Could be a chronic issue.unfrozencaveman said:Cannabis City is closed - on siesta for 10-15 days. Ran out of product
http://blogs.seattletimes.com/pot/2014/07/11/wheres-the-weed-the-morning-report-for-july-11/
-
That's what I thought.AZDuck said:
No.MikeDamone said:
I'm interested in the external costs of smoking and drinking. Can you provide some details?AZDuck said:Demand curves for drugs aren't super elastic. People who want drugs will get drugs and pay premium prices for them if they have to and will pay bargain prices if they can. I know that the external costs of smoking have been researched and litigated ad nauseum and those costs are quite high. Likewise, alcohol is either the cause of or a contributor to thousands of deaths and injuries each year, to say nothing of alcohol-related injuries.
Of all consumer drugs, pot probably has the lowest amount of negative externalities, but prices have been artificially high for about a hundred years. Only WA's fucking stupid implementation of legalization could have fucked that up, and apparently has.
As an outsider looking in, I think it is hilarious that WA looked at its liquor-control scheme and thought that it works great and should be replicated for pot.
http://lcb.wa.gov/publications/Marijuana/I-502/I-502_Draft_Rule_Summary_IIIX_02-27-14.pdf
LOL
