Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Leftist Shill denial POTD

11315171819

Comments

  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    The strange thing here is I don’t see anyone arguing that Joe took money. That is such a bad use of strawman, I think even @SFGbob is speechless. For the last time, the media ignored and even suppressed this information from coming out. You don’t acknowledge that, but instead rant about don jr or ‘but how did joe profit’. Then you call people girls and accuse others of false equivalency. I think you skipped some meds.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,343
    hardhat said:

    The strange thing here is I don’t see anyone arguing that Joe took money. That is such a bad use of strawman, I think even @SFGbob is speechless. For the last time, the media ignored and even suppressed this information from coming out. You don’t acknowledge that, but instead rant about don jr or ‘but how did joe profit’. Then you call people girls and accuse others of false equivalency. I think you skipped some meds.

    So you're butthurt that media didn't enthusiastically report about "the Big Guy's cut", with the alleged words of a drug addict being the only evidence of that "cut". No documents. No receipts. So the media "covered up" a doubtful story. Yes?
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    The strange thing here is I don’t see anyone arguing that Joe took money. That is such a bad use of strawman, I think even @SFGbob is speechless. For the last time, the media ignored and even suppressed this information from coming out. You don’t acknowledge that, but instead rant about don jr or ‘but how did joe profit’. Then you call people girls and accuse others of false equivalency. I think you skipped some meds.

    So you're butthurt that media didn't enthusiastically report about "the Big Guy's cut", with the alleged words of a drug addict being the only evidence of that "cut". No documents. No receipts. So the media "covered up" a doubtful story. Yes?
    You believed the bullshit bountygate story, and here you are questioning why the DOJ would bother opening up an investigation into Hunter. You make Qanon sound sane.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,343
    edited April 2021

    HHusky said:

    Its funny to see HH just slough off Hunter's business partner who went on the record, and Hunter himself who has incriminated his own father. Its as if they never happened to HH! He is going to ignore and then ask everyone for evidence. LOL! Its like having a discussion with a 2 year old.

    Where is the money Joe is supposed to have taken, ladies? Records. Accounts. Assets. You know, money stuff.
    How do politicians have millions and millions off 200k salaries post of the day

    ignorant piece of shit
    https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/29/joe-biden-releases-2019-tax-returns-ahead-of-presidential-debate.html

    Sounds like your 409(k) isn't doing too good.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,343
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    The strange thing here is I don’t see anyone arguing that Joe took money. That is such a bad use of strawman, I think even @SFGbob is speechless. For the last time, the media ignored and even suppressed this information from coming out. You don’t acknowledge that, but instead rant about don jr or ‘but how did joe profit’. Then you call people girls and accuse others of false equivalency. I think you skipped some meds.

    So you're butthurt that media didn't enthusiastically report about "the Big Guy's cut", with the alleged words of a drug addict being the only evidence of that "cut". No documents. No receipts. So the media "covered up" a doubtful story. Yes?
    You believed the bullshit bountygate story, and here you are questioning why the DOJ would bother opening up an investigation into Hunter. You make Qanon sound sane.
    The bountygate story hasn't been definitively proven or disproven. Daddy's meekness in his dealings with Putin is definitively proven.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    The strange thing here is I don’t see anyone arguing that Joe took money. That is such a bad use of strawman, I think even @SFGbob is speechless. For the last time, the media ignored and even suppressed this information from coming out. You don’t acknowledge that, but instead rant about don jr or ‘but how did joe profit’. Then you call people girls and accuse others of false equivalency. I think you skipped some meds.

    So you're butthurt that media didn't enthusiastically report about "the Big Guy's cut", with the alleged words of a drug addict being the only evidence of that "cut". No documents. No receipts. So the media "covered up" a doubtful story. Yes?
    You believed the bullshit bountygate story, and here you are questioning why the DOJ would bother opening up an investigation into Hunter. You make Qanon sound sane.
    The bountygate story hasn't been definitively proven or disproven. Daddy's meekness in his dealings with Putin is definitively proven.
    You are dunking on a 3 foot hoop against an imaginary opponent.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,343
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    The strange thing here is I don’t see anyone arguing that Joe took money. That is such a bad use of strawman, I think even @SFGbob is speechless. For the last time, the media ignored and even suppressed this information from coming out. You don’t acknowledge that, but instead rant about don jr or ‘but how did joe profit’. Then you call people girls and accuse others of false equivalency. I think you skipped some meds.

    So you're butthurt that media didn't enthusiastically report about "the Big Guy's cut", with the alleged words of a drug addict being the only evidence of that "cut". No documents. No receipts. So the media "covered up" a doubtful story. Yes?
    You believed the bullshit bountygate story, and here you are questioning why the DOJ would bother opening up an investigation into Hunter. You make Qanon sound sane.
    The bountygate story hasn't been definitively proven or disproven. Daddy's meekness in his dealings with Putin is definitively proven.
    You are dunking on a 3 foot hoop against an imaginary opponent.
    winning
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    edited April 2021
    HHusky said:

    Its funny to see HH just slough off Hunter's business partner who went on the record, and Hunter himself who has incriminated his own father. Its as if they never happened to HH! He is going to ignore and then ask everyone for evidence. LOL! Its like having a discussion with a 2 year old.

    Where is the money Joe is supposed to have taken, ladies? Records. Accounts. Assets. You know, money stuff.
    Not bad for a lifetime politician.

    https://nypost.com/article/joe-biden-houses-photos/
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    The strange thing here is I don’t see anyone arguing that Joe took money. That is such a bad use of strawman, I think even @SFGbob is speechless. For the last time, the media ignored and even suppressed this information from coming out. You don’t acknowledge that, but instead rant about don jr or ‘but how did joe profit’. Then you call people girls and accuse others of false equivalency. I think you skipped some meds.

    So you're butthurt that media didn't enthusiastically report about "the Big Guy's cut", with the alleged words of a drug addict being the only evidence of that "cut". No documents. No receipts. So the media "covered up" a doubtful story. Yes?
    You believed the bullshit bountygate story, and here you are questioning why the DOJ would bother opening up an investigation into Hunter. You make Qanon sound sane.
    The bountygate story hasn't been definitively proven or disproven. Daddy's meekness in his dealings with Putin is definitively proven.
    You are dunking on a 3 foot hoop against an imaginary opponent.
    winning
    You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,343
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Its funny to see HH just slough off Hunter's business partner who went on the record, and Hunter himself who has incriminated his own father. Its as if they never happened to HH! He is going to ignore and then ask everyone for evidence. LOL! Its like having a discussion with a 2 year old.

    Where is the money Joe is supposed to have taken, ladies? Records. Accounts. Assets. You know, money stuff.
    Not bad for a lifetime politician.

    https://nypost.com/article/joe-biden-houses-photos/
    So a two income professional couple owns two relatively expensive pieces of property after decades of work and the book deals and speaking gigs that celebrities often receive.

    yuge