Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

But Trump was a threat to democracy

hardhat
hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
in Tug Tavern
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    Don't hold your breath waiting for assholes like the Dazzler who danced around screaming about how Trump was destroying our norms and institution to object to this.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,992 Standard Supporter
    Seems like a high character thing to do. I heard people vote for high character candidates and not on their positions because of FEELZ.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,255
    Never underestimate liberals to have studies to determine if studies are needed

    What’s sad is most liberals think this is a good idea and that there’s nothing to see here
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,691
    RaceBannon said:

    Tequilla said:

    Never underestimate liberals to have studies to determine if studies are needed

    What’s sad is most liberals think this is a good idea and that there’s nothing to see here

    Leftist not liberal but that is a minor quibble

    What they fail to account for is nothing stays the same forever. That left wing court they dream of could be a right wing court someday. Like the sanctuary city crowd now watching states becoming sanctuaries for not following federal gun laws.

    FDR tried to pack the court too and failed. What's next for Joe? Internment camps?
    Quibble is a hate infused word
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 70,031 Founders Club
    This is right out of an Ayn Rand novel
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,750 Standard Supporter
    RaceBannon said:

    Tequilla said:

    Never underestimate liberals to have studies to determine if studies are needed

    What’s sad is most liberals think this is a good idea and that there’s nothing to see here

    Leftist not liberal but that is a minor quibble

    What they fail to account for is nothing stays the same forever. That left wing court they dream of could be a right wing court someday. Like the sanctuary city crowd now watching states becoming sanctuaries for not following federal gun laws.

    FDR tried to pack the court too and failed. What's next for Joe? Internment camps?
    I want top bunk.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EsophagealFeces
    EsophagealFeces Member Posts: 13,428
    Can’t wait until the study determines that the court needs roughly 4-6 new members. Gonna be speshul.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,255
    EsophagealFeces said:

    Can’t wait until the study determines that the court needs roughly 4-6 new members. Gonna be speshul.

    I mean if that’s what the experts say to do then what is Joe supposed to do? Follow the science/experts right?

    There’s a decent chance that there is some merit in having a fresh view of the current status of anything ...

    But the odds that there isn’t over reach here and that the bipartisan element shockingly becomes less bipartisan than it appears is obviously in play.

    The leftist/liberal crew will lap up and defend anything that Biden does because at the end of the day, he isn’t mean bad Orange Man
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter