Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
I'm glad the firecoachsark.com website is still up
Gladstone
Member Posts: 16,425
http://www.firecoachsark.com/category/fact-sheet/
That usually shoots down any Troojan or Doog argument pretty quick.
That usually shoots down any Troojan or Doog argument pretty quick.
Comments
-
When we are busy going to the Rose Bowl in the next 2-3 years under Petersen and SC is in their soon to be annual rut of 6-3 > 6-3 > 6-3 (throwing in an extra win b/c SC is SC), I hope that there's a www.thankyoupathadenfs.com
-
The site is great though for 1) the quick fire fact sheet and 2) the comments that are tied to saying that we should be aiming for Tim DeRuyter
-
Your welcome. I'll continue to keep it up as a public service.
Here is what pisses me off about Sark.
Sark is one of the very few coaches who didn't have to work his way up to being a HC. It took him only 8 years to be a HC. It takes most guys 20 years. Plus, he spent his 8 years mostly at USC. Look at guys like Mark Dantonio, Urban Meyer and Nick Saban. These guys toiled at multiple shit places for years then after roughly 20 years became head coaches.
Not only did Sark not have to put in any time and hard work to get the job, he also got the greatest job anyone could ever get. He took over, what was until 2004 a top 15 program with a history of competing for national championships coming off a 0 win season with extremely low expectations. Metrics superiority guy looked at the 2004-2008 stretch and he said that no top 25 program comes close to having as shitty of a 5 year period. Its a total historical anomaly (though Colorado is coming close).
Anyway, there was no way anyone would be viewed as a failure and they could use the job to get an even better job. The fuckwad then gets the USC job. And he's only 40. His career will be headed downhill before he's 45 though. I take solace in that.
-
I thought Tim DeRuyter would have been much better than Sark, and before Woodward proved he could put on big boy pants I would have been happy as shit for that trade.
-
Good reason to be thankful that Woody pulled on the big boy pants to go get a big boy HC.Swaye said:I thought Tim DeRuyter would have been much better than Sark, and before Woodward proved he could put on big boy pants I would have been happy as shit for that trade.
Two things to keep in mind for people that seem to forget this kind of shit:
1) We're Fucking Washington
2) Hiring anybody from USC often turns out to be a bad move for us -
Couldn't agree more, I just didn't see Pool Boy (at the time) really stepping up.Tequilla said:
Good reason to be thankful that Woody pulled on the big boy pants to go get a big boy HC.Swaye said:I thought Tim DeRuyter would have been much better than Sark, and before Woodward proved he could put on big boy pants I would have been happy as shit for that trade.
Two things to keep in mind for people that seem to forget this kind of shit:
1) We're Fucking Washington
2) Hiring anybody from USC often turns out to be a bad move for us -
Petersen >>>>>>>>>>>> DeRuyter >>>>>>>>Nuss >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sark >>>> TyTequilla said:The site is great though for 1) the quick fire fact sheet and 2) the comments that are tied to saying that we should be aiming for Tim DeRuyter
-
He went 9-4 last year. Saying otherwise is silly.
-
I'm probably getting whooshed by dnc but I would probably take Petersen over Mora, and I say this as a longtime Mora fanboy.
