Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Lin Wood to defend 17 yr old kid. ‘Clear self-defense’
Comments
-
See the final sentence of my post.Sledog said:
He wouldn't represent the boy in the trial. he'd pay for someone to do it. HTHFremontTroll said:
LOL at people downvoting me do you know anything about this guy?FremontTroll said:Lin Wood is a terrible trial attorney coasting on reputation.
Caveat emptor pal.
Here is a primer: https://www.law.com/dailyreportonline/2020/09/02/lin-wood-calls-ex-partners-fee-splitting-lawsuit-a-shakedown-effort/
He managed to lose his last jury trial despite Elon Musk double and tripling down on his client being a “pedo guy” to his millions of followers.
Lin failed to establish the very first element of libel: that the statements in question were referring to his client! Oops.
Afterward he penned an embarrassing capitulation saying Elon told the truth and claimed it was his last jury trial ever: https://www.reddit.com/r/RealTesla/comments/e8kjzw/some_reflections_from_lake_the_verdict_in/
Better hope he is just there to garner publicity and will have nothing to do with actual strategy.
If that is the case there is no point in him being involved from anyone’s perspective other than L. Wood himself who is getting some sweet free pub out of it. -
Is his role in the Covington settlement overblown? I wasn't following the attorneys but that appears to be his current claim to fameFremontTroll said:
See the final sentence of my post.Sledog said:
He wouldn't represent the boy in the trial. he'd pay for someone to do it. HTHFremontTroll said:
LOL at people downvoting me do you know anything about this guy?FremontTroll said:Lin Wood is a terrible trial attorney coasting on reputation.
Caveat emptor pal.
Here is a primer: https://www.law.com/dailyreportonline/2020/09/02/lin-wood-calls-ex-partners-fee-splitting-lawsuit-a-shakedown-effort/
He managed to lose his last jury trial despite Elon Musk double and tripling down on his client being a “pedo guy” to his millions of followers.
Lin failed to establish the very first element of libel: that the statements in question were referring to his client! Oops.
Afterward he penned an embarrassing capitulation saying Elon told the truth and claimed it was his last jury trial ever: https://www.reddit.com/r/RealTesla/comments/e8kjzw/some_reflections_from_lake_the_verdict_in/
Better hope he is just there to garner publicity and will have nothing to do with actual strategy.
If that is the case there is no point in him being involved from anyone’s perspective other than L. Wood himself who is getting some sweet free pub out of it. -
I did and answered you. That was started at the outset when he said he'd defend him.FremontTroll said:
See the final sentence of my post.Sledog said:
He wouldn't represent the boy in the trial. he'd pay for someone to do it. HTHFremontTroll said:
LOL at people downvoting me do you know anything about this guy?FremontTroll said:Lin Wood is a terrible trial attorney coasting on reputation.
Caveat emptor pal.
Here is a primer: https://www.law.com/dailyreportonline/2020/09/02/lin-wood-calls-ex-partners-fee-splitting-lawsuit-a-shakedown-effort/
He managed to lose his last jury trial despite Elon Musk double and tripling down on his client being a “pedo guy” to his millions of followers.
Lin failed to establish the very first element of libel: that the statements in question were referring to his client! Oops.
Afterward he penned an embarrassing capitulation saying Elon told the truth and claimed it was his last jury trial ever: https://www.reddit.com/r/RealTesla/comments/e8kjzw/some_reflections_from_lake_the_verdict_in/
Better hope he is just there to garner publicity and will have nothing to do with actual strategy.
If that is the case there is no point in him being involved from anyone’s perspective other than L. Wood himself who is getting some sweet free pub out of it. -
Jesus Christ. PolitiFarce seems to think no fucking video exists any-fucking-where showing that this fucking kid is a fucking American hero! Total bullshit. Trump's right, and the kid is going to walk.
Fact check my fucking ass.
https://politifact.com/factchecks/2020/sep/01/donald-trump/trump-paints-false-picture-kyle-rittenhouse-shooti/#sources
long time Tug reader, first time Tug poster... -
-
He originally built his name off a well known defendant in the 90s (Richard Jewell the Atlanta Olympics security guard who found the bomb) and then proceeded to represent numerous public figures more often in the media than in court.RaceBannon said:
Is his role in the Covington settlement overblown? I wasn't following the attorneys but that appears to be his current claim to fameFremontTroll said:
See the final sentence of my post.Sledog said:
He wouldn't represent the boy in the trial. he'd pay for someone to do it. HTHFremontTroll said:
LOL at people downvoting me do you know anything about this guy?FremontTroll said:Lin Wood is a terrible trial attorney coasting on reputation.
Caveat emptor pal.
Here is a primer: https://www.law.com/dailyreportonline/2020/09/02/lin-wood-calls-ex-partners-fee-splitting-lawsuit-a-shakedown-effort/
He managed to lose his last jury trial despite Elon Musk double and tripling down on his client being a “pedo guy” to his millions of followers.
Lin failed to establish the very first element of libel: that the statements in question were referring to his client! Oops.
Afterward he penned an embarrassing capitulation saying Elon told the truth and claimed it was his last jury trial ever: https://www.reddit.com/r/RealTesla/comments/e8kjzw/some_reflections_from_lake_the_verdict_in/
Better hope he is just there to garner publicity and will have nothing to do with actual strategy.
If that is the case there is no point in him being involved from anyone’s perspective other than L. Wood himself who is getting some sweet free pub out of it.
I agree with the analysis of pretty much every civil litigator I’ve seen opine on the issue that the Covington settlement was likely for a low $ value considering the case was in the pre-discovery stage and had barely survived the initial motion to dismiss. There would have been another summary judgment motion after discovery was taken the defendants were under no pressure to settle. -
Thanks. I just watched the Jewell movie. InterestingFremontTroll said:
He originally built his name off a well known defendant in the 90s (Richard Jewell the Atlanta Olympics security guard who found the bomb) and then proceeded to represent numerous public figures more often in the media than in court.RaceBannon said:
Is his role in the Covington settlement overblown? I wasn't following the attorneys but that appears to be his current claim to fameFremontTroll said:
See the final sentence of my post.Sledog said:
He wouldn't represent the boy in the trial. he'd pay for someone to do it. HTHFremontTroll said:
LOL at people downvoting me do you know anything about this guy?FremontTroll said:Lin Wood is a terrible trial attorney coasting on reputation.
Caveat emptor pal.
Here is a primer: https://www.law.com/dailyreportonline/2020/09/02/lin-wood-calls-ex-partners-fee-splitting-lawsuit-a-shakedown-effort/
He managed to lose his last jury trial despite Elon Musk double and tripling down on his client being a “pedo guy” to his millions of followers.
Lin failed to establish the very first element of libel: that the statements in question were referring to his client! Oops.
Afterward he penned an embarrassing capitulation saying Elon told the truth and claimed it was his last jury trial ever: https://www.reddit.com/r/RealTesla/comments/e8kjzw/some_reflections_from_lake_the_verdict_in/
Better hope he is just there to garner publicity and will have nothing to do with actual strategy.
If that is the case there is no point in him being involved from anyone’s perspective other than L. Wood himself who is getting some sweet free pub out of it.
I agree with the analysis of pretty much every civil litigator I’ve seen opine on the issue that the Covington settlement was likely for a low $ value considering the case was in the pre-discovery stage and had barely survived the initial motion to dismiss. There would have been another summary judgment motion after discovery was taken the defendants were under no pressure to settle. -
Ah, but it did survive the motion to dismiss. After that, it was all down hill for CNN and the Washington Post. They faced millions in discovery costs. They had lots to hide. The Sandmann was facing a fraction of the discovery costs of the defendant. Pretty easy to ask for all relevant email, hard to dig them up. It would take a small mind to ignore the shitload of truly awful internal emails out there and the depositions would also be embarrassing. The trial would be in Kentucky with a jury that would be sympathetic to the plaintiff against a clearly biased and untruthful defendants. I initially guessed that CNN would settle for $5 million. That's a low value against $250 million but a series of settlements add up.
-
No, no, no, no.WestlinnDuck said:Ah, but it did survive the motion to dismiss. After that, it was all down hill for CNN and the Washington Post. They faced millions in discovery costs. They had lots to hide. The Sandmann was facing a fraction of the discovery costs of the defendant. Pretty easy to ask for all relevant email, hard to dig them up. It would take a small mind to ignore the shitload of truly awful internal emails out there and the depositions would also be embarrassing. The trial would be in Kentucky with a jury that would be sympathetic to the plaintiff against a clearly biased and untruthful defendants. I initially guessed that CNN would settle for $5 million. That's a low value against $250 million but a series of settlements add up.
First of all to clarify these companies are insured. The decision is made by the commercial carrier.
Second, discovery and motion work costs at most would run into the low six figures not anywhere near millions. We are talking about one specific story and one specific period of time. This isn’t, for example, an environmental tort against a corporation with years of actions and inaction at question. Any documentary evidence that may exist is very limited in time and scope.
Third, Sandman may have had lower costs but he also had more to lose in discovery. He would have to be deposed. Not fun for a teenager and also likely to sink the case completely especially on the issue of damages.
Fourth, regardless of how you feel about the parties involved the theory behind the case was convoluted. Sandmann would have to prove that WaPo knew that Phillips was lying in republishing his statements. Keep in mind Wood just got destroyed at trial in a case where his client was directly accused of pedophilia on multiple occasions and said accusations were made to tens of millions of people. The Sandmann theory of knowingly republishing false statements would be a lot harder to explain to a jury.
Fifth, again, trial was a long way off so not really a significant threat to force settleKent at that point. A renewed summary judgment motion would be made after discovery was completed.
I agree that the likely costs of discovery for the defendants is a good place to start for the likely value of the settlement.
As a side note I found it interesting when Wood freaked out on Twitter about people unconnected to WaPo speculating that the settlement was probably for nuisance value. Me thinks the lady doth protest too much.
Not sure what Wood is up to now since he blocked me on Twitter after that incident but I am pretty sure he didn’t follow through with his baseless threats to sue for breach of confidentiality. -
Wood got blocked from Twitter. Why would he block some random person like you?FremontTroll said:
No, no, no, no.WestlinnDuck said:Ah, but it did survive the motion to dismiss. After that, it was all down hill for CNN and the Washington Post. They faced millions in discovery costs. They had lots to hide. The Sandmann was facing a fraction of the discovery costs of the defendant. Pretty easy to ask for all relevant email, hard to dig them up. It would take a small mind to ignore the shitload of truly awful internal emails out there and the depositions would also be embarrassing. The trial would be in Kentucky with a jury that would be sympathetic to the plaintiff against a clearly biased and untruthful defendants. I initially guessed that CNN would settle for $5 million. That's a low value against $250 million but a series of settlements add up.
First of all to clarify these companies are insured. The decision is made by the commercial carrier.
Second, discovery and motion work costs at most would run into the low six figures not anywhere near millions. We are talking about one specific story and one specific period of time. This isn’t, for example, an environmental tort against a corporation with years of actions and inaction at question. Any documentary evidence that may exist is very limited in time and scope.
Third, Sandman may have had lower costs but he also had more to lose in discovery. He would have to be deposed. Not fun for a teenager and also likely to sink the case completely especially on the issue of damages.
Fourth, regardless of how you feel about the parties involved the theory behind the case was convoluted. Sandmann would have to prove that WaPo knew that Phillips was lying in republishing his statements. Keep in mind Wood just got destroyed at trial in a case where his client was directly accused of pedophilia on multiple occasions and said accusations were made to tens of millions of people. The Sandmann theory of knowingly republishing false statements would be a lot harder to explain to a jury.
Fifth, again, trial was a long way off so not really a significant threat to force settleKent at that point. A renewed summary judgment motion would be made after discovery was completed.
I agree that the likely costs of discovery for the defendants is a good place to start for the likely value of the settlement.
As a side note I found it interesting when Wood freaked out on Twitter about people unconnected to WaPo speculating that the settlement was probably for nuisance value. Me thinks the lady doth protest too much.
Not sure what Wood is up to now since he blocked me on Twitter after that incident but I am pretty sure he didn’t follow through with his baseless threats to sue for breach of confidentiality. -
I’m not sure if you understand how Twitter works but to clarify Wood received the equivalent of a time-out for violating the terms of service.NorthwestFresh said:
Wood got blocked from Twitter. Why would he block some random person like you?FremontTroll said:
No, no, no, no.WestlinnDuck said:Ah, but it did survive the motion to dismiss. After that, it was all down hill for CNN and the Washington Post. They faced millions in discovery costs. They had lots to hide. The Sandmann was facing a fraction of the discovery costs of the defendant. Pretty easy to ask for all relevant email, hard to dig them up. It would take a small mind to ignore the shitload of truly awful internal emails out there and the depositions would also be embarrassing. The trial would be in Kentucky with a jury that would be sympathetic to the plaintiff against a clearly biased and untruthful defendants. I initially guessed that CNN would settle for $5 million. That's a low value against $250 million but a series of settlements add up.
First of all to clarify these companies are insured. The decision is made by the commercial carrier.
Second, discovery and motion work costs at most would run into the low six figures not anywhere near millions. We are talking about one specific story and one specific period of time. This isn’t, for example, an environmental tort against a corporation with years of actions and inaction at question. Any documentary evidence that may exist is very limited in time and scope.
Third, Sandman may have had lower costs but he also had more to lose in discovery. He would have to be deposed. Not fun for a teenager and also likely to sink the case completely especially on the issue of damages.
Fourth, regardless of how you feel about the parties involved the theory behind the case was convoluted. Sandmann would have to prove that WaPo knew that Phillips was lying in republishing his statements. Keep in mind Wood just got destroyed at trial in a case where his client was directly accused of pedophilia on multiple occasions and said accusations were made to tens of millions of people. The Sandmann theory of knowingly republishing false statements would be a lot harder to explain to a jury.
Fifth, again, trial was a long way off so not really a significant threat to force settleKent at that point. A renewed summary judgment motion would be made after discovery was completed.
I agree that the likely costs of discovery for the defendants is a good place to start for the likely value of the settlement.
As a side note I found it interesting when Wood freaked out on Twitter about people unconnected to WaPo speculating that the settlement was probably for nuisance value. Me thinks the lady doth protest too much.
Not sure what Wood is up to now since he blocked me on Twitter after that incident but I am pretty sure he didn’t follow through with his baseless threats to sue for breach of confidentiality.
Prior to that he spent the months since the Musk verdict blocking anyone who questioned him in anyway.
Not surprising if you read the article I linked above or the excerpt here. The man is unhinged and quite sensitive.
-
Twitter it's a communist platform just line Facebook. They target conservatives.
-
-
Remember when you guys were all over Lin Wood’s nuts?
-
I got five fuck offs and zero upvotes for this 100% correct take.FremontTroll said:Lin Wood is a terrible trial attorney coasting on reputation.
Caveat emptor pal.
Carry on masturbating on the internet over all your perceived grievances but your heroes are just here to grift off of you.
-
You are welcome here to masturbate over your down votes and fuck off grievances anytime friendFremontTroll said:
I got five fuck offs and zero upvotes for this 100% correct take.FremontTroll said:Lin Wood is a terrible trial attorney coasting on reputation.
Caveat emptor pal.
Carry on masturbating on the internet over all your perceived grievances but your heroes are just here to grift off of you. -
Linn got out of the boat. Never get out of the boat.FremontTroll said:Remember when you guys were all over Lin Wood’s nuts?
-
Line Wood is batshit crazy and that’s been apparent for a long while. What should always give Republicans pause is there is a correlation between someone’s love of Trump and their likely questionable mental health. Look at Mike Lindell, has anyone here been following him? Absolutely off his rocker, holy shit. Rudy G? WTF happened to that guy? Sydney Powell? Wow. It’s a Carnival of Crazy.FremontTroll said:Remember when you guys were all over Lin Wood’s nuts?
-
Rubberfist said:
Line Wood is batshit crazy and that’s been apparent for a long while. What should always give Republicans pause is there is a correlation between someone’s love of Trump and their likely questionable mental health. Look at Mike Lindell, has anyone here been following him? Absolutely off his rocker, holy shit. Rudy G? WTF happened to that guy? Sydney Powell? Wow. It’s a Carnival of Crazy.FremontTroll said:Remember when you guys were all over Lin Wood’s nuts?
You don't say... -
Rubber is trying to get a date with her.PurpleThrobber said:Rubberfist said:
Line Wood is batshit crazy and that’s been apparent for a long while. What should always give Republicans pause is there is a correlation between someone’s love of Trump and their likely questionable mental health. Look at Mike Lindell, has anyone here been following him? Absolutely off his rocker, holy shit. Rudy G? WTF happened to that guy? Sydney Powell? Wow. It’s a Carnival of Crazy.FremontTroll said:Remember when you guys were all over Lin Wood’s nuts?
You don't say... -
Rubber would fuck "her" if "she" asked because he wouldn't want anyone to think he was transphobic.Sledog said:
Rubber is trying to get a date with her.PurpleThrobber said:Rubberfist said:
Line Wood is batshit crazy and that’s been apparent for a long while. What should always give Republicans pause is there is a correlation between someone’s love of Trump and their likely questionable mental health. Look at Mike Lindell, has anyone here been following him? Absolutely off his rocker, holy shit. Rudy G? WTF happened to that guy? Sydney Powell? Wow. It’s a Carnival of Crazy.FremontTroll said:Remember when you guys were all over Lin Wood’s nuts?
You don't say... -
The conservative political movement ALWAYS needs a group to hate. It used to be black people until that became unpopular. Then it was the gays but as our culture became more accepting gay people came out and it turned out that conservatives had gay children. The people that they labeled as mentally ill were their children and neighbors. Now they have the perfect enemy; the trans community. It’s so small that it impacts almost nobody. You can hate them and the chances that your family member, friend or neighbor will come out as trans is incredibly small. A group of people that make up .1% of the population are the biggest issue in the conservative movement because they NEED a group to hate even though they impact almost nobody.SFGbob said:
Rubber would fuck "her" if "she" asked because he wouldn't want anyone to think he was transphobic.Sledog said:
Rubber is trying to get a date with her.PurpleThrobber said:Rubberfist said:
Line Wood is batshit crazy and that’s been apparent for a long while. What should always give Republicans pause is there is a correlation between someone’s love of Trump and their likely questionable mental health. Look at Mike Lindell, has anyone here been following him? Absolutely off his rocker, holy shit. Rudy G? WTF happened to that guy? Sydney Powell? Wow. It’s a Carnival of Crazy.FremontTroll said:Remember when you guys were all over Lin Wood’s nuts?
You don't say... -
Cool attempt at the narrative re-frame.Rubberfist said:
The conservative political movement ALWAYS needs a group to hate. It used to be black people until that became unpopular. Then it was the gays but as our culture became more accepting gay people came out and it turned out that conservatives had gay children. The people that they labeled as mentally ill were their children and neighbors. Now they have the perfect enemy; the trans community. It’s so small that it impacts almost nobody. You can hate them and the chances that your family member, friend or neighbor will come out as trans is incredibly small. A group of people that make up .1% of the population are the biggest issue in the conservative movement because they NEED a group to hate even though they impact almost nobody.SFGbob said:
Rubber would fuck "her" if "she" asked because he wouldn't want anyone to think he was transphobic.Sledog said:
Rubber is trying to get a date with her.PurpleThrobber said:Rubberfist said:
Line Wood is batshit crazy and that’s been apparent for a long while. What should always give Republicans pause is there is a correlation between someone’s love of Trump and their likely questionable mental health. Look at Mike Lindell, has anyone here been following him? Absolutely off his rocker, holy shit. Rudy G? WTF happened to that guy? Sydney Powell? Wow. It’s a Carnival of Crazy.FremontTroll said:Remember when you guys were all over Lin Wood’s nuts?
You don't say...
-
I could care less about the trans community but they care a great deal about me. Also, I can just feel the love for this country and constitutional republic emanating from the antifa and BLM wing of the dem party. Otherwise known as the dem party.Rubberfist said:
The conservative political movement ALWAYS needs a group to hate. It used to be black people until that became unpopular. Then it was the gays but as our culture became more accepting gay people came out and it turned out that conservatives had gay children. The people that they labeled as mentally ill were their children and neighbors. Now they have the perfect enemy; the trans community. It’s so small that it impacts almost nobody. You can hate them and the chances that your family member, friend or neighbor will come out as trans is incredibly small. A group of people that make up .1% of the population are the biggest issue in the conservative movement because they NEED a group to hate even though they impact almost nobody.SFGbob said:
Rubber would fuck "her" if "she" asked because he wouldn't want anyone to think he was transphobic.Sledog said:
Rubber is trying to get a date with her.PurpleThrobber said:Rubberfist said:
Line Wood is batshit crazy and that’s been apparent for a long while. What should always give Republicans pause is there is a correlation between someone’s love of Trump and their likely questionable mental health. Look at Mike Lindell, has anyone here been following him? Absolutely off his rocker, holy shit. Rudy G? WTF happened to that guy? Sydney Powell? Wow. It’s a Carnival of Crazy.FremontTroll said:Remember when you guys were all over Lin Wood’s nuts?
You don't say... -
Nice lecture on hate by the biggest hater ever.Rubberfist said:
The conservative political movement ALWAYS needs a group to hate. It used to be black people until that became unpopular. Then it was the gays but as our culture became more accepting gay people came out and it turned out that conservatives had gay children. The people that they labeled as mentally ill were their children and neighbors. Now they have the perfect enemy; the trans community. It’s so small that it impacts almost nobody. You can hate them and the chances that your family member, friend or neighbor will come out as trans is incredibly small. A group of people that make up .1% of the population are the biggest issue in the conservative movement because they NEED a group to hate even though they impact almost nobody.SFGbob said:
Rubber would fuck "her" if "she" asked because he wouldn't want anyone to think he was transphobic.Sledog said:
Rubber is trying to get a date with her.PurpleThrobber said:Rubberfist said:
Line Wood is batshit crazy and that’s been apparent for a long while. What should always give Republicans pause is there is a correlation between someone’s love of Trump and their likely questionable mental health. Look at Mike Lindell, has anyone here been following him? Absolutely off his rocker, holy shit. Rudy G? WTF happened to that guy? Sydney Powell? Wow. It’s a Carnival of Crazy.FremontTroll said:Remember when you guys were all over Lin Wood’s nuts?
You don't say...
Way to attempt fagging out the thread, RF. -
Rubber can fag out a bathhouse.TurdBomber said:
Nice lecture on hate by the biggest hater ever.Rubberfist said:
The conservative political movement ALWAYS needs a group to hate. It used to be black people until that became unpopular. Then it was the gays but as our culture became more accepting gay people came out and it turned out that conservatives had gay children. The people that they labeled as mentally ill were their children and neighbors. Now they have the perfect enemy; the trans community. It’s so small that it impacts almost nobody. You can hate them and the chances that your family member, friend or neighbor will come out as trans is incredibly small. A group of people that make up .1% of the population are the biggest issue in the conservative movement because they NEED a group to hate even though they impact almost nobody.SFGbob said:
Rubber would fuck "her" if "she" asked because he wouldn't want anyone to think he was transphobic.Sledog said:
Rubber is trying to get a date with her.PurpleThrobber said:Rubberfist said:
Line Wood is batshit crazy and that’s been apparent for a long while. What should always give Republicans pause is there is a correlation between someone’s love of Trump and their likely questionable mental health. Look at Mike Lindell, has anyone here been following him? Absolutely off his rocker, holy shit. Rudy G? WTF happened to that guy? Sydney Powell? Wow. It’s a Carnival of Crazy.FremontTroll said:Remember when you guys were all over Lin Wood’s nuts?
You don't say...
Way to attempt fagging out the thread, RF. -
So you’re not denying you’d fuck her??Rubberfist said:
The conservative political movement ALWAYS needs a group to hate. It used to be black people until that became unpopular. Then it was the gays but as our culture became more accepting gay people came out and it turned out that conservatives had gay children. The people that they labeled as mentally ill were their children and neighbors. Now they have the perfect enemy; the trans community. It’s so small that it impacts almost nobody. You can hate them and the chances that your family member, friend or neighbor will come out as trans is incredibly small. A group of people that make up .1% of the population are the biggest issue in the conservative movement because they NEED a group to hate even though they impact almost nobody.SFGbob said:
Rubber would fuck "her" if "she" asked because he wouldn't want anyone to think he was transphobic.Sledog said:
Rubber is trying to get a date with her.PurpleThrobber said:Rubberfist said:
Line Wood is batshit crazy and that’s been apparent for a long while. What should always give Republicans pause is there is a correlation between someone’s love of Trump and their likely questionable mental health. Look at Mike Lindell, has anyone here been following him? Absolutely off his rocker, holy shit. Rudy G? WTF happened to that guy? Sydney Powell? Wow. It’s a Carnival of Crazy.FremontTroll said:Remember when you guys were all over Lin Wood’s nuts?
You don't say... -
Exactly, I don't give a fuck about the trans community, but they sure are hell bent on restructuring parts of our society like girl's sports and the military so that I'm forced to care about them. You want to pretend you're a girl because you like sucking cock and you have a problem just admitting you're gay. Knock yourself out. But they aren't content with that. They want to force me to pay for their sex change operations. They want me to buy into their psychos and call them "she" and "her" and if I don't they want me fired.WestlinnDuck said:
I could care less about the trans community but they care a great deal about me. Also, I can just feel the love for this country and constitutional republic emanating from the antifa and BLM wing of the dem party. Otherwise known as the dem party.Rubberfist said:
The conservative political movement ALWAYS needs a group to hate. It used to be black people until that became unpopular. Then it was the gays but as our culture became more accepting gay people came out and it turned out that conservatives had gay children. The people that they labeled as mentally ill were their children and neighbors. Now they have the perfect enemy; the trans community. It’s so small that it impacts almost nobody. You can hate them and the chances that your family member, friend or neighbor will come out as trans is incredibly small. A group of people that make up .1% of the population are the biggest issue in the conservative movement because they NEED a group to hate even though they impact almost nobody.SFGbob said:
Rubber would fuck "her" if "she" asked because he wouldn't want anyone to think he was transphobic.Sledog said:
Rubber is trying to get a date with her.PurpleThrobber said:Rubberfist said:
Line Wood is batshit crazy and that’s been apparent for a long while. What should always give Republicans pause is there is a correlation between someone’s love of Trump and their likely questionable mental health. Look at Mike Lindell, has anyone here been following him? Absolutely off his rocker, holy shit. Rudy G? WTF happened to that guy? Sydney Powell? Wow. It’s a Carnival of Crazy.FremontTroll said:Remember when you guys were all over Lin Wood’s nuts?
You don't say...
Btw, can you identify any other medical condition that requires cutting off perfectly healthy body parts in order to "cure" the patient? If someone thinks of themselves as a blind person but they really can see should we gouge that person's eye's out at taxpayers expense and would anyone claim that person was sane? -
Thanks for caring.WestlinnDuck said:
I could care less about the trans community but they care a great deal about me. Also, I can just feel the love for this country and constitutional republic emanating from the antifa and BLM wing of the dem party. Otherwise known as the dem party.Rubberfist said:
The conservative political movement ALWAYS needs a group to hate. It used to be black people until that became unpopular. Then it was the gays but as our culture became more accepting gay people came out and it turned out that conservatives had gay children. The people that they labeled as mentally ill were their children and neighbors. Now they have the perfect enemy; the trans community. It’s so small that it impacts almost nobody. You can hate them and the chances that your family member, friend or neighbor will come out as trans is incredibly small. A group of people that make up .1% of the population are the biggest issue in the conservative movement because they NEED a group to hate even though they impact almost nobody.SFGbob said:
Rubber would fuck "her" if "she" asked because he wouldn't want anyone to think he was transphobic.Sledog said:
Rubber is trying to get a date with her.PurpleThrobber said:Rubberfist said:
Line Wood is batshit crazy and that’s been apparent for a long while. What should always give Republicans pause is there is a correlation between someone’s love of Trump and their likely questionable mental health. Look at Mike Lindell, has anyone here been following him? Absolutely off his rocker, holy shit. Rudy G? WTF happened to that guy? Sydney Powell? Wow. It’s a Carnival of Crazy.FremontTroll said:Remember when you guys were all over Lin Wood’s nuts?
You don't say...
