Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Doing away with our norms and traditions.

SFGbob
SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
Dazzler, where do you stand on doing away with the filibuster? I know you're HUGE on maintaining our historical norms and our institutional integrity, I just wanted to check in here.

Comments

  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Looking for the conseeeeeeeeervative hot take?
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,347 Founders Club

    I'm hearing from the performative virtue signalers that the filibuster is Jim Crow in a suit. Unless the GOP has the majority. Just what I'm hearing, don't spin. Don't be a spinner.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,973
    SFGbob said:

    Dazzler, where do you stand on doing away with the filibuster? I know you're HUGE on maintaining our historical norms and our institutional integrity, I just wanted to check in here.

    It's been altered many times over the years. It doesn't have to be all or nothing.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,631 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    Dazzler, where do you stand on doing away with the filibuster? I know you're HUGE on maintaining our historical norms and our institutional integrity, I just wanted to check in here.

    Always had mixed feelings but decided that the filibuster should have been removed when the republicans had the Senate. But the RINOs didn't and relied on the dems promise that they wouldn't eliminate the filibuster when in the majority because it was so important to have a consensus on major policy changes. So, I'll take them up on that promise.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,111 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Dazzler, where do you stand on doing away with the filibuster? I know you're HUGE on maintaining our historical norms and our institutional integrity, I just wanted to check in here.

    It's been altered many times over the years. It doesn't have to be all or nothing.
    So what "altering" is being proposed?

    99% is dump it. Patient #1 rambles about making people actually talk through it.

    What do you favor? I'm for keeping as is.