Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
WRs can't wait to play in JonDon's offense
Comments
-
Do we know if anyone other than semi-to-fully-autistic Husky fans still remember the Jimmy Run The Damn Ball thing? I'd love to have 10 under-developing 4-star players at every position but I just don't think it's possible in college football in 2021 with how easy transferring is. You have to get a few top guys and get them to perform and the Huskies should have that in Bynum, McMillan, and Odunze with Polk adding nice depth from the portal. Yes, that leaves little depth for injuries or if McMillan and/or Odunze don't keep progressing but that's what it is now.
-
Clemons said in an interview UW stopped talking to him a while ago.dnc said:
Dooging is defending backwards ass coaches just because they're *our?* coaches.
hth
They want guys who are both talented and have the intangibles they’re looking for. They’re not sacrificing talent for the intangibles. They’re getting both.
How are those highly-rated recruiting classes working out for USC and Oregon? Getting their shit pushed in by Iowa and Iowa State, that’s how they’re working out. Clearly, there are A LOT of highly rated West coast recruits who turn out to be soft bitches in college. UW needs to avoid those guys and stick to their process and recruit the guys with the intangibles they’re looking for who also have NFL talent.
It doesn’t matter how talented a guy is, if he’s soft, isn’t obsessed with football, isn’t a hard worker, or is too self-centered, he’s not going to make it here anyways and will just end up transferring out so why waste time recruiting him in the first place? -
-
IPukeOregonGrellow said:
Clemons said in an interview UW stopped talking to him a while ago.
They want guys who are both talented and have the intangibles they’re looking for. They’re not sacrificing talent for the intangibles. They’re getting both.
How are those highly-rated recruiting classes working out for USC and Oregon? Getting their shit pushed in by Iowa and Iowa State, that’s how they’re working out. Clearly, there are A LOT of highly rated West coast recruits who turn out to be soft bitches in college. UW needs to avoid those guys and stick to their process and recruit the guys with the intangibles they’re looking for who also have NFL talent.
It doesn’t matter how talented a guy is, if he’s soft, isn’t obsessed with football, isn’t a hard worker, or is too self-centered, he’s not going to make it here anyways and will just end up transferring out so why waste time recruiting him in the first place?
-
We need to get some elite talent but agree on the intangibles. Get guys that have instincts and like to hit, block, and tackle. A lot of it is really that simple.IPukeOregonGrellow said:
Clemons said in an interview UW stopped talking to him a while ago.
They want guys who are both talented and have the intangibles they’re looking for. They’re not sacrificing talent for the intangibles. They’re getting both.
How are those highly-rated recruiting classes working out for USC and Oregon? Getting their shit pushed in by Iowa and Iowa State, that’s how they’re working out. Clearly, there are A LOT of highly rated West coast recruits who turn out to be soft bitches in college. UW needs to avoid those guys and stick to their process and recruit the guys with the intangibles they’re looking for who also have NFL talent.
It doesn’t matter how talented a guy is, if he’s soft, isn’t obsessed with football, isn’t a hard worker, or is too self-centered, he’s not going to make it here anyways and will just end up transferring out so why waste time recruiting him in the first place? -
Kellen Clemons?
-
I agree with this. But we’re still missing on too many guys who do have the intangibles and that we really wanted.IPukeOregonGrellow said:
Clemons said in an interview UW stopped talking to him a while ago.
They want guys who are both talented and have the intangibles they’re looking for. They’re not sacrificing talent for the intangibles. They’re getting both.
How are those highly-rated recruiting classes working out for USC and Oregon? Getting their shit pushed in by Iowa and Iowa State, that’s how they’re working out. Clearly, there are A LOT of highly rated West coast recruits who turn out to be soft bitches in college. UW needs to avoid those guys and stick to their process and recruit the guys with the intangibles they’re looking for who also have NFL talent.
It doesn’t matter how talented a guy is, if he’s soft, isn’t obsessed with football, isn’t a hard worker, or is too self-centered, he’s not going to make it here anyways and will just end up transferring out so why waste time recruiting him in the first place? -
Well, that was fun.
-
Ballz copy pasta?IPukeOregonGrellow said:
Clemons said in an interview UW stopped talking to him a while ago.
They want guys who are both talented and have the intangibles they’re looking for. They’re not sacrificing talent for the intangibles. They’re getting both.
How are those highly-rated recruiting classes working out for USC and Oregon? Getting their shit pushed in by Iowa and Iowa State, that’s how they’re working out. Clearly, there are A LOT of highly rated West coast recruits who turn out to be soft bitches in college. UW needs to avoid those guys and stick to their process and recruit the guys with the intangibles they’re looking for who also have NFL talent.
It doesn’t matter how talented a guy is, if he’s soft, isn’t obsessed with football, isn’t a hard worker, or is too self-centered, he’s not going to make it here anyways and will just end up transferring out so why waste time recruiting him in the first place? -
I already asked him that. I assumed his chin was confirmation.dnc said:
Ballz copy pasta? -
Stop living in the past. The days of defense winning the natty are over. It is all about scoringRaceBannon said:
I've always preferred running the damn ball
One hat and the TSIO crowd is freaking out months later
The last Husky team to win the damn Rose Bowl ran the wishbone -
Is that in Hawaii?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Auburn fan -
I didn't mention defenseFireCohen said:
Stop living in the past. The days of defense winning the natty are over. It is all about scoring
Good luck the rest of the way -
It’s a bingo, pretty damn close to the whole card: WDWHA, intangibles x3, soft x2, anyone not going to Washington overrated, doesn’t care about football enough (Clemons went to Utah in order to play football in the fall but that was probably to get overrated), ego questions, an implication that there is some secret process that only whoever the UW head coach is and him are privy to, etc.dnc said:
Ballz copy pasta?
Fairly disappointing. No outlandish prediction that will be proven wrong within the year. Only medium and indirect levels of sycophancy for Jimmy Lake. A mildly defeated attitude. No hyperbole. This is obviously Ballz, but it reads like it could have been written by any of the run-of-the-mill doogmen. I’m sure he’s got plenty left in the tank but I think Jimmy needs to start getting some results - the justification well is bottomless, but the pressure is falling.
