So it's back to the Kangaroo Court, no due process system of dealing with campus sex issues.
In an executive order, Biden directed the Education Department to examine rules that the Trump administration issued around Title IX, the federal law that forbids sex discrimination in education. Biden directed the agency to “consider suspending, revising or rescinding” any policies that fail to protect students.
Trump established some measure of due process in these matters allowing people to confront their accusers and examine the evidence and be represented by a lawyer if the you choose to be. But we can't have that. Btw, got to love the AP's claim that it was the Trump Admin's policy that was "contentious" and not the system that Obama set up and that Biden is now re-imposing. A system that doesn't allow the accused to present evidence in their defense, a system that doesn't allow the accused to have legal representation, a system that doesn't even allow for the accused to cross exam their accuser, nothing "contentious" about that system.
Tell me again who the authoritarian and fascist was in this scenario.
Comments
-
"contentious Trump policy"
-
Yeah I loved that as well. Railroading young men and kicking them out college without ever been able to even question their accuser, nothing contentious about that.RaceBannon said:"contentious Trump policy"
-
Yeah, women are incredibly strong and never lie. Anita Hill and Blasey Ford are prime examples.SFGbob said:
Yeah I loved that as well. Railroading young men and kicking them out college without ever been able to even question their accuser, nothing contentious about that.RaceBannon said:"contentious Trump policy"
-
Mattress girl, the woman at Smith College, Althea Bernstein, the woman who claimed Kavanaugh was part gang rape crew, hell that woman who accused the Oregon Basketball players of rape. Women never lie.WestlinnDuck said:
Yeah, women are incredibly strong and never lie. Anita Hill and Blasey Ford are prime examples.SFGbob said:
Yeah I loved that as well. Railroading young men and kicking them out college without ever been able to even question their accuser, nothing contentious about that.RaceBannon said:"contentious Trump policy"
-
@DukeLacrosseDawg, true??
Buddy of mine sits on the national board of a fraternity. It's pretty much common knowledge that any party with sororitutes runs the risk of a rape charge.
The bros are trained on never to be in a room with a drunk chick by themselves (like WTF?!?!- isn't that what college is for?). Inevitably, the walk of shame turns into a walk of blame when the sorority comes back the next day with accusations either in person or on social media.
-
Many cases are really bad. Woman texts her "rapist" during the next week. Only after weeks of being badgered by "feminists" she finally files a police report. Not being able to defend yourself isn't exactly an American idea. Phucking commie show trial.PurpleThrobber said:@DukeLacrosseDawg, true??
Buddy of mine sits on the national board of a fraternity. It's pretty much common knowledge that any party with sororitutes runs the risk of a rape charge.
The bros are trained on never to be in a room with a drunk chick by themselves (like WTF?!?!- isn't that what college is for?). Inevitably, the walk of shame turns into a walk of blame when the sorority comes back the next day with accusations either in person or on social media. -
Are Commie show trials "contentious?"WestlinnDuck said:
Many cases are really bad. Woman texts her "rapist" during the next week. Only after weeks of being badgered by "feminists" she finally files a police report. Not being able to defend yourself isn't exactly an American idea. Phucking commie show trial.PurpleThrobber said:@DukeLacrosseDawg, true??
Buddy of mine sits on the national board of a fraternity. It's pretty much common knowledge that any party with sororitutes runs the risk of a rape charge.
The bros are trained on never to be in a room with a drunk chick by themselves (like WTF?!?!- isn't that what college is for?). Inevitably, the walk of shame turns into a walk of blame when the sorority comes back the next day with accusations either in person or on social media. -
Did he appoint mattress girl to his admin?
-
Trump's folks respected and implemented a constitutionally valid process. Biden revokes it and wipes his ass with the constitution.
Where's the surprise in this scenario? Dems hate the constitution and always have, because Dems don't believe in individual rights.
Because Dems are stupid and never dream this shit will happen to them. Hi, Governor Cuomo! -
And they are willing to trash innocent people's rights in pursuit of their ideology. In their minds women are victimized by men therefore we're going to stack the deck in favor of women shitting all over the due process rights of these men.TurdBomber said:Trump's folks respected and implemented a constitutionally valid process. Biden revokes it and wipes his ass with the constitution.
Where's the surprise in this scenario? Dems hate the constitution and always have, because Dems don't believe in individual rights.
Because Dems are stupid and never dream this shit will happen to them. Hi, Governor Cuomo! -
The most disgusting, yet revealing thing about all that "believe women" bullshit, was that it happened under Obama, a supposed "Constitutional Scholar" and former Constitutional Law Professor at Harvard. Any law professor that doesn't believe in the Bill of Rights is a fucking traitor, as far as I'm concerned. Or just a lazy and stupid phony. Take your pick. Barry checks both boxes.
-
Actually, he was a pretend law scholar/professor at the University of Chicago. My law school professor was the head of the Oregon ACLU and she knew sh*t about the written Constitution. "Felt" that the death penalty was unconstitutional even though it's mentioned at least twice in the US Constitution (5th and 14th Amendment) and at least by inference in the Treason clause. barry, like most Constitutional "professors" feel that the written Constitution is archaic and should organically change to reflect the current modern world. The written language is for suckers who clearly are QANON supporters.TurdBomber said:The most disgusting, yet revealing thing about all that "believe women" bullshit, was that it happened under Obama, a supposed "Constitutional Scholar" and former Constitutional Law Professor at Harvard. Any law professor that doesn't believe in the Bill of Rights is a fucking traitor, as far as I'm concerned. Or just a lazy and stupid phony. Take your pick. Barry checks both boxes.
-
Oh right, right, right. First Black Prez of Harvard Law Review. Wrong fake honor.WestlinnDuck said:
Actually, he was a pretend law scholar/professor at the University of Chicago. My law school professor was the head of the Oregon ACLU and she knew sh*t about the written Constitution. "Felt" that the death penalty was unconstitutional even though it's mentioned at least twice in the US Constitution (5th and 14th Amendment) and at least by inference in the Treason clause. barry, like most Constitutional "professors" feel that the written Constitution is archaic and should organically change to reflect the current modern world. The written language is for suckers who clearly are QANON supporters.TurdBomber said:The most disgusting, yet revealing thing about all that "believe women" bullshit, was that it happened under Obama, a supposed "Constitutional Scholar" and former Constitutional Law Professor at Harvard. Any law professor that doesn't believe in the Bill of Rights is a fucking traitor, as far as I'm concerned. Or just a lazy and stupid phony. Take your pick. Barry checks both boxes.
I don't understand what law school would hire a professor who doesn't understand and/or shits all over the Bill of Rights, especially that pesky 6th Amendment Right to confront your accusers. Terribly inconvenient for the all knowing, all powerful state. -
I'm not sure why there is so much outrage to have the Department of Education examine rules?
-
Why even bother with such an empty lightweight poast? Srsly.HustlinOwl said:I'm not sure why there is so much outrage to have the Department of Education examine rules?
-
Leftards lie and love to be lied to. There is the truth and then there are lies. Leftards treat the truth like slugs treat salt. Why would the MSM adopt the Russian collusion hoax? They just want political power and don't care how they get it.TurdBomber said:
Oh right, right, right. First Black Prez of Harvard Law Review. Wrong fake honor.WestlinnDuck said:
Actually, he was a pretend law scholar/professor at the University of Chicago. My law school professor was the head of the Oregon ACLU and she knew sh*t about the written Constitution. "Felt" that the death penalty was unconstitutional even though it's mentioned at least twice in the US Constitution (5th and 14th Amendment) and at least by inference in the Treason clause. barry, like most Constitutional "professors" feel that the written Constitution is archaic and should organically change to reflect the current modern world. The written language is for suckers who clearly are QANON supporters.TurdBomber said:The most disgusting, yet revealing thing about all that "believe women" bullshit, was that it happened under Obama, a supposed "Constitutional Scholar" and former Constitutional Law Professor at Harvard. Any law professor that doesn't believe in the Bill of Rights is a fucking traitor, as far as I'm concerned. Or just a lazy and stupid phony. Take your pick. Barry checks both boxes.
I don't understand what law school would hire a professor who doesn't understand and/or shits all over the Bill of Rights, especially that pesky 6th Amendment Right to confront your accusers. Terribly inconvenient for the all knowing, all powerful state.
