Rand Paul Confronts Biden's Transgender Health Nominee About "Genital Mutilation"
Comments
-
Hmm, sounds like a substantial and irreversible impact, on younger kids.TheKobeStopper said:
Would you agree to them being used on younger kids if more studies come back showing it’s safe?Goduckies said:I have no issue with Trans people I've seen some Trans women that are 10's here in SF if you didn't see the Adam's apple or voice, you wouldn't know. However with that, I do not believe they should be in women's sports as it is an unfair advantage and under 16, I'd say no hormones after 16 hormones with parental concent only.
Also, fun fact, if you use the puberty blockers before you go through puberty and then transition to a woman, you eliminate a lot of the advantages males have in sports. -
Oh yeahTheKobeStopper said:
Hormone blockers don’t mutilate people.RaceBannon said:Of course the left wants to help kids by letting them mutilate themselves. And then trafficking them
Nobel Prize time
Kids and teenagers are stupid. If an adult wants to mutilate themselves have at it. Just don't expect normal people to start dancing in the streets about it and pretending its anything more than mental illness
Once upon a time, normal people didn’t marry outside of their race. Normal people didn’t marry outside of their religion. Normal people didn’t marry their own sex. It’s called progress.
One day, normal people will go on hormone blockers. Normal people will have gender affirming surgery. And people like you will just move on to the next minority group to complain about.
blocking hormones and getting genitals removed is the same as marrying outside your race
lol -
You're weighing emotional harm and hurt feelings against permanent, irreversible disfigurement, and you're choosing the latter as the best course of action.TheKobeStopper said:
The way it gets portrayed by the people who disagree with it, is not at all what I’ve seen when I’ve looked into it. From the kids and adults that are trans to the doctors and therapists to the parents. Nothing is safe but we weigh the benefits versus the harm and I don’t think this one is particularly close.Tequilla said:
Ok ... I get that you’re saying that others support it. But my question was more tied to what safe means to you ...TheKobeStopper said:
I meant the question as if the requirements for whatever you define as safe can be met. I gave this leeway because @Goduckies seemed reasonable in their post.Tequilla said:
Define safe pleaseTheKobeStopper said:
Would you agree to them being used on younger kids if more studies come back showing it’s safe?Goduckies said:I have no issue with Trans people I've seen some Trans women that are 10's here in SF if you didn't see the Adam's apple or voice, you wouldn't know. However with that, I do not believe they should be in women's sports as it is an unfair advantage and under 16, I'd say no hormones after 16 hormones with parental concent only.
Also, fun fact, if you use the puberty blockers before you go through puberty and then transition to a woman, you eliminate a lot of the advantages males have in sports.
I would already view it as safe. Doctors support it, medical journals support it, mental health professionals support it. The same “lack of long term studies” crap that anti vaxxers tried using isn’t enough to sway me away from scientific consensus.
I’d agree that there’s a time and place where you lean on others that know more on a subject. There’s also a time and place to think critically and ask enough questions to make sure that the answers pass the sniff test.
The child part of this gives me pause ... adults I’m pretty much in the you do you camp. Only thing that I’m not sure of the answer to is from an insurance standpoint where everything falls on the coverage scale vs it being treated more like an elective procedure like most plastic surgery.
You are fucked in the head. -
Ten seconds of watching and listening to Biden's freak nominee is all that's required to reject such an obviously mental illness-driven pursuit of living as the opposite sex.
That transperson can't answer the simplest questions, and keeps suggesting "I'll come to your office and answer your questions" - Fuck That.
The fucker won't go on the record publicly, because it's answers are total bullshit and it doesn't want them challenged. It wants everything it believes in snuck into policy through back channels.
Fuck that Freak. The "do not confirm" vote should be a resounding "no" for this lying coward who refuses to answer questions. -
So you're saying having no clue what the bill of rights says is troubling? I'd agree! Excuse to gut it, that's what he's really saying.Tequilla said:
Why answer any questions when you’ll just be confirmed anyway?TurdBomber said:
Merrick Garland has removed any doubt that he is completely unqualified to sit on the Supreme Court.RaceBannon said:
Merrick Garland didn't have an opinion if crossing the border illegally was illegalTurdBomber said:Total and complete mockery of the confirmation process by the robotic nominee who spewed nothing but prepared talking points that provided absolutely no responses to any questions.
And I'm sure all the Democratic sheep will vote for this TransClown, without hesitation.
Because Joe Biden's America is Queer as Fuck.
So happy we got rid of that mean orange man.
Pathetic
I'm glad that spineless jellyfish has finally gone through a confirmation process, so the world can see how unprincipled he is.
But you’re right that his ability to answer some softball questions is alarming -
He will pass with flying colors and be paraded around as a heroTurdBomber said:Ten seconds of watching and listening to Biden's freak nominee is all that's required to reject such an obviously mental illness-driven pursuit of living as the opposite sex.
That transperson can't answer the simplest questions, and keeps suggesting "I'll come to your office and answer your questions" - Fuck That.
The fucker won't go on the record publicly, because it's answers are total bullshit and it doesn't want them challenged. It wants everything it believes in snuck into policy through back channels.
Fuck that Freak. The "do not confirm" vote should be a resounding "no" for this lying coward who refuses to answer questions. -
He? Trans Women Are Women!!!Pitchfork51 said:
He will pass with flying colors and be paraded around as a heroTurdBomber said:Ten seconds of watching and listening to Biden's freak nominee is all that's required to reject such an obviously mental illness-driven pursuit of living as the opposite sex.
That transperson can't answer the simplest questions, and keeps suggesting "I'll come to your office and answer your questions" - Fuck That.
The fucker won't go on the record publicly, because it's answers are total bullshit and it doesn't want them challenged. It wants everything it believes in snuck into policy through back channels.
Fuck that Freak. The "do not confirm" vote should be a resounding "no" for this lying coward who refuses to answer questions.
Except they aren't. And any 3 year old knows they're pretending. -
Are you fucking with me?GrundleStiltzkin said:
Hmm, sounds like a substantial and irreversible impact, on younger kids.TheKobeStopper said:
Would you agree to them being used on younger kids if more studies come back showing it’s safe?Goduckies said:I have no issue with Trans people I've seen some Trans women that are 10's here in SF if you didn't see the Adam's apple or voice, you wouldn't know. However with that, I do not believe they should be in women's sports as it is an unfair advantage and under 16, I'd say no hormones after 16 hormones with parental concent only.
Also, fun fact, if you use the puberty blockers before you go through puberty and then transition to a woman, you eliminate a lot of the advantages males have in sports. -
Just restating you're statement.TheKobeStopper said:
Are you fucking with me?GrundleStiltzkin said:
Hmm, sounds like a substantial and irreversible impact, on younger kids.TheKobeStopper said:
Would you agree to them being used on younger kids if more studies come back showing it’s safe?Goduckies said:I have no issue with Trans people I've seen some Trans women that are 10's here in SF if you didn't see the Adam's apple or voice, you wouldn't know. However with that, I do not believe they should be in women's sports as it is an unfair advantage and under 16, I'd say no hormones after 16 hormones with parental concent only.
Also, fun fact, if you use the puberty blockers before you go through puberty and then transition to a woman, you eliminate a lot of the advantages males have in sports.Also, fun fact, if you use the puberty blockers before you go through puberty and then transition to a woman, you eliminate a lot of the advantages males have in sports. -
Of all the things to dog your heels in on, TKS...
