US bombs and destroys camp in Syria with airstrike

John Kerry weeps?
Get ready for the next endless war. They need Assad out soon for the EU fossil fuel pipeline.
Comments
-
Well I agree with the reasons
-
President Biden approved the attack.
lol -
So are you pro-US soldiers getting hit with rockets?NorthwestFresh said:Reports of Iranian-backed terrorists killed.
John Kerry weeps?
Get ready for the next endless war. They need Assad out soon for the EU fossil fuel pipeline. -
And the Kurds?
-
I’m anti-war unless the USA is attacked and invaded and have been that way my entire life.Duckwithabone said:
So are you pro-US soldiers getting hit with rockets?NorthwestFresh said:Reports of Iranian-backed terrorists killed.
John Kerry weeps?
Get ready for the next endless war. They need Assad out soon for the EU fossil fuel pipeline.
So you’re pro-war, Rambo? When are you enlisting? Why did Biden start supporting Iran again only to bomb their proxies? Who the fuck is in charge of the military?
These may actually be Kurds that were bombed.PurpleThrobber said:And the Kurds?
-
Nope, but I'm not to hip on going back to a treaty and giving money to a country that we are also bombing. Seems a bit hypocritical, but that is the definition of Democrats at this point.Duckwithabone said:
So are you pro-US soldiers getting hit with rockets?NorthwestFresh said:Reports of Iranian-backed terrorists killed.
John Kerry weeps?
Get ready for the next endless war. They need Assad out soon for the EU fossil fuel pipeline. -
Well that’s a relief. I actually couldn’t agree more. It’s not that simple though, particularly when you’re talking about a country we’ve had troops in for 20 years and those troops lives are in danger. I hope you disagreed with the troops ever being sent to Iraq as well, but they’re there now and we owe it to them to protect them as well as all of our troops around the world. Maybe none of them should be there, and that’s a different debate. But protecting them once they are there should be obvious no matter who is president.NorthwestFresh said:
I’m anti-war unless the USA is attacked and invaded and have been that way my entire life.Duckwithabone said:
So are you pro-US soldiers getting hit with rockets?NorthwestFresh said:Reports of Iranian-backed terrorists killed.
John Kerry weeps?
Get ready for the next endless war. They need Assad out soon for the EU fossil fuel pipeline.
So you’re pro-war, Rambo? When are you enlisting?
These may actually be Kurds that were bombed.PurpleThrobber said:And the Kurds?
-
Strap on those combat boots, Biden Chickenhawk voters! Boner, you’re young enough to enlist, Chickenhawk.
https://youtu.be/WTVC3ioH99c
-
Biden is a draft dodger
I remember when that mattered. About a month ago -
-
What part of my anti-war stance didn’t you understand? The part where you had to read English? Fortunately I am not near young enough not have a desire to fight. But your assumptions are easy to shoot down. And you still apparently don’t approve of protecting our troops smhNorthwestFresh said:Strap on those combat boots, Biden Chickenhawk voters! Boner, you’re young enough to enlist, Chickenhawk.
https://youtu.be/WTVC3ioH99c
-
The mean orange man was withdrawing troops from a place where we've had troops for 20 years.Duckwithabone said:
Well that’s a relief. I actually couldn’t agree more. It’s not that simple though, particularly when you’re talking about a country we’ve had troops in for 20 years and those troops lives are in danger. I hope you disagreed with the troops ever being sent to Iraq as well, but they’re there now and we owe it to them to protect them as well as all of our troops around the world. Maybe none of them should be there, and that’s a different debate. But protecting them once they are there should be obvious no matter who is president.NorthwestFresh said:
I’m anti-war unless the USA is attacked and invaded and have been that way my entire life.Duckwithabone said:
So are you pro-US soldiers getting hit with rockets?NorthwestFresh said:Reports of Iranian-backed terrorists killed.
John Kerry weeps?
Get ready for the next endless war. They need Assad out soon for the EU fossil fuel pipeline.
So you’re pro-war, Rambo? When are you enlisting?
These may actually be Kurds that were bombed.PurpleThrobber said:And the Kurds?
No troops there, no lives in danger. It's pretty fucking simple. Instead Quid Pro Quo Joe listens to his 'experts' and stops that in its tracks.
And how deep do you swallow to believe that US troops were actually attacked? With those infamous 'weapons of mass destruction'? Or is that the tale the chickenhawks are selling again? That US lives are in danger. Really?
-
-
Enlist, you fucking pussy. Chickenhawk heard from.Duckwithabone said:
Well that’s a relief. I actually couldn’t agree more. It’s not that simple though, particularly when you’re talking about a country we’ve had troops in for 20 years and those troops lives are in danger. I hope you disagreed with the troops ever being sent to Iraq as well, but they’re there now and we owe it to them to protect them as well as all of our troops around the world. Maybe none of them should be there, and that’s a different debate. But protecting them once they are there should be obvious no matter who is president.NorthwestFresh said:
I’m anti-war unless the USA is attacked and invaded and have been that way my entire life.Duckwithabone said:
So are you pro-US soldiers getting hit with rockets?NorthwestFresh said:Reports of Iranian-backed terrorists killed.
John Kerry weeps?
Get ready for the next endless war. They need Assad out soon for the EU fossil fuel pipeline.
So you’re pro-war, Rambo? When are you enlisting?
These may actually be Kurds that were bombed.PurpleThrobber said:And the Kurds?
-
I guess this means you ran out of your point. Or did you even have one.NorthwestFresh said:
Enlist, you fucking pussy. Chickenhawk heard from.Duckwithabone said:
Well that’s a relief. I actually couldn’t agree more. It’s not that simple though, particularly when you’re talking about a country we’ve had troops in for 20 years and those troops lives are in danger. I hope you disagreed with the troops ever being sent to Iraq as well, but they’re there now and we owe it to them to protect them as well as all of our troops around the world. Maybe none of them should be there, and that’s a different debate. But protecting them once they are there should be obvious no matter who is president.NorthwestFresh said:
I’m anti-war unless the USA is attacked and invaded and have been that way my entire life.Duckwithabone said:
So are you pro-US soldiers getting hit with rockets?NorthwestFresh said:Reports of Iranian-backed terrorists killed.
John Kerry weeps?
Get ready for the next endless war. They need Assad out soon for the EU fossil fuel pipeline.
So you’re pro-war, Rambo? When are you enlisting?
These may actually be Kurds that were bombed.PurpleThrobber said:And the Kurds?
-
I said that we? would be escalating conflict with Syria by summer. I totally underestimated the blood thirst of Biden, his Bush Chickenhawk Warmongers, and Chickenhawk Biden voters such as @Duckwithabone wanting new war immmediately.
Wag that dog...
New war is a brilliant political strategy. The Left will now defend it, as we see with Bonehead, and inject some military extra spending into the economy to satisfy Liz Halliburton and the rest of the military-congressional Chickenhawks. -
Warships heading to the Persian Gulf again?
Liz Halliburton and Joe Raytheon aren’t wasting any tim.
No wonder DC looks like Pyongyang. -
World War 3. Mark my words.
-
Weakness invites warGrundleStiltzkin said:World War 3. Mark my words.
We chose weakness because we have become a soft fucking loser country
GO DAWGS -
My point since Biden was put in power was that Syria would be the next target for Chickenhawks and Warmongers. Posted it more than once.Duckwithabone said:
I guess this means you ran out of your point. Or did you even have one.NorthwestFresh said:
Enlist, you fucking pussy. Chickenhawk heard from.Duckwithabone said:
Well that’s a relief. I actually couldn’t agree more. It’s not that simple though, particularly when you’re talking about a country we’ve had troops in for 20 years and those troops lives are in danger. I hope you disagreed with the troops ever being sent to Iraq as well, but they’re there now and we owe it to them to protect them as well as all of our troops around the world. Maybe none of them should be there, and that’s a different debate. But protecting them once they are there should be obvious no matter who is president.NorthwestFresh said:
I’m anti-war unless the USA is attacked and invaded and have been that way my entire life.Duckwithabone said:
So are you pro-US soldiers getting hit with rockets?NorthwestFresh said:Reports of Iranian-backed terrorists killed.
John Kerry weeps?
Get ready for the next endless war. They need Assad out soon for the EU fossil fuel pipeline.
So you’re pro-war, Rambo? When are you enlisting?
These may actually be Kurds that were bombed.PurpleThrobber said:And the Kurds?
I was correct.
Fuck off, Rambo. -
I don’t like being correct on my prediction in this case.
-
I assume it’s true because the source is anonymous.
-
So both Biden and Harris are out of the loopNorthwestFresh said:I assume it’s true because the source is anonymous.
Interesting -
Here we go!!!
-
World War III?Bob_C said:Here we go!!!
-
So you were against Iraq? I’m gonna highly doubt that. You are def one of the more “politics as a team sport” guys in this bored.NorthwestFresh said:
I’m anti-war unless the USA is attacked and invaded and have been that way my entire life.Duckwithabone said:
So are you pro-US soldiers getting hit with rockets?NorthwestFresh said:Reports of Iranian-backed terrorists killed.
John Kerry weeps?
Get ready for the next endless war. They need Assad out soon for the EU fossil fuel pipeline.
So you’re pro-war, Rambo? When are you enlisting? Why did Biden start supporting Iran again only to bomb their proxies? Who the fuck is in charge of the military?
These may actually be Kurds that were bombed.PurpleThrobber said:And the Kurds?
-
I don’t like being correct on this but I literally did call this numerous tims on this board.
Biden’s military handlers need war, as do his donors. This literal air strike by US aircraft that weren’t drones makes Syria a hot zone now. -