Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

US bombs and destroys camp in Syria with airstrike

245678

Comments

  • Duckwithabone
    Duckwithabone Member Posts: 272

    Strap on those combat boots, Biden Chickenhawk voters! Boner, you’re young enough to enlist, Chickenhawk.

    https://youtu.be/WTVC3ioH99c

    What part of my anti-war stance didn’t you understand? The part where you had to read English? Fortunately I am not near young enough not have a desire to fight. But your assumptions are easy to shoot down. And you still apparently don’t approve of protecting our troops smh
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,809 Standard Supporter
    edited February 2021

    Reports of Iranian-backed terrorists killed.

    John Kerry weeps?

    Get ready for the next endless war. They need Assad out soon for the EU fossil fuel pipeline.

    So are you pro-US soldiers getting hit with rockets?
    I’m anti-war unless the USA is attacked and invaded and have been that way my entire life.

    So you’re pro-war, Rambo? When are you enlisting?

    And the Kurds?

    These may actually be Kurds that were bombed.
    Well that’s a relief. I actually couldn’t agree more. It’s not that simple though, particularly when you’re talking about a country we’ve had troops in for 20 years and those troops lives are in danger. I hope you disagreed with the troops ever being sent to Iraq as well, but they’re there now and we owe it to them to protect them as well as all of our troops around the world. Maybe none of them should be there, and that’s a different debate. But protecting them once they are there should be obvious no matter who is president.
    The mean orange man was withdrawing troops from a place where we've had troops for 20 years.

    No troops there, no lives in danger. It's pretty fucking simple. Instead Quid Pro Quo Joe listens to his 'experts' and stops that in its tracks.

    And how deep do you swallow to believe that US troops were actually attacked? With those infamous 'weapons of mass destruction'? Or is that the tale the chickenhawks are selling again? That US lives are in danger. Really?





  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972

    Reports of Iranian-backed terrorists killed.

    John Kerry weeps?

    Get ready for the next endless war. They need Assad out soon for the EU fossil fuel pipeline.

    So are you pro-US soldiers getting hit with rockets?
    I’m anti-war unless the USA is attacked and invaded and have been that way my entire life.

    So you’re pro-war, Rambo? When are you enlisting?

    And the Kurds?

    These may actually be Kurds that were bombed.
    Well that’s a relief. I actually couldn’t agree more. It’s not that simple though, particularly when you’re talking about a country we’ve had troops in for 20 years and those troops lives are in danger. I hope you disagreed with the troops ever being sent to Iraq as well, but they’re there now and we owe it to them to protect them as well as all of our troops around the world. Maybe none of them should be there, and that’s a different debate. But protecting them once they are there should be obvious no matter who is president.
    Enlist, you fucking pussy. Chickenhawk heard from.
  • Duckwithabone
    Duckwithabone Member Posts: 272

    Reports of Iranian-backed terrorists killed.

    John Kerry weeps?

    Get ready for the next endless war. They need Assad out soon for the EU fossil fuel pipeline.

    So are you pro-US soldiers getting hit with rockets?
    I’m anti-war unless the USA is attacked and invaded and have been that way my entire life.

    So you’re pro-war, Rambo? When are you enlisting?

    And the Kurds?

    These may actually be Kurds that were bombed.
    Well that’s a relief. I actually couldn’t agree more. It’s not that simple though, particularly when you’re talking about a country we’ve had troops in for 20 years and those troops lives are in danger. I hope you disagreed with the troops ever being sent to Iraq as well, but they’re there now and we owe it to them to protect them as well as all of our troops around the world. Maybe none of them should be there, and that’s a different debate. But protecting them once they are there should be obvious no matter who is president.
    Enlist, you fucking pussy. Chickenhawk heard from.
    I guess this means you ran out of your point. Or did you even have one.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited February 2021
    I said that we? would be escalating conflict with Syria by summer. I totally underestimated the blood thirst of Biden, his Bush Chickenhawk Warmongers, and Chickenhawk Biden voters such as @Duckwithabone wanting new war immmediately.

    Wag that dog...

    New war is a brilliant political strategy. The Left will now defend it, as we see with Bonehead, and inject some military extra spending into the economy to satisfy Liz Halliburton and the rest of the military-congressional Chickenhawks.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    Warships heading to the Persian Gulf again?

    Liz Halliburton and Joe Raytheon aren’t wasting any tim.

    No wonder DC looks like Pyongyang.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    World War 3. Mark my words.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,050 Founders Club

    World War 3. Mark my words.

    Weakness invites war

    We chose weakness because we have become a soft fucking loser country

    GO DAWGS
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972

    Reports of Iranian-backed terrorists killed.

    John Kerry weeps?

    Get ready for the next endless war. They need Assad out soon for the EU fossil fuel pipeline.

    So are you pro-US soldiers getting hit with rockets?
    I’m anti-war unless the USA is attacked and invaded and have been that way my entire life.

    So you’re pro-war, Rambo? When are you enlisting?

    And the Kurds?

    These may actually be Kurds that were bombed.
    Well that’s a relief. I actually couldn’t agree more. It’s not that simple though, particularly when you’re talking about a country we’ve had troops in for 20 years and those troops lives are in danger. I hope you disagreed with the troops ever being sent to Iraq as well, but they’re there now and we owe it to them to protect them as well as all of our troops around the world. Maybe none of them should be there, and that’s a different debate. But protecting them once they are there should be obvious no matter who is president.
    Enlist, you fucking pussy. Chickenhawk heard from.
    I guess this means you ran out of your point. Or did you even have one.
    My point since Biden was put in power was that Syria would be the next target for Chickenhawks and Warmongers. Posted it more than once.

    I was correct.

    Fuck off, Rambo.