Tulsi Gabbard: Lawmakers are undermining the foundation our country was built on
Comments
-
Though risking blindess, quoting myself for the @ComeLately bros refusal to go against the party line.PurpleThrobber said:
The ComeLatelyBros can't bring themselves to go against the central party line.pawz said:SR, YK.
It's sad the coronabros are too misogynist and racist to support a strong woman of color like Tulsi.
@TheKobeStopper @HHusky @insinceredawg @AOG @BennyBeaver @animate @BearsWiin
-
Pretty much. Trump never called for invading the Capitol building or for violence. Unlike most major dem politicians which encouraged the BLM/Antifa violence which raged for months.HHusky said:
You on the false flag bandwagon too, Gasbag?WestlinnDuck said:
Without fail, this is how a leftard argues, from the KobeSlobberer, the Dazzler, or George Stephanopoulos -hardhat said:
I work with plenty of lefties, so I'm used to them trying to use the 'false equivalency' argument to cover up hypocrisy. Nice try. And as for only one major party being taken over by its fringe, ha ha, that's funny.HHusky said:
Not a very apt equivalency argument, but we can agree the fringes are threats to our system. Only one of our two major parties has been taken over by its fringe and enabled an assault on the Capitol.hardhat said:
The left was pretty nice to people doing just that for the past ten months. Biden said it was just an idea. Maybe you should sit this one out.HHusky said:Why can't they be nicer about people who murder cops and damage property while trying to violently overturn Democratic elections?
1. Play the racist/bigot card.
2. Make a weak lame ass moral equivalency argument.
3. Phuck some strawman ass
4. Ignore a request for information.
5. Lie.
-
Another whiteboard hoax narrative being spun daily.WestlinnDuck said:
Pretty much. Trump never called for invading the Capitol building or for violence. Unlike most major dem politicians which encouraged the BLM/Antifa violence which raged for months.HHusky said:
You on the false flag bandwagon too, Gasbag?WestlinnDuck said:
Without fail, this is how a leftard argues, from the KobeSlobberer, the Dazzler, or George Stephanopoulos -hardhat said:
I work with plenty of lefties, so I'm used to them trying to use the 'false equivalency' argument to cover up hypocrisy. Nice try. And as for only one major party being taken over by its fringe, ha ha, that's funny.HHusky said:
Not a very apt equivalency argument, but we can agree the fringes are threats to our system. Only one of our two major parties has been taken over by its fringe and enabled an assault on the Capitol.hardhat said:
The left was pretty nice to people doing just that for the past ten months. Biden said it was just an idea. Maybe you should sit this one out.HHusky said:Why can't they be nicer about people who murder cops and damage property while trying to violently overturn Democratic elections?
1. Play the racist/bigot card.
2. Make a weak lame ass moral equivalency argument.
3. Phuck some strawman ass
4. Ignore a request for information.
5. Lie.
Pound it pound it pound it until that's all the MSM reports.
See also 'baseless claims'. See also 'many fine people'. See also "Russia Russia Russia".
-
How else would you describe this? Go back to the dumbfuck Wallace and the first debate. He had the Proud Boys all teed up. Over 81% of Americans have no idea these guys existied but the FBI and the Democrats did. Even the dementia patient almost remembered his line about the Proud Boys. AlmostRaceBannon said: -
Republicans are constantly fighting like a boxer with his hands tied behind his back. It’s like a boxer, and we want to be so nice. We want to be so respectful of everybody, including bad people. We’re going to have to fight much harder and Mike Pence is going to have to come through for us. If he doesn’t, that will be a sad day for our country because you’re sworn to uphold our constitution. Now it is up to Congress to confront this egregious assault on our democracy. After this, we’re going to walk down and I’ll be there with you. We’re going to walk down. We’re going to walk down any one you want, but I think right here. We’re going walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators, and congressmen and women. We’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong.WestlinnDuck said:
Pretty much. Trump never called for invading the Capitol building or for violence. Unlike most major dem politicians which encouraged the BLM/Antifa violence which raged for months.HHusky said:
You on the false flag bandwagon too, Gasbag?WestlinnDuck said:
Without fail, this is how a leftard argues, from the KobeSlobberer, the Dazzler, or George Stephanopoulos -hardhat said:
I work with plenty of lefties, so I'm used to them trying to use the 'false equivalency' argument to cover up hypocrisy. Nice try. And as for only one major party being taken over by its fringe, ha ha, that's funny.HHusky said:
Not a very apt equivalency argument, but we can agree the fringes are threats to our system. Only one of our two major parties has been taken over by its fringe and enabled an assault on the Capitol.hardhat said:
The left was pretty nice to people doing just that for the past ten months. Biden said it was just an idea. Maybe you should sit this one out.HHusky said:Why can't they be nicer about people who murder cops and damage property while trying to violently overturn Democratic elections?
1. Play the racist/bigot card.
2. Make a weak lame ass moral equivalency argument.
3. Phuck some strawman ass
4. Ignore a request for information.
5. Lie.
Is this sufficient to sustain a criminal conviction? Maybe not. Not by itself. ("Trial by combat!" was urged on the same stage.)
But it is more than enough to support a conviction by the Senate. Don't worry, most of the GOP Senators, while condemning this statement, will say that it's unconstitutional to have an impeachment after an official leaves office--though it's happened before. Some will rely on Jonathan Turley, who can argue both sides of this question, and has done so. -
So nothing then
How about that 2K check Biden promised instead? -
FTFYWestlinnDuck said:
Without fail, this is how a leftard argues, from the KobeSlobberer, the Dazzler, or George Stephanopoulos -hardhat said:
I work with plenty of lefties, so I'm used to them trying to use the 'false equivalency' argument to cover up hypocrisy. Nice try. And as for only one major party being taken over by its fringe, ha ha, that's funny.HHusky said:
Not a very apt equivalency argument, but we can agree the fringes are threats to our system. Only one of our two major parties has been taken over by its fringe and enabled an assault on the Capitol.hardhat said:
The left was pretty nice to people doing just that for the past ten months. Biden said it was just an idea. Maybe you should sit this one out.HHusky said:Why can't they be nicer about people who murder cops and damage property while trying to violently overturn Democratic elections?
1. Play the racist/bigot card.
2. Make a weak lame ass moral equivalency argument.
3. Phuck some strawman ass
4. Ignore a request for information.
5.Lie.PROFIT. -
-
-
-
Welcome to this summerTequilla said:
I told you following leftist narratives is bad -
I don’t follow them ...RaceBannon said:
Welcome to this summerTequilla said:
I told you following leftist narratives is bad
I just think it’s amusing that literally a 15 second search at a surface level blows up the narrative -
It really did come up here. It surprised me at the timeTequilla said:
I don’t follow them ...RaceBannon said:
Welcome to this summerTequilla said:
I told you following leftist narratives is bad
I just think it’s amusing that literally a 15 second search at a surface level blows up the narrative
The narrative gets blown up yet never dies. That gets frustrating