When are you getting a Cuog bored?
Comments
-
Lots of threads where road offers his $0.02 deserve it lately. Little Jimmy has definitely rubbed off on himHe_Needs_More_Time said:This thread really deserves a citrus bomb.
-
I'm not the dense retard who thinks an original Pac-8 school should be removed from the conference.RoadDawg55 said:
Just die. The Santa Barbara stuff was a fucking joke. I've had great times at WSU. I've also ha great times at Central, Montana, Montana State, an Western. It has nothing to do with the debate. Nobody gives a fuck if me or you has had a good time there. You are one dense fucktard.PostGameOrangeSlices said:RoadDawg55 said:"WSU belongs because they have hot chicks there and the students drink way more Busch Light than any other school."
-CuntSliceFS
Listen you dumb fuck. Almost any UC school has way hotter chicks. WSU is a decent party school, but visit UC Santa Barbara and your dumbass would see WSU sucks compared to it. I would rather day drink on a fucking beach with hot girls in bikinis than freeze my nuts off drinking in a shitty frat house.
Maybe UC Santa Barbara belongs in the PAC 12? After all, they have hot chicks and it's really fun there. It's funny you think of yourself as a smart guy. You've mentioned it many times, yet there has never been any proof of it being even remotely true.
Jesus fucking christ. Are you serious?
Obviously CA has hotter chicks: they have a hotter climate. Chicks get tanner, work out more, etc. CA also has a larger population of girls to draw from. Nice red herring though, as usual. You obviously have had some bad experiences at WSU, because every time I've gone there I've had a blast. But then again, I'm not a fucking retard, maybe that's your issue? Maybe you rub people the wrong with with your self-righteous "this place sucks" attitude? It's likely.
Does UC SB have a large enough donor base? No. Good, established athletics? No. Ever been to the Rose Bowl? No. Ever compete at a D1 level for decades like WSU has? No. Ever been to a Sweet 16? No. Does UC SB athletics have anyone that gives a shit about it? Relatively, no. Does it have the funding WSU has? No. The facilities? No. The national recognition? Not likely.
It's apples to oranges. Maybe in 50 years the mediocre UC and Cal State schools will get on WSU's level, but it isn't likely.
So until then shut the fuck up. I don't think of myself as a "smart guy". I just call out stupid shit when I see it.
And yes, the "good times at xxxx university" has nothing to do with the "does WSU belong" debate.
There were two separate points you made that I took issue with...
You are a fucking retard. -
Oranges is right about wazzu go look at their new facilities and what they are doing to stay competitive in the pac. To say they don't even belong in the same conference as UW when our dumbasses can't keep a fucking 18 point lead on them or blow them out in our building after such a meltdown is doogFS.
They'll battle with OSU to be a 2nd tier bowl team, as HNMT has said in a different thread. -
They are getting a lot of the money from the new TV deals and revenue sharing. That's how they afford Leach's salary too. I can't figure out how to paste the link on my phone but Google PAC 12 revenue sharing.haie said:Oranges is right about wazzu go look at their new facilities and what they are doing to stay competitive in the pac. To say they don't even belong in the same conference as UW when our dumbasses can't keep a fucking 18 point lead on them or blow them out in our building after such a meltdown is doogFS.
They'll battle with OSU to be a 2nd tier bowl team, as HNMT has said in a different thread.
It's too late to boot them, but I don't get why they were added instead of Nevada or SDSU. Those schools could easily be WSU if they were granted access instead. The 18 point lead has nothing to do any of this. That's a single game. You can't use that, but not use their home loss to Embree and Colorado.
Oregon State doesn't really belong either IMO, for many of the same reasons, but at least they have fielded decent teams under Riley. I certainly agree that the WSU program is in much better shape with Leach. Nobody would argue otherwise.
-
Hot cuog talk right here. Let's get that new bored started DJ!
-
Fair point, I'm not going to defend that game. Wazzu's struggles in general is what you get when you hire a fucking moron that just so happens to be an alum. They're lower tier teams that obviously need a good coach to do anything. Most of my buddies are coogs and my girlfriend's parents are beavers season ticket holders, so I've had to watch both of those teams in person a lot the past couple seasons. They are not ideal programs but they belong here more than fucking Utah.RoadDawg55 said:
They are getting a lot of the money from the new TV deals and revenue sharing. That's how they afford Leach's salary too. I can't figure out how to paste the link on my phone but Google PAC 12 revenue sharing.haie said:Oranges is right about wazzu go look at their new facilities and what they are doing to stay competitive in the pac. To say they don't even belong in the same conference as UW when our dumbasses can't keep a fucking 18 point lead on them or blow them out in our building after such a meltdown is doogFS.
They'll battle with OSU to be a 2nd tier bowl team, as HNMT has said in a different thread.
It's too late to boot them, but I don't get why they were added instead of Nevada or SDSU. Those schools could easily be WSU if they were granted access instead. The 18 point lead has nothing to do any of this. That's a single game. You can't use that, but not use their home loss to Embree and Colorado.
Oregon State doesn't really belong either IMO, for many of the same reasons, but at least they have fielded decent teams under Riley. I certainly agree that the WSU program is in much better shape with Leach. Nobody would argue otherwise.
-
Threads like this makes me really miss Harv.
Free Harv!
Oh and Oregon State had like 27 straight losing seasons in football for what it's worth. -
My efforts are paying off well in this thread.PurpleJ said:You're writing entire paragraphs about the fucking coogs.
-
ApostleOfGrief gives a shit.PostGameOrangeSlices said:RoadDawg55 said:"WSU belongs because they have hot chicks there and the students drink way more Busch Light than any other school."
-CuntSliceFS
Listen you dumb fuck. Almost any UC school has way hotter chicks. WSU is a decent party school, but visit UC Santa Barbara and your dumbass would see WSU sucks compared to it. I would rather day drink on a fucking beach with hot girls in bikinis than freeze my nuts off drinking in a shitty frat house.
Maybe UC Santa Barbara belongs in the PAC 12? After all, they have hot chicks and it's really fun there. It's funny you think of yourself as a smart guy. You've mentioned it many times, yet there has never been any proof of it being even remotely true.
Does UC SB athletics have anyone that gives a shit about it? Relatively, no. -
That's a reliefPostGameOrangeSlices said:RoadDawg55 said:"WSU belongs because they have hot chicks there and the students drink way more Busch Light than any other school."
-CuntSliceFS
Listen you dumb fuck. Almost any UC school has way hotter chicks. WSU is a decent party school, but visit UC Santa Barbara and your dumbass would see WSU sucks compared to it. I would rather day drink on a fucking beach with hot girls in bikinis than freeze my nuts off drinking in a shitty frat house.
Maybe UC Santa Barbara belongs in the PAC 12? After all, they have hot chicks and it's really fun there. It's funny you think of yourself as a smart guy. You've mentioned it many times, yet there has never been any proof of it being even remotely true.
Jesus fucking christ. Are you serious?
Obviously CA has hotter chicks: they have a hotter climate. Chicks get tanner, work out more, etc. CA also has a larger population of girls to draw from. Nice red herring though, as usual. You obviously have had some bad experiences at WSU, because every time I've gone there I've had a blast. But then again, I'm not a fucking retard, maybe that's your issue? Maybe you rub people the wrong with with your self-righteous "this place sucks" attitude? It's likely.
Does UC SB have a large enough donor base? No. Good, established athletics? No. Ever been to the Rose Bowl? No. Ever compete at a D1 level for decades like WSU has? No. Ever been to a Sweet 16? No. Does UC SB athletics have anyone that gives a shit about it? Relatively, no. Does it have the funding WSU has? No. The facilities? No. The national recognition? Not likely.
It's apples to oranges. Maybe in 50 years the mediocre UC and Cal State schools will get on WSU's level, but it isn't likely.
So until then shut the fuck up. I don't think of myself as a "smart guy". I just call out stupid shit when I see it. -
A little history lesson which Race Bannon(RIP) covered in a podcast(the fuck?) back in 2010. This notion that WSU is an original Pac-8 school so they are automatically grandfathered in is such bullshit.
In 1959 the Pacific Coast Conference which had been going since 1915 broke apart. Idaho btw was a part of our conference. Well in 1959 they formed a new conference which was the AAWU conference which consisted of the California schools Cal, USC, UCLA, and Stanford. Oh and it also included Washington as unlike Idaho, WSU, Oregon and Oregon State the Huskies could actually pull their weight.
The Huskies won the inaugural conference to go to the Rose Bowl in 1959 and 1960. In 1962 the Cougars were invited back into the conference. Then in 1964 the Oregon schools were added back in. The Huskies that year played 7 conference games while the rest only played 4(except Stanford who played 7). The rest of the California schools still wouldn't play the remainder of the PNW as it was a waste of their time.
Then in 1967 that was the first year every team in the conference started to play each other. So from 1959-1966 USC, UCLA, Cal all said fuck the PNW minus Washington they aren't pulling their weight so fuck em. In 1968 the conference was renamed the Pac-8 conference.
I don't know what this really has to do with booting WSU or not. However, to RoadDawg's point they had been booted before. Idaho was part of PCC dating back to 1922-1959 so there was precedent that teams not pulling their weight could be told to LEAVE! -
tl;drHe_Needs_More_Time said:A little history lesson which Race Bannon(RIP) covered in a podcast(the fuck?) back in 2010. This notion that WSU is an original Pac-8 school so they are automatically grandfathered in is such bullshit.
In 1959 the Pacific Coast Conference which had been going since 1915 broke apart. Idaho btw was a part of our conference. Well in 1959 they formed a new conference which was the AAWU conference which consisted of the California schools Cal, USC, UCLA, and Stanford. Oh and it also included Washington as unlike Idaho, WSU, Oregon and Oregon State the Huskies could actually pull their weight.
The Huskies won the inaugural conference to go to the Rose Bowl in 1959 and 1960. In 1962 the Cougars were invited back into the conference. Then in 1964 the Oregon schools were added back in. The Huskies that year played 7 conference games while the rest only played 4(except Stanford who played 7). The rest of the California schools still wouldn't play the remainder of the PNW as it was a waste of their time.
Then in 1967 that was the first year every team in the conference started to play each other. So from 1959-1966 USC, UCLA, Cal all said fuck the PNW minus Washington they aren't pulling their weight so fuck em. In 1968 the conference was renamed the Pac-8 conference.
I don't know what this really has to do with booting WSU or not. However, to RoadDawg's point they had been booted before. Idaho was part of PCC dating back to 1922-1959 so there was precedent that teams not pulling their weight could be told to LEAVE! -
they legitimately considering 2012 a success because they beat UW, even though they went 3 and fucking 9 and lost to colorado.CuntWaffle said:Fuck that I can't stand talking to coogs. Does a "coug" even exist? Fuck I mean even Harv is a full blown coog.
Apple Cup is the shittiest game ever created. Coog co workers talk about it all week like it is the Super Bowl and when they lose they "dont care" because UW should have won. When they win you dont stop hearing about it until the next Apple Cup.
That games needs to LEAVE! Fuck.
CHRIST! -
This thread needs more seducedbyacougar dot com
-
Disagree.PostGameOrangeSlices said:RoadDawg55 said:Oranges, shut the fuck up. You were the main one saying LIPO this year, so save the doog bullshit. Or talk about pressing. You are the guy who sends pm's and presses about fucking internet votes for almost a week.
I visited Pullman many times and always had a great time. It's a good place to party, no question about it, and it has better girls than UW. We have had this conversation before. The town still sucks, and it's pathetic people choose to live there. They don't belong in the PAC 12. It's that simple. There is no difference between WSU and Nevada, San Diego St, and other MWC schools other than WSU lucked out and someone made a stupid decision to bring them into the PAC 8.
They generate the smallest revenue of any school in the conference. Montana and Montana State are great party schools with lots of dumb sluts because of the easy admissions. That doesn't mean the belong in the PAC 12. You are a fucking idiot. No wonder all he older posters always hated you.
Listen idiot, LIPO was a legitimate argument. People were saying TSIO when UW was 4-0, all I said was "let if fucking play out" until the Furd and UO games. Obviously, Sark had his annual 3-game losing streak and LIFPO was wrong, but that wasn't a doog mantra. It was just letting the fucking situation play out, Sark was already back despite the HHB wish to the contrary.
My PM to Damone has been discussed ad nauseam by others, including about 10 threads about it. With that in mind, I don't think I was the one that was pressing....hth
Wazzu generates far more revenue than the other schools you compared it to, moron. And they are generating more, and are capable of generating more revenue, when the team is actually competitive for any amount of time. Moos and Leach are doing a good job of revitalizing that fan base.
Keep dooging dude. Sark's line was only bad because Willingham didn't recruit better ones, right? -
WSU has a small yet rich football tradition including many NFL players, A Super bowl MVP, a few all Pro's, #1 and #2 NFL draftee's and two rosebowls in the last 20 years (to our 1), Nobody can touch Bob Robertson and now Mike Leach followed the $ to Pullman thanks to Moos (the best AD in the Biz )
Respect is earned-WSU has earned it.
Proud to have them in our conference. We're going to need them to play spoiler next year if we are to get to the rose bowl. Then beat them in the apple cup.
I hate the fucking cougs. But the WAC shit is below you Roadie! -
Can't tell if serious.puppylove_sugarsteel said:WSU has a small yet rich football tradition including many NFL players, A Super bowl MVP, a few all Pro's, #1 and #2 NFL draftee's and two rosebowls in the last 20 years (to our 1), Nobody can touch Bob Robertson and now Mike Leach followed the $ to Pullman thanks to Moos (the best AD in the Biz )
Respect is earned-WSU has earned it.
Proud to have them in our conference. We're going to need them to play spoiler next year if we are to get to the rose bowl. Then beat them in the apple cup.
I hate the fucking cougs. But the WAC shit is below you Roadie!
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
