Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
New building in initial development in Seattle would be city's tallest
PostGameOrangeSlices
Member Posts: 27,221
bizjournals.com/seattle/blog/2014/03/here-s-what-seattle-s-tallest-tower-could-look.html?page=all
Reason #100000000 Seattle > Portland (Hi Sven)
Reason #100000000 Seattle > Portland (Hi Sven)
Comments
-
What is that? A building for ants? How can we expect people to work if they can't even fit in the building? The building has to be at least three times bigger than this!
-
That's what Seattle needs — more traffic.
-
I invented the piano key neck tie!!!!1
-
...DerekJohnson said:That's what Seattle needs — more traffic.
not sure if srs. traffic itself is good: it means people going about business, spending money, improving the economy, etc. traffic without the infrastructure to keep it moving at a reasonable pace is bad.
Seattle definitely needs to upgrade its infrastructure and public transportation, no argument there. But that doesn't mean the city can't continue to develop.
-
they should make it more ovular. it's too phallic at the moment, it's sexist!11!!!!1Mad_Son said:What is that? A building for ants? How can we expect people to work if they can't even fit in the building? The building has to be at least three times bigger than this!
-
They actually had to tone it down from earlier designs...PostGameOrangeSlices said:
they should make it more ovular. it's too phallic at the moment, it's sexist!11!!!!1Mad_Son said:What is that? A building for ants? How can we expect people to work if they can't even fit in the building? The building has to be at least three times bigger than this!
