Biden Says He Will ‘Defeat the NRA’ While in Office



President-elect Joe Biden on Jan. 8 promised to “defeat” the National Rifle Association while he’s in office.
Biden’s official Twitter account was responding to former Rep. Gabby Giffords (D-Ariz.), who was among 14 people wounded in a shooting rampage by Jared Lee Loughner in Tucson in 2011; six people died in the attack. Giffords had recounted how her life and community “changed forever.”
“But the attack did not break me—or the people I represented in Congress. We came together, turned pain into purpose, and found hope in each other,” she wrote, adding that she continues to work to “achieve a safer America.”
Biden responded, saying: “Your perseverance and immeasurable courage continue to inspire me and millions of others. I pledge to continue to work with you—and with survivors, families, and advocates across the country—to defeat the NRA and end our epidemic of gun violence.”
The NRA, which has more than 5 million members, seeks to protect and educate people about their Second Amendment rights.
While the association didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on Biden’s post, its lobbying arm recently published an article that says Biden would “begin a concerted attack on the rights of American gun owners” after being inaugurated.
“We must be ready for the onslaught,” the post reads, adding that a Biden administration, if officials get their way, “will ban and confiscate the most-commonly-owned rifle in the United States” and “will arbitrarily limit the number of guns that can be bought per month,” among other measures.
Biden’s website says he has a plan to end “our gun violence epidemic” and boasts that he has taken on the NRA twice and won, referring to his help passing the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act in 1993 and in passing a 10-year ban on some weapons and magazines the following year.
“As president, Joe Biden will defeat the NRA again,” the site states.
Some of the proposals include banning the manufacture and sale of so-called assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, restricting the number of guns one person may buy per month to one, and prohibiting people convicted of hate crimes from owning guns.
Comments
-
This article came from the Epoch News
-
Unity!
-
-
Name one politician who wants to take your guns. Faggy quadrunner wink. -
He means defeat the 2nd amendment of the constitution. Also the 1st, 4th etc etc.
Good thing he won't be in office! -
Just curious as to Tug cons solution for Laughner who was an unstable nut. He killed a nine year old little girl among others. It sucked.
I don't want the government to come take guns from law abiding, stable people. I also don't want innocent people to get gunned down for no good reason. -
I carry a gun so I don't get gunned down.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Just curious as to Tug cons solution for Laughner who was an unstable nut. He killed a nine year old little girl among others. It sucked.
I don't want the government to come take guns from law abiding, stable people. I also don't want innocent people to get gunned down for no good reason.
FYI I do not carry a gun to force my will upon others. I carry so others can't force their will upon me. -
Lots of bluster. The dems will never get the votes to do anything substantial.
-
He'll never make it to office, as he is not the President nor the President Elect of the United States.
-
I would recommend focusing on the mental health crisis. Exacerbated by locking people in the homes away from work, family and social life.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Just curious as to Tug cons solution for Laughner who was an unstable nut. He killed a nine year old little girl among others. It sucked.
I don't want the government to come take guns from law abiding, stable people. I also don't want innocent people to get gunned down for no good reason. -
-
They did it in 1994, even though as bad as that one was, their proposals are even worse.GreenRiverGatorz said:Lots of bluster. The dems will never get the votes to do anything substantial.
-
Right. And it became so unpopular that even reinstating that since-retired ban is a political non-starter.GrundleStiltzkin said:
They did it in 1994, even though as bad as that one was, their proposals are even worse.GreenRiverGatorz said:Lots of bluster. The dems will never get the votes to do anything substantial.
-
Biden is weighing this vs his original plan, which was to just lock every black person up in jail so his kids didn’t have to go to school in a racial jungle.
His words, not mine HTH -
Of course he will, because his is a racist.
Did you know why the NRA was started? To fight the KKK. The KKK wasn't allowing black people to practice their 2nd Amendment rights. Therefore, the start of the NRA to help all citizen to practice their Constitutional rights. -
SSSSSSShhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh the parties switched..........................alumni94 said:Of course he will, because his is a racist.
Did you know why the NRA was started? To fight the KKK. The KKK wasn't allowing black people to practice their 2nd Amendment rights. Therefore, the start of the NRA to help all citizen to practice their Constitutional rights. -
Yep, the big lie that people push when the find out that Democrat party is racist.Sledog said:
SSSSSSShhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh the parties switched..........................alumni94 said:Of course he will, because his is a racist.
Did you know why the NRA was started? To fight the KKK. The KKK wasn't allowing black people to practice their 2nd Amendment rights. Therefore, the start of the NRA to help all citizen to practice their Constitutional rights. -
Not that it matters even a little bit, but this is laughably false.alumni94 said:Of course he will, because his is a racist.
Did you know why the NRA was started? To fight the KKK. The KKK wasn't allowing black people to practice their 2nd Amendment rights. Therefore, the start of the NRA to help all citizen to practice their Constitutional rights. -
Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Just curious as to Tug cons solution for Laughner who was an unstable nut. He killed a nine year old little girl among others. It sucked.
I don't want the government to come take guns from law abiding, stable people. I also don't want innocent people to get gunned down for no good reason.
This one isn’t hard, especially in the age of Social Media.
If you see something, say something.
-
Good luck Joe!
-
Trump said he was gonna build a wall
BFD -
He did.HuskyJW said:Trump said he was gonna build a wall
BFD -
The 94 ban had a built-in 10 year sunset which happened to expire under a Republic administration.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Right. And it became so unpopular that even reinstating that since-retired ban is a political non-starter.GrundleStiltzkin said:
They did it in 1994, even though as bad as that one was, their proposals are even worse.GreenRiverGatorz said:Lots of bluster. The dems will never get the votes to do anything substantial.
Joe* campaigned on a new raft of gun regs. It's part of his* platform.
* Joe's handlers -
I don't think we're disagreeing on anything. Renewal attempts faded the last time dems had total control and I don't see any way they even get unanimous party support in the Senate for this, let alone a filibuster-proof majority.GrundleStiltzkin said:
The 94 ban had a built-in 10 year sunset which happened to expire under a Republic administration.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Right. And it became so unpopular that even reinstating that since-retired ban is a political non-starter.GrundleStiltzkin said:
They did it in 1994, even though as bad as that one was, their proposals are even worse.GreenRiverGatorz said:Lots of bluster. The dems will never get the votes to do anything substantial.
Joe* campaigned on a new raft of gun regs. It's part of his* platform.
* Joe's handlers -
filibuster?
-
I hope your right.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I don't think we're disagreeing on anything. Renewal attempts faded the last time dems had total control and I don't see any way they even get unanimous party support in the Senate for this, let alone a filibuster-proof majority.GrundleStiltzkin said:
The 94 ban had a built-in 10 year sunset which happened to expire under a Republic administration.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Right. And it became so unpopular that even reinstating that since-retired ban is a political non-starter.GrundleStiltzkin said:
They did it in 1994, even though as bad as that one was, their proposals are even worse.GreenRiverGatorz said:Lots of bluster. The dems will never get the votes to do anything substantial.
Joe* campaigned on a new raft of gun regs. It's part of his* platform.
* Joe's handlers -
Yes, that thing that I don't expect the dems will succeed in repealing.doogie said:filibuster?
-
Nice one sparky.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Yes, that thing that I don't expect the dems will succeed in repealing.doogie said:filibuster?
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/democrats-filibuster-rule-change-2021-senate-white-house/story?id=71843410 -
Yes dipshit, we all know that's their top agenda item. I said I don't think they will succeed.Southerndawg said:
Nice one sparky.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Yes, that thing that I don't expect the dems will succeed in repealing.doogie said:filibuster?
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/democrats-filibuster-rule-change-2021-senate-white-house/story?id=71843410 -