Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Over 432,000 Votes Removed From Trump In Pennsylvania, Data Scientists Say

HoustonHusky
Member Posts: 6,000
in Tug Tavern
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/over-432000-votes-removed-trump-pennsylvania-data-scientists-say
Yet another set of amazing coincidences that all go one way...
#BananaRepublic
Yet another set of amazing coincidences that all go one way...
#BananaRepublic
Comments
-
I guess it’s also an amazing coincidence that the group finding this is led by Sean Hannity’s producer.
-
Why attack the facts when you can attack the people?TheKobeStopper said:I guess it’s also an amazing coincidence that the group finding this is led by Sean Hannity’s producer.
-
Why use facts when you can use alternative facts?HoustonHusky said:
Why attack the facts when you can attack the people?TheKobeStopper said:I guess it’s also an amazing coincidence that the group finding this is led by Sean Hannity’s producer.
-
Sounds serious...where are your alternative facts again?TheKobeStopper said:
Why use facts when you can use alternative facts?HoustonHusky said:
Why attack the facts when you can attack the people?TheKobeStopper said:I guess it’s also an amazing coincidence that the group finding this is led by Sean Hannity’s producer.
-
I think loss after loss after loss in court trying to demonstrate fraud and evidence to overturn results is a decent start for these facts.HoustonHusky said:
Sounds serious...where are your alternative facts again?TheKobeStopper said:
Why use facts when you can use alternative facts?HoustonHusky said:
Why attack the facts when you can attack the people?TheKobeStopper said:I guess it’s also an amazing coincidence that the group finding this is led by Sean Hannity’s producer.
-
I'm sure THIS is the big one.
-
THIS HAS LEGS
-
But are they really "losing" in court? Do your homework.MelloDawg said:
I think loss after loss after loss in court trying to demonstrate fraud and evidence to overturn results is a decent start for these facts.HoustonHusky said:
Sounds serious...where are your alternative facts again?TheKobeStopper said:
Why use facts when you can use alternative facts?HoustonHusky said:
Why attack the facts when you can attack the people?TheKobeStopper said:I guess it’s also an amazing coincidence that the group finding this is led by Sean Hannity’s producer.
Lots of rulings like this:
"The judge ruled that the plaintiffs lacked legal standing and filed the case too late, that the federal court had no jurisdiction, and that the relief was impossible to grant"
"The case was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on December 9, 2020. The plaintiff also lacked legal standing."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_United_States_presidential_election#Summary_of_post-election_lawsuits
Courts won't even touch this and look at evidence in most cases.