Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
2021 Signing Day Thread
Comments
-
The walk-aims we suspect might be good never are and the ones that we know nothing about sometimes are.
-
Is it though? Raw athletes with very similar frames. Tryon's best offer until after his senior year was WSU. You saying given a few games in his senior season at DE Hopkins couldn't have gotten an offer from WSU? He already has Fresno/San Jose St/Nevada offers despite never taking a snap after his junior season and basically only ever playing QB.NorwegianHusky said:
He's good for a PWO, but that's a big stretch.dnc said:Joe Tryon 2.0.
Heck of a PWOOF.
I think they're very comparable. -
Probably some truth to this but which walk ons have we? ever really gotten excited about? Fowler and Kinchen are the only ones I can think of and it's way too soon to say they aren't any good. Who am I forgetting that was here long enough to write off?RoadDawg55 said:The walk-aims we suspect might be good never are and the ones that we know nothing about sometimes are.
-
Miles Bryant?dnc said:
Probably some truth to this but which walk ons have we? ever really gotten excited about? Fowler and Kinchen are the only ones I can think of and it's way too soon to say they aren't any good. Who am I forgetting that was here long enough to write off?RoadDawg55 said:The walk-aims we suspect might be good never are and the ones that we know nothing about sometimes are.
-
I had no clue who he was before he took the field for us. I'm sure others who followed more closely were aware of him.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Miles Bryant?dnc said:
Probably some truth to this but which walk ons have we? ever really gotten excited about? Fowler and Kinchen are the only ones I can think of and it's way too soon to say they aren't any good. Who am I forgetting that was here long enough to write off?RoadDawg55 said:The walk-aims we suspect might be good never are and the ones that we know nothing about sometimes are.
-
Since I started really paying attention to recruiting (recent relative to y'all), I've had the opposite experience. I was really excited by Ulofoshio, mostly because I thought he flew under the radar up in Alaska and was under-recruited. Didn't realize he had been at Gorman for two or three years until after he signed, but by then I was invested and not backing down from the theory that he'd be good and play. The athleticism, measureables, and film sure looked legit.RoadDawg55 said:The walk-aims we suspect might be good never are and the ones that we know nothing about sometimes are.
I was really excited about Myles Bryant because of the "this guy had P5 offers" angle. He was billed as stealing an extra scholarship commit and lived up to that billing.
To a lesser extent, I was excited about Ryan Bowman because he was local and the brother of a player who did earn a scholarship on the team. I didn't expect nearly the production we've seen, but I was excited for a good practice player who would help the team. He WAY exceeded my expectation, but I liked him as a pick-up.
Bronson was another one who was exciting because he was a starting college defensive lineman and that position group was thin.
I can't think of any other walk-ons I was really excited about. Did I miss any who have played/had an impact? With walk-ons, I get excited if I think of some kind of justification for why they may have been underrated. Great measureables paired with playing in the middle of nowhere and not going to camps? D1 athlete who missed the boat on signing day? Could have gone elsewhere but shits gold and pisses purple? High school injury prevented a proper evaluation? It's not an exact science, but it's been surprisingly good since Petersen was hired.
I think this year it's going to be way easier than normal for one to talk themselves into walk-on fever due to the lost high school season and all the uncertainty it created. Hell, a couple of years from now, you may see some unusual teams in the top-25 due to getting lucky with underrated recruits. Way more of a crapshoot than most years. -
Jimmy likes to talk about his superior evaluating skills, but the Bryant example definitely is a puzzler. Credit to getting him as a PWO, but other PAC 12s were able to tell he was worth a scholarship.
-
Should have a decent chance at a scholarship since we will likely only have like 80Neighbor2972 said:
We recruited him hard and offered him and then we were full. Cocky sob thought so highly of himself he chose to walk on at uw rather than take a schollie at a lesser program. But many thought he was pretty good.dnc said:
I had no clue who he was before he took the field for us. I'm sure others who followed more closely were aware of him.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Miles Bryant?dnc said:
Probably some truth to this but which walk ons have we? ever really gotten excited about? Fowler and Kinchen are the only ones I can think of and it's way too soon to say they aren't any good. Who am I forgetting that was here long enough to write off?RoadDawg55 said:The walk-aims we suspect might be good never are and the ones that we know nothing about sometimes are.
-
-
We? Initially offered Bryant a schollie but filled up before he made his decision. At the end it was UCLA and I think Colorado still holding scholarships for him but he came to UW as a PWO instead.doogville said:Jimmy likes to talk about his superior evaluating skills, but the Bryant example definitely is a puzzler. Credit to getting him as a PWO, but other PAC 12s were able to tell he was worth a scholarship.
-
But if you know — because you’re SO good at talent evaluation — that he’s a future NFL talent, you don’t risk losing him to UCLA because you don’t have a scholarship. If that level of talent wants to commit, you free up a scholarship and make it work.Ice_Holmvik said:
We? Initially offered Bryant a schollie but filled up before he made his decision. At the end it was UCLA and I think Colorado still holding scholarships for him but he came to UW as a PWO instead.doogville said:Jimmy likes to talk about his superior evaluating skills, but the Bryant example definitely is a puzzler. Credit to getting him as a PWO, but other PAC 12s were able to tell he was worth a scholarship.
I just think it’s an example of how the “we evaluate better than everyone else” is silly. -
That's the perfect type of PWO profile. In 4-5 years he could be a very major contributor. I also saw him play a couple times down here and noticed him more than the recruits I came to watch. He's physical as fuck and that's good enough for me.
-
This dude scorches earth on every play, yet his running back still can't pick up three yards to save his life. Rest of his team must be pretty shitty.Gladstone said:That's the perfect type of PWO profile. In 4-5 years he could be a very major contributor. I also saw him play a couple times down here and noticed him more than the recruits I came to watch. He's physical as fuck and that's good enough for me.
-
I do like earth scorchers. I'll take it.1to392831weretaken said:
This dude scorches earth on every play, yet his running back still can't pick up three yards to save his life. Rest of his team must be pretty shitty.Gladstone said:That's the perfect type of PWO profile. In 4-5 years he could be a very major contributor. I also saw him play a couple times down here and noticed him more than the recruits I came to watch. He's physical as fuck and that's good enough for me.
-
Off-season natty incoming!
-
I see your Schwartz is as big as mine.FecalFeast said: -
Let's see how he uses itCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I see your Schwartz is as big as mine.FecalFeast said:
