The dazzler's approach to advocating for higher taxes - There for other people
Comments
-
So Bob Dylan is on the commie insider payroll, too, and is cashing in before the new tax rates hit normal people?WestlinnDuck said:So Bob Dylan is selling his catalog for $300 million and closing the deal in 2020 with the federal capital gains tax at 20%. Biden and the dems want the rate to go to at least 39.6% Reminds me of both Al Gore selling his cable network and George Lucas selling the Star Wars catalog and beating capital gain increases.
Sounds about right.
-
I’m sure no one will sell a capital asset for gain ever again. Sad.
-
Dazzler's approach to everything is just to lie about it.
-
The dazzler loves hypocrisy. As long as it is on the left.SFGbob said:Dazzler's approach to everything is just to lie about it.
-
Prospective changes to tax rates produce incentives? Who knew?WestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler loves hypocrisy. As long as it is on the left.SFGbob said:Dazzler's approach to everything is just to lie about it.
-
One they've already paid taxes on owning year after year after year.HHusky said:I’m sure no one will sell a capital asset for gain ever again. Sad.
-
The fact that increasing taxes on private sector activity reduces private sector activity is still phu*cking news to leftards. The fact that you are a phu*cking ignorant hypocrite is not news.HHusky said:
Prospective changes to tax rates produce incentives? Who knew?WestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler loves hypocrisy. As long as it is on the left.SFGbob said:Dazzler's approach to everything is just to lie about it.
-
What you do pay is capital gains tax on each year's inflation.HHusky said: -
appreciation = inflation?WestlinnDuck said:
What you do pay is capital gains tax on each year's inflation.HHusky said:
Disagree -
So, I buy a stock for $100 and the inflation rate for the year is 3% and I sell the stock for $103 - how much money did I really make? Maff is hard for leftards.
-
When the rate is 20%, people will take profits.WestlinnDuck said:
The fact that increasing taxes on private sector activity reduces private sector activity is still phu*cking news to leftards. The fact that you are a phu*cking ignorant hypocrite is not news.HHusky said:
Prospective changes to tax rates produce incentives? Who knew?WestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler loves hypocrisy. As long as it is on the left.SFGbob said:Dazzler's approach to everything is just to lie about it.
When the rate is 39%, people will take profits.
Around the time of the change--assuming it is announced in advance--people either rush to sell (if the rate is increasing) or delay selling. These short term effects disappear quickly. There's this thing called history. You should look into it. -
Just more proof that you never got an MBA. People invest and want a rate of return. That rate of return is after tax rate of return. The higher the tax rate the lower return on investment. That means more risk and less investment. Sort of shocked that your matchbook cover MBA class didn't cover that.
-
Fascinating! Except the real world data doesn't support your claim. There's are reasons for that, but discussing them wouldn't be as satisfying to you as pontificating.WestlinnDuck said:Just more proof that you never got an MBA. People invest and want a rate of return. That rate of return is after tax rate of return. The higher the tax rate the lower return on investment. That means more risk and less investment. Sort of shocked that your matchbook cover MBA class didn't cover that.
-
If you're repeatedly getting 3% on money you are putting at risk, you have every right to be upset. But not at anyone here.WestlinnDuck said:So, I buy a stock for $100 and the inflation rate for the year is 3% and I sell the stock for $103 - how much money did I really make? Maff is hard for leftards.
-
Except every major capital project by business or investment firms runs an after tax rate of return. That's how fascinating it is. You increase taxes on private sector activity and you get less of it. You provide tax incentives for private sector activity - like wind and solar tax credits - you get more of it. When you get around to it you can tell us why gravity doesn't matter.HHusky said:
Fascinating! Except the real world data doesn't support your claim. There's are reasons for that, but discussing them wouldn't be as satisfying to you as pontificating.WestlinnDuck said:Just more proof that you never got an MBA. People invest and want a rate of return. That rate of return is after tax rate of return. The higher the tax rate the lower return on investment. That means more risk and less investment. Sort of shocked that your matchbook cover MBA class didn't cover that.
-
Biden will punt and H will look an idiot again
-
We were talking about capital gains. I don't blame you for running from that topic.WestlinnDuck said:
Except every major capital project by business or investment firms runs an after tax rate of return. That's how fascinating it is. You increase taxes on private sector activity and you get less of it. You provide tax incentives for private sector activity - like wind and solar tax credits - you get more of it. When you get around to it you can tell us why gravity doesn't matter.HHusky said:
Fascinating! Except the real world data doesn't support your claim. There's are reasons for that, but discussing them wouldn't be as satisfying to you as pontificating.WestlinnDuck said:Just more proof that you never got an MBA. People invest and want a rate of return. That rate of return is after tax rate of return. The higher the tax rate the lower return on investment. That means more risk and less investment. Sort of shocked that your matchbook cover MBA class didn't cover that.
-
Even though I'm not selling my music catalog.RaceBannon said:Biden will punt and H will look an idiot again
-
You are drowning here Mr. MBA. You invest in real property or a business, the end game is to sell for more than you paid and that gain is taxed at long-term capital gains rates, currently 20% for individuals and 21% for corporations. The end game is very different if the gain is taxes at 39.6%. Again basic business and Maff concepts escape you.HHusky said:
We were talking about capital gains. I don't blame you for running from that topic.WestlinnDuck said:
Except every major capital project by business or investment firms runs an after tax rate of return. That's how fascinating it is. You increase taxes on private sector activity and you get less of it. You provide tax incentives for private sector activity - like wind and solar tax credits - you get more of it. When you get around to it you can tell us why gravity doesn't matter.HHusky said:
Fascinating! Except the real world data doesn't support your claim. There's are reasons for that, but discussing them wouldn't be as satisfying to you as pontificating.WestlinnDuck said:Just more proof that you never got an MBA. People invest and want a rate of return. That rate of return is after tax rate of return. The higher the tax rate the lower return on investment. That means more risk and less investment. Sort of shocked that your matchbook cover MBA class didn't cover that.
-
This is time in the discussion where Dazzler just starts lying. Maybe he tells you what you were really thinking or what you really meant to say.HHusky said:
Even though I'm not selling my music catalog.RaceBannon said:Biden will punt and H will look an idiot again
-
Anyone with an MBA or any business experience at all can see that you want to stray from the topic of capital gains. Ever hear of the CAPM, Gasbag? Do business owners ever take a salary? Dividends?WestlinnDuck said:
You are drowning here Mr. MBA. You invest in real property or a business, the end game is to sell for more than you paid and that gain is taxed at long-term capital gains rates, currently 20% for individuals and 21% for corporations. The end game is very different if the gain is taxes at 39.6%. Again basic business and Maff concepts escape you.HHusky said:
We were talking about capital gains. I don't blame you for running from that topic.WestlinnDuck said:
Except every major capital project by business or investment firms runs an after tax rate of return. That's how fascinating it is. You increase taxes on private sector activity and you get less of it. You provide tax incentives for private sector activity - like wind and solar tax credits - you get more of it. When you get around to it you can tell us why gravity doesn't matter.HHusky said:
Fascinating! Except the real world data doesn't support your claim. There's are reasons for that, but discussing them wouldn't be as satisfying to you as pontificating.WestlinnDuck said:Just more proof that you never got an MBA. People invest and want a rate of return. That rate of return is after tax rate of return. The higher the tax rate the lower return on investment. That means more risk and less investment. Sort of shocked that your matchbook cover MBA class didn't cover that.
-
Oh fuck off. You are so far out of your lane it's not even funny.HHusky said:
We were talking about capital gains. I don't blame you for running from that topic.WestlinnDuck said:
Except every major capital project by business or investment firms runs an after tax rate of return. That's how fascinating it is. You increase taxes on private sector activity and you get less of it. You provide tax incentives for private sector activity - like wind and solar tax credits - you get more of it. When you get around to it you can tell us why gravity doesn't matter.HHusky said:
Fascinating! Except the real world data doesn't support your claim. There's are reasons for that, but discussing them wouldn't be as satisfying to you as pontificating.WestlinnDuck said:Just more proof that you never got an MBA. People invest and want a rate of return. That rate of return is after tax rate of return. The higher the tax rate the lower return on investment. That means more risk and less investment. Sort of shocked that your matchbook cover MBA class didn't cover that.
Jesus Christ, Dazzler. Over and over again your maff skills get slaughtered. Stay out of finance.
-
Setting aside the fact that my MBA was in finance, there's decades of history you girls can't explain with your dogma.PurpleThrobber said:
Oh fuck off. You are so far out of your lane it's not even funny.HHusky said:
We were talking about capital gains. I don't blame you for running from that topic.WestlinnDuck said:
Except every major capital project by business or investment firms runs an after tax rate of return. That's how fascinating it is. You increase taxes on private sector activity and you get less of it. You provide tax incentives for private sector activity - like wind and solar tax credits - you get more of it. When you get around to it you can tell us why gravity doesn't matter.HHusky said:
Fascinating! Except the real world data doesn't support your claim. There's are reasons for that, but discussing them wouldn't be as satisfying to you as pontificating.WestlinnDuck said:Just more proof that you never got an MBA. People invest and want a rate of return. That rate of return is after tax rate of return. The higher the tax rate the lower return on investment. That means more risk and less investment. Sort of shocked that your matchbook cover MBA class didn't cover that.
Jesus Christ, Dazzler. Over and over again your maff skills get slaughtered. Stay out of finance.
When your preferred economic propositions don't explain or accurately predict human behavior, the problem is with you. -
No habla gibberish. I have discussed the tax on capital gains and its impact on after tax cash flow. You just choose to tell me that there is no impact on private sector investment activity with a massive increase in the LTCG rate. That not ignoring dazzler that is ignorance.HHusky said:
Anyone with an MBA or any business experience at all can see that you want to stray from the topic of capital gains. Ever hear of the CAPM, Gasbag? Do business owners ever take a salary? Dividends?WestlinnDuck said:
You are drowning here Mr. MBA. You invest in real property or a business, the end game is to sell for more than you paid and that gain is taxed at long-term capital gains rates, currently 20% for individuals and 21% for corporations. The end game is very different if the gain is taxes at 39.6%. Again basic business and Maff concepts escape you.HHusky said:
We were talking about capital gains. I don't blame you for running from that topic.WestlinnDuck said:
Except every major capital project by business or investment firms runs an after tax rate of return. That's how fascinating it is. You increase taxes on private sector activity and you get less of it. You provide tax incentives for private sector activity - like wind and solar tax credits - you get more of it. When you get around to it you can tell us why gravity doesn't matter.HHusky said:
Fascinating! Except the real world data doesn't support your claim. There's are reasons for that, but discussing them wouldn't be as satisfying to you as pontificating.WestlinnDuck said:Just more proof that you never got an MBA. People invest and want a rate of return. That rate of return is after tax rate of return. The higher the tax rate the lower return on investment. That means more risk and less investment. Sort of shocked that your matchbook cover MBA class didn't cover that.
-
You're not listening. I am telling you there is a short term impact in reaction to the change, assuming the change is announced or expected. Then the impact disappears. That has been borne out time and again.WestlinnDuck said:
No habla gibberish. I have discussed the tax on capital gains and its impact on after tax cash flow. You just choose to tell me that there is no impact on private sector investment activity with a massive increase in the LTCG rate. That not ignoring dazzler that is ignorance.HHusky said:
Anyone with an MBA or any business experience at all can see that you want to stray from the topic of capital gains. Ever hear of the CAPM, Gasbag? Do business owners ever take a salary? Dividends?WestlinnDuck said:
You are drowning here Mr. MBA. You invest in real property or a business, the end game is to sell for more than you paid and that gain is taxed at long-term capital gains rates, currently 20% for individuals and 21% for corporations. The end game is very different if the gain is taxes at 39.6%. Again basic business and Maff concepts escape you.HHusky said:
We were talking about capital gains. I don't blame you for running from that topic.WestlinnDuck said:
Except every major capital project by business or investment firms runs an after tax rate of return. That's how fascinating it is. You increase taxes on private sector activity and you get less of it. You provide tax incentives for private sector activity - like wind and solar tax credits - you get more of it. When you get around to it you can tell us why gravity doesn't matter.HHusky said:
Fascinating! Except the real world data doesn't support your claim. There's are reasons for that, but discussing them wouldn't be as satisfying to you as pontificating.WestlinnDuck said:Just more proof that you never got an MBA. People invest and want a rate of return. That rate of return is after tax rate of return. The higher the tax rate the lower return on investment. That means more risk and less investment. Sort of shocked that your matchbook cover MBA class didn't cover that.
-
Taxation is theft.
-
deepGrundleStiltzkin said:Taxation is theft.
-
HHusky said:
deepGrundleStiltzkin said:Taxation is theft.
No red state provides free voter ID
Deeper and a fucking lie. -
It is.HHusky said:
deepGrundleStiltzkin said:Taxation is theft.
