Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
we have a well documented Stanford problem...however
Comments
-
It’s pretty embarrassing. I hear these reports that Stanford sucks and can’t do their goal line bullshit anymore but it seems to work just fine against us.Kingdome_Urinals said:Kwat is not elite (lol) against Stanford. What is this stubborn bullshit? You play to win the game not maintain an identity at any cost.
That was a really miserable performance, making Stanford look like a powerhouse, fucking pathetic.
-
-
I’m not upset by the Furd loss only because the offense schemed well enough to win (drops in the 1H and missed reads by a rFr average QB1 lead to no TDs) and the boneheaded defensive scheme was expected.
I would say I hope the coaches learn from this, but they won’t - it’s a stone cold fact the college football coaches by in large are the most overpaid employees relative to their output and to expect any creativity or humility is folly, and in 7 years they haven’t yet adjusted their scheme, see Stanford, Penn State, Ohio State, and Bama... same DL same run defense issues.
-
I was trying to be stubborn and run the best all season (for snow) money can buy this winter. Just threw in the towel and am putting some on Bridgestone Blizzaks tomorrow. Shaw is black ice.animate said:Is it that hard to change to a "conventional" defense for Stanford?
We go through this every year.
It's like having all season tires for most conditions.
Stanford is like ice driving in the Winter. Totally different. You NEED to slap on some winter tires and then you can perform.
Keeping the usual all weather tires in there conditions is knowing failure when you can out winters on.
What the fuck man.
Just go conventional and let the talent win against stanford.
