Truth to power
Comments
-
Its because Mueller and his gang are corrupt. No doubt about it. Now they are obstructing justice and destroying evidenceHHusky said:
We all know why Flynn is walking. Mumbo jumbo about deep state ain't it.RaceBannon said:https://foxnews.com/politics/republicans-demand-answers-on-muellers-team-wiping-phones
Clean up your own house
The poison tree is why Flynn is walking. Deal with it loser
Your lack of concern is noted. Loser
Flynn is walking all right. You lose again -
The use of a "quote" should be accompanied by an attribution to the author.HHusky said:"To describe the Government’s Motion to Dismiss as irregular would be a study in
understatement. In the United States, Presidents do not orchestrate pressure campaigns to get the
Justice Department to drop charges against defendants who have pleaded guilty—twice, before
two different judges—and whose guilt is obvious. And the Justice Department does not seek to
dismiss criminal charges on grounds riddled with legal and factual error, then argue that the
validity of those grounds cannot even be briefed to the Court that accepted the defendant’s guilty
plea. Nor does the Justice Department make a practice of attacking its own prior filings in a case,
as well as judicial opinions ruling in its favor, all while asserting that the normal rules should be
set aside for a defendant who is openly favored by the President.
Yet that is exactly what has unfolded here."
So, just like 'unnamed sources', feel free to fuck the fuck off with that dazzling bullshit.
-
It’s from the Flynn judge who is defending the other Flynn judge as they continue to not allow the DOJ to drop the case and prosecute it themselves. Basically writing a letter to himself as the court and Dipshit Dazzler thinks it means anything substantive, because that’s what dipshits do. It’s a worthless and laughable filing designed to fool retards, which it did.PurpleThrobber said:
The use of a "quote" should be accompanied by an attribution to the author.HHusky said:"To describe the Government’s Motion to Dismiss as irregular would be a study in
understatement. In the United States, Presidents do not orchestrate pressure campaigns to get the
Justice Department to drop charges against defendants who have pleaded guilty—twice, before
two different judges—and whose guilt is obvious. And the Justice Department does not seek to
dismiss criminal charges on grounds riddled with legal and factual error, then argue that the
validity of those grounds cannot even be briefed to the Court that accepted the defendant’s guilty
plea. Nor does the Justice Department make a practice of attacking its own prior filings in a case,
as well as judicial opinions ruling in its favor, all while asserting that the normal rules should be
set aside for a defendant who is openly favored by the President.
Yet that is exactly what has unfolded here."
So, just like 'unnamed sources', feel free to fuck the fuck off with that dazzling bullshit.
