Utah furloughs entire athletic dept including the AD
Comments
-
Tick Tick Tick
-
Props getting free pub!
WSU simply announced “pay cuts” back in April.
“Entire department furloughed” sounds much more dramatic -
The 12 Dwarfs has a nice ring to it as a new conference name.
-
So the recently pac 12 approved 15 minute antigen test makes daily testing affordable and practical. This is the basis on which the pro sports teams have been granted their health wavers
The PAC 12 question then shifts back to the underlying central question of is it morally defensible to provide sports teams the opportunity to congregate as a group which is where the transmission risk exists -
Lots of words to say "The Pac-12 sucks and are wimpy fags."DawgsCanDance said:So the recently pac 12 approved 15 minute antigen test makes daily testing affordable and practical. This is the basis on which the pro sports teams have been granted their health wavers
The PAC 12 question then shifts back to the underlying central question of is it morally defensible to provide sports teams the opportunity to congregate as a group which is where the transmission risk exists -
This has been the issue Pac12 presidents needed to finally get rid of sports anyway. That's been the west coast agenda for years.DawgsCanDance said:So the recently pac 12 approved 15 minute antigen test makes daily testing affordable and practical. This is the basis on which the pro sports teams have been granted their health wavers
The PAC 12 question then shifts back to the underlying central question of is it morally defensible to provide sports teams the opportunity to congregate as a group which is where the transmission risk exists
Welcome to reality. -
Arizona's to the Big 12, CU, Utah, UW, UO to the Big 10.TommySQC said:
This has been the issue Pac12 presidents needed to finally get rid of sports anyway. That's been the west coast agenda for years.DawgsCanDance said:So the recently pac 12 approved 15 minute antigen test makes daily testing affordable and practical. This is the basis on which the pro sports teams have been granted their health wavers
The PAC 12 question then shifts back to the underlying central question of is it morally defensible to provide sports teams the opportunity to congregate as a group which is where the transmission risk exists
Welcome to reality. -
WSU to Kingco 4A?89ute said:
Arizona's to the Big 12, CU, Utah, UW, UO to the Big 10.TommySQC said:
This has been the issue Pac12 presidents needed to finally get rid of sports anyway. That's been the west coast agenda for years.DawgsCanDance said:So the recently pac 12 approved 15 minute antigen test makes daily testing affordable and practical. This is the basis on which the pro sports teams have been granted their health wavers
The PAC 12 question then shifts back to the underlying central question of is it morally defensible to provide sports teams the opportunity to congregate as a group which is where the transmission risk exists
Welcome to reality. -
They’ll struggle against Bothell.DerekJohnson said:
WSU to Kingco 4A?89ute said:
Arizona's to the Big 12, CU, Utah, UW, UO to the Big 10.TommySQC said:
This has been the issue Pac12 presidents needed to finally get rid of sports anyway. That's been the west coast agenda for years.DawgsCanDance said:So the recently pac 12 approved 15 minute antigen test makes daily testing affordable and practical. This is the basis on which the pro sports teams have been granted their health wavers
The PAC 12 question then shifts back to the underlying central question of is it morally defensible to provide sports teams the opportunity to congregate as a group which is where the transmission risk exists
Welcome to reality. -
Yes, it is morally defensible to allow 18-24 year old Adults the opportunity to make personal, independent Adult decisions.DawgsCanDance said:So the recently pac 12 approved 15 minute antigen test makes daily testing affordable and practical. This is the basis on which the pro sports teams have been granted their health wavers
The PAC 12 question then shifts back to the underlying central question of is it morally defensible to provide sports teams the opportunity to congregate as a group which is where the transmission risk exists
Why do you believe otherwise?
