Sark IS Dirk Koetter, Mirror image
Does flabby-fucktard-fetters know what conference Woody came from? I've Been ripping on and correcting that tub-of-lard for 17 years and will now. Sark is gone if he completes the Turd Koetter model of success this year and has a losing season. I'd love to debate that blubbery bitch on this topic
The sad thing, Turd Koetter will have a better record than Sark after 5-6 years. Find me a better coach comparison than the bucking bronco
Comments
-
I always equated Sark to Charlie Weiss. Both guys were considered genius play callers, both guys were hired at major Universities with no head coaching experience, both guys decided to stay with their old team instead of go out and recruit once hired, both guys followed up Ty, both guys recruited well but constantly had average to poor teams.
I know Weiss made two BCS games(also had a 3-9) but looking at his W-L at ND and his background I'd say Sark is most like him. -
I made the Koetter comparison a while ago on dawgman. I was trying to illustrate the fact that Sark hasn't done anything yet. Many people over there think that recruits and writers are constantly in awe of Sark but in reality they see him as a guy like Koetter - a ,
.500 guy who hasn't proven anything. If the results continue this year, he will be the lame duck, dead man walking coach that guys like Koetter, Tedford, and Neuheisal were in their final year. -
"he will be the lame duck, dead man walking coach that guys like Koetter, Tedford, and Neuheisal were in their final year"
Except Woody will give him an extension. Can't expect miracles until they get a couple full recruiting cycles in the new stadium, incremental progress, improvements aren't always on the field etc. -
I love how Sark gets compared to Tedford, a guy who had multiple 10 win seasons in his first five years, one of which was damn close to being in the bcs game. Sure Sark could end up like him.....minus the 10 win seasons when there weren't 14 games a year.
-
I was comparing Sark after 8 or less wins this year to Tedford in his FINAL year. Everyone knew he was gone, including his players and recruits and they acted accordingly, just like Rick's final class at UCLA.
-
Yeah, not picking at your post, its just that I've heard many people making the comparison when Sark would be lucky to have the career Tedford did.bananasnblondes said:I was comparing Sark after 8 or less wins this year to Tedford in his FINAL year. Everyone knew he was gone, including his players and recruits and they acted accordingly, just like Rick's final class at UCLA.
-
This thread is worthless without BearsWiinHeretoBeatmyChest said:
Yeah, not picking at your post, its just that I've heard many people making the comparison when Sark would be lucky to have the career Tedford did.bananasnblondes said:I was comparing Sark after 8 or less wins this year to Tedford in his FINAL year. Everyone knew he was gone, including his players and recruits and they acted accordingly, just like Rick's final class at UCLA.
-
Good poast but fixed it up a bit.puppylove_sugarsteel said:40-34 in 6 seasons, 2, losing seasons (this year and next Sark will finish 7-6) According to that weeble-wobble fatty-fuck Fetters Sark will get a 6th year EVEN if he finishes 7-6 this year.
Does flabby-fucktard-fetters know what conference Woody came from? I've Been ripping on and correcting that tub-of-lard for 17 years and will now. Sark is gone if he completes the Turd Koetter model of success this year and has a losing season. I'd love to debate that blubbery bitch on this topic
The sad thing, Turd Koetter will have a better record than Sark after 5-6 years. Find me a better coach comparison than the bucking bronco -
Tell that to that idiot Race who would have hired Tedford!HeretoBeatmyChest said:I love how Sark gets compared to Tedford, a guy who had multiple 10 win seasons in his first five years, one of which was damn close to being in the bcs game. Sure Sark could end up like him.....minus the 10 win seasons when there weren't 14 games a year.
-
Tedford does not lack comportment.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Tell that to that idiot Race who would have hired Tedford!
-
Thank you beatmychest. Redford was a. Texas blowjob away from the rose bowl once, and 2 legit bcs shots in 5-6 years. Sark hasn't even CAME FUCKING CLOSE to a bcs bid. Good coaches win BIG road games. Sark can't. He WILL NEVER sniff a rose bowl. If he does, it will take 5 years to sniff another.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I love how Sark gets compared to Tedford, a guy who had multiple 10 win seasons in his first five years, one of which was damn close to being in the bcs game. Sure Sark could end up like him.....minus the 10 win seasons when there weren't 14 games a year.
ASU cut ties too late. Turd cutter NEVER would have got to a rose bowl, if he did it would be an aberration. Same with Sark. He might win the north in year 7, but a coach like Tedford would have had UW in EVERY game. No blowouts at LSU, Arizona, Oregon. Good coaches don't have setbacks like that.
Sark needs to ditch play calling. he will not win as a play caller/coach. he doesn't make rational play calling decisions. it will cost a stubborn d****** his job
-
UW sports already has one Tedford in basketball, we really don't need another Tedford in football.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Thank you beatmychest. Redford was a. Texas blowjob away from the rose bowl once, and 2 legit bcs shots in 5-6 years. Sark hasn't even CAME FUCKING CLOSE to a bcs bid. Good coaches win BIG road games. Sark can't. He WILL NEVER sniff a rose bowl. If he does, it will take 5 years to sniff another.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I love how Sark gets compared to Tedford, a guy who had multiple 10 win seasons in his first five years, one of which was damn close to being in the bcs game. Sure Sark could end up like him.....minus the 10 win seasons when there weren't 14 games a year.
ASU cut ties too late. Turd cutter NEVER would have got to a rose bowl, if he did it would be an aberration. Same with Sark. He might win the north in year 7, but a coach like Tedford would have had UW in EVERY game. No blowouts at LSU, Arizona, Oregon. Good coaches don't have setbacks like that.
Sark needs to ditch play calling. he will not win as a play caller/coach. he doesn't make rational play calling decisions. it will cost a stubborn d****** his job -
Why is Mike ******'s job an issue here?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Thank you beatmychest. Redford was a. Texas blowjob away from the rose bowl once, and 2 legit bcs shots in 5-6 years. Sark hasn't even CAME FUCKING CLOSE to a bcs bid. Good coaches win BIG road games. Sark can't. He WILL NEVER sniff a rose bowl. If he does, it will take 5 years to sniff another.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I love how Sark gets compared to Tedford, a guy who had multiple 10 win seasons in his first five years, one of which was damn close to being in the bcs game. Sure Sark could end up like him.....minus the 10 win seasons when there weren't 14 games a year.
ASU cut ties too late. Turd cutter NEVER would have got to a rose bowl, if he did it would be an aberration. Same with Sark. He might win the north in year 7, but a coach like Tedford would have had UW in EVERY game. No blowouts at LSU, Arizona, Oregon. Good coaches don't have setbacks like that.
Sark needs to ditch play calling. he will not win as a play caller/coach. he doesn't make rational play calling decisions. it will cost a stubborn d****** his job -
Free pub?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Why is Mike ******'s job an issue here?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Thank you beatmychest. Redford was a. Texas blowjob away from the rose bowl once, and 2 legit bcs shots in 5-6 years. Sark hasn't even CAME FUCKING CLOSE to a bcs bid. Good coaches win BIG road games. Sark can't. He WILL NEVER sniff a rose bowl. If he does, it will take 5 years to sniff another.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I love how Sark gets compared to Tedford, a guy who had multiple 10 win seasons in his first five years, one of which was damn close to being in the bcs game. Sure Sark could end up like him.....minus the 10 win seasons when there weren't 14 games a year.
ASU cut ties too late. Turd cutter NEVER would have got to a rose bowl, if he did it would be an aberration. Same with Sark. He might win the north in year 7, but a coach like Tedford would have had UW in EVERY game. No blowouts at LSU, Arizona, Oregon. Good coaches don't have setbacks like that.
Sark needs to ditch play calling. he will not win as a play caller/coach. he doesn't make rational play calling decisions. it will cost a stubborn d****** his job -
GRUNDLE STOp
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
