Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Sark IS Dirk Koetter, Mirror image

puppylove_sugarsteel
puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
in Hardcore Husky Board
40-34 in 6 seasons, 2, losing seasons (this year or next Sark will finish 6-7) According to that weeble-wobble fatty-fuck Fetters Sark will get a 6th year EVEN if he finishes 6-7 this year.

Does flabby-fucktard-fetters know what conference Woody came from? I've Been ripping on and correcting that tub-of-lard for 17 years and will now. Sark is gone if he completes the Turd Koetter model of success this year and has a losing season. I'd love to debate that blubbery bitch on this topic

The sad thing, Turd Koetter will have a better record than Sark after 5-6 years. Find me a better coach comparison than the bucking bronco
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    I always equated Sark to Charlie Weiss. Both guys were considered genius play callers, both guys were hired at major Universities with no head coaching experience, both guys decided to stay with their old team instead of go out and recruit once hired, both guys followed up Ty, both guys recruited well but constantly had average to poor teams.

    I know Weiss made two BCS games(also had a 3-9) but looking at his W-L at ND and his background I'd say Sark is most like him.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,641
    I made the Koetter comparison a while ago on dawgman. I was trying to illustrate the fact that Sark hasn't done anything yet. Many people over there think that recruits and writers are constantly in awe of Sark but in reality they see him as a guy like Koetter - a ,
    .500 guy who hasn't proven anything. If the results continue this year, he will be the lame duck, dead man walking coach that guys like Koetter, Tedford, and Neuheisal were in their final year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • section8
    section8 Member Posts: 1,581
    "he will be the lame duck, dead man walking coach that guys like Koetter, Tedford, and Neuheisal were in their final year"

    Except Woody will give him an extension. Can't expect miracles until they get a couple full recruiting cycles in the new stadium, incremental progress, improvements aren't always on the field etc.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    I love how Sark gets compared to Tedford, a guy who had multiple 10 win seasons in his first five years, one of which was damn close to being in the bcs game. Sure Sark could end up like him.....minus the 10 win seasons when there weren't 14 games a year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,641
    I was comparing Sark after 8 or less wins this year to Tedford in his FINAL year. Everyone knew he was gone, including his players and recruits and they acted accordingly, just like Rick's final class at UCLA.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    bananasnblondes said:

    I was comparing Sark after 8 or less wins this year to Tedford in his FINAL year. Everyone knew he was gone, including his players and recruits and they acted accordingly, just like Rick's final class at UCLA.

    Yeah, not picking at your post, its just that I've heard many people making the comparison when Sark would be lucky to have the career Tedford did.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    edited July 2013
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    I was comparing Sark after 8 or less wins this year to Tedford in his FINAL year. Everyone knew he was gone, including his players and recruits and they acted accordingly, just like Rick's final class at UCLA.

    Yeah, not picking at your post, its just that I've heard many people making the comparison when Sark would be lucky to have the career Tedford did.
    This thread is worthless without BearsWiin
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    40-34 in 6 seasons, 2, losing seasons (this year and next Sark will finish 7-6) According to that weeble-wobble fatty-fuck Fetters Sark will get a 6th year EVEN if he finishes 7-6 this year.

    Does flabby-fucktard-fetters know what conference Woody came from? I've Been ripping on and correcting that tub-of-lard for 17 years and will now. Sark is gone if he completes the Turd Koetter model of success this year and has a losing season. I'd love to debate that blubbery bitch on this topic

    The sad thing, Turd Koetter will have a better record than Sark after 5-6 years. Find me a better coach comparison than the bucking bronco

    Good poast but fixed it up a bit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    I love how Sark gets compared to Tedford, a guy who had multiple 10 win seasons in his first five years, one of which was damn close to being in the bcs game. Sure Sark could end up like him.....minus the 10 win seasons when there weren't 14 games a year.

    Tell that to that idiot Race who would have hired Tedford!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,782 Standard Supporter
    He_Needs_More_Time said:


    Tell that to that idiot Race who would have hired Tedford!

    Tedford does not lack comportment.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter