Stalin's UW Predictions
Comments
-
@backthepack gave my post the fuck off. He must view this team as a Final 4 contender.
-
DerekJohnson said:
@backthepack gave my post the fuck off. He must view this team as a Final 4 contender.
-
8-2, maybe 7-3. Cal game and Furd could go either way.
-
The only time I ever listened to the podcast ddy predicted a loss for every game. I found it funny
-
Stalin, you ignorant slut. Bagged-out, dried up slunk meat like you and Pumpy know the rules: if you want a contract, sign on the dotted line. Oh, but let's all shed a tear for poor Pumpy. There was only testimony that he had had sexual intercourse over forty times with another man while living with Purple J. But I suppose that sort of fashionable promiscuity means nothing to someone like you, Stalin, who flip flops from poster to poster, with the frequency of a cheap Ham Radio. But Hell hath no fury like a dipshit scorned, and Stalin like the screeching, squealing, rapacious swamp sow you are, are on the verge of your annual money grab. I guess what you are saying is, when you're on your back, the meter's running. Well, please spare us Stalin, and tell us the rates at the top. Then we can choose which two-bit parts and bargain basement sluts to shack up with.DerekJohnson said:Washington Huskies 4-5-1
Stanford (Sirmon's debut - 6 INT / loss)
Arizona (win)
Cal (We always lose to Cal - loss)
OSU (win)
Oregon (loss)
Colorado (win)
Utah (loss)
UCLA (win)
WSU (tie 3OT)
USC (loss)
And for the record, Baseman told you and the Pod, UW wouldn't lose to Michigan. And as always, I'm right. -
can confirmBaseman said:
Baseman's Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, a solicitation or recommendation for any scantily clad, partially nude, any suggestive broad, or similar offering, nor does it constitute an offer to provide real information regarding, and or related to the University of Washington Football program...Anything you poast, can, and will be used against you, years later.DerekJohnson said:Washington Huskies 4-5-1
Stanford (Sirmon's debut - 6 INT / loss)
Arizona (win)
Cal (We always lose to Cal - loss)
OSU (win)
Oregon (loss)
Colorado (win)
Utah (loss)
UCLA (win)
WSU (tie 3OT)
USC (loss) -
They will be 0-0. HthTommySQC said:
Fuckers better be 4-0 headed to Auzten.DerekJohnson said:Washington Huskies 4-5-1
Stanford (Sirmon's debut - 6 INT / loss)
Arizona (win)
Cal (We always lose to Cal - loss)
OSU (win)
Oregon (loss)
Colorado (win)
Utah (loss)
UCLA (win)
WSU (tie 3OT)
USC (loss)
Or else!!¹! -
I received a PM asking me why I would think Sirmon would get 6 INTs. There is attempted humor interjected into the OP. I do not actually think Sirmon will be picked off 6 times including two taken to the house. #MyFalcons
If I had to pick that game, I might actually give a slight edge to UW, because Stanford is in a faster state of decline than UW -
DerekJohnson said:
Washington Huskies 4-5-1
Stanford (Sirmon's debut - 6 INT / loss)
Arizona (win)
Cal (We always lose to Cal - loss)
OSU (win)
Oregon (loss)
Colorado (win)
Utah (loss)
UCLA (win)
WSU (tie 3OT)
USC (loss)
-
MikeDamone said:
They will be 0-0. HthTommySQC said:
Fuckers better be 4-0 headed to Auzten.DerekJohnson said:Washington Huskies 4-5-1
Stanford (Sirmon's debut - 6 INT / loss)
Arizona (win)
Cal (We always lose to Cal - loss)
OSU (win)
Oregon (loss)
Colorado (win)
Utah (loss)
UCLA (win)
WSU (tie 3OT)
USC (loss)
Or else!!¹!
