Season ticket sales are up.
blogs.seattletimes.com/huskyfootball/2013/07/19/uw-reports-increase-in-season-tickets-sold-for-new-husky-stadium/
Comments
-
I am glad season ticket sales are up, even if it is for the wrong reason. There is no reason to further pussify our games with empty seats. When we need to get rid of a coach all optional donations (i.e. non-seat mandated) should be shut off. I know that is not a practical scenario but I hate how the quality of gameday has decreased.Passion said:Fancy new theater. We'll see if it's the same movie.
blogs.seattletimes.com/huskyfootball/2013/07/19/uw-reports-increase-in-season-tickets-sold-for-new-husky-stadium/ -
Here is the problem....This group follows, they need to start leading. This crew and Sark have history to build from instead the history and tradition is ignored. The 25 should have NEVER been taken off the field, THAT should have never happened.
Minus Jerramy Stevens 2001 was an incredible football season, and Curtis Williams should be honored appropriately. That 2001 team wasn't incredibly talented they had guys with heart and battled. The national title team is easily had one of the greatest defense's of all time and the offense virtually unstoppable.
Once Sark decides to get out of his own way and commit to the run, special teams and defense he might just might be able to change his future at Washington.
I know Sark wants to create his own era and all that stuff, but people love history. People love stories and epic games of the past. For all the kids that only know the losing of the last 10 years and average seasons need to recognize this program was actually relevant. If anyone has read about husky football in the 20's it put Alabama football on the map by coming on train and beating mighty Washington. That started Bama football.
I know these guys have a business to run and college athletics is a very profitable business but this group needs to understand what could be.
Scott Woodward Director of Athletics LSU
Jennifer Cohen Senior Associate Athletic Director San Diego State
Paul King Senior Associate Athletic Director
Stephanie Rempe Senior Associate Athletic Director University of Arizona
Shondell Reed Senior Associate Athletic Director Cal St. Fullerton
O.D. Vincent Senior Associate Athletic Director
People involved in the game day experience, and marketing efforts. Fail...To them its about entertainment and ensuring the top "dawgs" continue to earn their unearned 6 & 7 figure salaries. Making it fun for the kids and stuff, develop huskies for life and all that. Make no mistake this about winning and winning creates more money and more money make the elite happy.
There is history and tradition at Washington that is not being leveraged. The story needs to be built on what was and what can be, not shiny helmets and flashy uniforms.
Develop and create the right message and people will follow the leaders.
-
The 2001 team went 8-4. The 2000 team went 11-1.
I agree not honoring #25 was stupid and a mistake. -
"Once Sark decides to get out of his own way and commit to the run" - jecornel
If you are going to bitch, at least pretend you know something about football. The Dawgs have had 4 straight 1,000+ rushers. 1st time in program history I believe, but I could be wrong.
In today's game, you cannot just RUN the ball without a threat of a decent passing game.
The problem is we cannot RECRUIT athletic Oline guys and we have a position coach who does not understand, or at least cannot develop guys to PASS protect. For some reason Sark has chose to stand behind Cozz, and that has been his biggest mistake. -
^^Agree, but Sark has shown a tendency to abandon the run during game situations where its working. So while overall there has been some solid rushing yardage, the choice to bail on the run and attempt to pass.
-
Look at our national ranking in rushing yards per game under Sark:IrishDawg22 said:"Once Sark decides to get out of his own way and commit to the run" - jecornel
If you are going to bitch, at least pretend you know something about football. The Dawgs have had 4 straight 1,000+ rushers. 1st time in program history I believe, but I could be wrong.
In today's game, you cannot just RUN the ball without a threat of a decent passing game.
The problem is we cannot RECRUIT athletic Oline guys and we have a position coach who does not understand, or at least cannot develop guys to PASS protect. For some reason Sark has chose to stand behind Cozz, and that has been his biggest mistake.
2012: 86th
2011: 63rd
2010: 38th (peaked)
2009: 68th
In comparison, Oregon was in the top 10 every year he has been here.
Source: cfbstats.com/2012/leader/national/team/offense/split01/category01/sort01.html
You are right about one thing. Cozz has done a shitty job and Sark kept him here, and recruits know that. -
1000 yard rushers are seriously overrated (Hi Reggie!). RN never had a 1000 yard rusher but his RB team was a powerhouse on the ground. As noted above, our running game has been mediocre at best under Sark, even compared to other teams in THIS ECONOMY.IrishDawg22 said:"Once Sark decides to get out of his own way and commit to the run" - jecornel
If you are going to bitch, at least pretend you know something about football. The Dawgs have had 4 straight 1,000+ rushers. 1st time in program history I believe, but I could be wrong.
In today's game, you cannot just RUN the ball without a threat of a decent passing game.
The problem is we cannot RECRUIT athletic Oline guys and we have a position coach who does not understand, or at least cannot develop guys to PASS protect. For some reason Sark has chose to stand behind Cozz, and that has been his biggest mistake. -
Pretty racist that you post a link to a blog written by a white guy.
-
That was an ass whooping.PurpleJ said:
Look at our national ranking in rushing yards per game under Sark:IrishDawg22 said:"Once Sark decides to get out of his own way and commit to the run" - jecornel
If you are going to bitch, at least pretend you know something about football. The Dawgs have had 4 straight 1,000+ rushers. 1st time in program history I believe, but I could be wrong.
In today's game, you cannot just RUN the ball without a threat of a decent passing game.
The problem is we cannot RECRUIT athletic Oline guys and we have a position coach who does not understand, or at least cannot develop guys to PASS protect. For some reason Sark has chose to stand behind Cozz, and that has been his biggest mistake.
2012: 86th
2011: 63rd
2010: 38th (peaked)
2009: 68th
In comparison, Oregon was in the top 10 every year he has been here.
Source: cfbstats.com/2012/leader/national/team/offense/split01/category01/sort01.html
You are right about one thing. Cozz has done a shitty job and Sark kept him here, and recruits know that. -
"As noted above, our running game has been mediocre at best under Sark, even compared to other teams in THIS ECONOMY."
Our running game will improve when Obama gets serious about THE ECONOMY.
-
Sorry, I meant the 2000 season. I was thinking of the RB game..ha! Yes Sark, is the first coach to have a RB rush for a 1,000 yards in 4 seasons. However, this year will feature a hybrid no huddle offense. He also got tremendous performances out of Polk. Polk had that monster game against WSU and Sark said this what I have envisioned all along for the program....cough, cough....What?
It was U$C's biggest complaint is that Sark had the keys to the Ferrari and stalled it before hitting 6th gear.
I am not trying to be funny or cute but I think Sark panics and it has cost him some big wins and huge steps forward.
-
I am loving the economy, my business is up and way up. Has been a great year thus far. All my clients have been busy all through the summer and fall is looking very good.tracker said:"As noted above, our running game has been mediocre at best under Sark, even compared to other teams in THIS ECONOMY."
Our running game will improve when Obama gets serious about THE ECONOMY.
When gets the run going wins and revenues will rise....yahooo.
-
Sark has been fortunate to have talented RB's not to mention like others say in key games Sark panics.jecornel said:Sorry, I meant the 2000 season. I was thinking of the RB game..ha! Yes Sark, is the first coach to have a RB rush for a 1,000 yards in 4 seasons. However, this year will feature a hybrid no huddle offense. He also got tremendous performances out of Polk. Polk had that monster game against WSU and Sark said this what I have envisioned all along for the program....cough, cough....What?
It was U$C's biggest complaint is that Sark had the keys to the Ferrari and stalled it before hitting 6th gear.
I am not trying to be funny or cute but I think Sark panics and it has cost him some big wins and huge steps forward.
With the Seahawks if they trail 10-0 they are still sticking with the run. If the Huskies sometimes even trial by just 7 points, Sark starts to panic and abandons the run game.
In college team rushing yards matter more than a thousand yard back. His QB's and backup RB's contribute zero to the rushing game.
While in 1991 or 2000 we didn't have a 1,000 yard rusher but were a great rushing team. -
You leave out 1 key component to our rushing numbers. We had a QB that was absolutely no threat while running the spread option. Add in a mobile QB (Miles) and you can add 500 yds into that number which would put us near the Top 30 to go with our passing attack.PurpleJ said:
Look at our national ranking in rushing yards per game under Sark:IrishDawg22 said:"Once Sark decides to get out of his own way and commit to the run" - jecornel
If you are going to bitch, at least pretend you know something about football. The Dawgs have had 4 straight 1,000+ rushers. 1st time in program history I believe, but I could be wrong.
In today's game, you cannot just RUN the ball without a threat of a decent passing game.
The problem is we cannot RECRUIT athletic Oline guys and we have a position coach who does not understand, or at least cannot develop guys to PASS protect. For some reason Sark has chose to stand behind Cozz, and that has been his biggest mistake.
2012: 86th
2011: 63rd
2010: 38th (peaked)
2009: 68th
In comparison, Oregon was in the top 10 every year he has been here.
Source: cfbstats.com/2012/leader/national/team/offense/split01/category01/sort01.html
You are right about one thing. Cozz has done a shitty job and Sark kept him here, and recruits know that.
My main concern is still the lack of TALENT up front and their ability to protect the passer.
As for Sark's play calling, we that speaks for itself. -
Because Sark never had a mobile quarterback before.IrishDawg22 said:
You leave out 1 key component to our rushing numbers. We had a QB that was absolutely no threat while running the spread option. Add in a mobile QB (Miles) and you can add 500 yds into that number which would put us near the Top 30 to go with our passing attack.PurpleJ said:
Look at our national ranking in rushing yards per game under Sark:IrishDawg22 said:"Once Sark decides to get out of his own way and commit to the run" - jecornel
If you are going to bitch, at least pretend you know something about football. The Dawgs have had 4 straight 1,000+ rushers. 1st time in program history I believe, but I could be wrong.
In today's game, you cannot just RUN the ball without a threat of a decent passing game.
The problem is we cannot RECRUIT athletic Oline guys and we have a position coach who does not understand, or at least cannot develop guys to PASS protect. For some reason Sark has chose to stand behind Cozz, and that has been his biggest mistake.
2012: 86th
2011: 63rd
2010: 38th (peaked)
2009: 68th
In comparison, Oregon was in the top 10 every year he has been here.
Source: cfbstats.com/2012/leader/national/team/offense/split01/category01/sort01.html
You are right about one thing. Cozz has done a shitty job and Sark kept him here, and recruits know that.
My main concern is still the lack of TALENT up front and their ability to protect the passer.
As for Sark's play calling, we that speaks for itself. -
Whooshjecornel said:
I am loving the economy, my business is up and way up. Has been a great year thus far. All my clients have been busy all through the summer and fall is looking very good.tracker said:"As noted above, our running game has been mediocre at best under Sark, even compared to other teams in THIS ECONOMY."
Our running game will improve when Obama gets serious about THE ECONOMY.
When gets the run going wins and revenues will rise....yahooo. -
Isn't it SARK'S job to recruit and develop that TALENT? Isn't it also his JOB to commit to having a solid GROUND game?IrishDawg22 said:
You leave out 1 key component to our rushing numbers. We had a QB that was absolutely no threat while running the spread option. Add in a mobile QB (Miles) and you can add 500 yds into that number which would put us near the Top 30 to go with our passing attack.PurpleJ said:
Look at our national ranking in rushing yards per game under Sark:IrishDawg22 said:"Once Sark decides to get out of his own way and commit to the run" - jecornel
If you are going to bitch, at least pretend you know something about football. The Dawgs have had 4 straight 1,000+ rushers. 1st time in program history I believe, but I could be wrong.
In today's game, you cannot just RUN the ball without a threat of a decent passing game.
The problem is we cannot RECRUIT athletic Oline guys and we have a position coach who does not understand, or at least cannot develop guys to PASS protect. For some reason Sark has chose to stand behind Cozz, and that has been his biggest mistake.
2012: 86th
2011: 63rd
2010: 38th (peaked)
2009: 68th
In comparison, Oregon was in the top 10 every year he has been here.
Source: cfbstats.com/2012/leader/national/team/offense/split01/category01/sort01.html
You are right about one thing. Cozz has done a shitty job and Sark kept him here, and recruits know that.
My main concern is still the lack of TALENT up front and their ability to protect the passer.
As for Sark's play calling, we that speaks for itself.
I can CAPITALIZE words in my POSTS, too. -
W. JW. I didn't think you could doog it up this badly but somehow you did.IrishDawg22 said:
You leave out 1 key component to our rushing numbers. We had a QB that was absolutely no threat while running the spread option. Add in a mobile QB (Miles) and you can add 500 yds into that number which would put us near the Top 30 to go with our passing attack.PurpleJ said:
Look at our national ranking in rushing yards per game under Sark:IrishDawg22 said:"Once Sark decides to get out of his own way and commit to the run" - jecornel
If you are going to bitch, at least pretend you know something about football. The Dawgs have had 4 straight 1,000+ rushers. 1st time in program history I believe, but I could be wrong.
In today's game, you cannot just RUN the ball without a threat of a decent passing game.
The problem is we cannot RECRUIT athletic Oline guys and we have a position coach who does not understand, or at least cannot develop guys to PASS protect. For some reason Sark has chose to stand behind Cozz, and that has been his biggest mistake.
2012: 86th
2011: 63rd
2010: 38th (peaked)
2009: 68th
In comparison, Oregon was in the top 10 every year he has been here.
Source: cfbstats.com/2012/leader/national/team/offense/split01/category01/sort01.html
You are right about one thing. Cozz has done a shitty job and Sark kept him here, and recruits know that.
My main concern is still the lack of TALENT up front and their ability to protect the passer.
As for Sark's play calling, we that speaks for itself. -
Your right, KP was so mobile last year.He_Needs_More_Time said:
W. JW. I didn't think you could doog it up this badly but somehow you did.IrishDawg22 said:
You leave out 1 key component to our rushing numbers. We had a QB that was absolutely no threat while running the spread option. Add in a mobile QB (Miles) and you can add 500 yds into that number which would put us near the Top 30 to go with our passing attack.PurpleJ said:
Look at our national ranking in rushing yards per game under Sark:IrishDawg22 said:"Once Sark decides to get out of his own way and commit to the run" - jecornel
If you are going to bitch, at least pretend you know something about football. The Dawgs have had 4 straight 1,000+ rushers. 1st time in program history I believe, but I could be wrong.
In today's game, you cannot just RUN the ball without a threat of a decent passing game.
The problem is we cannot RECRUIT athletic Oline guys and we have a position coach who does not understand, or at least cannot develop guys to PASS protect. For some reason Sark has chose to stand behind Cozz, and that has been his biggest mistake.
2012: 86th
2011: 63rd
2010: 38th (peaked)
2009: 68th
In comparison, Oregon was in the top 10 every year he has been here.
Source: cfbstats.com/2012/leader/national/team/offense/split01/category01/sort01.html
You are right about one thing. Cozz has done a shitty job and Sark kept him here, and recruits know that.
My main concern is still the lack of TALENT up front and their ability to protect the passer.
As for Sark's play calling, we that speaks for itself.
Have you ever watched a game???
Maybe I will add pics next time.
-
And when was I defending Sark???? The discussion was about the lack of running game, when in fact it is our inability to protect the passer that was our main issue on offense.PurpleJ said:
Isn't it SARK'S job to recruit and develop that TALENT? Isn't it also his JOB to commit to having a solid GROUND game?IrishDawg22 said:
You leave out 1 key component to our rushing numbers. We had a QB that was absolutely no threat while running the spread option. Add in a mobile QB (Miles) and you can add 500 yds into that number which would put us near the Top 30 to go with our passing attack.PurpleJ said:
Look at our national ranking in rushing yards per game under Sark:IrishDawg22 said:"Once Sark decides to get out of his own way and commit to the run" - jecornel
If you are going to bitch, at least pretend you know something about football. The Dawgs have had 4 straight 1,000+ rushers. 1st time in program history I believe, but I could be wrong.
In today's game, you cannot just RUN the ball without a threat of a decent passing game.
The problem is we cannot RECRUIT athletic Oline guys and we have a position coach who does not understand, or at least cannot develop guys to PASS protect. For some reason Sark has chose to stand behind Cozz, and that has been his biggest mistake.
2012: 86th
2011: 63rd
2010: 38th (peaked)
2009: 68th
In comparison, Oregon was in the top 10 every year he has been here.
Source: cfbstats.com/2012/leader/national/team/offense/split01/category01/sort01.html
You are right about one thing. Cozz has done a shitty job and Sark kept him here, and recruits know that.
My main concern is still the lack of TALENT up front and their ability to protect the passer.
As for Sark's play calling, we that speaks for itself.
I can CAPITALIZE words in my POSTS, too.
Sorry that is a TOUGH concept for some IDIOTS to grasp. -
The first two years he had Locker and Locker ran less with Sark than with Ty. Price isn't a runner but is mobile enough.IrishDawg22 said:
Your right, KP was so mobile last year.
Have you ever watched a game???
Maybe I will add pics next time.
You also haven't seen Miles play. Lindquist and Williams are more running threats than Miles is. -
Price mobile enough???? LMAOHe_Needs_More_Time said:
The first two years he had Locker and Locker ran less with Sark than with Ty. Price isn't a runner but is mobile enough.IrishDawg22 said:
Your right, KP was so mobile last year.
Have you ever watched a game???
Maybe I will add pics next time.
You also haven't seen Miles play. Lindquist and Williams are more running threats than Miles is.
I think he has -9 rushing yards for his career. He is a walking mash unit.
And thanks to a well timed business trip to Denver, I did get to see Cyler play. From what I observed, he is much more of a running threat than Price. -
You ignored the poont about Lockner.IrishDawg22 said:
Price mobile enough???? LMAOHe_Needs_More_Time said:
The first two years he had Locker and Locker ran less with Sark than with Ty. Price isn't a runner but is mobile enough.IrishDawg22 said:
Your right, KP was so mobile last year.
Have you ever watched a game???
Maybe I will add pics next time.
You also haven't seen Miles play. Lindquist and Williams are more running threats than Miles is.
I think he has -9 rushing yards for his career. He is a walking mash unit.
And thanks to a well timed business trip to Denver, I did get to see Cyler play. From what I observed, he is much more of a running threat than Price.
I personally can't wait for Miles to run for 500 yards in 1 season when Jack ran for 600 total in 2 seasons under ya boi Sark. -
Poont & ya boi??? Did I see you testifying in the Trayvon case a couple of weeks ago???TheKobeStopper said:
You ignored the poont about Lockner.IrishDawg22 said:
Price mobile enough???? LMAOHe_Needs_More_Time said:
The first two years he had Locker and Locker ran less with Sark than with Ty. Price isn't a runner but is mobile enough.IrishDawg22 said:
Your right, KP was so mobile last year.
Have you ever watched a game???
Maybe I will add pics next time.
You also haven't seen Miles play. Lindquist and Williams are more running threats than Miles is.
I think he has -9 rushing yards for his career. He is a walking mash unit.
And thanks to a well timed business trip to Denver, I did get to see Cyler play. From what I observed, he is much more of a running threat than Price.
I personally can't wait for Miles to run for 500 yards in 1 season when Jack ran for 600 total in 2 seasons under ya boi Sark.
Actually it was 773 & 13 TDs.
Wait, I thought he ran way too much in Yr 1???
And if you can't make a sound argument, you can always wave the pro Sark flag!!!!!
Soooo weak BRO!!!!
-
ID22EBAR.IrishDawg22 said:
Poont & ya boi??? Did I see you testifying in the Trayvon case a couple of weeks ago???TheKobeStopper said:
You ignored the poont about Lockner.IrishDawg22 said:
Price mobile enough???? LMAOHe_Needs_More_Time said:
The first two years he had Locker and Locker ran less with Sark than with Ty. Price isn't a runner but is mobile enough.IrishDawg22 said:
Your right, KP was so mobile last year.
Have you ever watched a game???
Maybe I will add pics next time.
You also haven't seen Miles play. Lindquist and Williams are more running threats than Miles is.
I think he has -9 rushing yards for his career. He is a walking mash unit.
And thanks to a well timed business trip to Denver, I did get to see Cyler play. From what I observed, he is much more of a running threat than Price.
I personally can't wait for Miles to run for 500 yards in 1 season when Jack ran for 600 total in 2 seasons under ya boi Sark.
Actually it was 773 & 13 TDs.
Wait, I thought he ran way too much in Yr 1???
And if you can't make a sound argument, you can always wave the pro Sark flag!!!!!
Soooo weak BRO!!!! -
And thanks for making my point. I said if we had a mobile QB we would finish Top 30 in rushing. In Jake's last year we were #38. Sorry, missed it by 8 spots.TheKobeStopper said:
You ignored the poont about Lockner.IrishDawg22 said:
Price mobile enough???? LMAOHe_Needs_More_Time said:
The first two years he had Locker and Locker ran less with Sark than with Ty. Price isn't a runner but is mobile enough.IrishDawg22 said:
Your right, KP was so mobile last year.
Have you ever watched a game???
Maybe I will add pics next time.
You also haven't seen Miles play. Lindquist and Williams are more running threats than Miles is.
I think he has -9 rushing yards for his career. He is a walking mash unit.
And thanks to a well timed business trip to Denver, I did get to see Cyler play. From what I observed, he is much more of a running threat than Price.
I personally can't wait for Miles to run for 500 yards in 1 season when Jack ran for 600 total in 2 seasons under ya boi Sark.
Now say something clever to distract from the facts.
-
And in Jack's other year we finished 68th. For an average of 53.5. Woof.IrishDawg22 said:
And thanks for making my point. I said if we had a mobile QB we would finish Top 30 in rushing. In Jake's last year we were #38. Sorry, missed it by 8 spots.TheKobeStopper said:
You ignored the poont about Lockner.IrishDawg22 said:
Price mobile enough???? LMAOHe_Needs_More_Time said:
The first two years he had Locker and Locker ran less with Sark than with Ty. Price isn't a runner but is mobile enough.IrishDawg22 said:
Your right, KP was so mobile last year.
Have you ever watched a game???
Maybe I will add pics next time.
You also haven't seen Miles play. Lindquist and Williams are more running threats than Miles is.
I think he has -9 rushing yards for his career. He is a walking mash unit.
And thanks to a well timed business trip to Denver, I did get to see Cyler play. From what I observed, he is much more of a running threat than Price.
I personally can't wait for Miles to run for 500 yards in 1 season when Jack ran for 600 total in 2 seasons under ya boi Sark.
Now say something clever to distract from the facts.
-
Pressing badly.IrishDawg22 said:
Poont & ya boi??? Did I see you testifying in the Trayvon case a couple of weeks ago???TheKobeStopper said:
You ignored the poont about Lockner.IrishDawg22 said:
Price mobile enough???? LMAOHe_Needs_More_Time said:
The first two years he had Locker and Locker ran less with Sark than with Ty. Price isn't a runner but is mobile enough.IrishDawg22 said:
Your right, KP was so mobile last year.
Have you ever watched a game???
Maybe I will add pics next time.
You also haven't seen Miles play. Lindquist and Williams are more running threats than Miles is.
I think he has -9 rushing yards for his career. He is a walking mash unit.
And thanks to a well timed business trip to Denver, I did get to see Cyler play. From what I observed, he is much more of a running threat than Price.
I personally can't wait for Miles to run for 500 yards in 1 season when Jack ran for 600 total in 2 seasons under ya boi Sark.
Actually it was 773 & 13 TDs.
Wait, I thought he ran way too much in Yr 1???
And if you can't make a sound argument, you can always wave the pro Sark flag!!!!!
Soooo weak BRO!!!! -
Says the guy with the username of a 16yr old.CuntWaffle said:
Pressing badly.IrishDawg22 said:
Poont & ya boi??? Did I see you testifying in the Trayvon case a couple of weeks ago???TheKobeStopper said:
You ignored the poont about Lockner.IrishDawg22 said:
Price mobile enough???? LMAOHe_Needs_More_Time said:
The first two years he had Locker and Locker ran less with Sark than with Ty. Price isn't a runner but is mobile enough.IrishDawg22 said:
Your right, KP was so mobile last year.
Have you ever watched a game???
Maybe I will add pics next time.
You also haven't seen Miles play. Lindquist and Williams are more running threats than Miles is.
I think he has -9 rushing yards for his career. He is a walking mash unit.
And thanks to a well timed business trip to Denver, I did get to see Cyler play. From what I observed, he is much more of a running threat than Price.
I personally can't wait for Miles to run for 500 yards in 1 season when Jack ran for 600 total in 2 seasons under ya boi Sark.
Actually it was 773 & 13 TDs.
Wait, I thought he ran way too much in Yr 1???
And if you can't make a sound argument, you can always wave the pro Sark flag!!!!!
Soooo weak BRO!!!!
Should I add a LOL so he understands??? -
If you are here to beat your chest you won't last long.IrishDawg22 said:
Says the guy with the username of a 16yr old.CuntWaffle said:
Pressing badly.IrishDawg22 said:
Poont & ya boi??? Did I see you testifying in the Trayvon case a couple of weeks ago???TheKobeStopper said:
You ignored the poont about Lockner.IrishDawg22 said:
Price mobile enough???? LMAOHe_Needs_More_Time said:
The first two years he had Locker and Locker ran less with Sark than with Ty. Price isn't a runner but is mobile enough.IrishDawg22 said:
Your right, KP was so mobile last year.
Have you ever watched a game???
Maybe I will add pics next time.
You also haven't seen Miles play. Lindquist and Williams are more running threats than Miles is.
I think he has -9 rushing yards for his career. He is a walking mash unit.
And thanks to a well timed business trip to Denver, I did get to see Cyler play. From what I observed, he is much more of a running threat than Price.
I personally can't wait for Miles to run for 500 yards in 1 season when Jack ran for 600 total in 2 seasons under ya boi Sark.
Actually it was 773 & 13 TDs.
Wait, I thought he ran way too much in Yr 1???
And if you can't make a sound argument, you can always wave the pro Sark flag!!!!!
Soooo weak BRO!!!!
Should I add a LOL so he understands???
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
