Fancy new theater. We'll see if it's the same movie.blogs.seattletimes.com/huskyfootball/2013/07/19/uw-reports-increase-in-season-tickets-sold-for-new-husky-stadium/
"Once Sark decides to get out of his own way and commit to the run" - jecornelIf you are going to bitch, at least pretend you know something about football. The Dawgs have had 4 straight 1,000+ rushers. 1st time in program history I believe, but I could be wrong.In today's game, you cannot just RUN the ball without a threat of a decent passing game.The problem is we cannot RECRUIT athletic Oline guys and we have a position coach who does not understand, or at least cannot develop guys to PASS protect. For some reason Sark has chose to stand behind Cozz, and that has been his biggest mistake.
"Once Sark decides to get out of his own way and commit to the run" - jecornelIf you are going to bitch, at least pretend you know something about football. The Dawgs have had 4 straight 1,000+ rushers. 1st time in program history I believe, but I could be wrong.In today's game, you cannot just RUN the ball without a threat of a decent passing game.The problem is we cannot RECRUIT athletic Oline guys and we have a position coach who does not understand, or at least cannot develop guys to PASS protect. For some reason Sark has chose to stand behind Cozz, and that has been his biggest mistake. Look at our national ranking in rushing yards per game under Sark:2012: 86th2011: 63rd2010: 38th (peaked)2009: 68thIn comparison, Oregon was in the top 10 every year he has been here. Source: cfbstats.com/2012/leader/national/team/offense/split01/category01/sort01.htmlYou are right about one thing. Cozz has done a shitty job and Sark kept him here, and recruits know that.
"As noted above, our running game has been mediocre at best under Sark, even compared to other teams in THIS ECONOMY."Our running game will improve when Obama gets serious about THE ECONOMY.
Sorry, I meant the 2000 season. I was thinking of the RB game..ha! Yes Sark, is the first coach to have a RB rush for a 1,000 yards in 4 seasons. However, this year will feature a hybrid no huddle offense. He also got tremendous performances out of Polk. Polk had that monster game against WSU and Sark said this what I have envisioned all along for the program....cough, cough....What?It was U$C's biggest complaint is that Sark had the keys to the Ferrari and stalled it before hitting 6th gear. I am not trying to be funny or cute but I think Sark panics and it has cost him some big wins and huge steps forward.
"Once Sark decides to get out of his own way and commit to the run" - jecornelIf you are going to bitch, at least pretend you know something about football. The Dawgs have had 4 straight 1,000+ rushers. 1st time in program history I believe, but I could be wrong.In today's game, you cannot just RUN the ball without a threat of a decent passing game.The problem is we cannot RECRUIT athletic Oline guys and we have a position coach who does not understand, or at least cannot develop guys to PASS protect. For some reason Sark has chose to stand behind Cozz, and that has been his biggest mistake. Look at our national ranking in rushing yards per game under Sark:2012: 86th2011: 63rd2010: 38th (peaked)2009: 68thIn comparison, Oregon was in the top 10 every year he has been here. Source: cfbstats.com/2012/leader/national/team/offense/split01/category01/sort01.htmlYou are right about one thing. Cozz has done a shitty job and Sark kept him here, and recruits know that. You leave out 1 key component to our rushing numbers. We had a QB that was absolutely no threat while running the spread option. Add in a mobile QB (Miles) and you can add 500 yds into that number which would put us near the Top 30 to go with our passing attack.My main concern is still the lack of TALENT up front and their ability to protect the passer.As for Sark's play calling, we that speaks for itself.
"As noted above, our running game has been mediocre at best under Sark, even compared to other teams in THIS ECONOMY."Our running game will improve when Obama gets serious about THE ECONOMY. I am loving the economy, my business is up and way up. Has been a great year thus far. All my clients have been busy all through the summer and fall is looking very good.When gets the run going wins and revenues will rise....yahooo.
"Once Sark decides to get out of his own way and commit to the run" - jecornelIf you are going to bitch, at least pretend you know something about football. The Dawgs have had 4 straight 1,000+ rushers. 1st time in program history I believe, but I could be wrong.In today's game, you cannot just RUN the ball without a threat of a decent passing game.The problem is we cannot RECRUIT athletic Oline guys and we have a position coach who does not understand, or at least cannot develop guys to PASS protect. For some reason Sark has chose to stand behind Cozz, and that has been his biggest mistake. Look at our national ranking in rushing yards per game under Sark:2012: 86th2011: 63rd2010: 38th (peaked)2009: 68thIn comparison, Oregon was in the top 10 every year he has been here. Source: cfbstats.com/2012/leader/national/team/offense/split01/category01/sort01.htmlYou are right about one thing. Cozz has done a shitty job and Sark kept him here, and recruits know that. You leave out 1 key component to our rushing numbers. We had a QB that was absolutely no threat while running the spread option. Add in a mobile QB (Miles) and you can add 500 yds into that number which would put us near the Top 30 to go with our passing attack.My main concern is still the lack of TALENT up front and their ability to protect the passer.As for Sark's play calling, we that speaks for itself. W. JW. I didn't think you could doog it up this badly but somehow you did.
"Once Sark decides to get out of his own way and commit to the run" - jecornelIf you are going to bitch, at least pretend you know something about football. The Dawgs have had 4 straight 1,000+ rushers. 1st time in program history I believe, but I could be wrong.In today's game, you cannot just RUN the ball without a threat of a decent passing game.The problem is we cannot RECRUIT athletic Oline guys and we have a position coach who does not understand, or at least cannot develop guys to PASS protect. For some reason Sark has chose to stand behind Cozz, and that has been his biggest mistake. Look at our national ranking in rushing yards per game under Sark:2012: 86th2011: 63rd2010: 38th (peaked)2009: 68thIn comparison, Oregon was in the top 10 every year he has been here. Source: cfbstats.com/2012/leader/national/team/offense/split01/category01/sort01.htmlYou are right about one thing. Cozz has done a shitty job and Sark kept him here, and recruits know that. You leave out 1 key component to our rushing numbers. We had a QB that was absolutely no threat while running the spread option. Add in a mobile QB (Miles) and you can add 500 yds into that number which would put us near the Top 30 to go with our passing attack.My main concern is still the lack of TALENT up front and their ability to protect the passer.As for Sark's play calling, we that speaks for itself. Isn't it SARK'S job to recruit and develop that TALENT? Isn't it also his JOB to commit to having a solid GROUND game? I can CAPITALIZE words in my POSTS, too.
Your right, KP was so mobile last year.Have you ever watched a game???Maybe I will add pics next time.
Your right, KP was so mobile last year.Have you ever watched a game???Maybe I will add pics next time. The first two years he had Locker and Locker ran less with Sark than with Ty. Price isn't a runner but is mobile enough. You also haven't seen Miles play. Lindquist and Williams are more running threats than Miles is.
Your right, KP was so mobile last year.Have you ever watched a game???Maybe I will add pics next time. The first two years he had Locker and Locker ran less with Sark than with Ty. Price isn't a runner but is mobile enough. You also haven't seen Miles play. Lindquist and Williams are more running threats than Miles is. Price mobile enough???? LMAOI think he has -9 rushing yards for his career. He is a walking mash unit.And thanks to a well timed business trip to Denver, I did get to see Cyler play. From what I observed, he is much more of a running threat than Price.
Your right, KP was so mobile last year.Have you ever watched a game???Maybe I will add pics next time. The first two years he had Locker and Locker ran less with Sark than with Ty. Price isn't a runner but is mobile enough. You also haven't seen Miles play. Lindquist and Williams are more running threats than Miles is. Price mobile enough???? LMAOI think he has -9 rushing yards for his career. He is a walking mash unit.And thanks to a well timed business trip to Denver, I did get to see Cyler play. From what I observed, he is much more of a running threat than Price. You ignored the poont about Lockner. I personally can't wait for Miles to run for 500 yards in 1 season when Jack ran for 600 total in 2 seasons under ya boi Sark.
Your right, KP was so mobile last year.Have you ever watched a game???Maybe I will add pics next time. The first two years he had Locker and Locker ran less with Sark than with Ty. Price isn't a runner but is mobile enough. You also haven't seen Miles play. Lindquist and Williams are more running threats than Miles is. Price mobile enough???? LMAOI think he has -9 rushing yards for his career. He is a walking mash unit.And thanks to a well timed business trip to Denver, I did get to see Cyler play. From what I observed, he is much more of a running threat than Price. You ignored the poont about Lockner. I personally can't wait for Miles to run for 500 yards in 1 season when Jack ran for 600 total in 2 seasons under ya boi Sark. Poont & ya boi??? Did I see you testifying in the Trayvon case a couple of weeks ago???Actually it was 773 & 13 TDs.Wait, I thought he ran way too much in Yr 1???And if you can't make a sound argument, you can always wave the pro Sark flag!!!!!Soooo weak BRO!!!!
Your right, KP was so mobile last year.Have you ever watched a game???Maybe I will add pics next time. The first two years he had Locker and Locker ran less with Sark than with Ty. Price isn't a runner but is mobile enough. You also haven't seen Miles play. Lindquist and Williams are more running threats than Miles is. Price mobile enough???? LMAOI think he has -9 rushing yards for his career. He is a walking mash unit.And thanks to a well timed business trip to Denver, I did get to see Cyler play. From what I observed, he is much more of a running threat than Price. You ignored the poont about Lockner. I personally can't wait for Miles to run for 500 yards in 1 season when Jack ran for 600 total in 2 seasons under ya boi Sark. And thanks for making my point. I said if we had a mobile QB we would finish Top 30 in rushing. In Jake's last year we were #38. Sorry, missed it by 8 spots.Now say something clever to distract from the facts.
Your right, KP was so mobile last year.Have you ever watched a game???Maybe I will add pics next time. The first two years he had Locker and Locker ran less with Sark than with Ty. Price isn't a runner but is mobile enough. You also haven't seen Miles play. Lindquist and Williams are more running threats than Miles is. Price mobile enough???? LMAOI think he has -9 rushing yards for his career. He is a walking mash unit.And thanks to a well timed business trip to Denver, I did get to see Cyler play. From what I observed, he is much more of a running threat than Price. You ignored the poont about Lockner. I personally can't wait for Miles to run for 500 yards in 1 season when Jack ran for 600 total in 2 seasons under ya boi Sark. Poont & ya boi??? Did I see you testifying in the Trayvon case a couple of weeks ago???Actually it was 773 & 13 TDs.Wait, I thought he ran way too much in Yr 1???And if you can't make a sound argument, you can always wave the pro Sark flag!!!!!Soooo weak BRO!!!! Pressing badly.
Your right, KP was so mobile last year.Have you ever watched a game???Maybe I will add pics next time. The first two years he had Locker and Locker ran less with Sark than with Ty. Price isn't a runner but is mobile enough. You also haven't seen Miles play. Lindquist and Williams are more running threats than Miles is. Price mobile enough???? LMAOI think he has -9 rushing yards for his career. He is a walking mash unit.And thanks to a well timed business trip to Denver, I did get to see Cyler play. From what I observed, he is much more of a running threat than Price. You ignored the poont about Lockner. I personally can't wait for Miles to run for 500 yards in 1 season when Jack ran for 600 total in 2 seasons under ya boi Sark. Poont & ya boi??? Did I see you testifying in the Trayvon case a couple of weeks ago???Actually it was 773 & 13 TDs.Wait, I thought he ran way too much in Yr 1???And if you can't make a sound argument, you can always wave the pro Sark flag!!!!!Soooo weak BRO!!!! Pressing badly. Says the guy with the username of a 16yr old.Should I add a LOL so he understands???
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
