Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I like secession efforts that don't get their asses handed to them

«13

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    Does anyone speak gullible fucking moron? IC is trying to say something here but it's pretty much unintelligible gibberish.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    SFGbob said:

    Does anyone speak gullible fucking moron? IC is trying to say something here but it's pretty much unintelligible gibberish.

    I thought this thread was going to be about the failed CHAZ secession effort.

  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,917
    edited July 2020
    Refusing to sign a bill giving troops who fight for America a raise in order to preserve the memory of troops who fought against America is an interesting strategy.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    MelloDawg said:

    Refusing to sign a bill giving troops who fight for America a raise in order to preserve the memory of troops who fought against America is an interesting strategy.

    The lengths people will go to fight for the legacy of the fucking traitors blows my mind.

    Fuck em.

    All of em.

    And yes, my great great grandfather donned the grey and fought against America.

    It ain't something to be proud of.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,286
    dnc said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Refusing to sign a bill giving troops who fight for America a raise in order to preserve the memory of troops who fought against America is an interesting strategy.

    The lengths people will go to fight for the legacy of the fucking traitors blows my mind.

    Fuck em.

    All of em.

    And yes, my great great grandfather donned the grey and fought against America.

    It ain't something to be proud of.
    But it's history. How else will we learn it?
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited July 2020
    MelloDawg said:

    Refusing to sign a bill giving troops who fight for America a raise in order to preserve the memory of troops who fought against America is an interesting strategy.

    Or, holding up military funds in order to make a social statement by changing base names is playing with their lives. Why not have a separate bill and just pay the people?
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    dnc said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Refusing to sign a bill giving troops who fight for America a raise in order to preserve the memory of troops who fought against America is an interesting strategy.

    The lengths people will go to fight for the legacy of the fucking traitors blows my mind.

    Fuck em.

    All of em.

    And yes, my great great grandfather donned the grey and fought against America.

    It ain't something to be proud of.
    But it's history. How else will we learn it?
    Sincerely, every redneck commenting on my FB celebration of my state taking down the rebel flag.








    Yeah I'm still on FB, fuck off.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    MelloDawg said:

    Refusing to sign a bill giving troops who fight for America a raise in order to preserve the memory of troops who fought against America is an interesting strategy.

    Or, holding up military funds in order to make a social statement by changing base names is playing with their lives. Why not have a separate bill and just pay the people?
    Both sides suck, as always.
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,917

    MelloDawg said:

    Refusing to sign a bill giving troops who fight for America a raise in order to preserve the memory of troops who fought against America is an interesting strategy.

    Or, holding up military funds in order to make a social statement by changing base names is playing with their lives. Why not have a separate bill and just pay the people?
    Also a valid argument. If you want a bill to only be about what's in its title, however, best of luck with that.

    And because I feel like each of my poasts should have some caveat, this whole Confederate statue / monument / base thing doesn't really move the needle for me. Trump could choose to die on many hills in order to rally the base, this seems like an odd one.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,604 Founders Club
    MelloDawg said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Refusing to sign a bill giving troops who fight for America a raise in order to preserve the memory of troops who fought against America is an interesting strategy.

    Or, holding up military funds in order to make a social statement by changing base names is playing with their lives. Why not have a separate bill and just pay the people?
    Also a valid argument. If you want a bill to only be about what's in its title, however, best of luck with that.

    And because I feel like each of my poasts should have some caveat, this whole Confederate statue / monument / base thing doesn't really move the needle for me. Trump could choose to die on many hills in order to rally the base, this seems like an odd one.
    "the base" is not uniform on the issue