Why shouldn't a Republican President hold a Juneteenth Rally?
Comments
-
You're an equal opportunity lover.PurpleThrobber said:
Agreed. Though no problem with the little perkies. Nipple sensitivity generally greater/harder.Pitchfork51 said:
She needs a boob job. Otherwise cuteGreenRiverGatorz said:Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.
-
Serious question (lol), do the GOP strategists think this is a persuasive argument that'll win over voters, or is this just another tactic to send libs into a frenzy and laugh at their overreaction?SFGbob said:
Which party was anti-slavery and which was pro-slavery?GreenRiverGatorz said:Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.
-
What you don't seem to get is that it doesn't need to be persuasive. It only needs to highlight the absurd idea that the Dems are the arbiter's of moral correctness.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Serious question (lol), do the GOP strategists think this is a persuasive argument that'll win over voters, or is this just another tactic to send libs into a frenzy and laugh at their overreaction?SFGbob said:
Which party was anti-slavery and which was pro-slavery?GreenRiverGatorz said:Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.
Trump doesn't need to convert people to win. He just has to keep people home because they realize the Dems are full of shit too. -
Was the question too tough for you?GreenRiverGatorz said:
Serious question (lol), do the GOP strategists think this is a persuasive argument that'll win over voters, or is this just another tactic to send libs into a frenzy and laugh at their overreaction?SFGbob said:
Which party was anti-slavery and which was pro-slavery?GreenRiverGatorz said:Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.
-
Democrats pulling down statues of Democrats and blaming the GOP for it is peak 2020. Democrats do nothing for blacks except for every 4 years when we get racism claims yet again. It really is pathetic.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Serious question (lol), do the GOP strategists think this is a persuasive argument that'll win over voters, or is this just another tactic to send libs into a frenzy and laugh at their overreaction?SFGbob said:
Which party was anti-slavery and which was pro-slavery?GreenRiverGatorz said:Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.
-
So it's the latter. Got it.Pitchfork51 said:
What you don't seem to get is that it doesn't need to be persuasive. It only needs to highlight the absurd idea that the Dems are the arbiter's of moral correctness.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Serious question (lol), do the GOP strategists think this is a persuasive argument that'll win over voters, or is this just another tactic to send libs into a frenzy and laugh at their overreaction?SFGbob said:
Which party was anti-slavery and which was pro-slavery?GreenRiverGatorz said:Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.
Trump doesn't need to convert people to win. He just has to keep people home because they realize the Dems are full of shit too. -
I ignore most of your questions. Just be @guntlove blessed that I answered this particular one.SFGbob said:
Was the question too tough for you?GreenRiverGatorz said:
Serious question (lol), do the GOP strategists think this is a persuasive argument that'll win over voters, or is this just another tactic to send libs into a frenzy and laugh at their overreaction?SFGbob said:
Which party was anti-slavery and which was pro-slavery?GreenRiverGatorz said:Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.
-
But you didn't answer it.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I ignore most of your questions. Just be @guntlove blessed that I answered this particular one.SFGbob said:
Was the question too tough for you?GreenRiverGatorz said:
Serious question (lol), do the GOP strategists think this is a persuasive argument that'll win over voters, or is this just another tactic to send libs into a frenzy and laugh at their overreaction?SFGbob said:
Which party was anti-slavery and which was pro-slavery?GreenRiverGatorz said:Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.
-
You really got me cornered on this one.SFGbob said:
But you didn't answer it.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I ignore most of your questions. Just be @guntlove blessed that I answered this particular one.SFGbob said:
Was the question too tough for you?GreenRiverGatorz said:
Serious question (lol), do the GOP strategists think this is a persuasive argument that'll win over voters, or is this just another tactic to send libs into a frenzy and laugh at their overreaction?SFGbob said:
Which party was anti-slavery and which was pro-slavery?GreenRiverGatorz said:Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.
-
insinceredawg said:
Do you find it ironic that the "Party of Lincoln" is crying over the removal of Confederate monuments and names? Why does your party now support traitorous racists?
IC please don't send anymore selfies.
