Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Did this get any coverage outside of Fox News?
SFGbob
Member Posts: 33,187
in Tug Tavern
Comments
-
If you watched any of this hearing or the meeting yesterday all of the Rats who were all in on having an investigation where ever it might lead us no longer want to have any investigation and are totally uninterested in any information being revealed in this hearing.SFGbob said:
Of course you haven't heard a word from the Dazzler or any of the other LooterBros who were all in on this Russian Collusion fraud. -
But but but...facts.
Pesky details.
The Jew throwing the German under the bus.
-
Coup's are OK now. If it's by the left.
-
It sure would be nice if members of the Rat party who were so strong on pushing this investigation would show a little interest in how this investigation went off the rails and abused their power. Their lack of interests leads me to believe that they never really cared about facts and were only interested in using this to hurt Trump.
Shouldn't they be happy to know that the President of the United States isn't a Russian agent as many of them had claimed?
To the best of my knowledge there were no elected Republican Senators who claimed Obama was a Muslim or that he was born in Kenya and yet the media never hesitated asking them to denounce the people who were claiming those things. Has anyone even bothered to ask Rat Senators about their previous claims? -
Absolutely no reason for the investigation. None.
-
Rosenstein signed off on the investigation because he is a gutless weasel who didn't have the spine to come out and publicly state what they all knew to be true. There was no evidence of anyone in the Trump campaign colluding with the Russians.Sledog said:Absolutely no reason for the investigation. None.
So to cover his ass and to avoid the heat he punted it to Mueller, who was really nothing more than a figurehead, and the same corrupt team that had already railroaded Flynn, added a bunch of Hillary supporting Rats who hated Trump to their team, and then proceeded to engage in a 2 year plus fishing expedition trying to manufacture an obstruction charge against Trump.
Whatever that is, it sure in the fuck isn't justice and if Rats had any shame they'd admit as much. -
"Where ever it will lead" Well, it led to Russian collusion by Team Hillary and the dem leftards had and have no interest in that truth.
-
And Mueller, who's investigation was supposed to be an investigation looking into Russian interference in our election had zero interest in looking into that story. And either no one in the FBI, who knew Steele's dossier was garbage no later than January 2017, ever bothered to inform Mueller of this fact, or Mueller and his team ignored it.WestlinnDuck said:"Where ever it will lead" Well, it led to Russian collusion by Team Hillary and the dem leftards had and have no interest in that truth.
Either way, there was never any whistle blower informing the public of that fact. And why is Hillary never asked about this? Why isn't Obama ever asked if he knew his FBI was using Russian disinformation to spy on the Trump campaign? Hell has Biden ever been asked that question? -
I bet you it gets brought up at the debates...SFGbob said:
And Mueller, who's investigation was supposed to be an investigation looking into Russian interference in our election had zero interest in looking into that story. And either no one in the FBI, who knew Steele's dossier was garbage no later than January 2017, ever bothered to inform Mueller of this fact, or Mueller and his team ignored it.WestlinnDuck said:"Where ever it will lead" Well, it led to Russian collusion by Team Hillary and the dem leftards had and have no interest in that truth.
Either way, there was never any whistle blower informing the public of that fact. And why is Hillary never asked about this? Why isn't Obama ever asked if he knew his FBI was using Russian disinformation to spy on the Trump campaign? Hell has Biden ever been asked that question? -
I don't have a lot of faith in Trump to ask that question in a coherent enough manner.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I bet you it gets brought up at the debates...SFGbob said:
And Mueller, who's investigation was supposed to be an investigation looking into Russian interference in our election had zero interest in looking into that story. And either no one in the FBI, who knew Steele's dossier was garbage no later than January 2017, ever bothered to inform Mueller of this fact, or Mueller and his team ignored it.WestlinnDuck said:"Where ever it will lead" Well, it led to Russian collusion by Team Hillary and the dem leftards had and have no interest in that truth.
Either way, there was never any whistle blower informing the public of that fact. And why is Hillary never asked about this? Why isn't Obama ever asked if he knew his FBI was using Russian disinformation to spy on the Trump campaign? Hell has Biden ever been asked that question? -
As always, whomever the said moderator is matters.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I bet you it gets brought up at the debates...SFGbob said:
And Mueller, who's investigation was supposed to be an investigation looking into Russian interference in our election had zero interest in looking into that story. And either no one in the FBI, who knew Steele's dossier was garbage no later than January 2017, ever bothered to inform Mueller of this fact, or Mueller and his team ignored it.WestlinnDuck said:"Where ever it will lead" Well, it led to Russian collusion by Team Hillary and the dem leftards had and have no interest in that truth.
Either way, there was never any whistle blower informing the public of that fact. And why is Hillary never asked about this? Why isn't Obama ever asked if he knew his FBI was using Russian disinformation to spy on the Trump campaign? Hell has Biden ever been asked that question? -
"We" impeached a President for nothing. Let that sink in. Not a good precedent to set, for any President. I loathed Obama, but I would never had advocated impeaching him because I didn't like his policies. This entire spectacle was shameful, but Pelosi and her ilk can't spell shame. If they tried it would come out "P-O-W-E-R."
-
They knowingly used a bogus investigation to go after people that they knew had committed no crime in the hope that they could nail them on a process crime. That isn't fucking justice folks. That's using the power of the state to go after your political opposition.Swaye said:"We" impeached a President for nothing. Let that sink in. Not a good precedent to set, for any President. I loathed Obama, but I would never had advocated impeaching him because I didn't like his policies. This entire spectacle was shameful, but Pelosi and her ilk can't spell shame. If they tried it would come out "P-O-W-E-R."
-
They call it treason!SFGbob said:
They knowingly used a bogus investigation to go after people that they knew had committed no crime in the hope that they could nail them on a process crime. That isn't fucking justice folks. That's using the power of the state to go after your political opposition.Swaye said:"We" impeached a President for nothing. Let that sink in. Not a good precedent to set, for any President. I loathed Obama, but I would never had advocated impeaching him because I didn't like his policies. This entire spectacle was shameful, but Pelosi and her ilk can't spell shame. If they tried it would come out "P-O-W-E-R."
