AANDY says Lambo should've read "Team of Rivals" to keep from being fired

topdawgnc · April 2014

whatshouldicareabout said:
Anyway, the whole point of this thread is that both Lambo and Sark sucked.

Thank God we have Petersen now.

Who in the fuck is Petersen?

Does he poast here?

Is his football team stacked or paper thin?

[Deleted User] · April 2014

MikeDamone said:

show previous quotes
whatshouldicareabout said:

MikeDamone said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

RoadDawg55 said:
I can't decide between Sark and Lambo. They both sucked.
Lambo had a Pac-10 championship. Sark's best year was 5-4 in conference.
Lambo did less with more. That 1996 and 1997 team's that tied for a pac 10 title and lost the holiday bowl and Aloha bowls were he most talented team of the last 20 years. And Lambo stumbled into 7 and 9 wins.
It was the 95 Sun Bowl team that won the Pac-10. Now let's never talk about 95 again.

Also, the argument that Lambo did less with more is true, but you could say the same for Sark, especially when you consider a team that had Locker, Polk, Kearse, Ta'amu, DTN, Bulter, Foster, and Trufant had a losing record.
You're right,should have said 1995 and 1996.

And yes, the same can be said for Sark....that truth and the lack of a forum to express it, is the reason this place exists.

The 1997 team sent 13 guys to the NFL following year and had a 7-4 regular season. Were ranked #2 in the country and top 10 until November.

That was the most depressing season ever even more than 2008.

digits · April 2014

dnc said:

show previous quotes
whatshouldicareabout said:

RoadDawg55 said:
I can't decide between Sark and Lambo. They both sucked.
Lambo had a Pac-10 championship. Sark's best year was 5-4 in conference.
True. OTOH, while Sark didn't take over the owen12 debacle that doog folklore likes to say he did, he didn't take over a a program coming off of 3 straight Rose Bowels with clearly established dominance in the northwest and most of the west coast either. Lambo inherited a sweetheart opportunity and never did better than splitting a conference title in six years.

I put Lambo slightly ahead of Sark, but I see the argument. They have a ton in common, right down to the PLSS love.

Yes, Lambo inherited a stacked roster. However, I wouldn't classify taking over a team less than two weeks before the season opener, trying to fill the shoes of a legendary coach (who just resigned in large part to protest his own university's actions), including two years probation/bowl ban, scholarship reductions, and no tv revenue exactly a, "sweetheart opportunity."

The program was absolutely shook to the core when DJ resigned, make no qualms about it.

I recognize Lambo wasn't the best HC, but comparing him to Sark is over the line. Lambo dedicated 30+ years as a student, player and coach to UW, and he gets compared to that shitbag Sark, who was here for five? Did Sark ever beat 0regon_GFY? How about Ohio St? What about Miami? DIAFF.

I don't give a shit, dedicating your life to something, anything, for 30+ years deserves some fucking respect.

Go fuck yourselves.

[Deleted User] · April 2014

Joe Stephanson said:

show previous quotes
dnc said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

RoadDawg55 said:
I can't decide between Sark and Lambo. They both sucked.
Lambo had a Pac-10 championship. Sark's best year was 5-4 in conference.
True. OTOH, while Sark didn't take over the owen12 debacle that doog folklore likes to say he did, he didn't take over a a program coming off of 3 straight Rose Bowels with clearly established dominance in the northwest and most of the west coast either. Lambo inherited a sweetheart opportunity and never did better than splitting a conference title in six years.

I put Lambo slightly ahead of Sark, but I see the argument. They have a ton in common, right down to the PLSS love.

Yes, Lambo inherited a stacked roster. However, I wouldn't classify taking over a team less than two weeks before the season opener, trying to fill the shoes of a legendary coach (who just resigned in large part to protest his own university's actions), including two years probation/bowl ban, scholarship reductions, and no tv revenue exactly a, "sweetheart opportunity."

The program was absolutely shook to the core when DJ resigned, make no qualms about it.

I recognize Lambo wasn't the best HC, but comparing him to Sark is over the line. Lambo dedicated 30+ years as a student, player and coach to UW, and he gets compared to that shitbag Sark, who was here for five? Did Sark ever beat 0regon_GFY? How about Ohio St? What about Miami? DIAFF.

I don't give a shit, dedicating your life to something, anything, for 30+ years deserves some fucking respect.

Go fuck yourselves.

Take this shit to Doogman where it belongs. You paint this dark picture for Lambo but facts are he inherited very talented teams. Probably more talented than any James team minus 1991 and 1984. The 1997 team actually had the talent to even match those teams. Throw in the fact that a different coach would have coached that squad up better and that team could have won a national title.

Lambo was slightly better than Sark but IMO both underachieved given the talent level. Both will have their Doogs like PLSS take away from his successor and give the credit to those dipshits as well.

AtomicDawg · April 2014

I don't see much difference between lambo and sark in the end. If sark has losing records at USC I guess you would be right. I think he will be very similar though. Lambo apologists are some of the worst.

Lambo was handed an absolute machine of a football program. At that point UW was considered a national contender the previous 3 years.

He was the head coach for some of the WORST losses I remember at UW based off of the amount of talent he had. Nobody is perfect but these stuck out to me as moments where he had no clue wtf he was doing.

@ Oregon (Kenny Wheaton. Great red zone route as always)

Oregon 24-22 (Cost us a rose bowl)

USC 21-21 (Consider it a loss given that they blew it and cost us a rose bowl)

Notre Dame 29-21 @ home (WTF happened at the end? I am still confused)

@Notre Dame 54-20 (This became the first in a trend to get our asses kicked vs good opponents on the road)

Colorado 33-21 (I am still confused how we got our ass kicked when Dillon ran wild the first half)

Nebraska 27-14 (Osborne vs. Lambo LOL)

Oregon 31-28 (great start to the game vs oregon as always.)

@UCLA (52-28 see the trend of shitty road performances continuing here. How in the hell did that team give up 52 and lose by 24???)

@Nebraska 55-7 (Great road performance as always)

AFA 45-25 (But Lambo was a great Players Coach. THey love playing for him. They won't quit!)

digits · April 2014

He_Needs_More_Time said:

show previous quotes
Joe Stephanson said:

dnc said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

RoadDawg55 said:
I can't decide between Sark and Lambo. They both sucked.
Lambo had a Pac-10 championship. Sark's best year was 5-4 in conference.
True. OTOH, while Sark didn't take over the owen12 debacle that doog folklore likes to say he did, he didn't take over a a program coming off of 3 straight Rose Bowels with clearly established dominance in the northwest and most of the west coast either. Lambo inherited a sweetheart opportunity and never did better than splitting a conference title in six years.

I put Lambo slightly ahead of Sark, but I see the argument. They have a ton in common, right down to the PLSS love.

Yes, Lambo inherited a stacked roster. However, I wouldn't classify taking over a team less than two weeks before the season opener, trying to fill the shoes of a legendary coach (who just resigned in large part to protest his own university's actions), including two years probation/bowl ban, scholarship reductions, and no tv revenue exactly a, "sweetheart opportunity."

The program was absolutely shook to the core when DJ resigned, make no qualms about it.

I recognize Lambo wasn't the best HC, but comparing him to Sark is over the line. Lambo dedicated 30+ years as a student, player and coach to UW, and he gets compared to that shitbag Sark, who was here for five? Did Sark ever beat 0regon_GFY? How about Ohio St? What about Miami? DIAFF.

I don't give a shit, dedicating your life to something, anything, for 30+ years deserves some fucking respect.

Go fuck yourselves.

Take this shit to Doogman where it belongs. You paint this dark picture for Lambo but facts are he inherited very talented teams. Probably more talented than any James team minus 1991 and 1984. The 1997 team actually had the talent to even match those teams. Throw in the fact that a different coach would have coached that squad up better and that team could have won a national title.

Lambo was slightly better than Sark but IMO both underachieved given the talent level. Both will have their Doogs like PLSS take away from his successor and give the credit to those dipshits as well.

"I don't deal in hypotheticals."

topdawgnc · April 2014

Joe Stephanson said:

show previous quotes
dnc said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

RoadDawg55 said:
I can't decide between Sark and Lambo. They both sucked.
Lambo had a Pac-10 championship. Sark's best year was 5-4 in conference.
True. OTOH, while Sark didn't take over the owen12 debacle that doog folklore likes to say he did, he didn't take over a a program coming off of 3 straight Rose Bowels with clearly established dominance in the northwest and most of the west coast either. Lambo inherited a sweetheart opportunity and never did better than splitting a conference title in six years.

I put Lambo slightly ahead of Sark, but I see the argument. They have a ton in common, right down to the PLSS love.

Yes, Lambo inherited a stacked roster. However, I wouldn't classify taking over a team less than two weeks before the season opener, trying to fill the shoes of a legendary coach (who just resigned in large part to protest his own university's actions), including two years probation/bowl ban, scholarship reductions, and no tv revenue exactly a, "sweetheart opportunity."

The program was absolutely shook to the core when DJ resigned, make no qualms about it.

I recognize Lambo wasn't the best HC, but comparing him to Sark is over the line. Lambo dedicated 30+ years as a student, player and coach to UW, and he gets compared to that shitbag Sark, who was here for five? Did Sark ever beat 0regon_GFY? How about Ohio St? What about Miami? DIAFF.

I don't give a shit, dedicating your life to something, anything, for 30+ years deserves some fucking respect.

Go fuck yourselves.

Even Don James doesn't buy your shit:

James not surprised

Don James, the winningest football coach in Washington history, whom Lambright replaced, said he wasn't surprised by the decision.

"I feel sorry for all of those coaches and their families," he said. "I'm not privy to all of what's going on there right now, but to me it seems a bit premature.

"There is going to be criticism. There always is. A few years, people wanted to get rid of me. The key is to win. And in the final analysis, Jim didn't do enough of that to keep the pressure off of him."

HeretoBeatmyChest · April 2014

He_Needs_More_Time said:

show previous quotes
MikeDamone said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

MikeDamone said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

RoadDawg55 said:
I can't decide between Sark and Lambo. They both sucked.
Lambo had a Pac-10 championship. Sark's best year was 5-4 in conference.
Lambo did less with more. That 1996 and 1997 team's that tied for a pac 10 title and lost the holiday bowl and Aloha bowls were he most talented team of the last 20 years. And Lambo stumbled into 7 and 9 wins.
It was the 95 Sun Bowl team that won the Pac-10. Now let's never talk about 95 again.

Also, the argument that Lambo did less with more is true, but you could say the same for Sark, especially when you consider a team that had Locker, Polk, Kearse, Ta'amu, DTN, Bulter, Foster, and Trufant had a losing record.
You're right,should have said 1995 and 1996.

And yes, the same can be said for Sark....that truth and the lack of a forum to express it, is the reason this place exists.
The 1997 team sent 13 guys to the NFL following year and had a 7-4 regular season. Were ranked #2 in the country and top 10 until November.

That was the most depressing season ever even more than 2008.

Exactly. In 2008 I felt we'd win 4 games and even told friends (in an email) that if Locker gets hurt we could only win 2.

1997 is the biggest dissapointment since losing to UCLA in 1990 and blowing the Apple Cup in 1982.

AtomicDawg · April 2014

Joe Stephanson said:

show previous quotes
He_Needs_More_Time said:

Joe Stephanson said:

dnc said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

RoadDawg55 said:
I can't decide between Sark and Lambo. They both sucked.
Lambo had a Pac-10 championship. Sark's best year was 5-4 in conference.
True. OTOH, while Sark didn't take over the owen12 debacle that doog folklore likes to say he did, he didn't take over a a program coming off of 3 straight Rose Bowels with clearly established dominance in the northwest and most of the west coast either. Lambo inherited a sweetheart opportunity and never did better than splitting a conference title in six years.

I put Lambo slightly ahead of Sark, but I see the argument. They have a ton in common, right down to the PLSS love.

Yes, Lambo inherited a stacked roster. However, I wouldn't classify taking over a team less than two weeks before the season opener, trying to fill the shoes of a legendary coach (who just resigned in large part to protest his own university's actions), including two years probation/bowl ban, scholarship reductions, and no tv revenue exactly a, "sweetheart opportunity."

The program was absolutely shook to the core when DJ resigned, make no qualms about it.

I recognize Lambo wasn't the best HC, but comparing him to Sark is over the line. Lambo dedicated 30+ years as a student, player and coach to UW, and he gets compared to that shitbag Sark, who was here for five? Did Sark ever beat 0regon_GFY? How about Ohio St? What about Miami? DIAFF.

I don't give a shit, dedicating your life to something, anything, for 30+ years deserves some fucking respect.

Go fuck yourselves.

Take this shit to Doogman where it belongs. You paint this dark picture for Lambo but facts are he inherited very talented teams. Probably more talented than any James team minus 1991 and 1984. The 1997 team actually had the talent to even match those teams. Throw in the fact that a different coach would have coached that squad up better and that team could have won a national title.

Lambo was slightly better than Sark but IMO both underachieved given the talent level. Both will have their Doogs like PLSS take away from his successor and give the credit to those dipshits as well.
"I don't deal in hypotheticals."

If you don't think an average coach would have done better with the talent Lambo was given then I can't help you.

AtomicDawg · April 2014

Joe Stephanson said:

show previous quotes
dnc said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

RoadDawg55 said:
I can't decide between Sark and Lambo. They both sucked.
Lambo had a Pac-10 championship. Sark's best year was 5-4 in conference.
True. OTOH, while Sark didn't take over the owen12 debacle that doog folklore likes to say he did, he didn't take over a a program coming off of 3 straight Rose Bowels with clearly established dominance in the northwest and most of the west coast either. Lambo inherited a sweetheart opportunity and never did better than splitting a conference title in six years.

I put Lambo slightly ahead of Sark, but I see the argument. They have a ton in common, right down to the PLSS love.

Yes, Lambo inherited a stacked roster. However, I wouldn't classify taking over a team less than two weeks before the season opener, trying to fill the shoes of a legendary coach (who just resigned in large part to protest his own university's actions), including two years probation/bowl ban, scholarship reductions, and no tv revenue exactly a, "sweetheart opportunity."

The program was absolutely shook to the core when DJ resigned, make no qualms about it.

I recognize Lambo wasn't the best HC, but comparing him to Sark is over the line. Lambo dedicated 30+ years as a student, player and coach to UW, and he gets compared to that shitbag Sark, who was here for five? Did Sark ever beat 0regon_GFY? How about Ohio St? What about Miami? DIAFF.

I don't give a shit, dedicating your life to something, anything, for 30+ years deserves some fucking respect.

Go fuck yourselves.

You don't get credit for dedicating your life to something when you get paid.

[Deleted User] · April 2014

AtomicDawg said:
I don't see much difference between lambo and sark in the end. If sark has losing records at USC I guess you would be right. I think he will be very similar though. Lambo apologists are some of the worst.

Lambo was handed an absolute machine of a football program. At that point UW was considered a national contender the previous 3 years.

He was the head coach for some of the WORST losses I remember at UW based off of the amount of talent he had. Nobody is perfect but these stuck out to me as moments where he had no clue wtf he was doing.

@ Oregon (Kenny Wheaton. Great red zone route as always)

Oregon 24-22 (Cost us a rose bowl)

USC 21-21 (Consider it a loss given that they blew it and cost us a rose bowl)

Notre Dame 29-21 @ home (WTF happened at the end? I am still confused)

@Notre Dame 54-20 (This became the first in a trend to get our asses kicked vs good opponents on the road)

Colorado 33-21 (I am still confused how we got our ass kicked when Dillon ran wild the first half)

Nebraska 27-14 (Osborne vs. Lambo LOL)

Oregon 31-28 (great start to the game vs oregon as always.)

@UCLA (52-28 see the trend of shitty road performances continuing here. How in the hell did that team give up 52 and lose by 24???)

@Nebraska 55-7 (Great road performance as always)

AFA 45-25 (But Lambo was a great Players Coach. THey love playing for him. They won't quit!)

Spot on! You nailed every bull shit loss of his minus Iowa plunger rape in 1995 when the tough "disciplined" Lambo had his players sneak over the border and get drunk night before the game Varsity Blues style.

I remember the sideline reporter reporting "spoke to coach Lambright and he said if any players are throwing up he's sitting them out"

Lambo being a "disciplinary" coach is the biggest farce ever. Remember during his time you had your starting RB in Rashaan Shehee injuring himself for the season jumping off a balcony because a gun fight broke out, Olin Kruetz ruining Sooki Wiggs life by breaking his jaw after practice. Wiggs was a projected 1st/2nd rounder DT that we could have used in 1995, he also wrote a letter to the judge backing up Jerramy Stevens and was the one who brought in Stevens knowing that Stevens stomped an unconscience guy out.

Lambo fans always gloss over all that and act like the program starting to run like a circus under Rick when that wasn't the furthest thing from the truth.

AtomicDawg · April 2014

He_Needs_More_Time said:

show previous quotes
AtomicDawg said:
I don't see much difference between lambo and sark in the end. If sark has losing records at USC I guess you would be right. I think he will be very similar though. Lambo apologists are some of the worst.

Lambo was handed an absolute machine of a football program. At that point UW was considered a national contender the previous 3 years.

He was the head coach for some of the WORST losses I remember at UW based off of the amount of talent he had. Nobody is perfect but these stuck out to me as moments where he had no clue wtf he was doing.

@ Oregon (Kenny Wheaton. Great red zone route as always)

Oregon 24-22 (Cost us a rose bowl)

USC 21-21 (Consider it a loss given that they blew it and cost us a rose bowl)

Notre Dame 29-21 @ home (WTF happened at the end? I am still confused)

@Notre Dame 54-20 (This became the first in a trend to get our asses kicked vs good opponents on the road)

Colorado 33-21 (I am still confused how we got our ass kicked when Dillon ran wild the first half)

Nebraska 27-14 (Osborne vs. Lambo LOL)

Oregon 31-28 (great start to the game vs oregon as always.)

@UCLA (52-28 see the trend of shitty road performances continuing here. How in the hell did that team give up 52 and lose by 24???)

@Nebraska 55-7 (Great road performance as always)

AFA 45-25 (But Lambo was a great Players Coach. THey love playing for him. They won't quit!)

Spot on! You nailed every bull shit loss of his minus Iowa plunger rape in 1995 when the tough "disciplined" Lambo had his players sneak over the border and get drunk night before the game Varsity Blues style.

I remember the sideline reporter reporting "spoke to coach Lambright and he said if any players are throwing up he's sitting them out"

Lambo being a "disciplinary" coach is the biggest farce ever. Remember during his time you had your starting RB in Rashaan Shehee injuring himself for the season jumping off a balcony because a gun fight broke out, Olin Kruetz ruining Sooki Wiggs life by breaking his jaw after practice. Wiggs was a projected 1st/2nd rounder DT that we could have used in 1995, he also wrote a letter to the judge backing up Jerramy Stevens and was the one who brought in Stevens knowing that Stevens stomped an unconscience guy out.

Lambo fans always gloss over all that and act like the program starting to run like a circus under Rick when that wasn't the furthest thing from the truth.

I thought about including that game but didn't, well, because it is the sun bowl. But at the time that was the first time back in a bowl in years and should have had a better effort.

digits · April 2014

Well suck me sideways. All valid points, especially AtomicDawg's breakdown.

There are so many different variables at play between the two's tenures, it's not a logical comparison to make, in my mind. Comparing Jim Owens 1st five years and Sark's tenure would make more sense to me.

whatshouldicareabout · April 2014

He_Needs_More_Time said:
knowing that Stevens stomped an unconscience guy out.

That word made me laugh, but what I found after is absolutely hilarious. If you google unconscience, the first link goes to a Wazzu website saying it's not a word. Like, they had to make a website because so many Coogs misspell it? Do Coogs have such shitty ass spelling that they need to make a fucking directory of all the words not to use in the English language?

http://public.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/errors.html

Have fun, it's a thrill-ride

[Deleted User] · April 2014

whatshouldicareabout said:

show previous quotes
He_Needs_More_Time said:
knowing that Stevens stomped an unconscience guy out.
That word made me laugh, but what I found after is absolutely hilarious. If you google unconscience, the first link goes to a Wazzu website saying it's not a word. Like, they had to make a website because so many Coogs misspell it? Do Coogs have such shitty ass spelling that they need to make a fucking directory of all the words not to use in the English language?

http://public.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/errors.html

Have fun, it's a thrill-ride

All I have to say about my misspelling is 90 MPH. I-5. Hookers and Blow.

CaptainPJ · April 2014

dnc said:

show previous quotes
whatshouldicareabout said:

RoadDawg55 said:
I can't decide between Sark and Lambo. They both sucked.
Lambo had a Pac-10 championship. Sark's best year was 5-4 in conference.
True. OTOH, while Sark didn't take over the owen12 debacle that doog folklore likes to say he did, he didn't take over a a program coming off of 3 straight Rose Bowels with clearly established dominance in the northwest and most of the west coast either. Lambo inherited a sweetheart opportunity and never did better than splitting a conference title in six years.

I put Lambo slightly ahead of Sark, but I see the argument. They have a ton in common, right down to the PLSS love.

Lambo had Dillon and a potentially great D.

He lost to Neu in the Holiday Bowl.

Fucking embarrassing

CaptainPJ · April 2014

OZONE said:

show previous quotes
Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Lambo did about average with the talent they had in '95 and '96, with two embarrassing loses (Sun Bowel va. Iowa and '96 ND). Average doesn't mean he did well, it only means they didn't massively underachieve.

The other four years he underachieved. I remember Rondeau making excuses for him after the '93 season (hi Chest!). He said it was a 7-8 win team. Even as a teen I wasn't buying it.

Anyway, it's Bitchcunt Babs' fault for keeping the loyal ass't around too long.

Sark had two acceptable, yet not great years to begin, then stalled out. I give him the slight edge for leaving the program with eight wins.
Even though I'm a Duck fan, I lived in Seattle during those years (lots of places to park my seaplane) and some of my good friends were Husky season ticket holders.

The story I heard was that Babs didn't like Lambo, and refused to give him the budget he wanted to hire the assistants he wanted to hire. He was forced to field a team with great talent, but mediocre assistant coaches.

Couldn't be further from truth.

Invite your friends to your gas party.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover · April 2014

He_Needs_More_Time said:

show previous quotes
whatshouldicareabout said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:
knowing that Stevens stomped an unconscience guy out.
That word made me laugh, but what I found after is absolutely hilarious. If you google unconscience, the first link goes to a Wazzu website saying it's not a word. Like, they had to make a website because so many Coogs misspell it? Do Coogs have such shitty ass spelling that they need to make a fucking directory of all the words not to use in the English language?

http://public.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/errors.html

Have fun, it's a thrill-ride
All I have to say about my misspelling is 90 MPH. I-5. Hookers and Blow.

Abundance.

topdawgnc · April 2014

He_Needs_More_Time said:

show previous quotes
AtomicDawg said:
I don't see much difference between lambo and sark in the end. If sark has losing records at USC I guess you would be right. I think he will be very similar though. Lambo apologists are some of the worst.

Lambo was handed an absolute machine of a football program. At that point UW was considered a national contender the previous 3 years.

He was the head coach for some of the WORST losses I remember at UW based off of the amount of talent he had. Nobody is perfect but these stuck out to me as moments where he had no clue wtf he was doing.

@ Oregon (Kenny Wheaton. Great red zone route as always)

Oregon 24-22 (Cost us a rose bowl)

USC 21-21 (Consider it a loss given that they blew it and cost us a rose bowl)

Notre Dame 29-21 @ home (WTF happened at the end? I am still confused)

@Notre Dame 54-20 (This became the first in a trend to get our asses kicked vs good opponents on the road)

Colorado 33-21 (I am still confused how we got our ass kicked when Dillon ran wild the first half)

Nebraska 27-14 (Osborne vs. Lambo LOL)

Oregon 31-28 (great start to the game vs oregon as always.)

@UCLA (52-28 see the trend of shitty road performances continuing here. How in the hell did that team give up 52 and lose by 24???)

@Nebraska 55-7 (Great road performance as always)

AFA 45-25 (But Lambo was a great Players Coach. THey love playing for him. They won't quit!)

Spot on! You nailed every bull shit loss of his minus Iowa plunger rape in 1995 when the tough "disciplined" Lambo had his players sneak over the border and get drunk night before the game Varsity Blues style.

I remember the sideline reporter reporting "spoke to coach Lambright and he said if any players are throwing up he's sitting them out"

Lambo being a "disciplinary" coach is the biggest farce ever. Remember during his time you had your starting RB in Rashaan Shehee injuring himself for the season jumping off a balcony because a gun fight broke out, Olin Kruetz ruining Sooki Wiggs life by breaking his jaw after practice. Wiggs was a projected 1st/2nd rounder DT that we could have used in 1995, he also wrote a letter to the judge backing up Jerramy Stevens and was the one who brought in Stevens knowing that Stevens stomped an unconscience guy out.

Lambo fans always gloss over all that and act like the program starting to run like a circus under Rick when that wasn't the furthest thing from the truth.

With exception of highlighted, all totally acceptable if the team is hoisting Rose Bowl trophies.

OZONE · April 2014

dnc said:

show previous quotes
OZONE said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Lambo did about average with the talent they had in '95 and '96, with two embarrassing loses (Sun Bowel va. Iowa and '96 ND). Average doesn't mean he did well, it only means they didn't massively underachieve.

The other four years he underachieved. I remember Rondeau making excuses for him after the '93 season (hi Chest!). He said it was a 7-8 win team. Even as a teen I wasn't buying it.

Anyway, it's Bitchcunt Babs' fault for keeping the loyal ass't around too long.

Sark had two acceptable, yet not great years to begin, then stalled out. I give him the slight edge for leaving the program with eight wins.
Even though I'm a Duck fan, I lived in Seattle during those years (lots of places to park my seaplane) and some of my good friends were Husky season ticket holders.

The story I heard was that Babs didn't like Lambo, and refused to give him the budget he wanted to hire the assistants he wanted to hire. He was forced to field a team with great talent, but mediocre assistant coaches.
Your frens were doogs

hth

All fuskies are doogs. Including all of you on this board.

hth

dnc · April 2014

OZONE said:

show previous quotes
dnc said:

OZONE said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Lambo did about average with the talent they had in '95 and '96, with two embarrassing loses (Sun Bowel va. Iowa and '96 ND). Average doesn't mean he did well, it only means they didn't massively underachieve.

The other four years he underachieved. I remember Rondeau making excuses for him after the '93 season (hi Chest!). He said it was a 7-8 win team. Even as a teen I wasn't buying it.

Anyway, it's Bitchcunt Babs' fault for keeping the loyal ass't around too long.

Sark had two acceptable, yet not great years to begin, then stalled out. I give him the slight edge for leaving the program with eight wins.
Even though I'm a Duck fan, I lived in Seattle during those years (lots of places to park my seaplane) and some of my good friends were Husky season ticket holders.

The story I heard was that Babs didn't like Lambo, and refused to give him the budget he wanted to hire the assistants he wanted to hire. He was forced to field a team with great talent, but mediocre assistant coaches.
Your frens were doogs

hth

All fuskies are doogs. Including all of you on this board.

hth

You don't know what doog means.

hth

TierbsHsotBoobs · April 2014

OZONE said:

show previous quotes
dnc said:

OZONE said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Lambo did about average with the talent they had in '95 and '96, with two embarrassing loses (Sun Bowel va. Iowa and '96 ND). Average doesn't mean he did well, it only means they didn't massively underachieve.

The other four years he underachieved. I remember Rondeau making excuses for him after the '93 season (hi Chest!). He said it was a 7-8 win team. Even as a teen I wasn't buying it.

Anyway, it's Bitchcunt Babs' fault for keeping the loyal ass't around too long.

Sark had two acceptable, yet not great years to begin, then stalled out. I give him the slight edge for leaving the program with eight wins.
Even though I'm a Duck fan, I lived in Seattle during those years (lots of places to park my seaplane) and some of my good friends were Husky season ticket holders.

The story I heard was that Babs didn't like Lambo, and refused to give him the budget he wanted to hire the assistants he wanted to hire. He was forced to field a team with great talent, but mediocre assistant coaches.
Your frens were doogs

hth

All fuskies are doogs. Including all of you on this board.

hth

And I thought you were figuring this shit out...

OZONE · April 2014

dnc said:

show previous quotes
OZONE said:

dnc said:

OZONE said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Lambo did about average with the talent they had in '95 and '96, with two embarrassing loses (Sun Bowel va. Iowa and '96 ND). Average doesn't mean he did well, it only means they didn't massively underachieve.

The other four years he underachieved. I remember Rondeau making excuses for him after the '93 season (hi Chest!). He said it was a 7-8 win team. Even as a teen I wasn't buying it.

Anyway, it's Bitchcunt Babs' fault for keeping the loyal ass't around too long.

Sark had two acceptable, yet not great years to begin, then stalled out. I give him the slight edge for leaving the program with eight wins.
Even though I'm a Duck fan, I lived in Seattle during those years (lots of places to park my seaplane) and some of my good friends were Husky season ticket holders.

The story I heard was that Babs didn't like Lambo, and refused to give him the budget he wanted to hire the assistants he wanted to hire. He was forced to field a team with great talent, but mediocre assistant coaches.
Your frens were doogs

hth

All fuskies are doogs. Including all of you on this board.

hth
You don't know what doog means.

hth

Indeed I do. We ducks coined the phrase, and gave it its original meaning. The fact that some of you have tried to co-opt it, doesn't change the original meaning.

Fuskie.

Doog.

No difference.

TierbsHsotBoobs · April 2014

OZONE said:

show previous quotes
dnc said:

OZONE said:

dnc said:

OZONE said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Lambo did about average with the talent they had in '95 and '96, with two embarrassing loses (Sun Bowel va. Iowa and '96 ND). Average doesn't mean he did well, it only means they didn't massively underachieve.

The other four years he underachieved. I remember Rondeau making excuses for him after the '93 season (hi Chest!). He said it was a 7-8 win team. Even as a teen I wasn't buying it.

Anyway, it's Bitchcunt Babs' fault for keeping the loyal ass't around too long.

Sark had two acceptable, yet not great years to begin, then stalled out. I give him the slight edge for leaving the program with eight wins.
Even though I'm a Duck fan, I lived in Seattle during those years (lots of places to park my seaplane) and some of my good friends were Husky season ticket holders.

The story I heard was that Babs didn't like Lambo, and refused to give him the budget he wanted to hire the assistants he wanted to hire. He was forced to field a team with great talent, but mediocre assistant coaches.
Your frens were doogs

hth

All fuskies are doogs. Including all of you on this board.

hth
You don't know what doog means.

hth

show previous quotes
dnc said:

OZONE said:

dnc said:

OZONE said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Lambo did about average with the talent they had in '95 and '96, with two embarrassing loses (Sun Bowel va. Iowa and '96 ND). Average doesn't mean he did well, it only means they didn't massively underachieve.

The other four years he underachieved. I remember Rondeau making excuses for him after the '93 season (hi Chest!). He said it was a 7-8 win team. Even as a teen I wasn't buying it.

Anyway, it's Bitchcunt Babs' fault for keeping the loyal ass't around too long.

Sark had two acceptable, yet not great years to begin, then stalled out. I give him the slight edge for leaving the program with eight wins.
Even though I'm a Duck fan, I lived in Seattle during those years (lots of places to park my seaplane) and some of my good friends were Husky season ticket holders.

The story I heard was that Babs didn't like Lambo, and refused to give him the budget he wanted to hire the assistants he wanted to hire. He was forced to field a team with great talent, but mediocre assistant coaches.
Your frens were doogs

hth

All fuskies are doogs. Including all of you on this board.

hth
You don't know what doog means.

hth
Indeed I do. We ducks coined the phrase, and gave it its original meaning. The fact that some of you have tried to co-opt it, doesn't change the original meaning.

Fuskie.

Doog.

No difference.

Not the case at all.

We made up the term to mock our fans that were acting like Coogs. You don't even know what a Coog is.

dnc · April 2014

OZONE said:

show previous quotes
dnc said:

OZONE said:

dnc said:

OZONE said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Lambo did about average with the talent they had in '95 and '96, with two embarrassing loses (Sun Bowel va. Iowa and '96 ND). Average doesn't mean he did well, it only means they didn't massively underachieve.

The other four years he underachieved. I remember Rondeau making excuses for him after the '93 season (hi Chest!). He said it was a 7-8 win team. Even as a teen I wasn't buying it.

Anyway, it's Bitchcunt Babs' fault for keeping the loyal ass't around too long.

Sark had two acceptable, yet not great years to begin, then stalled out. I give him the slight edge for leaving the program with eight wins.
Even though I'm a Duck fan, I lived in Seattle during those years (lots of places to park my seaplane) and some of my good friends were Husky season ticket holders.

The story I heard was that Babs didn't like Lambo, and refused to give him the budget he wanted to hire the assistants he wanted to hire. He was forced to field a team with great talent, but mediocre assistant coaches.
Your frens were doogs

hth

All fuskies are doogs. Including all of you on this board.

hth
You don't know what doog means.

hth

show previous quotes
dnc said:

OZONE said:

dnc said:

OZONE said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Lambo did about average with the talent they had in '95 and '96, with two embarrassing loses (Sun Bowel va. Iowa and '96 ND). Average doesn't mean he did well, it only means they didn't massively underachieve.

The other four years he underachieved. I remember Rondeau making excuses for him after the '93 season (hi Chest!). He said it was a 7-8 win team. Even as a teen I wasn't buying it.

Anyway, it's Bitchcunt Babs' fault for keeping the loyal ass't around too long.

Sark had two acceptable, yet not great years to begin, then stalled out. I give him the slight edge for leaving the program with eight wins.
Even though I'm a Duck fan, I lived in Seattle during those years (lots of places to park my seaplane) and some of my good friends were Husky season ticket holders.

The story I heard was that Babs didn't like Lambo, and refused to give him the budget he wanted to hire the assistants he wanted to hire. He was forced to field a team with great talent, but mediocre assistant coaches.
Your frens were doogs

hth

All fuskies are doogs. Including all of you on this board.

hth
You don't know what doog means.

hth
Indeed I do. We ducks coined the phrase, and gave it its original meaning. The fact that some of you have tried to co-opt it, doesn't change the original meaning.

Fuskie.

Doog.

No difference.

Literally every single sentence in this poast is untrue.

Impressive.

dnc · April 2014

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

show previous quotes
OZONE said:

dnc said:

OZONE said:

dnc said:

OZONE said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Lambo did about average with the talent they had in '95 and '96, with two embarrassing loses (Sun Bowel va. Iowa and '96 ND). Average doesn't mean he did well, it only means they didn't massively underachieve.

The other four years he underachieved. I remember Rondeau making excuses for him after the '93 season (hi Chest!). He said it was a 7-8 win team. Even as a teen I wasn't buying it.

Anyway, it's Bitchcunt Babs' fault for keeping the loyal ass't around too long.

Sark had two acceptable, yet not great years to begin, then stalled out. I give him the slight edge for leaving the program with eight wins.
Even though I'm a Duck fan, I lived in Seattle during those years (lots of places to park my seaplane) and some of my good friends were Husky season ticket holders.

The story I heard was that Babs didn't like Lambo, and refused to give him the budget he wanted to hire the assistants he wanted to hire. He was forced to field a team with great talent, but mediocre assistant coaches.
Your frens were doogs

hth

All fuskies are doogs. Including all of you on this board.

hth
You don't know what doog means.

hth

dnc said:

OZONE said:

dnc said:

OZONE said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Lambo did about average with the talent they had in '95 and '96, with two embarrassing loses (Sun Bowel va. Iowa and '96 ND). Average doesn't mean he did well, it only means they didn't massively underachieve.

The other four years he underachieved. I remember Rondeau making excuses for him after the '93 season (hi Chest!). He said it was a 7-8 win team. Even as a teen I wasn't buying it.

Anyway, it's Bitchcunt Babs' fault for keeping the loyal ass't around too long.

Sark had two acceptable, yet not great years to begin, then stalled out. I give him the slight edge for leaving the program with eight wins.
Even though I'm a Duck fan, I lived in Seattle during those years (lots of places to park my seaplane) and some of my good friends were Husky season ticket holders.

The story I heard was that Babs didn't like Lambo, and refused to give him the budget he wanted to hire the assistants he wanted to hire. He was forced to field a team with great talent, but mediocre assistant coaches.
Your frens were doogs

hth

All fuskies are doogs. Including all of you on this board.

hth
You don't know what doog means.

hth
Indeed I do. We ducks coined the phrase, and gave it its original meaning. The fact that some of you have tried to co-opt it, doesn't change the original meaning.

Fuskie.

Doog.

No difference.
Not the case at all.

We made up the term to mock our fans that were acting like Coogs. You don't even know what a Coog is.

Case closed, end of discussion.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover · April 2014

OZONE said:

show previous quotes
dnc said:

OZONE said:

dnc said:

OZONE said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Lambo did about average with the talent they had in '95 and '96, with two embarrassing loses (Sun Bowel va. Iowa and '96 ND). Average doesn't mean he did well, it only means they didn't massively underachieve.

The other four years he underachieved. I remember Rondeau making excuses for him after the '93 season (hi Chest!). He said it was a 7-8 win team. Even as a teen I wasn't buying it.

Anyway, it's Bitchcunt Babs' fault for keeping the loyal ass't around too long.

Sark had two acceptable, yet not great years to begin, then stalled out. I give him the slight edge for leaving the program with eight wins.
Even though I'm a Duck fan, I lived in Seattle during those years (lots of places to park my seaplane) and some of my good friends were Husky season ticket holders.

The story I heard was that Babs didn't like Lambo, and refused to give him the budget he wanted to hire the assistants he wanted to hire. He was forced to field a team with great talent, but mediocre assistant coaches.
Your frens were doogs

hth

All fuskies are doogs. Including all of you on this board.

hth
You don't know what doog means.

hth

show previous quotes
dnc said:

OZONE said:

dnc said:

OZONE said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Lambo did about average with the talent they had in '95 and '96, with two embarrassing loses (Sun Bowel va. Iowa and '96 ND). Average doesn't mean he did well, it only means they didn't massively underachieve.

The other four years he underachieved. I remember Rondeau making excuses for him after the '93 season (hi Chest!). He said it was a 7-8 win team. Even as a teen I wasn't buying it.

Anyway, it's Bitchcunt Babs' fault for keeping the loyal ass't around too long.

Sark had two acceptable, yet not great years to begin, then stalled out. I give him the slight edge for leaving the program with eight wins.
Even though I'm a Duck fan, I lived in Seattle during those years (lots of places to park my seaplane) and some of my good friends were Husky season ticket holders.

The story I heard was that Babs didn't like Lambo, and refused to give him the budget he wanted to hire the assistants he wanted to hire. He was forced to field a team with great talent, but mediocre assistant coaches.
Your frens were doogs

hth

All fuskies are doogs. Including all of you on this board.

hth
You don't know what doog means.

hth
Indeed I do. We ducks coined the phrase, and gave it its original meaning. The fact that some of you have tried to co-opt it, doesn't change the original meaning.

Fuskie.

Doog.

No difference.

You might want to PM Irishdawg. He's got this place dialed in and could give you some helpful advice.

CheersWestDawg · April 2014

OZONE said:

show previous quotes
dnc said:

OZONE said:

dnc said:

OZONE said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Lambo did about average with the talent they had in '95 and '96, with two embarrassing loses (Sun Bowel va. Iowa and '96 ND). Average doesn't mean he did well, it only means they didn't massively underachieve.

The other four years he underachieved. I remember Rondeau making excuses for him after the '93 season (hi Chest!). He said it was a 7-8 win team. Even as a teen I wasn't buying it.

Anyway, it's Bitchcunt Babs' fault for keeping the loyal ass't around too long.

Sark had two acceptable, yet not great years to begin, then stalled out. I give him the slight edge for leaving the program with eight wins.
Even though I'm a Duck fan, I lived in Seattle during those years (lots of places to park my seaplane) and some of my good friends were Husky season ticket holders.

The story I heard was that Babs didn't like Lambo, and refused to give him the budget he wanted to hire the assistants he wanted to hire. He was forced to field a team with great talent, but mediocre assistant coaches.
Your frens were doogs

hth

All fuskies are doogs. Including all of you on this board.

hth
You don't know what doog means.

hth

show previous quotes
dnc said:

OZONE said:

dnc said:

OZONE said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Lambo did about average with the talent they had in '95 and '96, with two embarrassing loses (Sun Bowel va. Iowa and '96 ND). Average doesn't mean he did well, it only means they didn't massively underachieve.

The other four years he underachieved. I remember Rondeau making excuses for him after the '93 season (hi Chest!). He said it was a 7-8 win team. Even as a teen I wasn't buying it.

Anyway, it's Bitchcunt Babs' fault for keeping the loyal ass't around too long.

Sark had two acceptable, yet not great years to begin, then stalled out. I give him the slight edge for leaving the program with eight wins.
Even though I'm a Duck fan, I lived in Seattle during those years (lots of places to park my seaplane) and some of my good friends were Husky season ticket holders.

The story I heard was that Babs didn't like Lambo, and refused to give him the budget he wanted to hire the assistants he wanted to hire. He was forced to field a team with great talent, but mediocre assistant coaches.
Your frens were doogs

hth

All fuskies are doogs. Including all of you on this board.

hth
You don't know what doog means.

hth
Indeed I do. We ducks coined the phrase, and gave it its original meaning. The fact that some of you have tried to co-opt it, doesn't change the original meaning.

Fuskie.

Doog.

No difference.

This is so inaccurate that it belongs on Dawgman.

OZONE · May 2014

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

show previous quotes
OZONE said:

dnc said:

OZONE said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Lambo did about average with the talent they had in '95 and '96, with two embarrassing loses (Sun Bowel va. Iowa and '96 ND). Average doesn't mean he did well, it only means they didn't massively underachieve.

The other four years he underachieved. I remember Rondeau making excuses for him after the '93 season (hi Chest!). He said it was a 7-8 win team. Even as a teen I wasn't buying it.

Anyway, it's Bitchcunt Babs' fault for keeping the loyal ass't around too long.

Sark had two acceptable, yet not great years to begin, then stalled out. I give him the slight edge for leaving the program with eight wins.
Even though I'm a Duck fan, I lived in Seattle during those years (lots of places to park my seaplane) and some of my good friends were Husky season ticket holders.

The story I heard was that Babs didn't like Lambo, and refused to give him the budget he wanted to hire the assistants he wanted to hire. He was forced to field a team with great talent, but mediocre assistant coaches.
Your frens were doogs

hth

All fuskies are doogs. Including all of you on this board.

hth
And I thought you were figuring this shit out...

Had it figured out ages ago... this board was started by a couple of guys that used to be in Kim's inner circle, until they weren't.

Now they act like they were never in his inner circle, because he's an idiot.

For some reason, it took them longer than some, to realize that he was an idiot...

But now that they've realized it, they act like they invented that realization, and others have followed them... people that used to pay Kim money, apparently also somewhat new to the realization about Kim's idiocy.

Are you suggesting there is more to it?

whatshouldicareabout · May 2014

OZONE said:
Had it figured out ages ago... this board was started by a couple of guys that used to be in Kim's inner circle, until they weren't.

Now they act like they were never in his inner circle, because he's an idiot.

For some reason, it took them longer than some, to realize that he was an idiot...

But now that they've realized it, they act like they invented that realization, and others have followed them... people that used to pay Kim money, apparently also somewhat new to the realization about Kim's idiocy.

Are you suggesting there is more to it?

W, JW

This guy just keeps reaching new lows with every post

AANDY says Lambo should've read "Team of Rivals" to keep from being fired

Comments

Welcome!

Welcome!

Quick Links