Crowdstrike Admits NO evidence Russia hacked DNC
https://youtu.be/t5Sw7TbmfN8Comments
-
Evidence does Prove the tab for the dossier was split between the Clintons and the DNC.e
Everyone knew this as #Obamagate unfolded. Many are now just learning about it. Millions remain in denial hiding in their Moms basement waiting out the Vid -
Seth Rich downloaded and delivered the emails, they are simply trying to rule out all 3 million reasons before they have to face the obvious one.
-
Dazzler claimed this was just Tucker Carlson spin.
-
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/us/politics/russian-interference-senate-intelligence-report.html
You gals can’t get enough orange, can ya? -
Shocking, an article that doesn't refute a fucking word anyone has said. Good job DazzlerHHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/us/politics/russian-interference-senate-intelligence-report.html
You gals can’t get enough orange, can ya? -
You should try reading it for comprehension.SFGbob said:
Shocking, an article that doesn't refute a fucking word anyone has said. Good job DazzlerHHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/us/politics/russian-interference-senate-intelligence-report.html
You gals can’t get enough orange, can ya? -
You should drink gas and swallow a matchHHusky said:
You should try reading it for comprehension.SFGbob said:
Shocking, an article that doesn't refute a fucking word anyone has said. Good job DazzlerHHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/us/politics/russian-interference-senate-intelligence-report.html
You gals can’t get enough orange, can ya? -
You should try quoting the part that refutes what anyone in this thread said. Clown nose on Dazzler.HHusky said:
You should try reading it for comprehension.SFGbob said:
Shocking, an article that doesn't refute a fucking word anyone has said. Good job DazzlerHHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/us/politics/russian-interference-senate-intelligence-report.html
You gals can’t get enough orange, can ya? -
Are you so ignorant of the facts that you were unaware that the intelligence community’s conclusions—affirmed here—include Russia’s hacking of the DNC? Seriously, you gals are shameless in your fealty to Daddy.SFGbob said:
You should try quoting the part that refutes what anyone in this thread said. Clown nose on Dazzler.HHusky said:
You should try reading it for comprehension.SFGbob said:
Shocking, an article that doesn't refute a fucking word anyone has said. Good job DazzlerHHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/us/politics/russian-interference-senate-intelligence-report.html
You gals can’t get enough orange, can ya? -
Finally read the article didn't ya Kunt. Are you such a lying fucking Kunt that you're trying to claim anything in that article refutes something that anyone in this thread said?HHusky said:
Are you so ignorant of the facts that you were unaware that the intelligence community’s conclusions—affirmed here—include Russia’s hacking of the DNC? Seriously, you gals are shameless in your fealty to Daddy.SFGbob said:
You should try quoting the part that refutes what anyone in this thread said. Clown nose on Dazzler.HHusky said:
You should try reading it for comprehension.SFGbob said:
Shocking, an article that doesn't refute a fucking word anyone has said. Good job DazzlerHHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/us/politics/russian-interference-senate-intelligence-report.html
You gals can’t get enough orange, can ya?
Fuck off Dazzler. You claimed I needed to read it for comprehension Kunt. Go ahead, quote it for me.
Cue the jackass dance. -
I should never have assumed you knew anything about the matter. My bad.SFGbob said:
Finally read the article didn't ya Kunt. Are you such a lying fucking Kunt that you're trying to claim anything in that article refutes something that anyone in this thread said?HHusky said:
Are you so ignorant of the facts that you were unaware that the intelligence community’s conclusions—affirmed here—include Russia’s hacking of the DNC? Seriously, you gals are shameless in your fealty to Daddy.SFGbob said:
You should try quoting the part that refutes what anyone in this thread said. Clown nose on Dazzler.HHusky said:
You should try reading it for comprehension.SFGbob said:
Shocking, an article that doesn't refute a fucking word anyone has said. Good job DazzlerHHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/us/politics/russian-interference-senate-intelligence-report.html
You gals can’t get enough orange, can ya?
Fuck off Dazzler. You claimed I needed to read it for comprehension Kunt. Go ahead, quote it for me.
Cue the jackass dance. -
You said I could just read the article you posted and I'd find something that refuted what anyone here said. I just needed to be able to read it for comprehension. Remember asshole? Quote if for me Kunt. Why is it that you can never back up your laying twat of mouth Dazzler?HHusky said:
I should never have assumed you knew anything about the matter. My bad.SFGbob said:
Finally read the article didn't ya Kunt. Are you such a lying fucking Kunt that you're trying to claim anything in that article refutes something that anyone in this thread said?HHusky said:
Are you so ignorant of the facts that you were unaware that the intelligence community’s conclusions—affirmed here—include Russia’s hacking of the DNC? Seriously, you gals are shameless in your fealty to Daddy.SFGbob said:
You should try quoting the part that refutes what anyone in this thread said. Clown nose on Dazzler.HHusky said:
You should try reading it for comprehension.SFGbob said:
Shocking, an article that doesn't refute a fucking word anyone has said. Good job DazzlerHHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/us/politics/russian-interference-senate-intelligence-report.html
You gals can’t get enough orange, can ya?
Fuck off Dazzler. You claimed I needed to read it for comprehension Kunt. Go ahead, quote it for me.
Cue the jackass dance.
Your problem Dazzler, and I've been telling you this for years, you are nowhere near as bright as you believe yourself to be. -
Are we talking about the Coast Guard? I hear they had a ton of information which proves Trump colluded with the Russians. Even Deadliest Catch had an episode showing how Trump was getting information from the Russians.HHusky said:
Are you so ignorant of the facts that you were unaware that the intelligence community’s conclusions—affirmed here—include Russia’s hacking of the DNC? Seriously, you gals are shameless in your fealty to Daddy.SFGbob said:
You should try quoting the part that refutes what anyone in this thread said. Clown nose on Dazzler.HHusky said:
You should try reading it for comprehension.SFGbob said:
Shocking, an article that doesn't refute a fucking word anyone has said. Good job DazzlerHHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/us/politics/russian-interference-senate-intelligence-report.html
You gals can’t get enough orange, can ya?
#16IntelligenceAgenciesagree
#97%
#yourafuccingbootlicker -
Which episode?
-
They call him the Dazzler because of his closing arguments in death penalty cases.
His clients never complain. -
FUC-KING THIS!!!!!!Postal91 said:Seth Rich downloaded and delivered the emails, they are simply trying to rule out all 3 million reasons before they have to face the obvious one.
-
A report based upon piles of fraudulent, fake, fabricated evidence.HHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/us/politics/russian-interference-senate-intelligence-report.html
You gals can’t get enough orange, can ya?
You can't commit enough malpractice, can ya, ShitForBrains? -
SFGbob said:
Shocking, an article that doesn't refute a fucking word anyone has said. Good job DazzlerHHusky said:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/us/politics/russian-interference-senate-intelligence-report.html
You gals can’t get enough orange, can ya?
-
I made that up. The Russians actually policed their fishery which helped drive up the price. The fleet was very concerned about the competition. I hear orange bad man was behind the whole thing. Shitf for brains would have definitely peddled that nonsense.doogie said:Which episode?
