Tough Day for the Rats
A court document from 1996 shows former Senate staffer Tara Reade told her ex-husband she was sexually harassed while working for Joe Biden in 1993.
https://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/politics-government/article242527331.html
Lets see now, we've got a court document from 1996 that supports her claims. We've got her mother calling into Larry King and we have 4 people who claim that she told them about this contemporaneously.
Meanwhile, Blassy Ford has Tommy's "life experiences" in support of her claim that she ever even met Kavanaugh.
Comments
-
Spaulding (@ThomasFremont) wants a hamburger... no, a cheeseburger. He wants a hot dog. He wants a milkshake...SFGbob said:Breaking news
A court document from 1996 shows former Senate staffer Tara Reade told her ex-husband she was sexually harassed while working for Joe Biden in 1993.
https://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/politics-government/article242527331.html
Lets see now, we've got a court document from 1996 that supports her claims. We've got her mother calling into Larry King and we have 4 people who claim that she told them about this contemporaneously.
Meanwhile, Blassy Ford has Tommy's "life experiences" in support of her claim that she ever even met Kavanaugh.
-
They both said something happened. Neither went to trial. Neither is demonstrably more true than the other. It’s hearsay.
Good effort. -
Yes genius. Yet Garth-Ford had her own friends say they had no clue what she was talking about, yet you cultists and your media was still believed her so we? needed an FBI investigation and an extra hearing. I think you’re stupid. Because you are.ThomasFremont said:They both said something happened. Neither went to trial. Neither is demonstrably more true than the other. It’s hearsay.
Good effort. -
One has evidence that she worked in Biden's office and told friends and family at the time something had happened. One had no evidence she ever met the person she was accusing other than the word of fucking moron who claimed his "life experience" proved they had met, and who never told anyone it had happened until 30 plus years later.ThomasFremont said:They both said something happened. Neither went to trial. Neither is demonstrably more true than the other. It’s hearsay.
Good effort. -
Now you care about this. Funny.SFGbob said:Breaking news
A court document from 1996 shows former Senate staffer Tara Reade told her ex-husband she was sexually harassed while working for Joe Biden in 1993.
https://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/politics-government/article242527331.html
Lets see now, we've got a court document from 1996 that supports her claims. We've got her mother calling into Larry King and we have 4 people who claim that she told them about this contemporaneously.
Meanwhile, Blassy Ford has Tommy's "life experiences" in support of her claim that she ever even met Kavanaugh. -
I care about hypocrites and liars. It's why I even respond to you Owl. If Ford was "credible" and was said to be believable by all you leftist Kunts despite the fact that she had zero evidence in support of her story why aren't you supporting this woman Owl?HustlinOwl said:
Now you care about this. Funny.SFGbob said:Breaking news
A court document from 1996 shows former Senate staffer Tara Reade told her ex-husband she was sexually harassed while working for Joe Biden in 1993.
https://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/politics-government/article242527331.html
Lets see now, we've got a court document from 1996 that supports her claims. We've got her mother calling into Larry King and we have 4 people who claim that she told them about this contemporaneously.
Meanwhile, Blassy Ford has Tommy's "life experiences" in support of her claim that she ever even met Kavanaugh. -
Owl was all-in on GarthFord, who had zero circumstantial evidence. These idiots are so mentally ill they can’t even admit the absolute hypocrisy of these two claims. Biden has 7 other accusers, too, plus a lot of sniffing pics with kids and admitting he let kids rub their hands through his hairy bare legs while he was a lifeguard.SFGbob said:
I care about hypocrites and liars. It's why I even respond to you Owl. If Ford was "credible" and was said to be believable by all you leftist Kunts despite the fact that she had zero evidence in support of her story why aren't you supporting this woman Owl?HustlinOwl said:
Now you care about this. Funny.SFGbob said:Breaking news
A court document from 1996 shows former Senate staffer Tara Reade told her ex-husband she was sexually harassed while working for Joe Biden in 1993.
https://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/politics-government/article242527331.html
Lets see now, we've got a court document from 1996 that supports her claims. We've got her mother calling into Larry King and we have 4 people who claim that she told them about this contemporaneously.
Meanwhile, Blassy Ford has Tommy's "life experiences" in support of her claim that she ever even met Kavanaugh. -
Either they’re equally believe ale or they’re not. You can’t have it both ways. This isn’t evidence. It’s just hearsay.
-
Yes, if you're a fucking moron who thinks their "life experiences" equal facts they are equally believable.ThomasFremont said:Either they’re equally believe ale or they’re not. You can’t have it both ways. This isn’t evidence. It’s just hearsay.
Hardly shocking that a dumbfuck who thought that video proved motive would think this Tommy. Did you and O'Keefed go to the same law school? -
You undercut your own breaking “evidence” by comparing it to Ford, not me.SFGbob said:
Yes, if you're a fucking moron who thinks their "life experiences" equal facts they are equally believable.ThomasFremont said:Either they’re equally believe ale or they’re not. You can’t have it both ways. This isn’t evidence. It’s just hearsay.
Hardly shocking that a dumbfuck who thought that video proved motive would think this Tommy. Did you and O'Keefed go to the same law school?
Great job. -
I'm going to need an fbi investigation and some hearings before congress before I make up my mind. If Biden is innocent he should have nothing to hide and no problem testifying before congress.ThomasFremont said:Either they’re equally believe ale or they’re not. You can’t have it both ways. This isn’t evidence. It’s just hearsay.
-
Well, now it’s been shifted to sexual harassment, not sexual assault. Neither are, of course, acceptable. The issue is the more one side tries to turn this into a “gotcha” story with a tone that’s meant to prove hypocrisy, it will receive less coverage as will the claims she made at the time.ThomasFremont said:They both said something happened. Neither went to trial. Neither is demonstrably more true than the other. It’s hearsay.
Good effort.
Ford’s story was politicized, but at least she was the focus. The Reade story isn’t even about the harassment or assault, it’s her being used to smear Democrats as hypocrites. Are they in comparison? Sure, it’s what happens when you mess up the messaging and say “believe all women” as opposed to “all women should be heard.” -
Disagree. One has plausible supporting evidence with a timeline. The other adjusted her story to make the timeline workThomasFremont said:They both said something happened. Neither went to trial. Neither is demonstrably more true than the other. It’s hearsay.
Good effort.
One has references. Including court documents.. One doesn't
Oh, but Blaisey Ford wanted 2 doors to her home
Jesus Fremont you are a fucking sheep when it comes to this stuff which is sad to see. -
Go for it.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm going to need an fbi investigation and some hearings before congress before I make up my mind. If Biden is innocent he should have nothing to hide and no problem testifying before congress.ThomasFremont said:Either they’re equally believe ale or they’re not. You can’t have it both ways. This isn’t evidence. It’s just hearsay.
-
Ford said they met. Kavanaugh was equivocal.SFGbob said:
One has evidence that she worked in Biden's office and told friends and family at the time something had happened. One had no evidence she ever met the person she was accusing other than the word of fucking moron who claimed his "life experience" proved they had met, and who never told anyone it had happened until 30 plus years later.ThomasFremont said:They both said something happened. Neither went to trial. Neither is demonstrably more true than the other. It’s hearsay.
Good effort.
They met. You don't have to believe anything else she has to say to conclude they met.
-
It doesn't need to be true. Just needs to smear him enough to the point that when Trump starts running the hair sniffing and kissing ads ppl are like what the fuck and it becomes a media sensation
Enough that on the fence people just say fuck it and stay home -
Stop plagiarisminizing my stuff before I need to A Man Named Sue.ThomasFremont said:
You undercut your own breaking “evidence” by comparing it to Ford, not me.SFGbob said:
Yes, if you're a fucking moron who thinks their "life experiences" equal facts they are equally believable.ThomasFremont said:Either they’re equally believe ale or they’re not. You can’t have it both ways. This isn’t evidence. It’s just hearsay.
Hardly shocking that a dumbfuck who thought that video proved motive would think this Tommy. Did you and O'Keefed go to the same law school?
Great job. -
How about this?UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm going to need an fbi investigation and some hearings before congress before I make up my mind. If Biden is innocent he should have nothing to hide and no problem testifying before congress.ThomasFremont said:Either they’re equally believe ale or they’re not. You can’t have it both ways. This isn’t evidence. It’s just hearsay.
“Tara Reade Says She’s Open To Cross-Examination: ‘I Will Take’ A Polygraph ‘If Joe Biden Takes One’
“Tara Reade said she’s open to cross-examination and would take a polygraph test if former Vice President Joe Biden agreed to take one as well.
Reade spoke to journalist Megyn Kelly in an exclusive interview Thursday. Kelly tweeted out parts of the interview and asked Reade, who has accused Biden of sexually assaulting her in the early 1990s, about what measures she would be willing to take to help prove her allegation.
Biden’s accuser said that she “absolutely” would go under oath and subject herself to cross examination. Kelly then asked if Reade would want to take a polygraph.
“I’m not a criminal,” Reade responded. “Joe Biden should take the polygraph. What kind of precedent does that set for survivors of violence? Does that mean we’re presumed guilty and we all have to take polygraphs?”
“So, I will take one if Joe Biden takes one. But I’m not a criminal.”
Tara Reade Says She’s Open To Cross-Examination: ‘I Will Take’ A Polygraph ‘If Joe Biden Takes One’
https://dailycaller.com/2020/05/07/tara-reade-open-cross-examination-polygraph-joe-biden-megyn-kelly/
-
Jeezus. You are a slime ball hypocrite.ThomasFremont said:They both said something happened. Neither went to trial. Neither is demonstrably more true than the other. It’s hearsay.
Good effort. -
I met Lionel @HHusky at a UDub game in The Zone against the Ducks in 2011 and saw him finger a 12 year-old. I told my The Rapist about it it in notes.HHusky said:
Ford said they met. Kavanaugh was equivocal.SFGbob said:
One has evidence that she worked in Biden's office and told friends and family at the time something had happened. One had no evidence she ever met the person she was accusing other than the word of fucking moron who claimed his "life experience" proved they had met, and who never told anyone it had happened until 30 plus years later.ThomasFremont said:They both said something happened. Neither went to trial. Neither is demonstrably more true than the other. It’s hearsay.
Good effort.
They met. You don't have to believe anything else she has to say to conclude they met. -
It goes way beyond hair sniffing. The swimming naked in front of female secret service detail. The cancellation of the secret service Christmas party because he almost got his ass kicked for cupping one of the wives breast.Pitchfork51 said:It doesn't need to be true. Just needs to smear him enough to the point that when Trump starts running the hair sniffing and kissing ads ppl are like what the fuck and it becomes a media sensation
Enough that on the fence people just say fuck it and stay home
When I was up there in the late 80's and 90's he was a known perv. I was just a lobbyist.
This man cannot be president. He is a grifter who abuses women.
-
Let the fbi investigate, give Biden due process, lay it all out, let the people decide.
-
WTF dudeNorthwestFresh said:
I met Lionel @HHusky at a UDub game in The Zone against the Ducks in 2011 and saw him finger a 12 year-old. I told my The Rapist about it it in notes.HHusky said:
Ford said they met. Kavanaugh was equivocal.SFGbob said:
One has evidence that she worked in Biden's office and told friends and family at the time something had happened. One had no evidence she ever met the person she was accusing other than the word of fucking moron who claimed his "life experience" proved they had met, and who never told anyone it had happened until 30 plus years later.ThomasFremont said:They both said something happened. Neither went to trial. Neither is demonstrably more true than the other. It’s hearsay.
Good effort.
They met. You don't have to believe anything else she has to say to conclude they met. -
It’s as (in)credible as Garth-Ford’s claim, Spaulding.ThomasFremont said:
WTF dudeNorthwestFresh said:
I met Lionel @HHusky at a UDub game in The Zone against the Ducks in 2011 and saw him finger a 12 year-old. I told my The Rapist about it it in notes.HHusky said:
Ford said they met. Kavanaugh was equivocal.SFGbob said:
One has evidence that she worked in Biden's office and told friends and family at the time something had happened. One had no evidence she ever met the person she was accusing other than the word of fucking moron who claimed his "life experience" proved they had met, and who never told anyone it had happened until 30 plus years later.ThomasFremont said:They both said something happened. Neither went to trial. Neither is demonstrably more true than the other. It’s hearsay.
Good effort.
They met. You don't have to believe anything else she has to say to conclude they met. -
No. It’s not.NorthwestFresh said:
It’s as (in)credible as Garth-Ford’s claim, Spaulding.ThomasFremont said:
WTF dudeNorthwestFresh said:
I met Lionel @HHusky at a UDub game in The Zone against the Ducks in 2011 and saw him finger a 12 year-old. I told my The Rapist about it it in notes.HHusky said:
Ford said they met. Kavanaugh was equivocal.SFGbob said:
One has evidence that she worked in Biden's office and told friends and family at the time something had happened. One had no evidence she ever met the person she was accusing other than the word of fucking moron who claimed his "life experience" proved they had met, and who never told anyone it had happened until 30 plus years later.ThomasFremont said:They both said something happened. Neither went to trial. Neither is demonstrably more true than the other. It’s hearsay.
Good effort.
They met. You don't have to believe anything else she has to say to conclude they met.
Take you child rape fantasies elsewhere you fucking weirdo. -
You know we’ve reached peak America when this sentence can be applied to both candidates for the highest office in the land.Bendintheriver said:
It goes way beyond hair sniffing. The swimming naked in front of female secret service detail. The cancellation of the secret service Christmas party because he almost got his ass kicked for cupping one of the wives breast.Pitchfork51 said:It doesn't need to be true. Just needs to smear him enough to the point that when Trump starts running the hair sniffing and kissing ads ppl are like what the fuck and it becomes a media sensation
Enough that on the fence people just say fuck it and stay home
When I was up there in the late 80's and 90's he was a known perv. I was just a lobbyist.
This man cannot be president. He is a grifter who abuses women. -
Prove it. Provide evidence in support of it. And then go fuck yourself you lying piece of shit.HHusky said:
Ford said they met. Kavanaugh was equivocal.SFGbob said:
One has evidence that she worked in Biden's office and told friends and family at the time something had happened. One had no evidence she ever met the person she was accusing other than the word of fucking moron who claimed his "life experience" proved they had met, and who never told anyone it had happened until 30 plus years later.ThomasFremont said:They both said something happened. Neither went to trial. Neither is demonstrably more true than the other. It’s hearsay.
Good effort.
They met. You don't have to believe anything else she has to say to conclude they met. -
Testimony is evidence. Evidence was presented on yer teevee.SFGbob said:
Prove it. Provide evidence in support of it. And then go fuck yourself you lying piece of shit.HHusky said:
Ford said they met. Kavanaugh was equivocal.SFGbob said:
One has evidence that she worked in Biden's office and told friends and family at the time something had happened. One had no evidence she ever met the person she was accusing other than the word of fucking moron who claimed his "life experience" proved they had met, and who never told anyone it had happened until 30 plus years later.ThomasFremont said:They both said something happened. Neither went to trial. Neither is demonstrably more true than the other. It’s hearsay.
Good effort.
They met. You don't have to believe anything else she has to say to conclude they met. -
Every day since Trump's election has been a kick in the nuts.
Now there was a sweet year where they truly believed that doddering old fool Mueller was gonna take down the trumpster
But as usually the cold hard reality is back with a size 16 cleat straight to the groin.
Now the hope is that the virus is gonna do it.
Seriously? When will they learn? -
A 12 year-old monkey, you freak.ThomasFremont said:
No. It’s not.NorthwestFresh said:
It’s as (in)credible as Garth-Ford’s claim, Spaulding.ThomasFremont said:
WTF dudeNorthwestFresh said:
I met Lionel @HHusky at a UDub game in The Zone against the Ducks in 2011 and saw him finger a 12 year-old. I told my The Rapist about it it in notes.HHusky said:
Ford said they met. Kavanaugh was equivocal.SFGbob said:
One has evidence that she worked in Biden's office and told friends and family at the time something had happened. One had no evidence she ever met the person she was accusing other than the word of fucking moron who claimed his "life experience" proved they had met, and who never told anyone it had happened until 30 plus years later.ThomasFremont said:They both said something happened. Neither went to trial. Neither is demonstrably more true than the other. It’s hearsay.
Good effort.
They met. You don't have to believe anything else she has to say to conclude they met.
Take you child rape fantasies elsewhere you fucking weirdo.
