Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

ESPN Releases Top 10 ‘Running Back U’ Programs - Oregon makes the list but UW doesn't

«1

Comments

  • BeerThirty
    BeerThirty Member Posts: 2,465
    ESPN likes to hang off of Oregon's sack. The Nike effect.
  • whlinder
    whlinder Member Posts: 5,266
    Not just Nike, but the fact that the Oregon mascot is literally a Disney character arranged through a special licensing agreement.
  • IPukeOregonGrellow
    IPukeOregonGrellow Member Posts: 2,183
    It also dates to the dawn of the BCS era, so Huge McEllemacphereon doesn’t count. My? Bigger beef was this.

  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    Who are UW’s top 3 QBs and RBs during the BCS/CFP era (‘99-present)?

    I’ve got Tuiasosopo-Pickett-Price, Gaskin-Polk-Sankey.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Any top 3 QB list without Jack H Lockner can LEAVE!!1!
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    Only Jake I even considered was Skinny.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,016
    edited April 2020
    What's the criteria? First it's BCS era, then the retard trying to suck off USC and Georgia brings in "all time" guys. Herschel Walker and OJ Simpson are well pre-BCS.

    Normally, _______________ U discussions center around who was good in college AND the NFL, with a focus on the latter.

    As such, Wisky falls off. Historically their backs don't translate to the NFL.

    When was the last time USC produced a great, or even productive, NFL back? They've had a few in the BCS era who were good in college, but not at the next level. SC hasn't produced a great NFL running back since Marcus Allen. Reggie Bush and Lendale White were complete NFL busts; White was a massive bust. For all hype of Pete's recruiting during their run, there is a lot of show and not a lot of go. Even the all-time list of Heisman tailbacks isn't so shiny when you consider NFL careers. Anthony Davis, Ricky Bell and Charles White didn't do shit in the NFL. Garrett had a respectable, but hardly noteworthy, NFL run. They really benefit from the shine of OJ, Allen and Giff.

    If it's BCS-forward era, Miami should be higher on the list. I'm open to other arguments, but I'm struggling to find a school that was as productive as Miami during that defined time: Edgerinn James, Clinton Portis, Lamar Miller, Frank Gore & Willis McGahee. Duke Johnson isn't a full time guy, but gets carries and passes thrown his way.

    If it's all-time, that changes things a bit. Florida gets into the conversation with guys like Emitt Smith, John L Williams, Neal Anderson, Fred Taylor and Eric Rhett, all of whom were pro bowl level players in the NFL.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,016

    ESPN likes to hang off of Oregon's sack. The Nike effect.

    What's the argument though?
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827

    As such, Wisky falls off. Historically their backs don't translate to the NFL.

    Weird, right? Wisco backs never seem as great when running behind a different line.

    OLU
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    I’m amused, but not at all surprised, that ESPN managed to omit Stanford (McCaffrey-Gerhart-Love) from their RB list. The Tree trio is arguably #1.
  • WillyRBeek
    WillyRBeek Member Posts: 133
    The only way I can even somewhat justify these rankings, is if they're doing them solely off of how they played in college. If they're factoring in the NFL, these are completely out to lunch.

    For the QB rankings, the player listed from a school in the Top 5 that actually had a good career was Palmer, but even he didn't really live up to expectations.

    Oregon at 3 is laughable, and Texas at #4 is even worse. Between the 2 there isn't a single QB that had a good NFL career, although obviously Herbert still has a chance to change that.

    The RB list isn't as bad, except for the fact that Miami is the undisputed #1, and that Georgia should probably be in the Top 3.
  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,782 Swaye's Wigwam
    ESPN sucks - they love flash and then more flash. but not the pac-11 (everyone other than the ducks)
  • WillyRBeek
    WillyRBeek Member Posts: 133
    LebamDawg said:

    ESPN sucks - they love flash and then more flash. but not the pac-11 (everyone other than the ducks)

    They're usually pretty friendly to USC too, but that aside, you're right.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,694 Founders Club
    UW has dillon, polk, Sankey, mmfg.

    Oregon has
  • WillyRBeek
    WillyRBeek Member Posts: 133
    haie said:

    UW has dillon, polk, Sankey, mmfg.

    Oregon has

    If they're going off of NFL production, Dillon alone puts UW over most of the teams on that list. He was the best RB in the league for a number of years in the late 90's/early 2000's
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,016
    haie said:

    UW has dillon, polk, Sankey, mmfg.

    Oregon has

    Stewart, Blount, & James
  • IPukeOregonGrellow
    IPukeOregonGrellow Member Posts: 2,183

    haie said:

    UW has dillon, polk, Sankey, mmfg.

    Oregon has

    Stewart, Blount, & James
    Why do people always forget Bongterrio?
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,016

    haie said:

    UW has dillon, polk, Sankey, mmfg.

    Oregon has

    Stewart, Blount, & James
    Why do people always forget Bongterrio?
    Fair. If we're going to list Polk and Sankey, Smith makes the list.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,016

    haie said:

    UW has dillon, polk, Sankey, mmfg.

    Oregon has

    If they're going off of NFL production, Dillon alone puts UW over most of the teams on that list. He was the best RB in the league for a number of years in the late 90's/early 2000's
    Well, Dillon would be alone because polk and sankey did nothing. Gaskin hasn't had a chance yet, so jury is out. If you count him, I guess you have to count Freeman for Oregon, since he gets carries in Denver.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,127
    edited April 2020

    What's the criteria? First it's BCS era, then the retard trying to suck off USC and Georgia brings in "all time" guys. Herschel Walker and OJ Simpson are well pre-BCS.

    Normally, _______________ U discussions center around who was good in college AND the NFL, with a focus on the latter.

    As such, Wisky falls off. Historically their backs don't translate to the NFL.

    When was the last time USC produced a great, or even productive, NFL back? They've had a few in the BCS era who were good in college, but not at the next level. SC hasn't produced a great NFL running back since Marcus Allen. Reggie Bush and Lendale White were complete NFL busts; White was a massive bust. For all hype of Pete's recruiting during their run, there is a lot of show and not a lot of go. Even the all-time list of Heisman tailbacks isn't so shiny when you consider NFL careers. Anthony Davis, Ricky Bell and Charles White didn't do shit in the NFL. Garrett had a respectable, but hardly noteworthy, NFL run. They really benefit from the shine of OJ, Allen and Giff.

    If it's BCS-forward era, Miami should be higher on the list. I'm open to other arguments, but I'm struggling to find a school that was as productive as Miami during that defined time: Edgerinn James, Clinton Portis, Lamar Miller, Frank Gore & Willis McGahee. Duke Johnson isn't a full time guy, but gets carries and passes thrown his way.

    If it's all-time, that changes things a bit. Florida gets into the conversation with guys like Emitt Smith, John L Williams, Neal Anderson, Fred Taylor and Eric Rhett, all of whom were pro bowl level players in the NFL.

    Lendale White wasn’t a massive bust. Maybe a slight disappointment, but RB’s have short careers. Leading the NFL in TD’s and also having a 1,000+ yard season for a 2nd round pick isn’t being a massive disappointment.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,016

    What's the criteria? First it's BCS era, then the retard trying to suck off USC and Georgia brings in "all time" guys. Herschel Walker and OJ Simpson are well pre-BCS.

    Normally, _______________ U discussions center around who was good in college AND the NFL, with a focus on the latter.

    As such, Wisky falls off. Historically their backs don't translate to the NFL.

    When was the last time USC produced a great, or even productive, NFL back? They've had a few in the BCS era who were good in college, but not at the next level. SC hasn't produced a great NFL running back since Marcus Allen. Reggie Bush and Lendale White were complete NFL busts; White was a massive bust. For all hype of Pete's recruiting during their run, there is a lot of show and not a lot of go. Even the all-time list of Heisman tailbacks isn't so shiny when you consider NFL careers. Anthony Davis, Ricky Bell and Charles White didn't do shit in the NFL. Garrett had a respectable, but hardly noteworthy, NFL run. They really benefit from the shine of OJ, Allen and Giff.

    If it's BCS-forward era, Miami should be higher on the list. I'm open to other arguments, but I'm struggling to find a school that was as productive as Miami during that defined time: Edgerinn James, Clinton Portis, Lamar Miller, Frank Gore & Willis McGahee. Duke Johnson isn't a full time guy, but gets carries and passes thrown his way.

    If it's all-time, that changes things a bit. Florida gets into the conversation with guys like Emitt Smith, John L Williams, Neal Anderson, Fred Taylor and Eric Rhett, all of whom were pro bowl level players in the NFL.

    Lendale White wasn’t a massive bust. Maybe a slight disappointment, but RB’s have short careers. Leading the NFL in TD’s and also having a 1,000+ yard season for a 2nd round pick isn’t being a massive disappointment.
    I'll split the difference with you. 45th pick in the draft is not a flyer pick. That's someone you expect to have a career. His best season, by far, he cracks 1,000 yards on over 303 carries. Each of the other seasons he was a non-factor. So, I'll back off "massive" bust, and you do better than "slight disappointment". Axe the people in Tennessee if they were slightly disappointed.


    2009 Tennessee Titans 13 64 4.9 222 3.5 17.1 2 11 11 17.2 0 0 1
    2008 Tennessee Titans 16 200 12.5 773 3.9 48.3 15 80T 43 21.5 4 2 0
    2007 Tennessee Titans 16 303 18.9 1,110 3.7 69.4 7 28 57 18.8 4 0 5
    2006 Tennessee Titans 13 61 4.7 244 4.0 18.8 0 26 13 21.3 1 0 0
    TOTAL 58 628 10.8 2,349 3.7 40.5 24 80 124 19.7 9 2 6
  • IPukeOregonGrellow
    IPukeOregonGrellow Member Posts: 2,183
    edited April 2020

    haie said:

    UW has dillon, polk, Sankey, mmfg.

    Oregon has

    If they're going off of NFL production, Dillon alone puts UW over most of the teams on that list. He was the best RB in the league for a number of years in the late 90's/early 2000's
    Well, Dillon would be alone because polk and sankey did nothing. Gaskin hasn't had a chance yet, so jury is out. If you count him, I guess you have to count Freeman for Oregon, since he gets carries in Denver.
    Dillon alone wouldn't because he didn't play in the BCS era.

    The comprehensive list of running backs who've been worth their salt in the NFL from the Pac-10/12 in that time frame are:

    Steven Jackson
    Marshawn
    Maurice Jones-Drew
    Reggie Bush
    Lendale White
    Stewart
    Blount
    Reuben Droughns
    McCaffrey
    Lindsay

    Tell me more about how this conference is screwed?
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,127
    TTJ said:

    Who are UW’s top 3 QBs and RBs during the BCS/CFP era (‘99-present)?

    I’ve got Tuiasosopo-Pickett-Price, Gaskin-Polk-Sankey.

    Bring on the fuck off votes, but Browning won a lot more and had better stats than both Picket and especially Price.

    What's the criteria? First it's BCS era, then the retard trying to suck off USC and Georgia brings in "all time" guys. Herschel Walker and OJ Simpson are well pre-BCS.

    Normally, _______________ U discussions center around who was good in college AND the NFL, with a focus on the latter.

    As such, Wisky falls off. Historically their backs don't translate to the NFL.

    When was the last time USC produced a great, or even productive, NFL back? They've had a few in the BCS era who were good in college, but not at the next level. SC hasn't produced a great NFL running back since Marcus Allen. Reggie Bush and Lendale White were complete NFL busts; White was a massive bust. For all hype of Pete's recruiting during their run, there is a lot of show and not a lot of go. Even the all-time list of Heisman tailbacks isn't so shiny when you consider NFL careers. Anthony Davis, Ricky Bell and Charles White didn't do shit in the NFL. Garrett had a respectable, but hardly noteworthy, NFL run. They really benefit from the shine of OJ, Allen and Giff.

    If it's BCS-forward era, Miami should be higher on the list. I'm open to other arguments, but I'm struggling to find a school that was as productive as Miami during that defined time: Edgerinn James, Clinton Portis, Lamar Miller, Frank Gore & Willis McGahee. Duke Johnson isn't a full time guy, but gets carries and passes thrown his way.

    If it's all-time, that changes things a bit. Florida gets into the conversation with guys like Emitt Smith, John L Williams, Neal Anderson, Fred Taylor and Eric Rhett, all of whom were pro bowl level players in the NFL.

    Lendale White wasn’t a massive bust. Maybe a slight disappointment, but RB’s have short careers. Leading the NFL in TD’s and also having a 1,000+ yard season for a 2nd round pick isn’t being a massive disappointment.
    I'll split the difference with you. 45th pick in the draft is not a flyer pick. That's someone you expect to have a career. His best season, by far, he cracks 1,000 yards on over 303 carries. Each of the other seasons he was a non-factor. So, I'll back off "massive" bust, and you do better than "slight disappointment". Axe the people in Tennessee if they were slightly disappointed.


    2009 Tennessee Titans 13 64 4.9 222 3.5 17.1 2 11 11 17.2 0 0 1
    2008 Tennessee Titans 16 200 12.5 773 3.9 48.3 15 80T 43 21.5 4 2 0
    2007 Tennessee Titans 16 303 18.9 1,110 3.7 69.4 7 28 57 18.8 4 0 5
    2006 Tennessee Titans 13 61 4.7 244 4.0 18.8 0 26 13 21.3 1 0 0
    TOTAL 58 628 10.8 2,349 3.7 40.5 24 80 124 19.7 9 2 6
    He also had to share time with Chris Johnson who was once probably the best RB in the entire league. White was lazy and too fat to sustain a career. I think it was more of a case where he was too big and just fast enough in college, but too big and slow for the NFL.
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,726 Founders Club

    haie said:

    UW has dillon, polk, Sankey, mmfg.

    Oregon has

    If they're going off of NFL production, Dillon alone puts UW over most of the teams on that list. He was the best RB in the league for a number of years in the late 90's/early 2000's
    Well, Dillon would be alone because polk and sankey did nothing. Gaskin hasn't had a chance yet, so jury is out. If you count him, I guess you have to count Freeman for Oregon, since he gets carries in Denver.
    Dillon alone wouldn't because he didn't play in the BCS era.

    The comprehensive list of running backs who've been worth their salt in the NFL from the Pac-10/12 in that time frame are:

    Steven Jackson
    Marshawn
    Maurice Jones-Drew
    Reggie Bush
    Lendale White
    Stewart
    Blount
    Reuben Droughns
    McCaffrey
    Lindsay

    Tell me more about how this conference is screwed?
    Forsett had a long good career as a backup and even popped off for 1200 as a Starter late in his career for Bmore.

    Cal players that make it tend to do shockingly well in the NFL. Legit superstars in Marshawn, Rodgers, and Desean Jackson.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,016

    TTJ said:

    Who are UW’s top 3 QBs and RBs during the BCS/CFP era (‘99-present)?

    I’ve got Tuiasosopo-Pickett-Price, Gaskin-Polk-Sankey.

    Bring on the fuck off votes, but Browning won a lot more and had better stats than both Picket and especially Price.
    Pickett was a better QB. Way better passing skills
    Doogles said:

    haie said:

    UW has dillon, polk, Sankey, mmfg.

    Oregon has

    If they're going off of NFL production, Dillon alone puts UW over most of the teams on that list. He was the best RB in the league for a number of years in the late 90's/early 2000's
    Well, Dillon would be alone because polk and sankey did nothing. Gaskin hasn't had a chance yet, so jury is out. If you count him, I guess you have to count Freeman for Oregon, since he gets carries in Denver.
    Dillon alone wouldn't because he didn't play in the BCS era.

    The comprehensive list of running backs who've been worth their salt in the NFL from the Pac-10/12 in that time frame are:

    Steven Jackson
    Marshawn
    Maurice Jones-Drew
    Reggie Bush
    Lendale White
    Stewart
    Blount
    Reuben Droughns
    McCaffrey
    Lindsay

    Tell me more about how this conference is screwed?
    Forsett had a long good career as a backup and even popped off for 1200 as a Starter late in his career for Bmore.

    Cal players that make it tend to do shockingly well in the NFL. Legit superstars in Marshawn, Rodgers, and Desean Jackson.
    True. Tony Gonzalez, Aaron Rodgers, etc.
  • rodmansrage
    rodmansrage Member Posts: 6,376

    haie said:

    UW has dillon, polk, Sankey, mmfg.

    Oregon has

    Stewart, Blount, & James
    didnt blount miss all (most?) of his senior year cause he sucker punched that bjc player?

    is this espn taek going off of nfl production?
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,127

    TTJ said:

    Who are UW’s top 3 QBs and RBs during the BCS/CFP era (‘99-present)?

    I’ve got Tuiasosopo-Pickett-Price, Gaskin-Polk-Sankey.

    Bring on the fuck off votes, but Browning won a lot more and had better stats than both Picket and especially Price.
    Pickett was a better QB. Way better passing skills
    Doogles said:

    haie said:

    UW has dillon, polk, Sankey, mmfg.

    Oregon has

    If they're going off of NFL production, Dillon alone puts UW over most of the teams on that list. He was the best RB in the league for a number of years in the late 90's/early 2000's
    Well, Dillon would be alone because polk and sankey did nothing. Gaskin hasn't had a chance yet, so jury is out. If you count him, I guess you have to count Freeman for Oregon, since he gets carries in Denver.
    Dillon alone wouldn't because he didn't play in the BCS era.

    The comprehensive list of running backs who've been worth their salt in the NFL from the Pac-10/12 in that time frame are:

    Steven Jackson
    Marshawn
    Maurice Jones-Drew
    Reggie Bush
    Lendale White
    Stewart
    Blount
    Reuben Droughns
    McCaffrey
    Lindsay

    Tell me more about how this conference is screwed?
    Forsett had a long good career as a backup and even popped off for 1200 as a Starter late in his career for Bmore.

    Cal players that make it tend to do shockingly well in the NFL. Legit superstars in Marshawn, Rodgers, and Desean Jackson.
    True. Tony Gonzalez, Aaron Rodgers, etc.
    They have some really good pros. I just looked it up. Keenan Allen, Cam Jordan, Mitchel Schwartz. Pro Bowlers. Goff is another. I didn’t realize how the quality of their players in the league. It’s gotta be the best in the PAC 12.

    https://www.pro-football-reference.com/schools/california/drafted.htm
  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,782 Swaye's Wigwam

    haie said:

    UW has dillon, polk, Sankey, mmfg.

    Oregon has

    Stewart, Blount, & James
    didnt blount miss all (most?) of his senior year cause he sucker punched that bjc player?

    is this espn taek going off of nfl production?
    ESPN puts out lists that have to include the schools that have fans that make the most comments on their website articles. Also, they include people who actually commented and liked ESPN "The Magazine"

  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004
    If this is “all time” to leave out GA is FS.

    Shit list, shit writer.