Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Maximum Carnage Week Game Thread

SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,060
First Anniversary Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
Founders Club
edited April 2020 in Tug Tavern
Game time fuckers.



edit: Making it the official game thread and pinning so you can get all your piles of plague bodies updates throughout this week of ULTIMATE DEATH!
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«134567…550

Comments

  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,777
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    edited April 2020
    Officials stats* get posted at 4PM.

    *as adjusted by the AAU scorekeepers.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,787
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Founders Club
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04F4xlWSFh0
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 33,855
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam
    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,110
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,110
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    YellowSnow said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,110
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    YellowSnow said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,110
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    YellowSnow said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
    I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,162
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    YellowSnow said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
    I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.
    So you have no idea if any of this made any difference. Like I said
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,481
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    This is a good read
    https://hotair.com/archives/allahpundit/2020/04/06/ihme-sharply-reduces-projected-hospitalizations-data-shows-nys-curve-flattening/
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,110
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    YellowSnow said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
    I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.
    So you have no idea if any of this made any difference. Like I said
    Until we run in traffic, how can we be sure that it is dangerous?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,861
    Photogenic First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Founders Club
    There’s definitely context things going around in the data reporting. The death output seems to be worst case and then when it comes in less, social distancing is being lauded. I seem to recall a time where the deaths that were being projected were with the social distancing assumption built in, so that can’t be the reason for variance in actuals.

    Part of the issue is too many models with wildly different assumptions and reporting taking pieces from each as if it were an integrated model.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,787
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Founders Club
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    This is a good read
    https://hotair.com/archives/allahpundit/2020/04/06/ihme-sharply-reduces-projected-hospitalizations-data-shows-nys-curve-flattening/

    Andrew Combover and Bill Deblah are heroes now, despite bad orange man. They flattened the curve thanks to their brilliance. Never mind that Deblasio said everything was normal well into March.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    DoogieMcDoogersonDoogieMcDoogerson Member Posts: 2,481
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    I find this chart interesting and the commentary describing it interesting. This is probably something the news should pick up on but it doesn't fit their narrative. "Deaths show by date of onset."


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    MelloDawgMelloDawg Member Posts: 6,097
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    YellowSnow said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
    I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.
    So you have no idea if any of this made any difference. Like I said
    Until we run in traffic, how can we be sure that it is dangerous?
    What do you have to lose? I may try it, I’ll have to talk to my doctor.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.