Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Whatever happened to believe all women?
Comments
-
It’s not believe all women. It’s believe all women we can use to advance our political agenda.
-
-
blob said "MSM". If he wanted to single out the silent, I have no problem with that. I suspect some will be forced to explain their reasoning.GreenRiverGatorz said:
95% of the time the shrill cries of "the MSM refuses to even talk about this" are easily refuted by simply googling to find an article by any number of MSM outlets that have in fact reported on the issue.SFGbob said:
More reading less cocksucking.HHusky said:
The MSM reported the allegations. What do you wanna bet there are journalists investigating those allegations right now?SFGbob said:
So believe all women was always bullshit and if you're a Republican you can count on the MSM to report on sexual assault allegations no matter how flimsy or nonexistent the evidence might be, but it you're a Rat you don't have to worry about it because "right wing news outlets."HHusky said:It’s a shame there are no right wing news outlets.
The victimhood routine is tired.
The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN haven't reported on it at all.
The shameless cocksucking routine is tired.
But as of today, neither Wapo or the NYT have even published a blurb on the new Reade allegations. That's a pretty damning and significant omission, especially given the high profile role the NYT played in the Weinstein saga. It's fucking shameful. -
Bernie voters got it trending on twitter and some outlets have picked it up
The difference as always is the massive advantage in the echo chamber technology of the left when they launch a smear
Everyone in America knew Cavanaugh was a beer drinking rapist. Got a televised hearing and everything
Joe should be vetted by Bernie who is his only remaining opponent.
It obviously won't be a general election issue because telling Billy Bush how women let you grab them by the pussy is just the same. As is consensual cheating on your wife which was cool in the 90's -
You seem pretty upset over this one.HHusky said:
blob said "MSM". If he wanted to single out the silent, I have no problem with that. I suspect some will be forced to explain their reasoning.GreenRiverGatorz said:
95% of the time the shrill cries of "the MSM refuses to even talk about this" are easily refuted by simply googling to find an article by any number of MSM outlets that have in fact reported on the issue.SFGbob said:
More reading less cocksucking.HHusky said:
The MSM reported the allegations. What do you wanna bet there are journalists investigating those allegations right now?SFGbob said:
So believe all women was always bullshit and if you're a Republican you can count on the MSM to report on sexual assault allegations no matter how flimsy or nonexistent the evidence might be, but it you're a Rat you don't have to worry about it because "right wing news outlets."HHusky said:It’s a shame there are no right wing news outlets.
The victimhood routine is tired.
The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN haven't reported on it at all.
The shameless cocksucking routine is tired.
But as of today, neither Wapo or the NYT have even published a blurb on the new Reade allegations. That's a pretty damning and significant omission, especially given the high profile role the NYT played in the Weinstein saga. It's fucking shameful. -
Take your time, Mike. Eventually you'll think of something clever . . . conceivably.MikeDamone said:
You seem pretty upset over this one.HHusky said:
blob said "MSM". If he wanted to single out the silent, I have no problem with that. I suspect some will be forced to explain their reasoning.GreenRiverGatorz said:
95% of the time the shrill cries of "the MSM refuses to even talk about this" are easily refuted by simply googling to find an article by any number of MSM outlets that have in fact reported on the issue.SFGbob said:
More reading less cocksucking.HHusky said:
The MSM reported the allegations. What do you wanna bet there are journalists investigating those allegations right now?SFGbob said:
So believe all women was always bullshit and if you're a Republican you can count on the MSM to report on sexual assault allegations no matter how flimsy or nonexistent the evidence might be, but it you're a Rat you don't have to worry about it because "right wing news outlets."HHusky said:It’s a shame there are no right wing news outlets.
The victimhood routine is tired.
The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN haven't reported on it at all.
The shameless cocksucking routine is tired.
But as of today, neither Wapo or the NYT have even published a blurb on the new Reade allegations. That's a pretty damning and significant omission, especially given the high profile role the NYT played in the Weinstein saga. It's fucking shameful. -
Keep proving me right dazzler. We find your level of retardation amusing, if not a bit sad.HHusky said:
Take your time, Mike. Eventually you'll think of something clever . . . conceivably.MikeDamone said:
You seem pretty upset over this one.HHusky said:
blob said "MSM". If he wanted to single out the silent, I have no problem with that. I suspect some will be forced to explain their reasoning.GreenRiverGatorz said:
95% of the time the shrill cries of "the MSM refuses to even talk about this" are easily refuted by simply googling to find an article by any number of MSM outlets that have in fact reported on the issue.SFGbob said:
More reading less cocksucking.HHusky said:
The MSM reported the allegations. What do you wanna bet there are journalists investigating those allegations right now?SFGbob said:
So believe all women was always bullshit and if you're a Republican you can count on the MSM to report on sexual assault allegations no matter how flimsy or nonexistent the evidence might be, but it you're a Rat you don't have to worry about it because "right wing news outlets."HHusky said:It’s a shame there are no right wing news outlets.
The victimhood routine is tired.
The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN haven't reported on it at all.
The shameless cocksucking routine is tired.
But as of today, neither Wapo or the NYT have even published a blurb on the new Reade allegations. That's a pretty damning and significant omission, especially given the high profile role the NYT played in the Weinstein saga. It's fucking shameful. -
They already manufacture TP.salemcoog said: -
Don't waste your time, RacistH. You'll die before saying anything clever.HHusky said:
Take your time, Mike. Eventually you'll think of something clever . . . conceivably.MikeDamone said:
You seem pretty upset over this one.HHusky said:
blob said "MSM". If he wanted to single out the silent, I have no problem with that. I suspect some will be forced to explain their reasoning.GreenRiverGatorz said:
95% of the time the shrill cries of "the MSM refuses to even talk about this" are easily refuted by simply googling to find an article by any number of MSM outlets that have in fact reported on the issue.SFGbob said:
More reading less cocksucking.HHusky said:
The MSM reported the allegations. What do you wanna bet there are journalists investigating those allegations right now?SFGbob said:
So believe all women was always bullshit and if you're a Republican you can count on the MSM to report on sexual assault allegations no matter how flimsy or nonexistent the evidence might be, but it you're a Rat you don't have to worry about it because "right wing news outlets."HHusky said:It’s a shame there are no right wing news outlets.
The victimhood routine is tired.
The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN haven't reported on it at all.
The shameless cocksucking routine is tired.
But as of today, neither Wapo or the NYT have even published a blurb on the new Reade allegations. That's a pretty damning and significant omission, especially given the high profile role the NYT played in the Weinstein saga. It's fucking shameful.
