Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
FILM STUDY: WHY OHIO STATE PREFERS A 'VISION-AND-BREAK' STYLE OF ZONE COVERAGE
Comments
-
They also prefer 5 star future first round draft picks to run it
-
If they can keep them out of prison. 😁
-
Day is mediocre but "BuckNuts" is going to fucking bury your program.
I would know. -
Will Oregon be "done and buried forever," again, after the Buck?haie said:Day is mediocre but "BuckNuts" is going to fucking bury your program.
I would know. -
Best coverage IMO. Can be easily manipulated to look like man too. Cover 2 is a lot easier to see pre snap because the CB’s normally need to come up and jam outside WR’s inside at the LOS.DJDuck said:
If your linebackers have any awareness (most don’t) and can diagnose the routes combos, it’s hard to complete passes vs this coverage.
The main problem I see in college football is LB’s tv at drop just to drop. I saw it all the time with UW’s LB’s last year. If a guy isn’t running right in front of their face they look clueless. You actually have to play man inside of yo ur zone area and communicate when you are letting a receiver go. It was a real annoyance of mine in my high school playing days as well.
Alright, enough faggy X’s and O’s talk from me.
