Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Remember,

BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 5,334
First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
If they are accusing you of something, odds are it is they who are doing the deed.

Another day another rat faking a hate crime. The link is an interesting read. This bitch went to a lot of trouble in an attempt to frame a Fraternity President and the entire fraternity.

If only rats would use their powers for good instead of evil maybe the fake hate crimes wouldn't outnumber the genuine hate crimes against them. The hate crimes and violence they have heaped on the right side of the "isle" is horrendous and too numerous to count but those instances never seem to make it into the MSM. I wonder why that is? Now that I think about it, I can't remember the last time a Republican voter faked a hate crime. Another "I wonder why that is" question.

https://www.thecollegefix.com/college-student-charged-with-faking-hate-crime-against-herself/

College student charged with faking hate crime against herself

The threats were so severe that the university “cancelled classes for a day to ‘reset’ and deal with the threats,” the department said. Dominguez-Pena has been charged with two felonies and two misdemeanors: criminal threats, perjury, “electronic impersonation” and six counts of filing a false police report.

“The investigation concluded that the suspect acted alone and no other members of the student group were involved with the criminal acts,” which included framing an innocent fraternity and its president for the hate crimes.

Comments

  • Options
    Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,601
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    The thing is....frats are racist and misogynistic so even if it wasnt him that did it he's probably guilty of something

    Also the important thing here is that she started a much needed conversation which will pay dividends in the future.





    Fuck I hate GDIs
  • Options
    HustlinOwlHustlinOwl Member Posts: 953
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    How do you know this girl is a liberal democrat and why would it matter?
  • Options
    DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    5 Awesomes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes
    edited March 2020

    How do you know this girl is a liberal democrat and why would it matter?

    Ex-Campus 'Social Justice' Leader Caught Blaming Fake Attacks On Fraternity




    https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesmatter/news/ex-campus-social-justice-leader-caught-blaming-fake-attacks-on-fraternity-tOi0jcxji0uHkVIqyfQRDg/2020-03-13T20:41:30.6077770Z/U5PifMTL30uPIis8J8hoDw

  • Options
    dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    How do you know this girl is a liberal democrat and why would it matter?

    A monopoly (from Greek μόνος, mónos, 'single, alone' and πωλεῖν, pōleîn, 'to sell') exists when a specific person or enterprise is the only supplier of a particular commodity. This contrasts with a monopsony which relates to a single entity's control of a market to purchase a good or service, and with oligopoly which consists of a few sellers dominating a market.[1] Monopolies are thus characterized by a lack of economic competition to produce the good or service, a lack of viable substitute goods, and the possibility of a high monopoly price well above the seller's marginal cost that leads to a high monopoly profit.[2] The verb monopolise or monopolize refers to the process by which a company gains the ability to raise prices or exclude competitors. In economics, a monopoly is a single seller. In law, a monopoly is a business entity that has significant market power, that is, the power to charge overly high prices.[3] Although monopolies may be big businesses, size is not a characteristic of a monopoly. A small business may still have the power to raise prices in a small industry (or market).[3]

    Competition law
    Scale of justice 2.svg
    Basic concepts
    History of competition law
    Monopoly
    Coercive monopoly
    Natural monopoly
    Barriers to entry
    Herfindahl–Hirschman Index
    Market concentration
    Market power
    SSNIP test
    Relevant market
    Merger control
    Anti-competitive practices
    Monopolization
    Collusion
    Formation of cartels
    Price fixing
    Bid rigging
    Product bundling and tying
    Refusal to deal
    Group boycott
    Essential facilities
    Exclusive dealing
    Dividing territories
    Conscious parallelism
    Predatory pricing
    Misuse of patents and copyrights
    Enforcement authorities and organizations
    International Competition Network
    List of competition regulators
    vte
    A monopoly is distinguished from a monopsony, in which there is only one buyer of a product or service; a monopoly may also have monopsony control of a sector of a market. Likewise, a monopoly should be distinguished from a cartel (a form of oligopoly), in which several providers act together to coordinate services, prices or sale of goods. Monopolies, monopsonies and oligopolies are all situations in which one or a few entities have market power and therefore interact with their customers (monopoly or oligopoly), or suppliers (monopsony) in ways that distort the market.[citation needed]

    Monopolies can be established by a government, form naturally, or form by integration. In many jurisdictions, competition laws restrict monopolies due to government concerns over potential adverse effects. Holding a dominant position or a monopoly in a market is often not illegal in itself, however certain categories of behavior can be considered abusive and therefore incur legal sanctions when business is dominant. A government-granted monopoly or legal monopoly, by contrast, is sanctioned by the state, often to provide an incentive to invest in a risky venture or enrich a domestic interest group. Patents, copyrights, and trademarks are sometimes used as examples of government-granted monopolies. The government may also reserve the venture for itself, thus forming a government monopoly, for example with a state-owned company.[citation needed]

    Monopolies may be naturally occurring due to limited competition because the industry is resource intensive and requires substantial costs to operate (e.g., certain railroad systems).


    Contents
    1 Market structures
    2 Characteristics
    3 Sources of monopoly power
    4 Monopoly versus competitive markets
    5 Inverse elasticity rule
    5.1 Market power
    6 Price discrimination
    6.1 Example
    6.2 Classifying customers
    7 Monopoly and efficiency
    7.1 Natural monopoly
    7.2 Government-granted monopoly
    8 Monopolist shutdown rule
    9 Breaking up monopolies
    10 Law
    10.1 Establishing dominance
    10.1.1 Relevant product market
    10.1.2 Relevant geographic market
    10.1.3 Market shares
    10.1.4 Other related factors
    10.2 Types of abuses
    10.3 Examples of abuses
    11 Historical monopolies
    11.1 Origin
    11.2 Monopolies of resources
    11.2.1 Salt
    11.2.2 Coal
    11.2.3 Petroleum
    11.2.4 Steel
    11.2.5 Diamonds
    11.3 Utilities
    11.4 Transportation
    11.5 Foreign trade
    11.6 Professional sports
    11.7 Other examples of monopolies
    12 Countering monopolies
    13 See also
    14 Notes and references
    15 Further reading
    16 External links
    Market structures
    In economics, the idea of monopoly is important in the study of management structures, which directly concerns normative aspects of economic competition, and provides the basis for topics such as industrial organization and economics of regulation. There are four basic types of market structures in traditional economic analysis: perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly and monopoly. A monopoly is a structure in which a single supplier produces and sells a given product or service. If there is a single seller in a certain market and there are no close substitutes for the product, then the market structure is that of a "pure monopoly". Sometimes, there are many sellers in an industry and/or there exist many close substitutes for the goods being produced, but nevertheless companies retain some market power. This is termed monopolistic competition, whereas in oligopoly the companies interact strategically.

    In general, the main results from this theory compares the price-fixing methods across market structures, analyze the effect of a certain structure on welfare, and vary technological/demand assumptions in order to assess the consequences for an abstract model of society. Most economic textbooks follow the practice of carefully explaining the perfect competition model, mainly because this helps to understand "departures" from it (the so-called imperfect competition models).

    The boundaries of what constitutes a market and what does not are relevant distinctions to make in economic analysis. In a general equilibrium context, a good is a specific concept including geographical and time-related characteristics. Most studies of market structure relax a little their definition of a good, allowing for more flexibility in the identification of substitute goods.

    Characteristics
    A monopoly has these characteristics:

    Profit maximizer: Maximizes profits.
    Price maker: Decides the price of the good or product to be sold, but does so by determining the quantity in order to demand the price desired by the firm.
    High barriers to entry: Other sellers are unable to enter the market of the monopoly.
    Single seller: In a monopoly, there is one seller of the good, who produces all the output.[4] Therefore, the whole market is being served by a single company, and for practical purposes, the company is the same as the industry.
    Price discrimination: A monopolist can change the price or quantity of the product. They sell higher quantities at a lower price in a very elastic market, and sell lower quantities at a higher price in a less elastic market.
    Sources of monopoly power
    Monopolies derive their market power from barriers to entry – circumstances that prevent or greatly impede a potential competitor's ability to compete in a market. There are three major types of barriers to entry: economic, legal and deliberate.[5]

    Economic barriers: Economic barriers include economies of scale, capital requirements, cost advantages and technological superiority.[6]
    Economies of scale: Decreasing unit costs for larger volumes of production.[7] Decreasing costs coupled with large initial costs, If for example the industry is large enough to support one company of minimum efficient scale then other companies entering the industry will operate at a size that is less than MES, and so cannot produce at an average cost that is competitive with the dominant company. And if the long-term average cost of the dominant company is constantly decreasing[clarification needed], then that company will continue to have the least cost method to provide a good or service.[8]
    Capital requirements: Production processes that require large investments of capital, perhaps in the form of large research and development costs or substantial sunk costs, limit the number of companies in an industry:[9] this is an example of economies of scale.
    Technological superiority: A monopoly may be better able to acquire, integrate and use the best possible technology in producing its goods while entrants either do not have the expertise or are unable to meet the large fixed costs (see above) needed for the most efficient technology.[7] Thus one large company can often produce goods cheaper than several small companies.[10]
    No substitute goods: A monopoly sells a good for which there is no close substitute. The absence of substitutes makes the demand for that good relatively inelastic, enabling monopolies to extract positive profits.
    Control of natural resources: A prime source of monopoly power is the control of resources (such as raw materials) that are critical to the production of a final good.
    Network externalities: The use of a product by a person can affect the value of that product to other people. This is the network effect. There is a direct relationship between the proportion of people using a product and the demand for that product. In other words, the more people who are using a product, the greater the probability that another individual will start to use the product. This reflects fads, fashion trends,[11] social networks etc. It also can play a crucial role in the development or acquisition of market power. The most famous current example is the market dominance of the Microsoft office suite and operating system in personal computers.[citation needed]
  • Options
    BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 5,334
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    After concocting the hoaxes, she then applied for victim compensation through the California Victim Compensation Board, Det. Nishimura told the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin.

    Victim Compensation Board? WTF? Talk about rats enabling other rats to lie and fake hate crimes. The rats in CA pay top dollar I am sure. FFS.
  • Options
    KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,750
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    DJDuck said:

    How do you know this girl is a liberal democrat and why would it matter?

    Ex-Campus 'Social Justice' Leader Caught Blaming Fake Attacks On Fraternity




    https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesmatter/news/ex-campus-social-justice-leader-caught-blaming-fake-attacks-on-fraternity-tOi0jcxji0uHkVIqyfQRDg/2020-03-13T20:41:30.6077770Z/U5PifMTL30uPIis8J8hoDw

    The poor thing could only hope to be sexually abused at this point. Only action she's gonna get.
  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,866
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    If they are accusing you of something, odds are it is they who are doing the deed.

    Another day another rat faking a hate crime. The link is an interesting read. This bitch went to a lot of trouble in an attempt to frame a Fraternity President and the entire fraternity.

    If only rats would use their powers for good instead of evil maybe the fake hate crimes wouldn't outnumber the genuine hate crimes against them. The hate crimes and violence they have heaped on the right side of the "isle" is horrendous and too numerous to count but those instances never seem to make it into the MSM. I wonder why that is? Now that I think about it, I can't remember the last time a Republican voter faked a hate crime. Another "I wonder why that is" question.

    https://www.thecollegefix.com/college-student-charged-with-faking-hate-crime-against-herself/

    College student charged with faking hate crime against herself

    The threats were so severe that the university “cancelled classes for a day to ‘reset’ and deal with the threats,” the department said. Dominguez-Pena has been charged with two felonies and two misdemeanors: criminal threats, perjury, “electronic impersonation” and six counts of filing a false police report.

    “The investigation concluded that the suspect acted alone and no other members of the student group were involved with the criminal acts,” which included framing an innocent fraternity and its president for the hate crimes.

    This actually happens more than people realize.

    Instead of the heretofore slutty walk of shame for bad decisions after copious amounts of alcohol, the sisters now rally around the victim and demand justice from the brothers who so angrily FORCED them to down lemon drops and flash their tittays like strippers. They treat the gal who sucked off the frat president and lived to tell about it like a hero. He MADE her do those things.

    They are innocent victims.

    It is rampant. Happens almost every weekend around the country.

  • Options
    Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,601
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker

    If they are accusing you of something, odds are it is they who are doing the deed.

    Another day another rat faking a hate crime. The link is an interesting read. This bitch went to a lot of trouble in an attempt to frame a Fraternity President and the entire fraternity.

    If only rats would use their powers for good instead of evil maybe the fake hate crimes wouldn't outnumber the genuine hate crimes against them. The hate crimes and violence they have heaped on the right side of the "isle" is horrendous and too numerous to count but those instances never seem to make it into the MSM. I wonder why that is? Now that I think about it, I can't remember the last time a Republican voter faked a hate crime. Another "I wonder why that is" question.

    https://www.thecollegefix.com/college-student-charged-with-faking-hate-crime-against-herself/

    College student charged with faking hate crime against herself

    The threats were so severe that the university “cancelled classes for a day to ‘reset’ and deal with the threats,” the department said. Dominguez-Pena has been charged with two felonies and two misdemeanors: criminal threats, perjury, “electronic impersonation” and six counts of filing a false police report.

    “The investigation concluded that the suspect acted alone and no other members of the student group were involved with the criminal acts,” which included framing an innocent fraternity and its president for the hate crimes.

    This actually happens more than people realize.

    Instead of the heretofore slutty walk of shame for bad decisions after copious amounts of alcohol, the sisters now rally around the victim and demand justice from the brothers who so angrily FORCED them to down lemon drops and flash their tittays like strippers. They treat the gal who sucked off the frat president and lived to tell about it like a hero. He MADE her do those things.

    They are innocent victims.

    It is rampant. Happens almost every weekend around the country.

    When you incentivize victimhood what do people expect
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    How do you know this girl is a liberal democrat and why would it matter?

    This is like when Owl questioned whether a black, female, school superintendent for the Atlanta public school system that had worked on the Obama re-election campaign was caught fudging the student test scores on standardized tests in order to get more Federal dollars was really a Rat.

    Fuck off Owl.
  • Options
    ramenduckramenduck Member Posts: 734
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    edited March 2020

    After concocting the hoaxes, she then applied for victim compensation through the California Victim Compensation Board, Det. Nishimura told the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin.

    Victim Compensation Board? WTF? Talk about rats enabling other rats to lie and fake hate crimes. The rats in CA pay top dollar I am sure. FFS.

    The Victim Compensation Board is a good program and a godsend for those who genuinely need it. Not familiar with CA's version, but I make regular referrals to Oregon's. Makes the whole thing all the more despicable. This chick should reap the fucking whirlwind.
Sign In or Register to comment.