Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Does Bernie suck or does Socialism?

2

Comments

  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,494

    Abundance?

    Heard since Trump got elected that America really wants Socialism and Bernie

    Got to win your conference to make the final

    Dude lost to Hillary and Biden

    That's a fucking loser

    Who has next for the Reds?

    I've never heard that. But I hang around winners, and winners don't like socialism. Except HCH socialism that works for me.

    Bernie's old, weird and confused about how best to manage our affairs. He'll never be Prez. Ever. Ever.

    I'm now on alert for his successor FS.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 18,122 Standard Supporter
    HW would have made it undefeated but he decided that raising tax rates was more important. Bush I also would never fight back against the leftard slurs. W should have been an easy winner in 2004. The Swift Boater's bailed out Bush II in Florida. Bush's open borders stance didn't help him either. Toss in W's love of never ending war. He was replaced by Maverick who hated Palin more than barry and also loved eternal war. Mittens wouldn't fight either and as an supposed elite secretly loved national health care more than capitalism. Then he also loved open borders.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,972 Founders Club

    HW would have made it undefeated but he decided that raising tax rates was more important. Bush I also would never fight back against the leftard slurs. W should have been an easy winner in 2004. The Swift Boater's bailed out Bush II in Florida. Bush's open borders stance didn't help him either. Toss in W's love of never ending war. He was replaced by Maverick who hated Palin more than barry and also loved eternal war. Mittens wouldn't fight either and as an supposed elite secretly loved national health care more than capitalism. Then he also loved open borders.

    41 still wins with tax hike without Perot wasted votes. As Rush used to say....oh ye 43%. All in all the country was in fine shape when he left office.

    43 was wrong on Iraq (I bought in), old people mess and borders. He still won twice. Jeb probably would have been better than Dubya. But he showed up to run at the wrong moment in history.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,458 Founders Club
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Jeb?

    Uh no

    Low energy Jeb?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,221

    HW would have made it undefeated but he decided that raising tax rates was more important. Bush I also would never fight back against the leftard slurs. W should have been an easy winner in 2004. The Swift Boater's bailed out Bush II in Florida. Bush's open borders stance didn't help him either. Toss in W's love of never ending war. He was replaced by Maverick who hated Palin more than barry and also loved eternal war. Mittens wouldn't fight either and as an supposed elite secretly loved national health care more than capitalism. Then he also loved open borders.

    41 still wins with tax hike without Perot wasted votes. As Rush used to say....oh ye 43%. All in all the country was in fine shape when he left office.

    43 was wrong on Iraq (I bought in), old people mess and borders. He still won twice. Jeb probably would have been better than Dubya. But he showed up to run at the wrong moment in history.
    I remember my Jeb was better than W phase.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,458 Founders Club
    edited March 2020
    I think W hanging with the Clinton and Obama gang kind of eliminated any lingering luster

    Lot of Bush appointments in the witch hunt.

    Establishment family, establishment party
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 49,063 Standard Supporter

    And Bernie took it like a Bush.

    You mean the family that’s 3-1 all time against Dems?
    Did 41 actually lose to the Dems or lost in best ball with Perot joining at the turn?




  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,862 Swaye's Wigwam
    The reason W went 2-0 was the ability of the dems to put up such a good opponent. which they seem to be really good at.

    Gore the bore and Kerry
    and W doesn't, or at that time didn't, have a personality and still won