Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Voter turnout in Virginia nearly doubles from 2016

DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 67,680 Founders Club
in Tug Tavern
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/485850-voter-turnout-in-virginia-nearly-doubles-from-2016
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 112,614 Founders Club
    The dead people are motivated to beat Trump
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 47,720 Standard Supporter
    DerekJohnson said:

    https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/485850-voter-turnout-in-virginia-nearly-doubles-from-2016

    Lots of dead Democrats in Prince William County.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,823 Standard Supporter
    edited March 2020
    Trump won and his voters didn't even need to turn out. He beat the combined dimwit party candidates on super tuesday in a blue state. Dems are doomed.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    Sledog said:

    Trump won and his voters didn't even need to turn out. He beat the combined dimwit party candidates on super tuesday in a blue state. Dems are doomed.

    If you actually do the math of the current polling numbers instead of relying on tweets from Sloth from the Goonies, you'll see that the dems had about 125k more turnout for their CO primary than the republicans. Those numbers are completely insignificant for either side.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,823 Standard Supporter
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    Trump won and his voters didn't even need to turn out. He beat the combined dimwit party candidates on super tuesday in a blue state. Dems are doomed.

    If you actually do the math of the current polling numbers instead of relying on tweets from Sloth from the Goonies, you'll see that the dems had about 125k more turnout for their CO primary than the republicans. Those numbers are completely insignificant for either side.
    Insignificant that the losers had less actual votes? Nope.

    Use your pole all you want.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    Sledog said:

    Trump won and his voters didn't even need to turn out. He beat the combined dimwit party candidates on super tuesday in a blue state. Dems are doomed.

    No he didn't.

    755k dem votes in Colorado. 591k for Trump.

    755k > 591k

    maff is hard....
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,823 Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    Trump won and his voters didn't even need to turn out. He beat the combined dimwit party candidates on super tuesday in a blue state. Dems are doomed.

    No he didn't.

    755k dem votes in Colorado. 591k for Trump.

    755k > 591k

    maff is hard....
    Your sure be shmart! Better get the calculator unless you have a different set of numbers you're not posting.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,878 Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    Trump won and his voters didn't even need to turn out. He beat the combined dimwit party candidates on super tuesday in a blue state. Dems are doomed.

    No he didn't.

    755k dem votes in Colorado. 591k for Trump.

    755k > 591k

    maff is hard....
    Why would anyone post numbers of a highly contested rat election and compare that to a uncontested incumbent election and think it makes sense?

    Scotti?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    Trump won and his voters didn't even need to turn out. He beat the combined dimwit party candidates on super tuesday in a blue state. Dems are doomed.

    No he didn't.

    755k dem votes in Colorado. 591k for Trump.

    755k > 591k

    maff is hard....
    Your sure be shmart! Better get the calculator unless you have a different set of numbers you're not posting.




    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,823 Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    Trump won and his voters didn't even need to turn out. He beat the combined dimwit party candidates on super tuesday in a blue state. Dems are doomed.

    No he didn't.

    755k dem votes in Colorado. 591k for Trump.

    755k > 591k

    maff is hard....
    Your sure be shmart! Better get the calculator unless you have a different set of numbers you're not posting.




    I'm sure normal people deducted the illegal votes.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    Bendintheriver said:

    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    Trump won and his voters didn't even need to turn out. He beat the combined dimwit party candidates on super tuesday in a blue state. Dems are doomed.

    No he didn't.

    755k dem votes in Colorado. 591k for Trump.

    755k > 591k

    maff is hard....
    Why would anyone post numbers of a highly contested rat election and compare that to a uncontested incumbent election and think it makes sense?

    Scotti?
    Good question. Maybe ask Sle.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,823 Standard Supporter
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    Trump won and his voters didn't even need to turn out. He beat the combined dimwit party candidates on super tuesday in a blue state. Dems are doomed.

    No he didn't.

    755k dem votes in Colorado. 591k for Trump.

    755k > 591k

    maff is hard....
    Why would anyone post numbers of a highly contested rat election and compare that to a uncontested incumbent election and think it makes sense?

    Scotti?
    Good question. Maybe ask Sle.
    Already stated. No one had to show up for Trump. He's running unopposed. He's setting records for votes breaking records up to 40 years old.

    And no one had to show up to vote.

    Think about it.

    I know it'll hurt.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • QuietcowskeeQuietcowskee Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,125 Swaye's Wigwam
    Sledog said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    Trump won and his voters didn't even need to turn out. He beat the combined dimwit party candidates on super tuesday in a blue state. Dems are doomed.

    No he didn't.

    755k dem votes in Colorado. 591k for Trump.

    755k > 591k

    maff is hard....
    Why would anyone post numbers of a highly contested rat election and compare that to a uncontested incumbent election and think it makes sense?

    Scotti?
    Good question. Maybe ask Sle.
    Already stated. No one had to show up for Trump. He's running unopposed. He's setting records for votes breaking records up to 40 years old.

    And no one had to show up to vote.

    Think about it.

    I know it'll hurt.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 47,720 Standard Supporter
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    Trump won and his voters didn't even need to turn out. He beat the combined dimwit party candidates on super tuesday in a blue state. Dems are doomed.

    If you actually do the math of the current polling numbers instead of relying on tweets from Sloth from the Goonies, you'll see that the dems had about 125k more turnout for their CO primary than the republicans. Those numbers are completely insignificant for either side.
    More fans attend UW vs. USC than UW vs. EWU.

    Turnout matters when it matters.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 20,016 Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    Trump won and his voters didn't even need to turn out. He beat the combined dimwit party candidates on super tuesday in a blue state. Dems are doomed.

    No he didn't.

    755k dem votes in Colorado. 591k for Trump.

    755k > 591k

    maff is hard....
    NOGAF what you write, you lying POS pedophile. Let's see those Tulsi words, at long last, asshole.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ntxduckntxduck Member Posts: 6,064
    edited March 2020
    Sledog said:

    Trump won and his voters didn't even need to turn out. He beat the combined dimwit party candidates on super tuesday in a blue state. Dems are doomed.

    Klobs and Mayor Pete's votes didn't get counted since they withdrew prior to Tuesday (obscure Colorado law)--and Colorado is a heavy (80%+) vote early by mail state. They are both currently sitting at 0. It will show up in the undervote count when the final count is certified--probably 150-200k votes for those 2. Don't listen to that sloth looking motherfucker Kirk. Current vote total in CO (including Klobs and Pete) is about 910k for Dems, 600k for GOP.

    Also if you think Trump has any shot in CO in November, you are dumb af. Colorado is bluer than Oregon, now.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,823 Standard Supporter
    edited March 2020
    ntxduck said:

    Sledog said:

    Trump won and his voters didn't even need to turn out. He beat the combined dimwit party candidates on super tuesday in a blue state. Dems are doomed.

    Klobs and Mayor Pete's votes didn't get counted since they withdrew prior to Tuesday (obscure Colorado law)--and Colorado is a heavy (80%+) vote early by mail state. They are both currently sitting at 0. It will show up in the undervote count when the final count is certified--probably 150-200k votes for those 2. Don't listen to that sloth looking motherfucker Kirk. Current vote total in CO (including Klobs and Pete) is about 910k for Dems, 600k for GOP.

    Also if you think Trump has any shot in CO in November, you are dumb af. Colorado is bluer than Oregon, now.
    Don't know if he stands a chance or not. I know no commie is going to beat him.

    Too bad CO has gone commie. It was a nice state previously. The left destroys everything. Just wish they'd get on with their revolution. Won't be many left afterwards and what a wonderful world it will be.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ntxduckntxduck Member Posts: 6,064
    edited March 2020
    Sledog said:

    ntxduck said:

    Sledog said:

    Trump won and his voters didn't even need to turn out. He beat the combined dimwit party candidates on super tuesday in a blue state. Dems are doomed.

    Klobs and Mayor Pete's votes didn't get counted since they withdrew prior to Tuesday (obscure Colorado law)--and Colorado is a heavy (80%+) vote early by mail state. They are both currently sitting at 0. It will show up in the undervote count when the final count is certified--probably 150-200k votes for those 2. Don't listen to that sloth looking motherfucker Kirk. Current vote total in CO (including Klobs and Pete) is about 910k for Dems, 600k for GOP.

    Also if you think Trump has any shot in CO in November, you are dumb af. Colorado is bluer than Oregon, now.
    Don't know if he stands a chance or not. I know no commie is going to beat him.

    Too bad CO has gone commie. It was a nice state previously. The left destroys everything. Just wish they'd get on with their revolution. Won't be many left afterwards and what a wonderful world it will be.
    Lol. Yeah Colorado is awful. That must be why everyone under 40 with a degree from Iowa, Wisconsin, Kansas etc has/is moving there and Denver has one of the highest quality of living indexes in the country. Please don’t visit
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ntxduckntxduck Member Posts: 6,064
    RaceBannon said:

    ntxduck said:

    Sledog said:

    ntxduck said:

    Sledog said:

    Trump won and his voters didn't even need to turn out. He beat the combined dimwit party candidates on super tuesday in a blue state. Dems are doomed.

    Klobs and Mayor Pete's votes didn't get counted since they withdrew prior to Tuesday (obscure Colorado law)--and Colorado is a heavy (80%+) vote early by mail state. They are both currently sitting at 0. It will show up in the undervote count when the final count is certified--probably 150-200k votes for those 2. Don't listen to that sloth looking motherfucker Kirk. Current vote total in CO (including Klobs and Pete) is about 910k for Dems, 600k for GOP.

    Also if you think Trump has any shot in CO in November, you are dumb af. Colorado is bluer than Oregon, now.
    Don't know if he stands a chance or not. I know no commie is going to beat him.

    Too bad CO has gone commie. It was a nice state previously. The left destroys everything. Just wish they'd get on with their revolution. Won't be many left afterwards and what a wonderful world it will be.
    Lol. Yeah Colorado is awful. That must be why everyone under 40 with a degree from Iowa, Wisconsin, Kansas etc is moving there and Denver has one of the highest quality of living indexes in the country. Please don’t visit
    Pretty sure they would move anywhere

    But why? They’re red states—they must be positively thriving compared to Colorado per Sledog logic.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.