You won't have Andrew Yang to kick around anymore
Comments
-
-
So you’re saying that the Throbber’s Yang is out?
-
the voter's finally saw that he was a minority
-
Something tells me the voters will be hungry for more Yang in an hour.
-
Now more than ever....time to yangoff furiously.SFGbob said:So you’re saying that the Throbber’s Yang is out?
I need to be alone now.
-
RIP to my dude
-
-
#WangsOutForYangdnc said: -
Klobuchar sucks but @dnc is going to go all in on her
-
Well, he'll be missed
-
If I like my little asian prop, can I keep him?
-
-
Yep.RaceBannon said:Klobuchar sucks but @dnc is going to go all in on her
-
Truly incredible about how Yang drops out and all of a sudden everyone in the media wants to talk about how he was such a great candidate
Really makes you wonder -
Water is wet. He was always the best Dem candidate.jhfstyle24 said:Truly incredible about how Yang drops out and all of a sudden everyone in the media wants to talk about how he was such a great candidate
Really makes you wonder -
I would have voted for him in the general.WilburHooksHands said:
Water is wet. He was always the best Dem candidate.jhfstyle24 said:Truly incredible about how Yang drops out and all of a sudden everyone in the media wants to talk about how he was such a great candidate
Really makes you wonder
Sad but not surprised to see him go. -
As in balls deep all in? That would take some serious beer goggles.RaceBannon said:Klobuchar sucks but @dnc is going to go all in on her
-
I'd have thought about it, but ultimately he's got some serious deficiencies in defense of civil rights.dnc said:
I would have voted for him in the general.WilburHooksHands said:
Water is wet. He was always the best Dem candidate.jhfstyle24 said:Truly incredible about how Yang drops out and all of a sudden everyone in the media wants to talk about how he was such a great candidate
Really makes you wonder
Sad but not surprised to see him go. -
I think Yang as entitlements Czar to clean some things up would give it a bipartisan look
-
Too soon. Too damn soon.RaceBannon said:I think Yang as entitlements Czar to clean some things up would give it a bipartisan look
I need some time.....
-
His plan would eliminate so much wasted money on administrative costs alone. I imagine he could clean up a lot of other things as well.RaceBannon said:I think Yang as entitlements Czar to clean some things up would give it a bipartisan look
-
Agree on that. However, his party would make UBI an addition-to welfare, etc., not replacement-of.ThomasFremont said:
His plan would eliminate so much wasted money on administrative costs alone. I imagine he could clean up a lot of other things as well.RaceBannon said:I think Yang as entitlements Czar to clean some things up would give it a bipartisan look
-
No way to reasonably pay for that. So you’re probably right.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Agree on that. However, his party would make UBI an addition-to welfare, etc., not replacement-of.ThomasFremont said:
His plan would eliminate so much wasted money on administrative costs alone. I imagine he could clean up a lot of other things as well.RaceBannon said:I think Yang as entitlements Czar to clean some things up would give it a bipartisan look
I don’t think he’d support a plan that was doomed to fail from the start though. -
I have a hard time imagining a Democrat congress, or even GOP, repealing any measure of welfare even if it was replaced with something else.ThomasFremont said:
No way to reasonably pay for that. So you’re probably right.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Agree on that. However, his party would make UBI an addition-to welfare, etc., not replacement-of.ThomasFremont said:
His plan would eliminate so much wasted money on administrative costs alone. I imagine he could clean up a lot of other things as well.RaceBannon said:I think Yang as entitlements Czar to clean some things up would give it a bipartisan look
I don’t think he’d support a plan that was doomed to fail from the start though. -
That's the basis for my pipe dream. I think Trump would actually consider adding Yang and working with him to fix entitlements to at least provide some cover. But the entrenched establishment would be formidable against itGrundleStiltzkin said:
I have a hard time imagining a Democrat congress, or even GOP, repealing any measure of welfare even if it was replaced with something else.ThomasFremont said:
No way to reasonably pay for that. So you’re probably right.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Agree on that. However, his party would make UBI an addition-to welfare, etc., not replacement-of.ThomasFremont said:
His plan would eliminate so much wasted money on administrative costs alone. I imagine he could clean up a lot of other things as well.RaceBannon said:I think Yang as entitlements Czar to clean some things up would give it a bipartisan look
I don’t think he’d support a plan that was doomed to fail from the start though.
As we saw this week Trump's budget that cuts spending increases by 4 trillion and extends a balanced budget out 10 years is being greeted as an attack on the poor, women, and minorities
Cuts spending increases. Not spending.
Nothing changes -
I'd pay good money just to see the shitshow on the Left if Yang "defected" to the Nazis.RaceBannon said:
That's the basis for my pipe dream. I think Trump would actually consider adding Yang and working with him to fix entitlements to at least provide some cover. But the entrenched establishment would be formidable against itGrundleStiltzkin said:
I have a hard time imagining a Democrat congress, or even GOP, repealing any measure of welfare even if it was replaced with something else.ThomasFremont said:
No way to reasonably pay for that. So you’re probably right.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Agree on that. However, his party would make UBI an addition-to welfare, etc., not replacement-of.ThomasFremont said:
His plan would eliminate so much wasted money on administrative costs alone. I imagine he could clean up a lot of other things as well.RaceBannon said:I think Yang as entitlements Czar to clean some things up would give it a bipartisan look
I don’t think he’d support a plan that was doomed to fail from the start though.
As we saw this week Trump's budget that cuts spending increases by 4 trillion and extends a balanced budget out 10 years is being greeted as an attack on the poor, women, and minorities
Cuts spending increases. Not spending.
Nothing changes -
lmaodnc said:
I would have voted for him in the general.WilburHooksHands said:
Water is wet. He was always the best Dem candidate.jhfstyle24 said:Truly incredible about how Yang drops out and all of a sudden everyone in the media wants to talk about how he was such a great candidate
Really makes you wonder
Sad but not surprised to see him go.
why? -
This is so true and the reason why so many opposed the idea, but never understood how he wanted to implement it correctly.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Agree on that. However, his party would make UBI an addition-to welfare, etc., not replacement-of.ThomasFremont said:
His plan would eliminate so much wasted money on administrative costs alone. I imagine he could clean up a lot of other things as well.RaceBannon said:I think Yang as entitlements Czar to clean some things up would give it a bipartisan look
-
Just need more tim to get his own legislators in there?WilburHooksHands said:
This is so true and the reason why so many opposed the idea, but never understood how he wanted to implement it correctly.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Agree on that. However, his party would make UBI an addition-to welfare, etc., not replacement-of.ThomasFremont said:
His plan would eliminate so much wasted money on administrative costs alone. I imagine he could clean up a lot of other things as well.RaceBannon said:I think Yang as entitlements Czar to clean some things up would give it a bipartisan look
