You are better than thjs
This was well-derided yesterday https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/comment/1271933/#Comment_1271933
Of course, the problem with this stat is that, if you have talent like Washington has, your comparator group is going to be comprised of very good teams.Conversely, when you don't have talent, you only need to beat teams that have more talent, but are not necessarily good themselves. Shit beats slightly less shit all the tim. It's a different thing to beat genuinely good teams.I'm not apologizing for Toothy; and this stat can reveal coaches who underperform with what they have. But there's a reason Cuog is atop this poll and it's not all because of the Pirate. Cuog's comparator group is not a murderer's row, and he has that passing game that will allow him to beat some teams who may be better overall, but not necessarily elite or even very good.
Of course, the problem with this stat is that, if you have talent like Washington has, your comparator group is going to be comprised of very good teams.Conversely, when you don't have talent, you only need to beat teams that have more talent, but are not necessarily good themselves. Shit beats slightly less shit all the tim. It's a different thing to beat genuinely good teams.I'm not apologizing for Toothy; and this stat can reveal coaches who underperform with what they have. But there's a reason Cuog is atop this poll and it's not all because of the Pirate. Cuog's comparator group is not a murderer's row, and he has that passing game that will allow him to beat some teams who may be better overall, but not necessarily elite or even very good. Good analysis here Creep. The 5 wins were as follows...2017 UCLA and Oregon (they were one spot higher than us in 247 composite that year)2018 Stanford and UCLA2019 USCNot exactly murderer's row.
Of course, the problem with this stat is that, if you have talent like Washington has, your comparator group is going to be comprised of very good teams.Conversely, when you don't have talent, you only need to beat teams that have more talent, but are not necessarily good themselves. Shit beats slightly less shit all the tim. It's a different thing to beat genuinely good teams.I'm not apologizing for Toothy; and this stat can reveal coaches who underperform with what they have. But there's a reason Cuog is atop this poll and it's not all because of the Pirate. Cuog's comparator group is not a murderer's row, and he has that passing game that will allow him to beat some teams who may be better overall, but not necessarily elite or even very good. Good analysis here Creep. The 5 wins were as follows...2017 UCLA and Oregon (they were one spot higher than us in 247 composite that year)2018 Stanford and UCLA2019 USCNot exactly murderer's row. Yup. There you have it.But, but, but we do more with less.I hate the fucking saying. It's for losers.
You are better than thjs What does this even mean? Go get back on the bus and carry on.
This was well-derided yesterday https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/comment/1271933/#Comment_1271933 Ah shit. I need to do better about looking in Husky Jacks. FML.
This was well-derided yesterday https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/comment/1271933/#Comment_1271933 Ah shit. I need to do better about looking in Husky Jacks. FML. Eat shit
You are better than thjs What does this even mean? Go get back on the bus and carry on. Fun time ridding those back in the day
So my neuheisal compassion is being proven out more every day. Rick without the Rosebowl win.
Stats are for losers
Stats are for losers main stat is wins and lossesget enough wins and we're talking gay offs and rose bowls, which he did, so I'm not going to sit here and trash Chrisbut 2014, 2015, and 2019 were Sarkesque and he's barely better than Rick, if at all. Rick left after 7-6. He left after 7-5...
So my neuheisal compassion is being proven out more every day. Rick without the Rosebowl win. You’ve never had compassion for nobody.