Lamar Alexander
Gotta respect that honesty at least.
Comments
-
You want to quote any of the other 50 votes or do you just want to cherry pick that one? I can provide you some good quotes from the other 50. You interested?HHusky said:They already proved it. No witnesses because we’re not going impeach him for it.
Gotta respect that honesty at least.
Would you be interested in hearing your leaders telling America that this whole impeachment process is Anti-American? That witnesses is the wrong thing to do. That a divided political impeachment is anti-American?
Again, I would be happy to post many videos with your party leaders being total fucking hypocrites.
Yeah, that's what I thought. -
I can’t stop you from posting anything, Madam.Bendintheriver said:
You want to quote any of the other 50 votes or do you just want to cherry pick that one? I can provide you some good quotes from the other 50. You interested?HHusky said:They already proved it. No witnesses because we’re not going impeach him for it.
Gotta respect that honesty at least.
Would you be interested in hearing your leaders telling America that this whole impeachment process is Anti-American? That witnesses is the wrong thing to do. That a divided political impeachment is anti-American?
Again, I would be happy to post many videos with your party leaders being total fucking hypocrites.
Yeah, that's what I thought. -
Again HH, you need to back away from the keyboard. Whatever respect you had has been eroded.HHusky said:They already proved it. No witnesses because we’re not going impeach him for it.
Gotta respect that honesty at least. -
Your concern is touching.Bendintheriver said:
Again HH, you need to back away from the keyboard. Whatever respect you had has been eroded.HHusky said:They already proved it. No witnesses because we’re not going impeach him for it.
Gotta respect that honesty at least. -
TDS away HH. I tried.
-
You really are projecting this evening. And yes, you really should have that kinda dirty feeling.
-
The honesty of Alexander and Murkowski were both pretty refreshing. Alexander went with it’s proven but we don’t care and Murkowski went with the GOP wont conduct a fair trial anyway so why prolong the inevitable. As fucked up as both arguments are at least they are honest.
-
You sound upset
How you guys constantly get your hopes up then totally devastated is amazing to me
Usually people harden themselves to these things but not you dickheads.
No. You beat on, boats against the current
-
My expectations of the GOP were met.Pitchfork51 said:You sound upset
How you guys constantly get your hopes up then totally devastated is amazing to me
Usually people harden themselves to these things but not you dickheads.
No. You beat on, boats against the current
-
The dumb rednecks owning the enlightened trio of nadler Schiff and Nancy?HHusky said:
My expectations of the GOP were met.Pitchfork51 said:You sound upset
How you guys constantly get your hopes up then totally devastated is amazing to me
Usually people harden themselves to these things but not you dickheads.
No. You beat on, boats against the current -
Is that what your media told you they said?GDS said:The honesty of Alexander and Murkowski were both pretty refreshing. Alexander went with it’s proven but we don’t care and Murkowski went with the GOP wont conduct a fair trial anyway so why prolong the inevitable. As fucked up as both arguments are at least they are honest.
-
What the fuck would you know about honesty, you lying pedophile fuck?GDS said:The honesty of Alexander and Murkowski were both pretty refreshing. Alexander went with it’s proven but we don’t care and Murkowski went with the GOP wont conduct a fair trial anyway so why prolong the inevitable. As fucked up as both arguments are at least they are honest.
-
Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., announced Thursday night he will vote against calling witnesses to the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump. “It was inappropriate for the president to ask a foreign leader to investigate his political opponent and to withhold United States aid to encourage that investigation,” Alexander said, adding that the president’s actions were the kind that “undermines the principle of equal justice under the law.”Bendintheriver said:
You want to quote any of the other 50 votes or do you just want to cherry pick that one? I can provide you some good quotes from the other 50. You interested?HHusky said:They already proved it. No witnesses because we’re not going impeach him for it.
Gotta respect that honesty at least.
Would you be interested in hearing your leaders telling America that this whole impeachment process is Anti-American? That witnesses is the wrong thing to do. That a divided political impeachment is anti-American?
Again, I would be happy to post many videos with your party leaders being total fucking hypocrites.
Yeah, that's what I thought.
“But,” he added, “the Constitution does not give the Senate the power to remove the president from office and ban him from this year’s ballot simply for actions that are inappropriate.”
"The question then is not whether the president did it, but whether the United States Senate or the American people should decide what to do about what he did. I believe that the Constitution provides that the people should make that decision in the presidential election that begins in Iowa on Monday,” Alexander said. -
I read their statement they each put out. On twatter. Not as reputable as Gateway Pundit...UW_Doog_Bot said:
Is that what your media told you they said?GDS said:The honesty of Alexander and Murkowski were both pretty refreshing. Alexander went with it’s proven but we don’t care and Murkowski went with the GOP wont conduct a fair trial anyway so why prolong the inevitable. As fucked up as both arguments are at least they are honest.
-
Oh, so you're just dense.GDS said:
I read their statement they each put out. On twatter. Not as reputable as Gateway Pundit...UW_Doog_Bot said:
Is that what your media told you they said?GDS said:The honesty of Alexander and Murkowski were both pretty refreshing. Alexander went with it’s proven but we don’t care and Murkowski went with the GOP wont conduct a fair trial anyway so why prolong the inevitable. As fucked up as both arguments are at least they are honest.
-
dumbshit - this is what she saidGDS said:The honesty of Alexander and Murkowski were both pretty refreshing. Alexander went with it’s proven but we don’t care and Murkowski went with the GOP wont conduct a fair trial anyway so why prolong the inevitable. As fucked up as both arguments are at least they are honest.
Given the partisan nature of this impeachment from the very beginning and throughout, I have come to the conclusion that there will be no fair trial in the Senate. I don’t believe the continuation of this process will change anything. It is sad for me to admit that, as an institution, the Congress has failed -
Thanks for proving my point. You should let bot know.LebamDawg said:
dumbshit - this is what she saidGDS said:The honesty of Alexander and Murkowski were both pretty refreshing. Alexander went with it’s proven but we don’t care and Murkowski went with the GOP wont conduct a fair trial anyway so why prolong the inevitable. As fucked up as both arguments are at least they are honest.
Given the partisan nature of this impeachment from the very beginning and throughout, I have come to the conclusion that there will be no fair trial in the Senate. I don’t believe the continuation of this process will change anything. It is sad for me to admit that, as an institution, the Congress has failed -
Taking a victory lap bc you're too stupid. Keep going.GDS said:
Thanks for proving my point. You should let bot know.LebamDawg said:
dumbshit - this is what she saidGDS said:The honesty of Alexander and Murkowski were both pretty refreshing. Alexander went with it’s proven but we don’t care and Murkowski went with the GOP wont conduct a fair trial anyway so why prolong the inevitable. As fucked up as both arguments are at least they are honest.
Given the partisan nature of this impeachment from the very beginning and throughout, I have come to the conclusion that there will be no fair trial in the Senate. I don’t believe the continuation of this process will change anything. It is sad for me to admit that, as an institution, the Congress has failed -
And yet you think the Democrats held a fair and impartial hearing in the House?HHusky said:
My expectations of the GOP were met.Pitchfork51 said:You sound upset
How you guys constantly get your hopes up then totally devastated is amazing to me
Usually people harden themselves to these things but not you dickheads.
No. You beat on, boats against the current -
It was kinda sorta fair in a clandestine, unauthorized committee action sort of way maybe.Swaye said:
And yet you think the Democrats held a fair and impartial hearing in the House?HHusky said:
My expectations of the GOP were met.Pitchfork51 said:You sound upset
How you guys constantly get your hopes up then totally devastated is amazing to me
Usually people harden themselves to these things but not you dickheads.
No. You beat on, boats against the current -
HHusky said:
They already proved it. No witnesses because we’re not going impeach him for it.
Gotta respect that honesty at least.
