Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Cracks have appeared in GOP unity on impeachment trial

2»

Comments

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,462

    Any day now! It's an urgent matter!
    Look, we all get that you and Mitch will acquit Daddy of anything without a trial. Nancy is playing the cards she has. Don’t whine.
  • LebamDawgLebamDawg Member Posts: 8,763 Standard Supporter
    if the dems wanted all the testimony they should have done a better job of getting the witnesses into their investigations. They elected to not do that and go quickly trying to get the Senate to bring in their preferred witnesses.

    Can't do these things too fast if you want all the 'facts'

    and as far as these cracks are -

    some are good cracks


    and some not so good



  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 16,981 Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    Look, we all get that you and Mitch will acquit Daddy of anything without a trial. Nancy is playing the cards she has. Don’t whine.
    Was it quid pro quo? Oh shit, no it was bribery, or was it abuse of power?

    If you're going to cry wolf, and admit that your going to cry wolf no matter what, you are going to need iron clad proof of literal treason. It's not my fault the Dems fucked this up irrevocably and played partisan politics in the house. Now you've got crocodile tears that the senate won't follow due process on bullshit? GTFO councilor. Do you tell your judges to just make inferences from 2 + 2?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 35,550 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Look, we all get that you and Mitch will acquit Daddy of anything without a trial. Nancy is playing the cards she has. Don’t whine.
    just like you and Nancy would make up shit to charge him with?

    The rules are what we say they are.

    What's good for the goose is good for the gander!

    Dems didn't subpoena witnesses they wanted and wouldn't allow the repubs to call any witnesses but expect then to call any witness they want?

    Evidently the only trial court time you've had was in fantasy land
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,896
    HHusky said:

    Look, we all get that you and Mitch will acquit Daddy of anything without a trial. Nancy is playing the cards she has. Don’t whine.
    What cards are those? Delaying handing over the articles of impeachment until October? Sounds like a winning strategy to me. But honestly I could see this happening. And also I could see them handing over the articles after Trump won the 2nd time. It would be so Democrat.
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,964 Founders Club

    Was it quid pro quo? Oh shit, no it was bribery, or was it abuse of power?

    If you're going to cry wolf, and admit that your going to cry wolf no matter what, you are going to need iron clad proof of literal treason. It's not my fault the Dems fucked this up irrevocably and played partisan politics in the house. Now you've got crocodile tears that the senate won't follow due process on bullshit? GTFO councilor. Do you tell your judges to just make inferences from 2 + 2?

  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,964 Founders Club
    salemcoog said:

    What cards are those? Delaying handing over the articles of impeachment until October? Sounds like a winning strategy to me. But honestly I could see this happening. And also I could see them handing over the articles after Trump won the 2nd time. It would be so Democrat.
    Trump will own the high distinction of being the only President to be impeached twice.

    You know, because the House actually doing the work of the people would be road to far.

    Book it.
  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,518 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Imagine looking at 2 + 2 and having to be convinced that they sum to 4.
    What? No examples.... again? I have asked you for examples and proof of your lies and false accusations. Wonder why you can't provide anything to support your bullshit?
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 16,981 Swaye's Wigwam
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781


    So cracks with the dems?
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,994 Standard Supporter
    Fienstein has that "I could die at any moment, so could we please get this show on the road(?)" look about her.
Sign In or Register to comment.