Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Oregon’s Meathead Mexican
Comments
-
I agree that the win is a win but c'mon Creep. Wisky is always tier 2 in the Big 10 in a good year for them. No need to pretend otherwise. If you gotta pick two teams from each conference to go as "flagship" Wisky ain't making it. If it wasn't for the division splits how many times would Wisky have even made it to the CCG in the big 10?creepycoug said:
Let's dig into this a little.RoadDawg55 said:
No. That Penn State had way more talent. Better QB, better TE, better WR’s.creepycoug said:Wisky was PSU two years ago. Same running back story and everything.
Both had great RB’s but Barkley was one of the fastest players in the country at 230 pounds.
No team can afford all those turnovers, but that is especially true for a team that doesn’t throw the ball well.
First, it's a little disingenuous to glibly reference Wisky as a "4-loss team". I know you didn't, but someone else did. Penn State was a 2-loss team in 2017, but didn't have to play Ohio State twice because they weren't in the conference championship game, and the fourth loss would have been to Washington, except it wasn't. Wisky had to play OSU twice, and lost the Rose Bowl because they weren't playing Washington.
Second, IDR care how fast Barkeley was; Taylor is one of the most prolific running backs in cfb history. #s don't lie. Facts. Boom. 'nuff said.
Next, let's examine this claim of a much better QB:
McSorley in 2017: 284 427 3,570 12.6 85 66.5 28 10 162.4 (attempts, completions, yards, average, long, completion %, TDs, Ints, Rating)
Coan in 2019: 195 271 2,307 8.5 70 72.3 17 4 161.6 (same order)
Much better? I'd say an offense with a different approach to playing. McSorley threw it WAY more than Coan. It's hard to just say McSorley was much better. In 2018, McSorley's #s were far different when he didn't put it up nearly as often (from 284 attempts to 192, closer to what Coan threw this year).
In terms of much better talent overall, on what basis? Do you actually know this? Things like this are easy to say. But I'm guessing it's not really true.
Lastly, the claim of a much better defense. Let's compare the only measure that matters: points allowed.
Penn State 2017: 214 points surrendered. Wisky 2019: 237 points surrendered, including two games against Ohio State against one for Penn State.
I don't blame you. Wisky is annually amongst the most criminally underchinned programs in the country. People forget about them until they start racking up wins and everybody assumes they're just a bunch of try-hard cheese head white guys. Their NFL production tells a much different story.
Let's face it. The comparison of 2019 Wisky and 2017 PSU is close enough to shut down the doogery. Creep prevails once again. That's the only point here. Doogs like Gladdy grasping at straws, which is sad af. -
You're better than this. First, we're not discussing conference history. Generalizing is the rhetorical tool of the man losing the argument.
We're comparing two specific teams and the suggestion that 2017 PSU was better than 2019 Wisky, and nobody has been able to substantiate the claim.
If we are talking about B10 in general, the order goes Ohio State, then Wisky and everybody else. Just look at the results. They support my stance. -
The doog revisionist history on that penn state team is funny.
-
This is stupid. In the grand scheme of things, if Oregon somehow played an 8-4 Indiana team in the Rose Bowl and won, a will is still a win. The opponent doesn't matter. A win is a win and a loss is a loss. Win or GTFO. Talking about the great teams you lost to is loser talk. If you want to be losers, then please continue. Sean Connery said it best " Losers always whine about their best. Winners go home and fuck the prom queen."
-
Disagreecreepycoug said:
Fuck off.UWhuskytskeet said:
You brought it up. Quit living up to your name.creepycoug said:
So we're going to try to drill down to one or two reasons why Washington lost and then compare/contrast? Fuck outta here. Oregon contained a phenomenal running back that has run over everybody; Washington gave up a big score to Barkley. I don't care. Oregon didn't let Taylor beat them; Washington let Barkley at least help beat them.UWhuskytskeet said:
137 with a long of 92. That's not why they lost they game.creepycoug said:
So did Wisky. Different offensive philosophy. I will take these numbers from my QB all day if I have Taylor: 195 completetions on 271 attempts for 2,307 yards. 72.3% completion %. 17 TDs 4 picks 161.6 QB rating.1to392831weretaken said:
PSU had a QB who could complete a pass longer than 7 yards.creepycoug said:Wisky was PSU two years ago. Same running back story and everything.
You're also ignoring the fact that Oregon's defense kept the nation's best running back under 100 yards for the game. Remind me how Barkley did in the Fiesta.
This discussion is ridiculous and for losers. Thanks @Gladstone for starting such a doogy sub-thread.
And I brought it up because it stands. If you want to support the doog narrative that the B10 opponent was some shit fourth-tier team in its own conference, then go ahead and park your head up your ass when you usually keep it.
But I'm going to do what I do and drive you and your friends crazy in the process. -
You're too late. I won.UWhuskytskeet said:
Disagreecreepycoug said:
Fuck off.UWhuskytskeet said:
You brought it up. Quit living up to your name.creepycoug said:
So we're going to try to drill down to one or two reasons why Washington lost and then compare/contrast? Fuck outta here. Oregon contained a phenomenal running back that has run over everybody; Washington gave up a big score to Barkley. I don't care. Oregon didn't let Taylor beat them; Washington let Barkley at least help beat them.UWhuskytskeet said:
137 with a long of 92. That's not why they lost they game.creepycoug said:
So did Wisky. Different offensive philosophy. I will take these numbers from my QB all day if I have Taylor: 195 completetions on 271 attempts for 2,307 yards. 72.3% completion %. 17 TDs 4 picks 161.6 QB rating.1to392831weretaken said:
PSU had a QB who could complete a pass longer than 7 yards.creepycoug said:Wisky was PSU two years ago. Same running back story and everything.
You're also ignoring the fact that Oregon's defense kept the nation's best running back under 100 yards for the game. Remind me how Barkley did in the Fiesta.
This discussion is ridiculous and for losers. Thanks @Gladstone for starting such a doogy sub-thread.
And I brought it up because it stands. If you want to support the doog narrative that the B10 opponent was some shit fourth-tier team in its own conference, then go ahead and park your head up your ass when you usually keep it.
But I'm going to do what I do and drive you and your friends crazy in the process.
Like I always do.
-
Whats going on here in this thread? Havent paid much attention. Believe there's a little cuban man or 2 involved.
-
You won vicariously through the Ducks. Your team still sucks.creepycoug said:
You're too late. I won.UWhuskytskeet said:
Disagreecreepycoug said:
Fuck off.UWhuskytskeet said:
You brought it up. Quit living up to your name.creepycoug said:
So we're going to try to drill down to one or two reasons why Washington lost and then compare/contrast? Fuck outta here. Oregon contained a phenomenal running back that has run over everybody; Washington gave up a big score to Barkley. I don't care. Oregon didn't let Taylor beat them; Washington let Barkley at least help beat them.UWhuskytskeet said:
137 with a long of 92. That's not why they lost they game.creepycoug said:
So did Wisky. Different offensive philosophy. I will take these numbers from my QB all day if I have Taylor: 195 completetions on 271 attempts for 2,307 yards. 72.3% completion %. 17 TDs 4 picks 161.6 QB rating.1to392831weretaken said:
PSU had a QB who could complete a pass longer than 7 yards.creepycoug said:Wisky was PSU two years ago. Same running back story and everything.
You're also ignoring the fact that Oregon's defense kept the nation's best running back under 100 yards for the game. Remind me how Barkley did in the Fiesta.
This discussion is ridiculous and for losers. Thanks @Gladstone for starting such a doogy sub-thread.
And I brought it up because it stands. If you want to support the doog narrative that the B10 opponent was some shit fourth-tier team in its own conference, then go ahead and park your head up your ass when you usually keep it.
But I'm going to do what I do and drive you and your friends crazy in the process.
Like I always do. -
I won here right here [X}.UWhuskytskeet said:
You won vicariously through the Ducks. Your team still sucks.creepycoug said:
You're too late. I won.UWhuskytskeet said:
Disagreecreepycoug said:
Fuck off.UWhuskytskeet said:
You brought it up. Quit living up to your name.creepycoug said:
So we're going to try to drill down to one or two reasons why Washington lost and then compare/contrast? Fuck outta here. Oregon contained a phenomenal running back that has run over everybody; Washington gave up a big score to Barkley. I don't care. Oregon didn't let Taylor beat them; Washington let Barkley at least help beat them.UWhuskytskeet said:
137 with a long of 92. That's not why they lost they game.creepycoug said:
So did Wisky. Different offensive philosophy. I will take these numbers from my QB all day if I have Taylor: 195 completetions on 271 attempts for 2,307 yards. 72.3% completion %. 17 TDs 4 picks 161.6 QB rating.1to392831weretaken said:
PSU had a QB who could complete a pass longer than 7 yards.creepycoug said:Wisky was PSU two years ago. Same running back story and everything.
You're also ignoring the fact that Oregon's defense kept the nation's best running back under 100 yards for the game. Remind me how Barkley did in the Fiesta.
This discussion is ridiculous and for losers. Thanks @Gladstone for starting such a doogy sub-thread.
And I brought it up because it stands. If you want to support the doog narrative that the B10 opponent was some shit fourth-tier team in its own conference, then go ahead and park your head up your ass when you usually keep it.
But I'm going to do what I do and drive you and your friends crazy in the process.
Like I always do.
Where you lost.
-
You better fucking believe it Paco.Pitchfork51 said:Whats going on here in this thread? Havent paid much attention. Believe there's a little cuban man or 2 involved.
-
Wellcreepycoug said:
You better fucking believe it Paco.Pitchfork51 said:Whats going on here in this thread? Havent paid much attention. Believe there's a little cuban man or 2 involved.
Carry on then -
Threads on this site go from 1 page to 7 for no reason what so ever. 6 of the pages are just people calling each other stupid because they don’t agree with someone else’s opinion.
-
And?Theironshiek said:Threads on this site go from 1 page to 7 for no reason what so ever. 6 of the pages are just people calling each other stupid because they don’t agree with someone else’s opinion.
-
You bet me the Coogs would win the Apple Cup. Then you went double or nothing the next year.creepycoug said:
You're too late. I won.UWhuskytskeet said:
Disagreecreepycoug said:
Fuck off.UWhuskytskeet said:
You brought it up. Quit living up to your name.creepycoug said:
So we're going to try to drill down to one or two reasons why Washington lost and then compare/contrast? Fuck outta here. Oregon contained a phenomenal running back that has run over everybody; Washington gave up a big score to Barkley. I don't care. Oregon didn't let Taylor beat them; Washington let Barkley at least help beat them.UWhuskytskeet said:
137 with a long of 92. That's not why they lost they game.creepycoug said:
So did Wisky. Different offensive philosophy. I will take these numbers from my QB all day if I have Taylor: 195 completetions on 271 attempts for 2,307 yards. 72.3% completion %. 17 TDs 4 picks 161.6 QB rating.1to392831weretaken said:
PSU had a QB who could complete a pass longer than 7 yards.creepycoug said:Wisky was PSU two years ago. Same running back story and everything.
You're also ignoring the fact that Oregon's defense kept the nation's best running back under 100 yards for the game. Remind me how Barkley did in the Fiesta.
This discussion is ridiculous and for losers. Thanks @Gladstone for starting such a doogy sub-thread.
And I brought it up because it stands. If you want to support the doog narrative that the B10 opponent was some shit fourth-tier team in its own conference, then go ahead and park your head up your ass when you usually keep it.
But I'm going to do what I do and drive you and your friends crazy in the process.
Like I always do.
-
And? That's what makes this place great.Theironshiek said:Threads on this site go from 1 page to 7 for no reason what so ever. 6 of the pages are just people calling each other stupid because they don’t agree with someone else’s opinion.
You can always go to doogfarm. I'm sure the circle jerk threads there are nice and short. -
Except for those two times.dflea said:
You bet me the Coogs would win the Apple Cup. Then you went double or nothing the next year.creepycoug said:
You're too late. I won.UWhuskytskeet said:
Disagreecreepycoug said:
Fuck off.UWhuskytskeet said:
You brought it up. Quit living up to your name.creepycoug said:
So we're going to try to drill down to one or two reasons why Washington lost and then compare/contrast? Fuck outta here. Oregon contained a phenomenal running back that has run over everybody; Washington gave up a big score to Barkley. I don't care. Oregon didn't let Taylor beat them; Washington let Barkley at least help beat them.UWhuskytskeet said:
137 with a long of 92. That's not why they lost they game.creepycoug said:
So did Wisky. Different offensive philosophy. I will take these numbers from my QB all day if I have Taylor: 195 completetions on 271 attempts for 2,307 yards. 72.3% completion %. 17 TDs 4 picks 161.6 QB rating.1to392831weretaken said:
PSU had a QB who could complete a pass longer than 7 yards.creepycoug said:Wisky was PSU two years ago. Same running back story and everything.
You're also ignoring the fact that Oregon's defense kept the nation's best running back under 100 yards for the game. Remind me how Barkley did in the Fiesta.
This discussion is ridiculous and for losers. Thanks @Gladstone for starting such a doogy sub-thread.
And I brought it up because it stands. If you want to support the doog narrative that the B10 opponent was some shit fourth-tier team in its own conference, then go ahead and park your head up your ass when you usually keep it.
But I'm going to do what I do and drive you and your friends crazy in the process.
Like I always do.
And I have a weakness for my alma mater. Sue me. -
Should we throw your RB trophy against Purdue in the lake? For Purdue to win the Big Ten Ohio State, Michigan, and Penn State would have to be .500 teams, which they were that year.Gladstone said:Oregon got fourth best in big ten Wisconsin and we got Urban last game Ohio State. That's it. The end. Go home.
Only a Doog would talk shit about a trophy they haven't won in 20 years.
-
Imagine getting owned by a poster who coached in the highest classification of high school football in Alabama.Mosster47 said:
Should we throw your RB trophy against Purdue in the lake? For Purdue to win the Big Ten Ohio State, Michigan, and Penn State would have to be .500 teams, which they were that year.Gladstone said:Oregon got fourth best in big ten Wisconsin and we got Urban last game Ohio State. That's it. The end. Go home.
Only a Doog would talk shit about a trophy they haven't won in 20 years. -
Alabama is a football state, after all.creepycoug said:Imagine getting owned by a poster who coached in the highest classification of high school football in Alabama.
-
Looking back, most of UWs Rose bowl victories were against pretty mediocre big ten teams. Awesome wins over some 8-4 Iowa squadsMosster47 said:
Should we throw your RB trophy against Purdue in the lake? For Purdue to win the Big Ten Ohio State, Michigan, and Penn State would have to be .500 teams, which they were that year.Gladstone said:Oregon got fourth best in big ten Wisconsin and we got Urban last game Ohio State. That's it. The end. Go home.
Only a Doog would talk shit about a trophy they haven't won in 20 years. -
You are using move quotes from a nearly 25 year old movie starring Nick Cage? Such a fag.PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:This is stupid. In the grand scheme of things, if Oregon somehow played an 8-4 Indiana team in the Rose Bowl and won, a will is still a win. The opponent doesn't matter. A win is a win and a loss is a loss. Win or GTFO. Talking about the great teams you lost to is loser talk. If you want to be losers, then please continue. Sean Connery said it best " Losers always whine about their best. Winners go home and fuck the prom queen."
-
The correct opinion is it doesn't matter who you're playing in the rose bowl. It didn't matter who Oregon played this year.ntxduck said:
Looking back, most of UWs Rose bowl victories were against pretty mediocre big ten teams. Awesome wins over some 8-4 Iowa squadsMosster47 said:
Should we throw your RB trophy against Purdue in the lake? For Purdue to win the Big Ten Ohio State, Michigan, and Penn State would have to be .500 teams, which they were that year.Gladstone said:Oregon got fourth best in big ten Wisconsin and we got Urban last game Ohio State. That's it. The end. Go home.
Only a Doog would talk shit about a trophy they haven't won in 20 years.
It didn't matter who UW played last year. -
Expected to find pics here of the hot piece that he puts his Mexican meat in. Instead this bullshit.
How far this place has fallen. -
I'm glad we got this sorted. Race taught me many moons ago not to be one of those fags who diminishes winners. Winners win, and losers talk about why winners shouldn't be winners.MikeSeaver said:
You’re correct. Probably quoted the wrong guy.RaceBannon said:
That's pretty much what he wrote. Thanks for the translation into duckMikeSeaver said:
The last time UW won a Rose Bowl it was in standard definition and you beat #14 AP/coaches, #17 BCS, Purdue.Swaye said:
No doubt. Wisconsin is garbage.This is Tui beating Purdue level stuff here. Thing is I was at the Tui beating shitty ass Purdue Rose Bowel and I don't really ever think about the fact we beat a shitty team to win it. I just think about the feeling of winning it. Nobody ever remembers you beat a shit team. They just remember you are winners.Gladstone said:Oh I'm on board that we've been soft dick losers in every game with a pulse, but the Rose Bowl emo meltdown is a bit much as Wisconsin is a billion orders of magnitude shittier than that Ohio State team.
Sorry kiddos.
Credit to Cristoball. I thought he was going to be a shitbag. Turns out he won a Rose Bowl in year 2 while we were on the 6 year "process plan" to lose one.
Gay ass #FlexFriday works. Who knew?
Nobody cares.
Into the trophy case with a Black XL T-shirt.
Was still fun to write though. -
Exactly. Nobody ever cares who you beat, just that you won. Wisconsin is hot garbage. And so was Purdue. And so was Iowa. Etc. NOGAF. Winners win and hoist trophies. Losers diddle themselves in the losers locker room and talk about how TUFF Ohio State was.ntxduck said:
Looking back, most of UWs Rose bowl victories were against pretty mediocre big ten teams. Awesome wins over some 8-4 Iowa squadsMosster47 said:
Should we throw your RB trophy against Purdue in the lake? For Purdue to win the Big Ten Ohio State, Michigan, and Penn State would have to be .500 teams, which they were that year.Gladstone said:Oregon got fourth best in big ten Wisconsin and we got Urban last game Ohio State. That's it. The end. Go home.
Only a Doog would talk shit about a trophy they haven't won in 20 years. -
It’s Sean Connery’s line, and the movie is actually pretty good. One of the few decent movies with Nick Cage. If you don’t like action movies like The Rock, then maybe serendipity is more your speed.longduckdong said:
You are using move quotes from a nearly 25 year old movie starring Nick Cage? Such a fag.PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:This is stupid. In the grand scheme of things, if Oregon somehow played an 8-4 Indiana team in the Rose Bowl and won, a will is still a win. The opponent doesn't matter. A win is a win and a loss is a loss. Win or GTFO. Talking about the great teams you lost to is loser talk. If you want to be losers, then please continue. Sean Connery said it best " Losers always whine about their best. Winners go home and fuck the prom queen."
-
If we're bashing Serendipity, I'm fucking out.
-
It's hard to insult a Husky more than we insult ourselves these days but this is a good onentxduck said:
Looking back, most of UWs Rose bowl victories were against pretty mediocre big ten teams. Awesome wins over some 8-4 Iowa squadsMosster47 said:
Should we throw your RB trophy against Purdue in the lake? For Purdue to win the Big Ten Ohio State, Michigan, and Penn State would have to be .500 teams, which they were that year.Gladstone said:Oregon got fourth best in big ten Wisconsin and we got Urban last game Ohio State. That's it. The end. Go home.
Only a Doog would talk shit about a trophy they haven't won in 20 years.
Our best wasn't the Rose Bowl. It was the Orange Bowl -
@Gladstone ? True?Swaye said:
I'm glad we got this sorted. Race taught me many moons ago not to be one of those fags who diminishes winners. Winners win, and losers talk about why winners shouldn't be winners.MikeSeaver said:
You’re correct. Probably quoted the wrong guy.RaceBannon said:
That's pretty much what he wrote. Thanks for the translation into duckMikeSeaver said:
The last time UW won a Rose Bowl it was in standard definition and you beat #14 AP/coaches, #17 BCS, Purdue.Swaye said:
No doubt. Wisconsin is garbage.This is Tui beating Purdue level stuff here. Thing is I was at the Tui beating shitty ass Purdue Rose Bowel and I don't really ever think about the fact we beat a shitty team to win it. I just think about the feeling of winning it. Nobody ever remembers you beat a shit team. They just remember you are winners.Gladstone said:Oh I'm on board that we've been soft dick losers in every game with a pulse, but the Rose Bowl emo meltdown is a bit much as Wisconsin is a billion orders of magnitude shittier than that Ohio State team.
Sorry kiddos.
Credit to Cristoball. I thought he was going to be a shitbag. Turns out he won a Rose Bowl in year 2 while we were on the 6 year "process plan" to lose one.
Gay ass #FlexFriday works. Who knew?
Nobody cares.
Into the trophy case with a Black XL T-shirt.
Was still fun to write though. -
Cubans really like to start shit, eh?creepycoug said:
@Gladstone ? True?Swaye said:
I'm glad we got this sorted. Race taught me many moons ago not to be one of those fags who diminishes winners. Winners win, and losers talk about why winners shouldn't be winners.MikeSeaver said:
You’re correct. Probably quoted the wrong guy.RaceBannon said:
That's pretty much what he wrote. Thanks for the translation into duckMikeSeaver said:
The last time UW won a Rose Bowl it was in standard definition and you beat #14 AP/coaches, #17 BCS, Purdue.Swaye said:
No doubt. Wisconsin is garbage.This is Tui beating Purdue level stuff here. Thing is I was at the Tui beating shitty ass Purdue Rose Bowel and I don't really ever think about the fact we beat a shitty team to win it. I just think about the feeling of winning it. Nobody ever remembers you beat a shit team. They just remember you are winners.Gladstone said:Oh I'm on board that we've been soft dick losers in every game with a pulse, but the Rose Bowl emo meltdown is a bit much as Wisconsin is a billion orders of magnitude shittier than that Ohio State team.
Sorry kiddos.
Credit to Cristoball. I thought he was going to be a shitbag. Turns out he won a Rose Bowl in year 2 while we were on the 6 year "process plan" to lose one.
Gay ass #FlexFriday works. Who knew?
Nobody cares.
Into the trophy case with a Black XL T-shirt.
Was still fun to write though.
