Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Tug commies wet dream
Comments
-
Imagine actually enforcing laws. It’s exactly like fascism.MikeDamone said:
How would you plan to confiscate wealth if not by the threat of force? IdiotHHusky said:
At the point of a gun? You’re getting hysterical, lady.MikeDamone said:BearsWiin said:decorum, cool
Weird that helping people who need it becomes Bataan and Pol Pot with you angry tards
“Helping people” christ. You’re so moral!
“Helping people” at the point of a gun is a tested commie approach. No wonder you love it. It’s failed and caused misery everywhere it’s been tried. See Venezuela for a recent example.
How did the commies do it. Please tell us. Dumbfuck -
Imagine passing a law that people give you money or be met with violence. You were in favor of the fugitive slave act. It needed to be enforced. It was the law.HHusky said:
Imagine actually enforcing laws. It’s exactly like fascism.MikeDamone said:
How would you plan to confiscate wealth if not by the threat of force? IdiotHHusky said:
At the point of a gun? You’re getting hysterical, lady.MikeDamone said:BearsWiin said:decorum, cool
Weird that helping people who need it becomes Bataan and Pol Pot with you angry tards
“Helping people” christ. You’re so moral!
“Helping people” at the point of a gun is a tested commie approach. No wonder you love it. It’s failed and caused misery everywhere it’s been tried. See Venezuela for a recent example.
How did the commies do it. Please tell us. Dumbfuck -
Ultimately societies use force to enforce the law if that’s what is required. It’s not a difference between left and right, your adolescent adherence to libertarianism notwithstanding.MikeDamone said:
Imagine passing a law that people give you money or be met with violence. You were in favor of the fugitive slave act. It needed to be enforced. It was the law.HHusky said:
Imagine actually enforcing laws. It’s exactly like fascism.MikeDamone said:
How would you plan to confiscate wealth if not by the threat of force? IdiotHHusky said:
At the point of a gun? You’re getting hysterical, lady.MikeDamone said:BearsWiin said:decorum, cool
Weird that helping people who need it becomes Bataan and Pol Pot with you angry tards
“Helping people” christ. You’re so moral!
“Helping people” at the point of a gun is a tested commie approach. No wonder you love it. It’s failed and caused misery everywhere it’s been tried. See Venezuela for a recent example.
How did the commies do it. Please tell us. Dumbfuck -
Will all you Tug commies get this revolution going! I'm getting older and don't want to miss out on it and the laughter that I'll get from it.
-
So I was right. Warren’s policies are your wet dream.HHusky said:
Ultimately societies use force to enforce the law if that’s what is required. It’s not a difference between left and right, your adolescent adherence to libertarianism notwithstanding.MikeDamone said:
Imagine passing a law that people give you money or be met with violence. You were in favor of the fugitive slave act. It needed to be enforced. It was the law.HHusky said:
Imagine actually enforcing laws. It’s exactly like fascism.MikeDamone said:
How would you plan to confiscate wealth if not by the threat of force? IdiotHHusky said:
At the point of a gun? You’re getting hysterical, lady.MikeDamone said:BearsWiin said:decorum, cool
Weird that helping people who need it becomes Bataan and Pol Pot with you angry tards
“Helping people” christ. You’re so moral!
“Helping people” at the point of a gun is a tested commie approach. No wonder you love it. It’s failed and caused misery everywhere it’s been tried. See Venezuela for a recent example.
How did the commies do it. Please tell us. Dumbfuck
*classical liberal - but of course you don’t understand the difference. -
You’re a libertarian, not a classical liberal. And I suppose if we have to seize your property to get you to pay your library fines, we will. But that doesn’t exactly make us Venezuela.MikeDamone said:
So I was right. Warren’s policies are your wet dream.HHusky said:
Ultimately societies use force to enforce the law if that’s what is required. It’s not a difference between left and right, your adolescent adherence to libertarianism notwithstanding.MikeDamone said:
Imagine passing a law that people give you money or be met with violence. You were in favor of the fugitive slave act. It needed to be enforced. It was the law.HHusky said:
Imagine actually enforcing laws. It’s exactly like fascism.MikeDamone said:
How would you plan to confiscate wealth if not by the threat of force? IdiotHHusky said:
At the point of a gun? You’re getting hysterical, lady.MikeDamone said:BearsWiin said:decorum, cool
Weird that helping people who need it becomes Bataan and Pol Pot with you angry tards
“Helping people” christ. You’re so moral!
“Helping people” at the point of a gun is a tested commie approach. No wonder you love it. It’s failed and caused misery everywhere it’s been tried. See Venezuela for a recent example.
How did the commies do it. Please tell us. Dumbfuck
*classical liberal - but of course you don’t understand the difference. -
You’re a communist. That’s clear.HHusky said:
You’re a libertarian, not a classical liberal. And I suppose if we have to seize your property to get you to pay your library fines, we will. But that doesn’t exactly make us Venezuela.MikeDamone said:
So I was right. Warren’s policies are your wet dream.HHusky said:
Ultimately societies use force to enforce the law if that’s what is required. It’s not a difference between left and right, your adolescent adherence to libertarianism notwithstanding.MikeDamone said:
Imagine passing a law that people give you money or be met with violence. You were in favor of the fugitive slave act. It needed to be enforced. It was the law.HHusky said:
Imagine actually enforcing laws. It’s exactly like fascism.MikeDamone said:
How would you plan to confiscate wealth if not by the threat of force? IdiotHHusky said:
At the point of a gun? You’re getting hysterical, lady.MikeDamone said:BearsWiin said:decorum, cool
Weird that helping people who need it becomes Bataan and Pol Pot with you angry tards
“Helping people” christ. You’re so moral!
“Helping people” at the point of a gun is a tested commie approach. No wonder you love it. It’s failed and caused misery everywhere it’s been tried. See Venezuela for a recent example.
How did the commies do it. Please tell us. Dumbfuck
*classical liberal - but of course you don’t understand the difference.
I’m not surprised you’re simple mind is confused by what classical liberalism is. -
He doesn’t have a clue.MikeDamone said:
You’re a communist. That’s clear.HHusky said:
You’re a libertarian, not a classical liberal. And I suppose if we have to seize your property to get you to pay your library fines, we will. But that doesn’t exactly make us Venezuela.MikeDamone said:
So I was right. Warren’s policies are your wet dream.HHusky said:
Ultimately societies use force to enforce the law if that’s what is required. It’s not a difference between left and right, your adolescent adherence to libertarianism notwithstanding.MikeDamone said:
Imagine passing a law that people give you money or be met with violence. You were in favor of the fugitive slave act. It needed to be enforced. It was the law.HHusky said:
Imagine actually enforcing laws. It’s exactly like fascism.MikeDamone said:
How would you plan to confiscate wealth if not by the threat of force? IdiotHHusky said:
At the point of a gun? You’re getting hysterical, lady.MikeDamone said:BearsWiin said:decorum, cool
Weird that helping people who need it becomes Bataan and Pol Pot with you angry tards
“Helping people” christ. You’re so moral!
“Helping people” at the point of a gun is a tested commie approach. No wonder you love it. It’s failed and caused misery everywhere it’s been tried. See Venezuela for a recent example.
How did the commies do it. Please tell us. Dumbfuck
*classical liberal - but of course you don’t understand the difference.
I’m not surprised you’re simple mind is confused by what classical liberalism is.
Or is coopting the term like the rest of the woke progs. Big Brother ran the same scam -
The pretense of intellectual depth you hens carry with you really is very funny as well as ironic.PurpleThrobber said:
He doesn’t have a clue.MikeDamone said:
You’re a communist. That’s clear.HHusky said:
You’re a libertarian, not a classical liberal. And I suppose if we have to seize your property to get you to pay your library fines, we will. But that doesn’t exactly make us Venezuela.MikeDamone said:
So I was right. Warren’s policies are your wet dream.HHusky said:
Ultimately societies use force to enforce the law if that’s what is required. It’s not a difference between left and right, your adolescent adherence to libertarianism notwithstanding.MikeDamone said:
Imagine passing a law that people give you money or be met with violence. You were in favor of the fugitive slave act. It needed to be enforced. It was the law.HHusky said:
Imagine actually enforcing laws. It’s exactly like fascism.MikeDamone said:
How would you plan to confiscate wealth if not by the threat of force? IdiotHHusky said:
At the point of a gun? You’re getting hysterical, lady.MikeDamone said:BearsWiin said:decorum, cool
Weird that helping people who need it becomes Bataan and Pol Pot with you angry tards
“Helping people” christ. You’re so moral!
“Helping people” at the point of a gun is a tested commie approach. No wonder you love it. It’s failed and caused misery everywhere it’s been tried. See Venezuela for a recent example.
How did the commies do it. Please tell us. Dumbfuck
*classical liberal - but of course you don’t understand the difference.
I’m not surprised you’re simple mind is confused by what classical liberalism is. -
a wannabe libertarian, at thatHHusky said:
You’re a libertarian, not a classical liberal.MikeDamone said:
So I was right. Warren’s policies are your wet dream.HHusky said:
Ultimately societies use force to enforce the law if that’s what is required. It’s not a difference between left and right, your adolescent adherence to libertarianism notwithstanding.MikeDamone said:
Imagine passing a law that people give you money or be met with violence. You were in favor of the fugitive slave act. It needed to be enforced. It was the law.HHusky said:
Imagine actually enforcing laws. It’s exactly like fascism.MikeDamone said:
How would you plan to confiscate wealth if not by the threat of force? IdiotHHusky said:
At the point of a gun? You’re getting hysterical, lady.MikeDamone said:BearsWiin said:decorum, cool
Weird that helping people who need it becomes Bataan and Pol Pot with you angry tards
“Helping people” christ. You’re so moral!
“Helping people” at the point of a gun is a tested commie approach. No wonder you love it. It’s failed and caused misery everywhere it’s been tried. See Venezuela for a recent example.
How did the commies do it. Please tell us. Dumbfuck
*classical liberal - but of course you don’t understand the difference.
